Startseite Multicenter performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Multicenter performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer

  • Christiaan L. Slim ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Brigitte A. Wevers , Martijn W.H.J. Demmers , Gabriella Lakos , Johannes J.M.L. Hoffmann ORCID logo , Henk J. Adriaansen , Jurgen A. Kooren und Huibert Storm
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. Juli 2019
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background

Alinity hq (Abbott) is a new high-throughput hematology analyzer that exclusively employs optical principles for detecting and enumerating blood cells. It reports 29 parameters, including a six-part white blood cell (WBC) differential. The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Alinity hq.

Methods

Complete blood count (CBC) results and morphological flagging were compared to that of CELL-DYN Sapphire (Abbott) and 2 × 200-cell manual differential results, on 1473 whole-blood samples from a well-defined patient population from three different clinical laboratories in the Netherlands. In addition, within-run and within-laboratory precision, linearity, limit of quantitation, carryover and sample stability were assessed. External quality assessment samples were also evaluated.

Results

Data analysis demonstrated strong concordance of Alinity hq results with those of CELL-DYN Sapphire for all CBC parameters, except for basophil granulocytes. Alinity hq WBC differential showed high level of agreement with manual differential results and exhibited a better agreement with manual basophil results than CELL-DYN Sapphire. The sensitivity of the Alinity hq Blast flag was 57.6%, equal to the 57.6% sensitivity of the CELL-DYN Sapphire’s Blast Alert. When considering samples with ≥5% blasts, the sensitivity of the Alinity hq Blast flag was 70.0%. Analytical performance of Alinity hq was shown to be consistent with state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance characteristics.

Conclusions

Alinity hq CBC measurands demonstrated good overall agreement with results obtained with CELL-DYN Sapphire, as well as manual WBC differential. The analytical and clinical performance characteristics of Alinity hq make it well suited for clinical laboratories.


Corresponding author: Christiaan L. Slim, PhD, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Location Medical Center Leeuwarden, Certe Medical Diagnostics & Advice, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands, Phone: +31-58-288-4449
aChristiaan L. Slim and Brigitte A. Wevers contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gerard Poiesz, Jisk Koopmans and Gea de Jong (Certe), Carin de Swart-Scholtes, Marion Taskin and technicians (Atalmedial), Dinanda Wes and Sabine Damhuis (Gelre) for their help with analyzing the samples.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: Analyzers and reagents were provided free of charge by Abbott Diagnostics, Santa Clara, CA, USA.

  3. Employment or leadership: GL is a scientific employee of Abbott Diagnostics. At the time of the study, JH was a scientific employee of Abbott Diagnostics.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization played no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication. The funding organization provided a minimal version of the study design that was later supplemented and finalized by the study group.

References

1. Xiang D, Yue J, Sha C, Ren S, Li M, Wang C. Performance evaluation of the Mindray BC 6800 hematology analyzer and flag comparison with the XE-2100 and manual microscopy. Clin Lab 65. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2018.180923. [Epub ahead of print].Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Bruegel M, George TI, Feng B, Allen TR, Bracco D, Zahniser DJ, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the cobas m 511 integrated hematology analyzer. Int J Lab Hematol 2018;40:672–82.10.1111/ijlh.12903Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Kratz A, Lee S-H, Zini G, Riedl JA, Hur M, Machin S, et al. Digital morphology analyzers in hematology: ICSH review and recommendations. Int J Lab Hematol. doi: 10.1111/ijlh.13042. [Epub ahead of print].Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Aidoudi F, Baccini V, Bardet B, Lafon C, Pellicier A, Reins F, et al. Performance analysis of the « Blast » flag on ADVIA® 2120/2120i – results of a multicenter study. Ann Biol Clin (Paris) 2019;77:174–8.10.1684/abc.2019.1423Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. International Council for Standardization in Haematology, Writing Group, Briggs C, Culp N, Davis B, d’Onofrio G, Zini G, et al.ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting. Int J Lab Hematol 2014;36:613–27.10.1111/ijlh.12201Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. H26-A2 – Validation, Verification, and Quality Assurance of Automated Hematology Analyzers. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI, 2010.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Chow EY, Leung KK. Evaluating the CELL-DYN 3500 haematology analyser in an acute general hospital. Clin Lab Haematol 1996;18:187–93.10.1046/j.1365-2257.1996.00171.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Müller R, Mellors I, Johannessen B, Aarsand AK, Kiefer P, Hardy J, et al. European multi-center evaluation of the Abbott Cell-Dyn sapphire hematology analyzer. Lab Hematol Off Publ Int Soc Lab Hematol 2006;12:15–31.10.1532/LH96.05041Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Gill JE, Davis KA, Cowart WJ, Nepacena FU, Kim YR. A rapid and accurate closed-tube immunoassay for platelets on an automated hematology analyzer. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:47–56.10.1309/8UJ4-P7DB-5C1J-U2H7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Desirable Biological Variation Database specifications – Westgard. https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm. Accessed: 5 Jun 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

