Home Medicine Anti-ruthenium antibodies mimic macro-TSH in electrochemiluminescent immunoassay
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Anti-ruthenium antibodies mimic macro-TSH in electrochemiluminescent immunoassay

  • Alois Gessl EMAIL logo , Stefan Blueml , Christian Bieglmayer and Rodrig Marculescu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 15, 2014

Abstract

Background: Macro-hormones are circulating conjugates of hormones with immunoglobulins, which often artefactually elevate biochemical test results. Particularly when causing only moderate elevation no suspicion will be raised. By far the most frequently encountered macro-hormone is macro-prolactin. Here we report a female patient with rheumatoid arthritis who had persistently and grossly elevated thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) but normal free thyroxine in electrochemiluminescent assays. Although clinically euthyroid, she was put on thyroxine therapy which caused hyperthyroid symptoms.

Methods: An analytic interference by macro-TSH was assumed by dilution experiments, polyethylene-glycol-precipitation, the addition of a heterophilic antibody blocking reagent and size exclusion chromatography.

Results: Further workup, however, revealed the presence of anti-ruthenium antibodies.

Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the first report of anti-ruthenium antibodies selectively interfering with a TSH assay and causing erratic gross elevation of TSH mimicking macro-TSH.


Corresponding authors: Alois Gessl, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine III, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Phone: +43 1 40400 4310, Fax: +43 1 40400 4309; E-mail: ; and Rodrig Marculescu, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria, Phone: +43 1 40400 5355, Fax: +43 1 40400 5389, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Christina Porzig, Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany for her help with elucidating this case.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Caldwell G, Kellett HA, Gow SM, Beckett GJ, Sweeting VM, Seth J, et al. A new strategy for thyroid function testing. Lancet 1985;1:1117–9.10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92429-8Search in Google Scholar

2. Gessl A, Raber W, Nowotny P, Vierhapper H. Spuriously high serum concentrations of TSH due to the use of an automatic pipetting device. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2000;108:510–2.10.1055/s-2000-11005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Gessl A, Vierhapper H, Feichtinger H. Non-suppressible TSH in a patient thyroidectomized due to follicular thyroid carcinoma. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2006;114:389–92.10.1055/s-2006-924327Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Beckett GJ, Toft AD. First-line thyroid function tests – TSH alone is not enough. Clin Endocrinol 2003;58:20–1.10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01690.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Kricka LJ. Interference in immunoassays. Clin Chem 2000;46:1037–8.10.1093/clinchem/46.8.1037Search in Google Scholar

6. Webster R, Fahie-Wilson M, Barker P, Chatterjee VK, Halsall DJ. Immunoglobulin interference in serum follicle-stimulating hormone assays: autoimmune and heterophilic antibody interference. Ann Clin Biochem 2010;47:386–9.10.1258/acb.2010.010044Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Fahie-Wilson MN, John R, Ellis AR. Macroprolactin; high molecular mass forms of circulating prolactin. Ann Clin Biochem 2005;42:175–92.10.1258/0004563053857969Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Ismail AA. Interference from endogenous antibodies in automated immunoassays: what laboratorians need to know. J Clin Pathol 2009;62:673–8.10.1136/jcp.2008.055848Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Sturgeon CM, Viljoen A. Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48: 418–32.10.1258/acb.2011.011073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Beltran L, Fahie-Wilson MN, McKenna TJ, Kavanagh L, Smith TP. Serum total prolactin and monomeric prolactin reference intervals determined by precipitation with polyethylene glycol: evaluation and validation on common immunoassay platforms. Clin Chem 2008;54:1673–81.10.1373/clinchem.2008.105312Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Norden AG, Jackson RA, Norden LE, Griffin AJ, Barnes MA, Little JA. Misleading results from immunoassays of serum free thyroxine in the presence of rheumatoid factor. Clin Chem 1997;43:957–62.10.1093/clinchem/43.6.957Search in Google Scholar

12. Gurnell M, Halsall DJ, Chatterjee VK. What should be done when thyroid function tests do not make sense? Clin Endocrinol 2011;74:673–8.10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04023.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Davies C. Introduction to immunoassay principles. In: Wild D, editor. The immunoassay handbook, 3rd ed. London: Elsevier, 2005:110–5.Search in Google Scholar

14. Mendoza H, Connacher A, Srivastava R. Unexplained high thyroid stimulating hormone: a “BIG” problem. Br Med J Case Rep 2009; DOI: 10.1136/bcr.01.2009.1474 .10.1136/bcr.01.2009.1474Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Halsall DJ, English E, Chatterjee VK. Interference from heterophilic antibodies in TSH assays. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:345–6.10.1258/acb.2009.009024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Akamizu T, Mori T, Kasagi K, Kosugi S, Miyamoto M, Nishino K, et al. Anti-TSH antibody with high specificity to human TSH in sera from a patient with Graves’ disease: its isolation from, and interaction with, TSH receptor antibodies. Clin Endocrinol 1987;26:311–20.10.1111/j.1365-2265.1987.tb00788.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Czernichow P, Vandalem JL, Hennen G. Transient neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia: a factitious syndrome due to the presence of heterophilic antibodies in the plasma of infants and their mothers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1981;53:387–93.10.1210/jcem-53-2-387Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Bifulco M, Spitz I, Hirsch HJ, Shorer J, Aloj SM. High-molecular-weight serum thyrotropin revisited. N Engl J Med 1987;316:1609–10.10.1056/NEJM198706183162519Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Spitz IM, Le Roith D, Hirsch H, Carayon P, Pekonen F, Liel Y, et al. Increased high-molecular-weight thyrotropin with impaired biologic activity in a euthyroid man. N Engl J Med 1981;304: 278–82.10.1056/NEJM198101293040506Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Lazarus JH, John R, Ginsberg J, Hughes IA, Shewring G, Smith BR, et al. Transient neonatal hyperthyrotrophinaemia: a serum abnormality due to transplacentally acquired antibody to thyroid stimulating hormone. Br Med J 1983;286:592–4.10.1136/bmj.286.6365.592Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Tamaki H, Takeoka K, Nishi I, Shindoh Y, Tsukada Y, Amino N. Novel thyrotropin (TSH)-TSH antibody complex in a healthy woman and her neonates. Thyroid 1995;5:299–303.10.1089/thy.1995.5.299Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Ismail AA, Walker PL, Barth JH, Lewandowski KC, Jones R, Burr WA. Wrong biochemistry results: two case reports and observational study in 5310 patients on potentially misleading thyroid stimulating hormone and gonadotropin immunoassay results. Clin Chem 2002;48:2023–9.10.1093/clinchem/48.11.2023Search in Google Scholar

23. Halsall DJ, Fahie-Wilson MN, Hall SK, Barker P, Anderson J, Gama R, et al. Macro thyrotropin-IgG complex causes factitious increases in thyroid-stimulating hormone screening tests in a neonate and mother. Clin Chem 2006;52:1968–9; author reply 52:1969–70.10.1373/clinchem.2006.071050Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Newman JD, Bergman PB, Doery JC, Balazs ND. Factitious increase in thyrotropin in a neonate caused by a maternally transmitted interfering substance. Clin Chem 2006;52:541–2.10.1373/clinchem.2005.064832Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Vieira JG, Maciel RM, Hauache OM, Nishida SK, Boelter DM, Pinheiro MF. Unexpected high values of TSH: the presence of high molecular weight forms (macro TSH) must be investigated. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 2006;50:445–9.10.1590/S0004-27302006000300006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Sakai H, Fukuda G, Suzuki N, Watanabe C, Odawara M. Falsely elevated thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level due to macro-TSH. Endocr J 2009;56:435–40.10.1507/endocrj.K08E-361Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Lewis EJ, Lim R, Joseph F, Ewins D, Goenka N, Bowles SA, et al. Recognising macro-TSH: a rare cause of inappropriately high TSH values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49(Suppl):S421.Search in Google Scholar

28. Verhoye E, Van den Bruel A, Delanghe JR, Debruyne E, Langlois MR. Spuriously high thyrotropin values due to anti-thyrotropin antibodies in adult patients. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:604–6.10.1515/CCLM.2009.138Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Rix M, Laurberg P, Porzig C, Kristensen SR. Elevated thyroid stimulating hormone level in a euthyroid neonate caused by macro thyrotropin-IgG complex. Acta Paediatr 2011;100: e135–7.10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02212.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Loh TP, Kao SL, Halsall DJ, Toh SE, Chan E, Ho SC, et al. Macro-thyrotropin: a case report and review of literature. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012;97:1823–8.10.1210/jc.2011-3490Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Ohba K, Noh JY, Unno T, Satoh T, Iwahara K, Matsushita A, et al. Falsely elevated thyroid hormone levels caused by anti-ruthenium interference in the Elecsys assay resembling the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of thyrotropin. Endocr J 2012;59:663–7.10.1507/endocrj.EJ12-0089Search in Google Scholar

32. Ross HA, Menheere PP, Thomas CM, Mudde AH, Kouwenberg M, Wolffenbuttel BH. Interference from heterophilic antibodies in seven current TSH assays. Ann Clin Biochem 2008;45:616.10.1258/acb.2008.008066Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Mifflin TE, Bruns DE, Wrotnoski U, MacMillan RH, Stallings RG, Felder RA, et al. University of Virginia case conference. Macroamylase, macro creatine kinase, and other macroenzymes. Clin Chem 1985;31:1743–8.10.1093/clinchem/31.10.1743Search in Google Scholar

34. Levitt MD, Cooperband SR. Hyperamylasemia from the binding of serum amylase by an 11S IgA globulin. N Engl J Med 1968;278:474–9.10.1056/NEJM196802292780903Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Sudo K, Maekawa M, Kanno T. Immunochemical properties of immunoglobulin G conjugated with lactate dehydrogenase. Clin Chem 1985;31:1178–81.10.1093/clinchem/31.7.1178Search in Google Scholar

36. Pudek MR, Jacobson BE. Falsely negative laboratory diagnosis for myocardial infarction owing to the concurrent presence of macro creatine kinase and macro lactate dehydrogenase. Clin Chem 1982;28:2434–7.10.1093/clinchem/28.12.2434Search in Google Scholar

37. Ando T, Yasui J, Inokuchi N, Usa T, Ashizawa K, Kamihara S, et al. Non-specific activities against ruthenium crosslinker as a new cause of assay interference in an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. Intern Med 2007;46:1225–9.10.2169/internalmedicine.46.0188Search in Google Scholar PubMed

38. Sapin R, Agin A, Gasser F. Efficacy of a new blocker against anti-ruthenium antibody interference in the Elecsys free triiodothyronine assay. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:416–8.10.1515/CCLM.2007.064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. McKillop D, Thompson D, Sharpe P. Response to Heijboer et al. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:263–4. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:428–9.10.1258/acb.2009.009144Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Buijs MM, Gorgels JP, Endert E. Interference by anti-ruthenium antibodies in the Roche thyroid-stimulating hormone assay. Ann Clin Biochem 2011;48:276–81.10.1258/acb.2010.010160Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Heijboer AC, Ijzerman RG, Bouman AA, Blankenstein MA. Two cases of anti-ruthenium antibody interference in modular free thyroxine assay. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:263–4.10.1258/acb.2009.008258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Tatarewicz S, Miller JM, Swanson SJ, Moxness MS. Rheumatoid factor interference in immunogenicity assays for human monoclonal antibody therapeutics. J Immunol Methods 2010;357:10–6.10.1016/j.jim.2010.03.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

43. Xu L, Yu Z, Fan W, Wang X, Xie M, Xu Y, et al. Negative interference in serum HBsAg ELISA from rheumatoid factors. PLoS One 2013;8:e80620.10.1371/journal.pone.0080620Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

44. Bartels EM, Ribel-Madsen S. Cytokine measurements and possible interference from heterophilic antibodies – problems and solutions experienced with rheumatoid factor. Methods 2013;61:18–22.10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.12.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-1-19
Accepted: 2014-4-16
Published Online: 2014-5-15
Published in Print: 2014-11-19

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. From symptoms to biomarkers: a change of paradigm
  4. Reviews
  5. Biochemical markers in early diagnosis and management of systemic amyloidoses
  6. The accuracy of the anti-mitochondrial antibody and the M2 subtype test for diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis: a meta-analysis
  7. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  8. Selection of an optimal method for co-isolation of circulating DNA and miRNA from the plasma of pregnant women
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Harmonisation of seven common enzyme results through EQA
  11. Harmonization in hemolysis detection and prevention. A working group of the Catalonian Health Institute (ICS) experience
  12. Adopting European Network for Health Technology Assessments (EunetHTA) core model for diagnostic technologies for improving the accuracy and appropriateness of blood gas analyzers’ assessment
  13. Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D
  14. Anti-ruthenium antibodies mimic macro-TSH in electrochemiluminescent immunoassay
  15. The relationship between the Spine Deformity Index, biochemical parameters of bone metabolism and vascular calcifications: results from the Epidemiological VERtebral FRACtures iTalian Study (EVERFRACT) in dialysis patients
  16. Quantification of polyclonal free light chains in clinical samples using a single turbidimetric immunoassay
  17. Global coagulation tests: their applicability for measuring direct factor Xa- and thrombin inhibition and reversal of anticoagulation by prothrombin complex concentrate
  18. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  19. The importance of individual biology in the clinical use of serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer
  20. The quality of diagnostic testing may be impaired during shipment of lithium-heparin gel tubes
  21. Cancer Diagnostics
  22. Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a tumor marker in men with lung cancer
  23. Intestinal permeability in patients with metastatic colon cancer treated with patupilone
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. European multicenter analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT STAT high sensitive troponin I immunoassay
  26. Infectious Diseases
  27. Early indicators of severity and construction of a risk model for prognosis based upon laboratory parameters in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome
  28. Corrigendum
  29. Automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis is a standardized alternative for visual microscope interpretation
  30. Letters to the Editor
  31. The future of the laboratory information system – what are the requirements for a powerful system for a laboratory data management?
  32. Hypernatraemia in disguise
  33. Interference of therapeutic monoclonal immunoglobulins in the investigation of M-proteins
  34. The impact of exercise on the variation of serum free light chains
  35. Response to Jacobs: N Latex FLC serum free light-chain assays in patients with renal impairment
  36. Reply to Berlanga et al. (DOI 10.1515/cclm-2014-0420)
  37. Mean platelet volume in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: is mean platelet volume ready as a surrogate marker?
  38. False-positive D-dimer result in a latex-enhanced immunoassay caused by interfering human anti-mouse antibodies
  39. D-Dimer in normal pregnancy: determination of reference values for three commercially available assays
  40. Paraoxonase 2 sequence variation (c.311 C>G) is associated with a modest decrease in circulating LDL size in children and adolescents
  41. The effect of volume of hydrochloric acid preservation on 24-hour urinary catecholamine test
  42. Congress Abstracts
  43. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  44. The 3rd EFLM-UEMS Congress
  45. 46th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
Downloaded on 7.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0067/html
Scroll to top button