Home Harmonization protocols for TSH immunoassays: a multicenter study in Italy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Harmonization protocols for TSH immunoassays: a multicenter study in Italy

  • Aldo Clerico EMAIL logo , Andrea Ripoli , Antonio Fortunato , Antonio Alfano , Cinzia Carrozza , Mario Correale , Ruggero Dittadi , Gianluca Gessoni , Marco Migliardi , Sara Rizzardi , Concetta Prontera , Silvia Masotti , Giancarlo Zucchelli , Cristina Guiotto , Palma Aurelia Iacovazzi , Giorgio Iervasi and on behalf of the Italian Section of the European Ligand Assay Society (ELAS)
Published/Copyright: February 28, 2017

Abstract

Background:

Systematic difference between thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoassays may produce misleading interpretation when samples of the same patients are measured with different methods. The study aims were to evaluate whether systematic differences are present among TSH immunoassays, and whether it is possible to obtain a better harmonization among TSH methods using results obtained in external quality assessment (EQA) schemes.

Methods:

Seven Italian clinical laboratories measured TSH in 745 serum samples of healthy subjects and patients with thyroid disorders. These samples were also re-measured by two reference laboratories of the study with the six TSH immunoassays most popular in Italy after 2 months of storage at −80 °C. Moreover, these data were compared to 53,823 TSH measurements, obtained by laboratories participant to 2012–2015 EQA annual cycles in 72 quality control samples (TSH concentrations from about 0.1 mIU/L to 18.0 mIU/L). TSH concentrations were recalibrated using a mathematical approach based on the principal component analysis (PCA).

Results:

Systematic differences were found between the most popular commercially available TSH immunoassays. TSH concentrations measured by the clinical laboratories were very closely correlated to those measured with the same method by reference laboratories after 2 months of storage at −80 °C. After recalibration using the PCA approach the variation of TSH values significantly decreased from a median pre-calibration value of 13.53% (10.79%–16.53%) to 9.63% (6.90%–13.21%) after recalibration.

Conclusions:

Our data suggest that EQA schemes are useful to improve harmonization among TSH immunoassays and also to produce some mathematical formulas, which can be used by clinicians to better compare TSH values measured with different methods.


Corresponding author and Coordinator: Prof. Aldo Clerico, MD, Laboratory of Cardiovascular Endocrinology and Cell Biology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Fondazione CNR Toscana G. Monasterio, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Via Trieste 41, 56126 Pisa, Italy

Acknowledgments

All the immunoassay kits used in this study were kindly supported by the manufacturers, namely: Abbott Diagnostics Italia (Rome, Italy), Beckman Coulter S.P.A Italy (Cassina de’ Pecchi, Milan, Italy), Roche Diagnostics Italia (Monza, Milan, Italy), Medical Solution Siemens Healthineers Italia (Milan, Italy), and Tosoh Bioscience Srl (Rivoli, Turin, Italy).

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Iervasi G, Clerico A. Harmonization of free thyroid hormone test: a mission impossible? Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:43–8.10.1515/CCLM.2011.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Thienpont LM, Faix JD, Beastall G. Standardization of FT4 and harmonization of TSH measurements – A request for input from endocrinologists and other physicians. Eur Thyroid J 2015;4:271–2.10.1159/000440614Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Spencer CA. Assay of thyroid hormones and related substances. Thyroid disease manager. In: De Groot LJ, Beck-Peccoz P, Chrousos G, Dungan K, Grossman A, Hershman JM, et al., editors. Endotext [Internet]. South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com, Inc.; Last revision by Carole Spencer, 1 January 2013.Search in Google Scholar

4. Clerico A, Ripoli A, Zucchelli GC, Plebani M. Harmonization protocols for thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) immunoassays: different approaches based on the consensus mean value. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:377–82.10.1515/cclm-2014-0586Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Beastall G, Faix JD, Leiri T, Miller WG, et al. Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests (WG-STFT) – part 1: thyroid stimulating hormone. Clin Chem 2010;56:902–11.10.1373/clinchem.2009.140178Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Beastall G, Faix JD, Leiri T, Miller WG, et al. Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests (WG-STFT) – part 2: free thyroxine and free triiodothyronine. Clin Chem 2010;56:912–20.10.1373/clinchem.2009.140194Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Beastall G, Faix JD, Leiri T, Miller WG, et al. Report of the IFCC Working Group for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests (WG-STFT) – part 3: total thyroxine and total triiodothyronine. Clin Chem 2010;56:921–9.10.1373/clinchem.2009.140228Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Thienpont LM, Van Uytfanghe K, Van Houcke S, Das B, Faix JD, MacKenzie F, et al. IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests (C-STFT). A progress report of the IFCC Committee for Standardization of Thyroid Function Tests. Eur Thyroid J 2014; 3:109–16.10.1159/000358270Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Stockl D, Van Uytfanghe K, Van Aelest S, Thienpont L. A statistical basis for harmonization of thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassays using a robust factor analysis model. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:956–72.10.1515/cclm-2013-1038Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Gantzer ML, Miller WG. Harmonization of measurement procedures: how do we get it done? Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:95–100.Search in Google Scholar

11. Van Houcke SK, Thienpont LM. “Good samples make good assays” – the problem of sourcing clinical samples for a standardization project. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:967–72.10.1515/cclm-2012-0617Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Van Houcke SK, Van Aelst S, Van Uytfanghe K, Thienpont LM. Harmonization of immunoassays to the all-procedure trimmed mean – proof of concept by use of data from the insulin standardization project. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:e103–5.10.1515/cclm-2012-0661Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Van Uytfanghe K, De Grande LA, Thienpont LM. A “Step-Up” approach for harmonization. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:62–7.10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.015Search in Google Scholar

14. Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:741–51.10.1515/cclm-2013-0075Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Plebani M, Panteghini M. Promoting clinical and laboratory interaction by harmonization. Clin Chim Acta 2014;432:15–21.10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.051Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Plebani M, Astion ML, Barth JH, Chen W, de Oliveira Galoro CA, Escuer MI, et al. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:951–8.10.1515/cclm-2014-0142Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Miller WG. Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. Clin Chim Acta 2003;327:25–37.10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00370-4Search in Google Scholar

18. Giovannini S, Zucchelli GC, Iervasi G, Iervasi A, Chiesa MR, Mercuri A, et al. Multicentre comparison of free thyroid hormones immunoassays: the Immunocheck study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1669–76.10.1515/CCLM.2011.647Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Prontera C, Zaninotto M, Giovannini S, Zucchelli GC, Pilo A, Sciacovelli L, et al. Proficiency testing project for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N-terminal part of the propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP) immunoassays: the CardioOrmocheck study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:762–8.10.1515/CCLM.2009.153Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT. Exploratory factor anlysis. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc., 2001:1–176.Search in Google Scholar

21. Joliffe IT. Principal component analysis. New York: Springer, 2013:1–520.Search in Google Scholar

22. Croux C, Filzmoser P, Oliveira MR. Algorithms for projection-pursuit robust principal component analysis. Chemometr Intell Lab Sys 2007;87:218–25.10.1016/j.chemolab.2007.01.004Search in Google Scholar

23. Clerico A, Ripoli A, Masotti S, Prontera C, Storti S, Fortunato A, et al. Pilot study on harmonization of cardiac troponin I immunoassays using patients and quality control plasma samples. Clin Chim Acta 2016;456:427#x2013;8.10.1016/j.cca.2016.02.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Arlot S, Celisse A. A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection. Stat Surv 2010;4:70–9.10.1214/09-SS054Search in Google Scholar

