Startseite Assessment of EGFR mutation status using cell-free DNA from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Assessment of EGFR mutation status using cell-free DNA from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid

  • Sojung Park , Jae Young Hur , Kye Young Lee , Jae Cheol Lee , Jin Kyung Rho , Sun Hwa Shin und Chang-Min Choi EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Februar 2017
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background:

Much attention has been focused on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing since the introduction of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have improved survival in EGFR-positive lung cancer patients. Liquid biopsy using circulating tumor cells or cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has enabled less invasive testing, but requires a highly sensitive method. To date, liquid biopsy using bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid has rarely been used.

Methods:

From 20 patients with lung adenocarcinoma, we isolated cfDNA from 20 samples of cell-free BAL fluid and 19 cell-free bronchial washing samples. cfDNA was examined for EGFR mutations using peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-mediated PCR clamping method. In cases where the results from the tumor biopsy and BAL-derived cfDNA test were not consistent, PANAMutyper™ R EGFR kit was used along with PNA clamping-assisted fluorescence melting curve analysis.

Results:

We included 17 patients with advanced stage disease and three with non-advanced stage disease. Tumor biopsy detected EGFR mutations in 12 of the patients. One patient had a p.L858R mutation and a de novo p.T790M mutation. The results from PNA-mediated PCR clamping were 75.0% (9/12) concordant with the tumor biopsy results for EGFR mutation status. PANAMutyper with fluorescence melting curve analysis was performed in three cases, which detected EGFR mutations in two more patients (11/12, 91.7%). EGFR mutations were detected in the cfDNA extracted from two bronchial washing samples.

Conclusions:

cfDNA from BAL fluid could be used for molecular testing of EGFR mutations and identification of p.T790M mutations, with an easily applicable method.


Corresponding author: Chang-Min Choi, MD, PhD, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Republic of Korea
aSojung Park and Jae Young Hur contributed equally to this work.
  1. Author contributions: C.M.C. has been identified as a corresponding author of the paper, taking responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, from study conception to published article. K.Y.L. and J.C.L. contributed to study conception and data acquisition. S.P. and J.Y.H. had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of the data analysis and drafting. S.H.S. and J.K.R. contributed to data acquisition. All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This study was supported by a grant (2015-467) from Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Ji H, Li D, Chen L, Shimamura T, Kobayashi S, McNamara K, et al. The impact of human EGFR kinase domain mutations on lung tumorigenesis and in vivo sensitivity to EGFR-targeted therapies. Cancer Cell 2006;9:485–95.10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.022Suche in Google Scholar

2. Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S, Yang C-H, Chu D-T, Saijo N, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947–57.10.1056/NEJMoa0810699Suche in Google Scholar

3. Zhou C, Wu Y-L, Chen G, Feng J, Liu X-Q, Wang C, et al. Erlotinib versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG-0802): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:735–42.10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70184-XSuche in Google Scholar

4. Sozzi G, Conte D, Leon M, Cirincione R, Roz L, Ratcliffe C, et al. Quantification of free circulating DNA as a diagnostic marker in lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3902–8.10.1200/JCO.2003.02.006Suche in Google Scholar

5. Diehl F, Schmidt K, Choti MA, Romans K, Goodman S, Li M, et al. Circulating mutant DNA to assess tumor dynamics. Nat Med 2008;14:985–90.10.1038/nm.1789Suche in Google Scholar

6. Jiang T, Ren S, Zhou C. Role of circulating-tumor DNA analysis in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2015;90:128–34.10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.09.013Suche in Google Scholar

7. Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, Hardt D, Fackelmayer FO, Hesch RD, et al. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res 2001;61:1659–65.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Stroun M, Lyautey J, Lederrey C, Olson-Sand A, Anker P. About the possible origin and mechanism of circulating DNA apoptosis and active DNA release. Clin Chim Acta 2001;313:139–42.10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00665-9Suche in Google Scholar