11. Minimum Specifications from Biological Variation database – Westgard. https://www.westgard.com/minimum-biodatabase1.htm. Accessed: 17 Dec 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

12. Optimal Biological Variation database specifications – Westgard. https://www.westgard.com/optimal-biodatabase1htm.htm. Accessed: 17 Dec 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Biological Variation Data for setting Quality Specifications – Westgard. Available at: https://www.westgard.com/guest12.htm. Accessed: 17 Dec 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Vis JY, Huisman A. Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol 2016;38(Suppl):100–9.10.1111/ijlh.12503Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

15. SKML (English). https://www.skml.nl/en/home?op=setLanguage;language=English. Accessed: 5 Jun 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

16. de Jonge R, Brouwer R, de Graaf MT, Luitwieler RL, Fleming C, de Frankrijker-Merkestijn M, et al. Evaluation of the new body fluid mode on the Sysmex XE-5000 for counting leukocytes and erythrocytes in cerebrospinal fluid and other body fluids. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:665–75.10.1515/CCLM.2010.108Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29:S49–S52.Suche in Google Scholar

18. H20-A2 – Reference Leukocyte (WBC) Differential Count (Proportional) and Evaluation of Instrumental Methods. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA, USA: CLSI, 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

19. Barnes PW, McFadden SL, Machin SJ, Simson E, international consensus group for hematology. The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis. Lab Hematol Off Publ Int Soc Lab Hematol 2005;11:83–90.10.1532/LH96.05019Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Schoonjans F. MedCalc’s diagnostic test evaluation calculator. MedCalc. https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php. Accessed: 1 Jun 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Hoffmann JJ, Yu T. Howell-Jolly body interference in reticulocyte counts. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:305–6.10.1515/cclm-2013-0414Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Bartlett WA, Braga F, Carobene A, Coşkun A, Prusa R, Fernandez-Calle P, et al. A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:879–85.10.1515/cclm-2014-1127Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Amundsen EK, Henriksson CE, Holthe MR, Urdal P. Is the blood basophil count sufficiently precise, accurate, and specific?: three automated hematology instruments and flow cytometry compared. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;137:86–92.10.1309/AJCP19BFTHYTMOROSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Hummel K, Sachse M, Hoffmann JJ, van Dun LP. Comparative evaluation of platelet counts in two hematology analyzers and potential effects on prophylactic platelet transfusion decisions. Transfusion (Paris) 2018;58:2301–8.10.1111/trf.14886Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Bruegel M, Nagel D, Funk M, Fuhrmann P, Zander J, Teupser D. Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1057–71.10.1515/cclm-2014-0945Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Meintker L, Ringwald J, Rauh M, Krause SW. Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott Sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;139:641–50.10.1309/AJCP7D8ECZRXGWCGSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Kang SH, Kim HK, Ham CK, Lee DS, Cho HI. Comparison of four hematology analyzers, CELL-DYN Sapphire, ADVIA 120, Coulter LH 750, and Sysmex XE-2100, in terms of clinical usefulness. Int J Lab Hematol 2008;30:480–6.10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.00981.xSuche in Google Scholar

28. Hotton J, Broothaers J, Swaelens C, Cantinieaux B. Performance and abnormal cell flagging comparisons of three automated blood cell counters: Cell-Dyn Sapphire, DxH-800, and XN-2000. Am J Clin Pathol 2013;140:845–52.10.1309/AJCPE5R4SOQBUULZSuche in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0155).


Received: 2019-02-08
Accepted: 2019-06-17
Published Online: 2019-07-24
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. The re-emergence of dried blood spot sampling – are we ready?
  4. Review
  5. The role of platelets in bleeding in patients with thrombocytopenia and hematological disease
  6. Opinion Paper
  7. Exertional hematuria: definition, epidemiology, diagnostic and clinical considerations
  8. Guidelines and Recommendations from Scientific Societies
  9. A protocol for testing the stability of biochemical analytes. Technical document
  10. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  11. Hereditary hyperferritinaemia-cataract syndrome (HHCS) – an underestimated condition: ferritin light chain variant spectrum in German families
  12. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  13. Performance of a web-based application measuring spot quality in dried blood spot sampling
  14. Clinical application of a dried blood spot assay for sirolimus and everolimus in transplant patients
  15. Plasma and dried blood spot lysosphingolipids for the diagnosis of different sphingolipidoses: a comparative study
  16. Liquid biopsy of cerebrospinal fluid identifies neuronal pentraxin receptor (NPTXR) as a biomarker of progression of Alzheimer’s disease
  17. Integrity of serum samples is changed by modified centrifugation conditions
  18. Heparin and citrate additive carryover during blood collection
  19. Copeptin – a biomarker of short-term mortality risk (7 days) in patients with end-stage liver disease
  20. Comparison of a new rapid method for the determination of adalimumab serum levels with two established ELISA kits
  21. Measurement of α-dicarbonyl compounds in human saliva by pre-column derivatization HPLC
  22. Establishment of the intelligent verification criteria for a routine urinalysis analyzer in a multi-center study
  23. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  24. A new indirect estimation of reference intervals: truncated minimum chi-square (TMC) approach
  25. EGFR and EGFR ligands in serum in healthy women; reference intervals and age dependency
  26. Early pregnancy reference intervals; 29 serum analytes from 4 to 12 weeks’ gestation in naturally conceived and uncomplicated pregnancies resulting in live births
  27. Paediatric reference intervals for 17 Roche cobas 8000 e602 immunoassays in the CALIPER cohort of healthy children and adolescents
  28. Hematology and Coagulation
  29. Study of the analytical performance at different concentrations of hematological parameters using Spanish EQAS data
  30. Multicenter performance evaluation of the Abbott Alinity hq hematology analyzer
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Fast 0/1-h algorithm for detection of NSTEMI: are current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays fit for purpose? An EQA-based evaluation
  33. Infectious Diseases
  34. Diagnostic performance of cerebrospinal fluid free light chains in Lyme neuroborreliosis – a pilot study
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Quality management at the national biobanking level – establishing a culture of mutual trust and support: the BBMRI.at example
  37. Molecular diagnosis of MODY3 permitted to reveal a de novo 12q24.31 deletion and to explain a complex phenotype in a young diabetic patient
  38. Increased C-reactive protein values in the absence of inflammation: monoclonal immunoglobulin interference in immunonephelometry
  39. An approach based on simulated hemolysis for establishing the hemolysis index threshold for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay
  40. Utility of the icteric index for the management of bilirubin test requesting
  41. Quality control of monocyte volume and distribution width parameters of the Beckman Coulter DxH series
  42. Mozhaisk haemoglobin variant effects on leukocyte differential channel using the Sysmex XN series
  43. Detection of a novel hemoglobin variant Hb Liaoning by matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry
  44. Appropriateness of repetitive therapeutic drug monitoring and laboratory turnaround time
  45. Congress Abstracts
  46. 51th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
Heruntergeladen am 9.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0155/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen