Home Medicine Analytical evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Analytical evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay

  • Giuseppe Lippi ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Anna Ferrari , Giorgio Gandini , Matteo Gelati , Claudia Lo Cascio and Gian Luca Salvagno
Published/Copyright: July 12, 2017

Abstract

Background:

This study was aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of the novel chemiluminescent and fully-automated Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI high-sensitivity immunoassay for measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI).

Methods:

The study, using lithium heparin samples, included assessment of limit of blank (LOB), limit of detection (LOD), functional sensitivity, linearity, imprecision (within run, between-run and total), calculation of 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) in 175 healthy blood donors (mean age, 36±12 years; 47% women) and comparison with two other commercial cTnI immunoassays.

Results:

The LOB, LOD and functional sensitivity of Access hsTnI were 0.14, 0.34 and 1.35 ng/L, respectively. The within-run, between-run and total imprecision was 2.2%–2.9%, 4.6%–5.4%, and 5.4%–6.1%, respectively. The linearity was excellent in the range of cTnI values between 0.95 and 4195 ng/L (r=1.00). The 99th percentile URL was 15.8 ng/L. Measurable cTnI values were found in 173/175 healthy subjects (98.9%). Good agreement of cTnI values was found with AccuTnI+3 (r=0.97; mean bias, −9.3%), whereas less satisfactory agreement was found with Siemens Dimension Vista cTnI (r=0.95; mean bias, −55%).

Conclusions:

The results of our evaluation of the Beckman Coulter Access hsTnI indicate that the analytical performance of this fully-automated immunoassay is excellent.


Corresponding author: Prof. Giuseppe Lippi, Section of Clinical Biochemistry, University Hospital of Verona, P.le LA Scuro 10, 37134 Verona, Italy

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The reagents used in this study were provided by Beckman Coulter, but the company played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Cervellin G, Mattiuzzi C, Bovo C, Lippi G. Diagnostic algorithms for acute coronary syndrome-is one better than another? Ann Transl Med 2016;4:193.10.21037/atm.2016.05.16Search in Google Scholar

2. Ferraro S, Panteghini M. Laboratory medicine as the science that underpins medicine: the “high-sensitivity” troponin paradigm. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:653–64.10.1515/cclm-2014-0812Search in Google Scholar

3. Lackner KJ. Do we really need high-sensitive troponin immunoassays in the emergency department? Definitely, yes! Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:201–4.10.1515/cclm-2013-0604Search in Google Scholar

4. Lippi G, Cervellin G. Cardiospecific troponin immunoassays: How low is it worth to go? Eur J Intern Med 2016;30:e7–8.10.1016/j.ejim.2015.11.015Search in Google Scholar

5. Shah AS, Anand A, Sandoval Y, Lee KK, Smith SW, Adamson PD, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet 2015;386:2481–8.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00391-8Search in Google Scholar

6. Ferraro S, Dolci A, Panteghini M. Fast track protocols using highly sensitive troponin assays for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1683–9.10.1515/cclm-2017-0044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Lippi G. The mystifying nomenclature of cardiac troponin immunoassays. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 2014;74:273–7.10.3109/00365513.2014.888590Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Giannitsis E, Kurz K, Hallermayer K, Jarausch J, Jaffe AS, Katus HA. Analytical validation of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2010;56:254–61.10.1373/clinchem.2009.132654Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Lackner KJ. High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponins. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:631–3.10.1515/cclm-2015-0141Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Kavsak PA, MacRae AR, Yerna MJ, Jaffe AS. Analytic and clinical utility of a next-generation, highly sensitive cardiac troponin I assay for early detection of myocardial injury. Clin Chem 2009;55:573–7.10.1373/clinchem.2008.116020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Armbruster DA, Pry T. Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29 Suppl 1:S49–52.Search in Google Scholar

12. Krouwer JS, Rabinowitz R. How to improve estimates of imprecision. Clin Chem 1984;30:290–2.10.1093/clinchem/30.2.290Search in Google Scholar

13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory, 3rd ed. Document EP28-A3C. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

14. Lippi G, Dipalo M, Avanzini P, Formentini A, Aloe R. Analytical assessment of the Beckman Coulter Unicel DxI AccuTnI+3 immunoassay. Diagnosis 2014;1:195–7.10.1515/dx-2013-0039Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Arrebola MM, Lillo JA, Diez De Los Ríos MJ, Rodríguez M, Dayaldasani A, Yahyaoui R, et al. Analytical performance of a sensitive assay for cardiac troponin I with loci technology. Clin Biochem 2010;43:998–1002.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.04.073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Clerico A, Fortunato A, Ripoli A, Prontera C, Zucchelli GC, Emdin M. Distribution of plasma cardiac troponin I values in healthy subjects: pathophysiological considerations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:804–8.10.1515/CCLM.2008.162Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Zeller T, Ojeda F, Brunner FJ, Peitsmeyer P, Münzel T, Binder H, et al. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I in the general population – defining reference populations for the determination of the 99th percentile in the Gutenberg Health Study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:699–706.10.1515/cclm-2014-0619Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Krintus M, Kozinski M, Boudry P, Lackner K, Lefèvre G, Lennartz L, et al. Defining normality in a European multinational cohort: Critical factors influencing the 99th percentile upper reference limit for high sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Int J Cardiol 2015;187:256–63.10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.282Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Schofer N, Brunner FJ, Schlüter M, Ojeda F, Zeller T, Baldus S, et al. Gender-specific diagnostic performance of a new high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay for detection of acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 2017;6:60–8.10.1177/2048872615626660Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Storti S, Masotti S, Prontera C, Franzini M, Buzzi P, Casagranda I, et al. Evaluation of analytical performance and comparison of clinical results of the new generation method AccuTnI+3 for the measurement of cardiac troponin I using both patients and quality control plasma samples. Clin Chim Acta 2015;451:129–34.10.1016/j.cca.2015.09.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Clerico A, Ripoli A, Masotti S, Prontera C, Storti S, Fortunato A, et al. Pilot study on harmonization of cardiac troponin I immunoassays using patients and quality control plasma samples. On behalf of the Italian Section of the European Ligand Assay Society (ELAS) and of the Study Group on Cardiovascular Biomarkers of the Società Italiana di Biochimica Clinica (SIBioC). Clin Chim Acta 2016;456:42–8.10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lippi G, Cervellin G. Degradation of troponin I in serum or plasma: mechanisms, and analytical and clinical implications. Semin Thromb Hemost 2012;38:222–9.10.1055/s-0032-1301419Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Panteghini M, Pagani F, Yeo KT, Apple FS, Christenson RH, Dati F, et al. Evaluation of imprecision for cardiac troponin assays at low-range concentrations. Clin Chem 2004;50:327–32.10.1373/clinchem.2003.026815Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Krintus M, Kozinski M, Boudry P, Capell NE, Köller U, Lackner K, et al. European multicenter analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT STAT highly sensitive troponin I immunoassay. Clin. Chem Lab Med 2014;52:1657–65.Search in Google Scholar

25. Casagranda I, Cavazza M, Clerico A, Galvani M, Ottani F, Zaninotto M, et al. Proposal for the use in emergency departments of cardiac troponins measured with the latest generation methods in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1727–37.10.1515/cclm-2013-0423Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Lippi G. Biomarkers: Novel troponin immunoassay for early ACS rule-out. Nat Rev Cardiol 2016;13:9–10.10.1038/nrcardio.2015.174Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2017-4-22
Accepted: 2017-6-1
Published Online: 2017-7-12
Published in Print: 2017-11-27

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Method comparison – a practical approach based on error identification
  4. Review
  5. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a risk marker in cardiovascular disease
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. α-Defensin point-of-care test for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: neglected role of laboratory and clinical pathologists
  8. The diagnostic accuracy of biomarkers for diagnosis of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) in anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA)-negative PBC patients: a review of literature
  9. Opinion Paper
  10. New issues on measurement of B-type natriuretic peptides
  11. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  12. The SEeMORE strategy: single-tube electrophoresis analysis-based genotyping to detect monogenic diseases rapidly and effectively from conception until birth
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Determination of serum calcium levels by 42Ca isotope dilution inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
  15. The effects of dry ice exposure on plasma pH and coagulation analyses
  16. Placental protein-13 (PP13) in combination with PAPP-A and free leptin index (fLI) in first trimester maternal serum screening for severe and early preeclampsia
  17. Circulating CD89-IgA complex does not predict deterioration of kidney function in Korean patients with IgA nephropathy
  18. Performance analysis of automated evaluation of Crithidia luciliae-based indirect immunofluorescence tests in a routine setting – strengths and weaknesses
  19. Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60
  20. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  21. Determination of reference intervals for urinary steroid profiling using a newly validated GC-MS/MS method
  22. Reference intervals and longitudinal changes in copeptin and MR-proADM concentrations during pregnancy
  23. Definition of the upper reference limit of glycated albumin in blood donors from Italy
  24. Reference values of fecal calgranulin C (S100A12) in school aged children and adolescents
  25. Processing-independent proANP measurement for low concentrations in plasma: reference intervals and effect of body mass index and plasma glucose
  26. Cancer Diagnostics
  27. Cancer sniffer dogs: how can we translate this peculiarity in laboratory medicine? Results of a pilot study on gastrointestinal cancers
  28. Cardiovascular Diseases
  29. NGAL and MMP-9/NGAL as biomarkers of plaque vulnerability and targets of statins in patients with carotid atherosclerosis
  30. Analytical evaluation of the new Beckman Coulter Access high sensitivity cardiac troponin I immunoassay
  31. Infectious Diseases
  32. Analytical evaluation of the performances of Diazyme and BRAHMS procalcitonin applied to Roche Cobas in comparison with BRAHMS PCT-sensitive Kryptor
  33. Effects of procalcitonin testing on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in patients with upper respiratory tract infections. An individual patient data meta-analysis
  34. Acknowledgment
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Handling the altered test results of hemolyzed samples. Recommendations of the Quality, Management, Safety and Evidence Committee (CCGSE) of the Spanish Association of Medical Biopathology and Laboratory Medicine (AEBM-ML)
  37. Reply to: Analytical evaluation of the performances of Diazyme and BRAHMS procalcitonin applied to Roche Cobas in comparison with BRAHMS PCT-sensitive Kryptor
  38. Excessive hypercortisolemia due to ectopic Cushing’s syndrome requiring extending the reportable range for plasma cortisol for management
  39. Heavy chain disease: our experience
  40. An abnormal elevation of serum CA72-4 due to taking colchicine
  41. Rivaroxaban non-responders: do plasma measurements have a place?
  42. Next generation sequencing and immuno-histochemistry profiling identify numerous biomarkers for personalized therapy of endometrioid endometrial carcinoma
  43. A multicenter effort to improve comparability of vitamin B6 assays in whole blood
  44. PR3-anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in ulcerative colitis
Downloaded on 3.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2017-0350/html
Scroll to top button