9. Schmidt B, Carstensen T, Engel E, Jandrig B, Witt C, Fleischhacker M. Detection of cell-free nucleic acids in bronchial lavage fluid supernatants from patients with lung cancer. Eur J Cancer 2004;40:452–60.10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.020Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Sun PL, Seol H, Lee HJ, Yoo SB, Kim H, Xu X, et al. High incidence of EGFR mutations in Korean men smokers with no intratumoral heterogeneity of lung adenocarcinomas: correlation with histologic subtypes, EGFR/TTF-1 expressions, and clinical features. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:323–30.10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182381515Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Rantakokko-Jalava K, Jalava J. Optimal DNA isolation method for detection of bacteria in clinical specimens by broad-range PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:4211–7.10.1128/JCM.40.11.4211-4217.2002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Han HS, Lim SN, An JY, Lee KM, Choe KH, Lee KH, et al. Detection of EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma specimens with different proportions of tumor cells using two methods of differential sensitivity. J Thorac Oncol 2012;7:355–64.10.1097/JTO.0b013e31823c4c1bSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Kim YT, Kim JW, Kim SK, Joe GH, Hong IS. Simultaneous genotyping of multiple somatic mutations by using a clamping PNA and PNA detection probes. Chembiochem 2015;16:209–13.10.1002/cbic.201402640Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977;74:5463–7.10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. da Cunha Santos G, Saieg MA, Geddie W, Leighl N. EGFR gene status in cytological samples of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: controversies and opportunities. Cancer Cytopathol 2011;119:80–91.10.1002/cncy.20150Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Savic S, Tapia C, Grilli B, Rufle A, Bihl MP, de Vito Barascud A, et al. Comprehensive epidermal growth factor gene analysis from cytological specimens of non-small-cell lung cancers. Br J Cancer 2008;98:154–60.10.1038/sj.bjc.6604142Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Garcia-Olive I, Monso E, Andreo F, Sanz-Santos J, Taron M, Molina-Vila MA, et al. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for identifying EGFR mutations. Eur Respir J 2010;35:391–5.10.1183/09031936.00028109Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Pirker R, Herth FJ, Kerr KM, Filipits M, Taron M, Gandara D, et al. Consensus for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer: results from a European workshop. J Thorac Oncol 2010;5:1706–13.10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181f1c8deSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 2012;366:883–92.10.1056/NEJMoa1113205Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

20. Murtaza M, Dawson S-J, Tsui DW, Gale D, Forshew T, Piskorz AM, et al. Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 2013;497:108–12.10.1038/nature12065Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Beiter T, Fragasso A, Hudemann J, Niess AM, Simon P. Short-term treadmill running as a model for studying cell-free DNA kinetics in vivo. Clin Chem 2011;57:633–6.10.1373/clinchem.2010.158030Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Chang CP, Chia RH, Wu TL, Tsao KC, Sun CF, Wu JT. Elevated cell-free serum DNA detected in patients with myocardial infarction. Clin Chim Acta 2003;327:95–101.10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00337-6Suche in Google Scholar

23. Korabecna M, Opatrna S, Wirth J, Rulcova K, Eiselt J, Sefrna F, et al. Cell-free plasma DNA during peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis and in patients with chronic kidney disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1137:296–301.10.1196/annals.1448.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Zhong XY, Hahn S, Kiefer V, Holzgreve W. Is the quantity of circulatory cell-free DNA in human plasma and serum samples associated with gender, age and frequency of blood donations? Ann Hematol 2007;86:139–43.10.1007/s00277-006-0182-5Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Zachariah RR, Schmid S, Buerki N, Radpour R, Holzgreve W, Zhong X. Levels of circulating cell-free nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Obstet Gynecol 2008;112:843–50.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181867bc0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Ellinger J, Muller SC, Wernert N, von Ruecker A, Bastian PJ. Mitochondrial DNA in serum of patients with prostate cancer: a predictor of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008;102:628–32.10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.07613.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Zanetti-Dallenbach RA, Schmid S, Wight E, Holzgreve W, Ladewing A, Hahn S, et al. Levels of circulating cell-free serum DNA in benign and malignant breast lesions. Int J Biol Markers 2007;22:95–9.10.1177/172460080702200202Suche in Google Scholar

28. Buttitta F, Felicioni L, Del Grammastro M, Filice G, Di Lorito A, Malatesta S, et al. Effective assessment of egfr mutation status in bronchoalveolar lavage and pleural fluids by next-generation sequencing. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:691–8.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1958Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Kim HR, Lee SY, Hyun DS, Lee MK, Choi CM, Yang SH, et al. Detection of EGFR mutations in circulating free DNA by PNA-mediated PCR clamping. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2013;32:50.10.1186/1756-9966-32-50Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. Arcila ME, Oxnard GR, Nafa K, Riely GJ, Solomon SB, Zakowski MF, et al. Rebiopsy of lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors and enhanced detection of the T790M mutation using a locked nucleic acid-based assay. Clin Cancer Res 2011;17:1169–80.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2277Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Jänne PA, Yang JC-H, Kim D-W, Planchard D, Ohe Y, Ramalingam SS, et al. AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor–resistant non–small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1689–99.10.1056/NEJMoa1411817Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2016-4-12
Accepted: 2017-1-5
Published Online: 2017-2-14
Published in Print: 2017-8-28

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. Reporting LDL-cholesterol levels in the era of intensive lipid management: a clarion call
  4. The challenges of genetic risk scores for the prediction of coronary heart disease
  5. Reviews
  6. Advanced lipoprotein testing for cardiovascular diseases risk assessment: a review of the novel approaches in lipoprotein profiling
  7. A review of the challenge in measuring and standardizing BCR-ABL1
  8. Mini Review
  9. Challenges in the analysis of epigenetic biomarkers in clinical samples
  10. Opinion Paper
  11. Defining a roadmap for harmonizing quality indicators in Laboratory Medicine: a consensus statement on behalf of the IFCC Working Group “Laboratory Error and Patient Safety” and EFLM Task and Finish Group “Performance specifications for the extra-analytical phases”
  12. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  13. Assessment of EGFR mutation status using cell-free DNA from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. A survey of patients’ views from eight European countries of interpretive support from Specialists in Laboratory Medicine
  16. Verification of examination procedures in clinical laboratory for imprecision, trueness and diagnostic accuracy according to ISO 15189:2012: a pragmatic approach
  17. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA
  18. A candidate reference method for serum potassium measurement by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry
  19. Practical motives are prominent in test-ordering in the Emergency Department
  20. Technical and clinical validation of the Greiner FC-Mix glycaemia tube
  21. Comparison of pneumatic tube system with manual transport for routine chemistry, hematology, coagulation and blood gas tests
  22. Accuracy of cerebrospinal fluid Aβ1-42 measurements: evaluation of pre-analytical factors using a novel Elecsys immunosassay
  23. Evaluation of cannabinoids concentration and stability in standardized preparations of cannabis tea and cannabis oil by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
  24. Analytical performance and diagnostic accuracy of six different faecal calprotectin assays in inflammatory bowel disease
  25. Novel immunoassays for detection of CUZD1 autoantibodies in serum of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases
  26. Hematology and Coagulation
  27. Critical appraisal of discriminant formulas for distinguishing thalassemia from iron deficiency in patients with microcytic anemia
  28. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  29. Reference ranges of thromboelastometry in healthy full-term and pre-term neonates
  30. Cancer Diagnostics
  31. Immunoparesis in IgM gammopathies as a useful biomarker to predict disease progression
  32. Cardiovascular Diseases
  33. Assessment of the clinical utility of adding common single nucleotide polymorphism genetic scores to classical risk factor algorithms in coronary heart disease risk prediction in UK men
  34. Time and age dependent decrease of NT-proBNP after septal myectomy in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy
  35. Infectious Diseases
  36. Higher serum caspase-cleaved cytokeratin-18 levels during the first week of sepsis diagnosis in non-survivor patients
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. Data mining for age-related TSH reference intervals in adulthood
  39. Intra-laboratory variation and its effect on gestational diabetes diagnosis
  40. Evaluation of long-term imprecision of automated complete blood cell count on the Sysmex XN-9000 system
  41. Sensitivity of the Sysmex XN9000 WPC-channel for detection of monoclonal B-cell populations
  42. Evaluation of biotin interference on immunoassays: new data for troponin I, digoxin, NT-Pro-BNP, and progesterone
  43. Stability of procalcitonin in cerebrospinal fluid
  44. Between-laboratory analysis of IgG antibodies against Aspergillus fumigatus in paired quality control samples
  45. Mass spectrometry vs. immunoassay in clinical and forensic toxicology: qui modus in rebus est?
  46. Great need for changes in higher education in Greece
  47. A note from the Editor in Chief regarding the Letter to the Editor “Great need for changes in higher education in Greece”
Heruntergeladen am 1.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2016-0302/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen