Home Evaluation of serum electrolytes measurement through the 6-year trueness verification program in China
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Evaluation of serum electrolytes measurement through the 6-year trueness verification program in China

  • Ying Yan , Yungang Pu , Jie Zeng , Tianjiao Zhang , Weiyan Zhou , Jiangtao Zhang , Jing Wang , Chao Zhang , Wenxiang Chen and Chuanbao Zhang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 28, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

The National Center for Clinical Laboratories (NCCL) in China initiated a serum electrolyte trueness verification (ETV) program in 2014 for measurement standardization.

Methods

Every year, two levels of fresh frozen commutable serum samples determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) reference methods were transported to participating clinical laboratories for the measurement of sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium. Both samples were measured 15 times in 3 days, and the mean values and coefficient variations (CVs) were calculated from the results. The tolerance limits of trueness (bias), precision (CV) and accuracy (TE) based on the biological variation database were used as the evaluation criteria. The overall trend of the ETV program over 6 years was surveyed by calculating the pass rates of the participating laboratories. The mean bias, inter-laboratory CV, and TE of all laboratory results were analysed. Furthermore, homogeneous and heterogeneous systems were compared, and the bias and CV results of mainstream analysis systems were analysed.

Results

Pass rates of the three quality specifications increased, and the overall mean bias and inter-laboratory CVs decreased. The homogeneous system was superior to the heterogeneous system for calcium and magnesium measurements. For sodium, potassium, calcium and magnesium, the minimum bias corresponded to Hitachi, Siemens, Beckman AU and Roche, respectively. For inter-laboratory robust CVs, no obvious differences were observed between each peer group.

Conclusions

The commutable ETV materials assigned via reference methods can evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of an individual laboratory and the calibration traceability and uniformity between laboratories for measurements.


Corresponding author: Chuanbao Zhang, Researcher, National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Laboratory Medicine, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, 1 Dahua Road, Dongdan, Beijing, 100730, P.R. China; and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 9 Dongdan, Santiao Road, Beijing, 100005, P.R. China. Phone: +86 010 5811 5059, Fax: +86 010 6513 2968, E-mail:

Funding source: National Key Technology R&D Program of China

Award Identifier / Grant number: 2011AA02A102

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (Grant 2011AA02A102).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: Residual serum samples were collected at the clinical laboratory of Beijing Hospital with approval from the Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital.

References

1. Burtis, CA, Ashwood, ER, Bruns, DE, editors. Fundamentals of clinical chemistry, 6th ed. St. Louis, MO: Saunders; 2007:432 p.Search in Google Scholar

2. Scott, MG, LeGrys, VA. Electrolytes and blood gases. In: Burtis, CA, Ashwood, ER, Bruns, DE, editors. Tietz fundamentals of clinical chemistry, 6th ed. Missouri: Saunders Press; 2008:431–5 pp.10.1016/B978-1-4160-6164-9.00028-7Search in Google Scholar

3. Brady, H, Ryan, M, Horgan, J. Magnesium: the forgotten cation. Ir Med J 1987;80:250–3. 3312087.Search in Google Scholar

4. Gowenlock, AH, McMurray, JR, McLauchlan, DH, editors. Varley’s practical clinical biochemistry, 6th ed. London: Heinemann Medical Books; 1988.10.1016/0009-8981(88)90045-9Search in Google Scholar

5. Belk, WP, Sunderman, FW. A survey of the accuracy of chemical analyses in clinical laboratories. Am J Clin Pathol 1947;17:853–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/17.11.853.Search in Google Scholar

6. Wootton, ID, King, EJ. Normal values for blood constituents; interhospital differences. Lancet 1953;1:470–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(53)91643-2.Search in Google Scholar

7. Cobbaert, C, Weykamp, C, Franck, P, de Jonge, R, Kuypers, A, Steigstra, H, et al. Systematic monitoring of standardization and harmonization status with commutable EQA-samples – five year experience from The Netherlands. Clin Chim Acta 2012;414:234–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Bais, R. What information should manufacturers provide on their procedures? Clin Chem 2006;52:1624–5. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2006.069773.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Singh, RJ, Grebe, SK, Yue, B, Rockwood, AL, Cramer, JC, Gombos, Z, et al. Precisely wrong? Urinary fractionated metanephrines and peer-based laboratory proficiency testing. Clin Chem 2005;51:472–4. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.043802.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Wang, Y, Wang, J, Zhao, H, Zhang, J, Zhang, T, Zeng, J, et al. Assessment of enzyme measurement procedures in China through a trueness verification program. Clin Chim Acta 2016;461:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.07.008.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Vesper, HW, Thienpont, LM. Traceability in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem 2009;55:1067–75. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.107052.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Panteghini, M. Traceability, reference systems and result comparability. Clin Biochem Rev 2007;28:97–104. 17909614.Search in Google Scholar

13. Dybkaer, R. Metrology in laboratory medicine –Reference measurement systems. Accred Qual Assur 2001;6:16–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00010430.Search in Google Scholar

14. Thienpont, LM, Van Uytfanghe, K, De Leenheer, AP. Reference measurement systems in clinical chemistry. Clin Chim Acta 2002;323:73–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00188-2.Search in Google Scholar

15. International Organization for Standardization. International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO; 1993.Search in Google Scholar

16. Yan, Y, Zhang, C, Zhang, J, Zhang, T, Zhou, W, Zeng, J, et al. Measurement of serum sodium and magnesium by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry with aluminum as internal standard. Clin Lab 2016;62:719–25. https://doi.org/10.7754/clin.lab.2015.150140.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Yan, Y, Han, B, Zeng, J, Zhou, W, Zhang, T, Zhang, J, et al. A candidate reference method for serum potassium measurements by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1517–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0803.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Yan, Y, Ge, M, Ma, R, Zhao, H, Wang, D, Hu, C, et al. A candidate reference method for serum calcium measurement by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Clin Chim Acta 2016;461:141–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.07.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Evaluation of commutability of processed samples. approved guideline, 3rd ed.; 2014. ISBN 1-56238-971-8; CLSI document EP 14-A3.Search in Google Scholar

20. Yan, Y, Han, B, Zhao, H, Ma, R, Wang, J, Wang, D, et al. Commutability of external quality assessment materials for serum sodium and potassium measurements. Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:465–75. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0385.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Yan, Y, Pu, Y, Long, Q, Zhang, J, Zhang, T, Zhou, W, et al. Commutability of external quality assessment materials for serum magnesium and calcium measurements. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2019;79:404–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2019.1636404.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. ISO/IEC Guide 98-3:2008. Uncertainty of measurement – part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). Geneva: ISO; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

23. Ellison, SL, Rosslein, M, Williams, A, editors. EURACHEM/CITAC guide CG 4: quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd ed. Czech Republic: EURACHEM; 2000.Search in Google Scholar

24. EFLM biological variation database. [Internet]; 2019. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/.Search in Google Scholar

25. Desirable biological variation database specifications. [Internet]; 2014. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm.Search in Google Scholar

26. ISO 13528:2015 (E). Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison.Search in Google Scholar

27. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. CLIA’88 Final rule. Federal register, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

28. Analytical quality specifiation for routine analytes in clinical biochemistry, WS/T 403–2012.Search in Google Scholar

29. Goossens, K, Van Uytfanghe, K, Thienpont, LM. Trueness and comparability assessment of widely used assays for 5 common enzymes and 3 electrolytes. Clin Chim Acta 2015;442:44–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. User verification of precision and estimation of bias; approved guideline, 3rd ed.; ISBN 1-56238-965-3; CLSI document EP 15-A3, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-03-20
Accepted: 2020-07-08
Published Online: 2020-07-28
Published in Print: 2021-01-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. 10.1515/cclm-2020-frontmatter1
  2. Mario Plebani turns 70
  3. Editorial
  4. Measurement uncertainty and the importance of correlation
  5. Reviews
  6. Untangling the association between prostate-specific antigen and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  7. The emerging role of cell senescence in atherosclerosis
  8. Mini Review
  9. Minimum retesting intervals in practice: 10 years experience
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Cardiotoxic effects and myocardial injury: the search for a more precise definition of drug cardiotoxicity
  12. EFLM Papers
  13. The CRESS checklist for reporting stability studies: on behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE)
  14. Thoughts and expectations of young professionals about the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
  15. Guidelines and Recommendations
  16. Evidence on clinical relevance of cardiovascular risk evaluation in the general population using cardio-specific biomarkers
  17. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  18. A systematic evaluation of stool DNA preparation protocols for colorectal cancer screening via analysis of DNA methylation biomarkers
  19. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  20. The new IVD Regulation 2017/746: a case study at a large university hospital laboratory in Belgium demonstrates the need for clarification on the degrees of freedom laboratories have to use lab-developed tests to improve patient care
  21. Evaluation of serum electrolytes measurement through the 6-year trueness verification program in China
  22. Feasibility for aggregation of commutable external quality assessment results to evaluate metrological traceability and agreement among results
  23. Sample size and rejection limits for detecting reagent lot variability: analysis of the applicability of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP26-A protocol to real-world clinical chemistry data
  24. Effects of calcium dobesilate (CaD) interference on serum creatinine measurements: a national External Quality Assessment (EQA)-based educational survey of drug-laboratory test interactions
  25. Mass spectrometric sample identification with indicator compounds introduced via labeled sample tubes
  26. Automation and validation of a MALDI-TOF MS (Mass-Fix) replacement of immunofixation electrophoresis in the clinical lab
  27. A new strategy implementing mass spectrometry in the diagnosis of congenital disorders of N-glycosylation (CDG)
  28. Analytical evaluation of four faecal immunochemistry tests for haemoglobin
  29. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  30. Study of total error specifications of lymphocyte subsets enumeration using China National EQAS data and Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC)-compliant publications
  31. Mass spectrometric quantification of urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin: age-dependent excretion and biological variation
  32. Establishment of international autoantibody reference standards for the detection of autoantibodies directed against PML bodies, GW bodies, and NuMA protein
  33. Hematology and Coagulation
  34. Appropriate thresholds for accurate screening for β-thalassemias in the newborn period: results from a French center for newborn screening
  35. Cardiovascular Diseases
  36. Analysis of B-type natriuretic peptide impurities using label-free data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry technology
  37. Diabetes
  38. Hemoglobin variants in southern China: results obtained during the measurement of glycated hemoglobin in a large population
  39. Potential of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to overcome the interference of hemoglobin variants on HbA1c measurement
  40. Acknowledgment
  41. Acknowledgment
  42. Letter to the Editors
  43. Measurement uncertainty estimation for derived biological quantities
  44. Non-reproducible cardiac troponin results occurring with a particular reagent lot
  45. Successfully meeting analytical expectations for the fast 0/1-h algorithm for NSTEMI by internal control procedures for cardiac troponin T
  46. Performance of perpendicular drop versus tangent skimming gating of M-protein in proficiency testing challenges
  47. Analytical evaluation of Reebio procalcitonin latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric assay on the HITACHI Labospect 008AS
  48. Assessment of intraindividual agreement in prolactin results after post-polyethylene glycol precipitation test for the estimation of macroprolactin. Should the precipitation procedure be repeated in the same patient?
  49. Aggregation kinetic and temperature optimum of an EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia
Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2020-0355/html
Scroll to top button