25. Rawlins ML, Roberts WL. Performance characteristics of six third-generation assays for thyroid-stimulating hormone. Clin Chem 2004;50:2338–44.10.1373/clinchem.2004.039156Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Lawrence N. Probabilistic non-linear principal component analysis with gaussian process latent variable models. J Mach Learning Res 2005;6:1783–816.Search in Google Scholar

27. Buhlmann P, Hothorn T. Boosting algorithms: regularization, prediction and model fitting. Statist Sci 2007;4:477–505.Search in Google Scholar

28. Cheng B, Titterington DM. Neural networks: a review from a statistical perspective. Statist Sci 1994;1:2–54.Search in Google Scholar

29. Bartel J, Krumsiek J, Theis FJ. Statistical methods for the analysis of high-throughput metabolomics data. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2013;4:e201301009.10.5936/csbj.201301009Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central


Supplemental Material:

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2016-0899).


Received: 2016-10-7
Accepted: 2017-1-25
Published Online: 2017-2-28
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. High-sensitivity assays for cardiac troponins – continued
  4. Reviews
  5. The 99th percentile of reference population for cTnI and cTnT assay: methodology, pathophysiology and clinical implications
  6. Vitamin B1 in critically ill patients: needs and challenges
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Point
  9. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin: do think twice, it’s not all right
  10. Counterpoint
  11. Terminology of cardiac troponin assays and data censoring
  12. Establishing consensus-based, assay-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits to facilitate proper utilization of cardiac troponin measurements
  13. Fast track protocols using highly sensitive troponin assays for ruling out and ruling in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
  14. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  15. Relationship between polymorphisms in the CRP, LEP and LEPR genes and high sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in Spanish children
  16. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  17. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes
  18. Selecting multi-rule quality control procedures based on patient risk
  19. Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool
  20. Multidisciplinary training activities for decreasing preanalytical mistakes in samples from primary care
  21. Harmonization protocols for TSH immunoassays: a multicenter study in Italy
  22. Circulating free light chain measurement in the diagnosis, prognostic assessment and evaluation of response of AL amyloidosis: comparison of Freelite and N latex FLC assays
  23. Serum prolactin revisited: parametric reference intervals and cross platform evaluation of polyethylene glycol precipitation-based methods for discrimination between hyperprolactinemia and macroprolactinemia
  24. Temporal and regional variability in the request of vitamin D from general practitioners in Spain
  25. Fibrinogen determination according to Clauss: commutability assessment of International and commercial standards and quality control samples
  26. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  27. S100B maternal blood levels are gestational age- and gender-dependent in healthy pregnancies
  28. Gestational age-specific reference intervals for serum thyroid hormone levels in a multi-ethnic population
  29. Cancer Diagnostics
  30. Serum complexed and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the diagnosis of the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. A new immunochemistry platform for a guideline-compliant cardiac troponin T assay at the point of care: proof of principle
  33. Diabetes
  34. Adiponectin and leptin as first trimester markers for gestational diabetes mellitus: a cohort study
  35. Letters to the Editor
  36. Can we still trust hemoglobin A1c in all situations?
  37. Automated detection of unstable hemoglobin variants by Sysmex XE-Series analyzers
  38. Mean hemoglobin concentrations in fasting venous and non-fasting capillary blood of Cambodian women using a hemoglobinometer and an automated hematology analyzer
  39. Evaluation of a POCT device for C-reactive protein, hematocrit and leukocyte differential
  40. New perspectives on existing data in comparative measurements: a simple extension of the regression analysis
  41. Evaluation of a human anti-mouse antibody rapid test for patients requiring radio-immunodiagnostic
  42. The cortisol-CBG ratio affects cortisol immunoassay bias at elevated CBG concentrations
  43. Prognostic value of total antioxidant capacity to predict functional outcome in traumatic brain injury patients
  44. Use of IFCC guidelines to verify acetylcholinesterase reference interval in adults determined with ChE check mobile testing system
  45. Congress Abstracts
  46. 49th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
  47. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0899/html
Scroll to top button