Startseite Harmonization of urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) results: a study based on an external quality assessment program in Polish laboratories
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Harmonization of urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) results: a study based on an external quality assessment program in Polish laboratories

  • Agnieszka Ćwiklińska EMAIL logo , Hanna Dąbrowska , Robert Kowalski , Agnieszka Kuchta , Barbara Kortas-Stempak , Aleksandra Fijałkowska , Gabriela Bednarczuk und Maciej Jankowski
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. Mai 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

The ratio of albumin to creatinine (ACR) is an important parameter used for detection of albuminuria in patients with early kidney damage. The aim of the study was to evaluate the harmonization of ACR results among Polish participants in an international external quality assessment (EQA) program, and to evaluate the impact of albumin and creatinine analytical performance on the harmonization of ACR results.

Methods:

We analyzed 182 results of albumin, 202 of creatinine, and 180 of ACR obtained from Polish laboratories in an EQA program organized by Labquality. The dispersion of the results in surveys and percentage differences between the results and target values were calculated. Moreover, differences between method groups were assessed.

Results:

The inter-laboratory coefficient of variation (CV) for ACR was 36%. Only 74% of results of Polish laboratories were within the target limits; for 11% of the results, an incorrect albuminuria category would have been reported. The inter-laboratory CV for albumin was 20%, 2.6-fold higher than for creatinine. Significant differences between method groups for albumin determination have been observed, even when the same measurement technique was used. The greatest difference between two groups was 23%, 2.5-fold greater in comparison to creatinine.

Conclusions:

There is an insufficient harmonization of ACR values among Polish laboratories, caused mainly by urine albumin analytical performance. Given the important role of ACR in the classification, monitoring and treatment of kidney damage, the harmonization of albumin measurements is crucial and urgently needed.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: Aleksandra Fijalkowska and Gabriela Bednarczuk are full-time employees of SOWA-med, Polish distributor of Labquality EQA programs. Agnieszka Ćwiklińska and Barbara Kortas-Stempak cooperates with SOWA-med as experts in clinical chemistry.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. American Diabetes Association. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018. Diabetes Care 2018;41(Suppl. 1):S105–18.10.2337/dc18-S010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Levin A, Stevens PE, Bilous RW, Coresh J, De Francisco AL, De Jong PE, et al. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl 2013;3:1–150.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Vart P, Scheven L, Lambers Heerspink HJ, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D, Gansevoort RT. Urine albumin-creatinine ratio versus albumin excretion for albuminuria staging: a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis 2016;67:70–8.10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.05.025Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Miller WG, Bruns DE, Hortin GL, Sandberg S, Aakre KM, McQueen MJ, et al. Current issues in measurement and reporting of urinary albumin excretion. Clin Chem 2009;55:24–38.10.1373/clinchem.2008.106567Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Gantzer ML, Miller WG. Harmonisation of measurement procedures: how do we get it done? Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:95–100.Suche in Google Scholar

6. Miller WG, Myers GL, Lou Gantzer M, Kahn SE, Schonbrunner ER, Thienpont LM, et al. Roadmap for harmonization of clinical laboratory measurement procedures. Clin Chem 2011;57:1108–17.10.3343/lmo.2012.2.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

7. Jacobson BE, Seccombe DW, Katayev A, Levin A. A study examining the bias of albumin and albumin/creatinine ratio measurements in urine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1737–43.10.1515/cclm-2014-1105Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Graziani MS, Plebani M. The standardization of the urine albumin assays: no longer deferrable. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1657–9.10.1515/cclm-2015-0831Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Bachmann LM, Nilsson G, Bruns DE, McQueen MJ, Lieske JC, Zakowski JJ, et al. State of the art for measurement of urine albumin: comparison of routine measurement procedures to isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2014;60:471–80.10.1373/clinchem.2013.210302Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Bargnoux AS, Barrot A, Fesler P, Kuster N, Badiou S, Dupuy AM, et al. Evaluation of five immunoturbidimetric assays for urinary albumin quantification and their impact on albuminuria categorization. Clin Biochem 2014;47:250–3.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.07.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Seegmiller JC, Miller WG, Bachmann LM. Moving toward standardization of urine albumin measurements. EJIFCC 2017;28:258–67.Suche in Google Scholar

12. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Standardisation of Albumin Assay in Urine in Collaboration with NKDEP (WG-SAU). http://www.ifcc.org/ifcc-scientific-division/sd-working-groups/wg-sau/. Accessed 28 Feb 2018.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, Plebani M. The role of the External Quality Assessment. Biochem Medica 2010;20:160–4.10.11613/BM.2010.019Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-01-30
Accepted: 2018-04-09
Published Online: 2018-05-11
Published in Print: 2018-09-25

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: Blowin’ in the wind
  4. Standardization and harmonization of autoimmune diagnostics
  5. On the complexity of hemostasis and the need for harmonization of test practice
  6. Harmonization of laboratory hematology: a long and winding journey
  7. Section 1: Current Harmonization Activities at Global Level
  8. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: more than clinical chemistry?
  9. Harmonization of External Quality Assessment Schemes and their role – clinical chemistry and beyond
  10. An overview of EFLM harmonization activities in Europe
  11. Metrological traceability and harmonization of medical tests: a quantum leap forward is needed to keep pace with globalization and stringent IVD-regulations in the 21st century!
  12. Assessment of bone turnover in osteoporosis: harmonization of the total testing process
  13. Recent initiatives in harmonization of hemostasis practice
  14. EASI – European Autoimmunity Standardisation Initiative: facing the challenges of diagnostics in autoimmunity
  15. Harmonization of microbiology processes and standards: work in progress
  16. Harmonization initiatives in the generation, reporting and application of biological variation data
  17. Harmonization of accreditation to ISO15189
  18. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation
  19. Section 2: Pre-Pre and Pre-Analytical Phase
  20. Laboratory testing in the emergency department: an Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC) and Academy of Emergency Medicine and Care (AcEMC) consensus report
  21. The EFLM strategy for harmonization of the preanalytical phase
  22. Section 3: The Analytical Phase
  23. The roadmap for harmonization: status of the International Consortium for Harmonization of Clinical Laboratory Results
  24. The quest for equivalence of test results: the pilgrimage of the Dutch Calibration 2.000 program for metrological traceability
  25. Current state and recommendations for harmonization of serum/plasma 17-hydroxyprogesterone mass spectrometry methods
  26. International normalized ratio (INR) testing in Europe: between-laboratory comparability of test results obtained by Quick and Owren reagents
  27. Detecting molecular forms of antithrombin by LC-MRM-MS: defining the measurands
  28. A design for external quality assessment for the analysis of thiopurine drugs: pitfalls and opportunities
  29. Harmonization of PCR-based detection of intestinal pathogens: experiences from the Dutch external quality assessment scheme on molecular diagnosis of protozoa in stool samples
  30. Harmonization of urine albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) results: a study based on an external quality assessment program in Polish laboratories
  31. Standardization of autoimmune testing – is it feasible?
  32. Diagnostic laboratory tests for systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases: unmet needs towards harmonization
  33. Clinically relevant discrepancies between different rheumatoid factor assays
  34. An international survey on anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) testing in daily clinical practice
  35. Predictive autoimmunity using autoantibodies: screening for anti-nuclear antibodies
  36. Harmonization in autoimmune thyroid disease diagnostics
  37. International consensus on antinuclear antibody patterns: definition of the AC-29 pattern associated with antibodies to DNA topoisomerase I
  38. Reference standards for the detection of anti-mitochondrial and anti-rods/rings autoantibodies
  39. International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibody Patterns: defining negative results and reporting unidentified patterns
Heruntergeladen am 10.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2018-0102/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen