Startseite An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes

  • Andrea Padoan EMAIL logo , Giorgia Antonelli , Ada Aita , Laura Sciacovelli und Mario Plebani ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 28. Februar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

The present study was prompted by the ISO 15189 requirements that medical laboratories should estimate measurement uncertainty (MU).

Methods:

The method used to estimate MU included the: a) identification of quantitative tests, b) classification of tests in relation to their clinical purpose, and c) identification of criteria to estimate the different MU components. Imprecision was estimated using long-term internal quality control (IQC) results of the year 2016, while external quality assessment schemes (EQAs) results obtained in the period 2015–2016 were used to estimate bias and bias uncertainty.

Results:

A total of 263 measurement procedures (MPs) were analyzed. On the basis of test purpose, in 51 MPs imprecision only was used to estimate MU; in the remaining MPs, the bias component was not estimable for 22 MPs because EQAs results did not provide reliable statistics. For a total of 28 MPs, two or more MU values were calculated on the basis of analyte concentration levels. Overall, results showed that uncertainty of bias is a minor factor contributing to MU, the bias component being the most relevant contributor to all the studied sample matrices.

Conclusions:

The model chosen for MU estimation allowed us to derive a standardized approach for bias calculation, with respect to the fitness-for-purpose of test results. Measurement uncertainty estimation could readily be implemented in medical laboratories as a useful tool in monitoring the analytical quality of test results since they are calculated using a combination of both the long-term imprecision IQC results and bias, on the basis of EQAs results.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. ISO 15189: Medical laboratories – particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

2. JCGM 200:2012. International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (VIM 3rd edition). Available at: www.bipm.org. Accessed: Nov 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Oosterhuis WP, Theodorsson E. Total error vs. measurement uncertainty: revolution or evolution? Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:235–9.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Jones GRD. Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories – a revision of the concept. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1303–7.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: consensus statement from the 1st strategic conference of the European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.10.1515/cclm-2015-0067Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

6. White GH. Basics of estimating measurement uncertainty. Clin Biochem Rev 2008;29:Suppl 1:S53–60.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. JCGM 100:2008. Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, with minor corrections (GUM). Available at: www.bipm.org. Accessed: Sept 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Westgard JO. Useful measures and models for analytical quality management in medical laboratories. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:223–33.10.1515/cclm-2015-0710Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Farrance I, Badrick T, Sikaris KA. Uncertainty in measurement and total error – are they so incompatible? Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1309–11.10.1515/cclm-2016-0314Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Tate JR, Plebani M. Measurement uncertainty – a revised understanding of its calculation and use. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:1277–9.10.1515/cclm-2016-0327Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Matar G, Poggi B, Meley R, Bon C, Chardon L, Chikh K, et al. Uncertainty in measurement for 43 biochemistry, immunoassay, and hemostasis routine analytes evaluated by a method using only external quality assessment data. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:1725–36.10.1515/cclm-2014-0942Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Nordic Innovation. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories. NT TR 537 – Edition 3.1, 2012. Available at: www.nordtest.info. Accessed: Sept 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Guide to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty for quantitative test results. Technical Committee for Quality Assurance in Testing (TCQA). EUROLAB Technical Report No. 1/2006.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Quantifying Uncertainty in Analytical measurement. Eurachem/CITAC Guide CG 4, 3rd ed. Available at: www.eurachem.org. Accessed: Nov 2016.Suche in Google Scholar

15. ISO 13528:2015 Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparison. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 2012.Suche in Google Scholar

16. James D, Ames D, Lopez B, Still R, Simpson W, Twomey P. External quality assessment: best practice. J Clin Pathol 2014;67:651–5.10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201621Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Tran MT, Hoang K, Greaves RF. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680. Clin Biochem 2016;49:1259–66.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.08.008Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-10-6
Accepted: 2017-1-18
Published Online: 2017-2-28
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponins – continued
  4. Reviews
  5. The 99th percentile of reference population for cTnI and cTnT assay: methodology, pathophysiology and clinical implications
  6. Vitamin B1 in critically ill patients: needs and challenges
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Point
  9. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin: do think twice, it’s not all right
  10. Counterpoint
  11. Terminology of cardiac troponin assays and data censoring
  12. Establishing consensus-based, assay-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits to facilitate proper utilization of cardiac troponin measurements
  13. Fast track protocols using highly sensitive troponin assays for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Relationship between polymorphisms in the CRP, LEP and LEPR genes and high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in Spanish children
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes
  18. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk
  19. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool
  20. Multidisciplinary training activities for decreasing preanalytical mistakes in samples from primary care
  21. Harmonization protocols for TSH immunoassays: a multicenter study in Italy
  22. Circulating free light chain measurement in the diagnosis, prognostic assessment and evaluation of response of AL amyloidosis: comparison of Freelite and N latex FLC assays
  23. Serum prolactin revisited: parametric reference intervals and cross platform evaluation of polyethylene glycol precipitation-based methods for discrimination between hyperprolactinemia and macroprolactinemia
  24. Temporal and regional variability in the request of vitamin D from general practitioners in Spain
  25. Fibrinogen determination according to Clauss: commutability assessment of International and commercial standards and quality control samples
  26. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  27. S100B maternal blood levels are gestational age- and gender-dependent in healthy pregnancies
  28. Gestational age-specific reference intervals for serum thyroid hormone levels in a multi-ethnic population
  29. Cancer Diagnostics
  30. Serum complexed and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the diagnosis of the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. A new immunochemistry platform for a guideline-compliant cardiac troponin T assay at the point of care: proof of principle
  33. Diabetes
  34. Adiponectin and leptin as first trimester markers for gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Can we still trust hemoglobin A1c in all situations?
  37. Automated detection of unstable hemoglobin variants by Sysmex XE-Series analyzers
  38. Mean hemoglobin concentrations in fasting venous and non-fasting capillary blood of Cambodian women using a hemoglobinometer and an automated hematology analyzer
  39. Evaluation of a POCT device for C-reactive protein, hematocrit and leukocyte differential
  40. New perspectives on existing data in comparative measurements: a simple extension of the regression analysis
  41. Evaluation of a human anti-mouse antibody rapid test for patients requiring radio-immunodiagnostic
  42. The cortisol-CBG ratio affects cortisol immunoassay bias at elevated CBG concentrations
  43. Prognostic value of total antioxidant capacity to predict functional outcome in traumatic brain injury patients
  44. Use of IFCC guidelines to verify acetylcholinesterase reference interval in adults determined with ChE check mobile testing system
  45. Congress Abstracts
  46. 49th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
  47. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Heruntergeladen am 9.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0896/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen