Home Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a tumor marker in men with lung cancer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a tumor marker in men with lung cancer

  • Béla Nagy , Harjit Pal Bhattoa , Zoltán Steiber , Mária Csobán , Mária Szilasi , Gábor Méhes , Mónika Müller , József Lázár , János Kappelmayer and Péter Antal-Szalmás EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 15, 2014

Abstract

Background: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a reliable tumor marker for ovarian cancer, but only limited data are available on HE4 levels in lung malignancies.

Methods: HE4 levels were measured at diagnosis in 98 men with lung cancer at different stages of the disease, and these results were compared to an age-matched healthy male cohort (n=98). The concentrations of classical tumor markers were also determined, and their efficacy was compared to that of HE4.

Results: Compared to healthy controls, patients with lung neoplasm showed significantly higher HE4 levels [118.2 (80.6–150.1) pmol/L vs. 62.2 (47.2–76.1) pmol/L; p<0.001]. Although age and smoking modulated HE4 levels in the healthy cohort, no such effect was observed in the patient population. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) for HE4 was 0.848 (95% CI 0.792–0.904) for differentiating lung cancer patients from healthy controls, with a cut-off value of 97.6 pmol/L (sensitivity: 64.3%, specificity: 95.9%). HE4 levels were significantly elevated in all stages of lung cancer, and even in patients without clinical symptoms (p<0.05), but no difference was found between the different histological subgroups. A significant correlation was found between HE4 values and the tumor size determined by CT/MRI (Spearman’s ρ=0.227, p=0.030). The combination of HE4 with CEA and CA 125 considerably enhanced the diagnostic efficacy [ROC-AUC: 0.963 (95% CI 0.937–0.990), sensitivity: 91.8%, specificity: 92.8%].

Conclusions: Our data suggest that serum HE4, especially in combination with CEA and CA 125, qualifies as a surrogate diagnostic marker in men with lung cancer.


Corresponding author: Péter Antal-Szalmás, MD, PhD, Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, Debrecen 4032, Hungary, Phone: + 36 52 340006, Fax: + 36 52 417631, E-mail:
aBéla Nagy Jr and Harjit Pal Bhattoa contributed equally to this work.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research funding played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Research funding: Béla Nagy Jr was supported by the János Bólyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. Harjit Pal Bhattoa was supported by the OTKA 105073 Research Grant. János Kappelmayer was supported by the TÁMOP 4.2.1./B-09/1/KONV-2010-0007 and the TÁMOP-4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0025 projects. These latter projects are implemented through the New Hungary Development Plan, co-financed by the European Social Fund. Péter Antal-Szalmás was supported by the National Office for Research and Technology of Hungary (presently National Development Agency) (TECH-09-A1-2009-0113; mAB-CHIC).

Employment or leadership: Mónika Müller is an employee at the Adware Research Ltd., and József Lázár is employed by the Biosystem International Hungary Co.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893–7.10.1002/ijc.25516Search in Google Scholar

2. Molina JR, Yang P, Cassivi SD, Schild SE, Adjei AA. Non-small cell lung cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, treatment, and survivorship. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:584–94.10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60735-0Search in Google Scholar

3. Sher T, Dy GK, Adjei AA. Small cell lung cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:355–67.10.4065/83.3.355Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Humphrey LL, Teutsch S, Johnson M, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Lung cancer screening with sputum cytologic examination, chest radiography, and computed tomography: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2004;140:740–53.10.7326/0003-4819-140-9-200405040-00015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Kulpa J, Wójcik E, Reinfuss M, Kołodziejski L. Carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and neuron-specific enolase in squamous cell lung cancer patients. Clin Chem 2002;48:1931–7.10.1093/clinchem/48.11.1931Search in Google Scholar

6. Hatzakis KD, Froudarakis ME, Bouros D, Tzanakis N, Karkavitsas N, Siafakas NM. Prognostic value of serum tumor markers in patients with lung cancer. Respiration 2002;69:25–9.10.1159/000049366Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Bingle L, Singleton V, Bingle CD. The putative ovarian tumour marker gene HE4 (WFDC2) is expressed in normal tissues and undergoes complex alternative splicing to yield multiple protein isoforms. Oncogene 2002;21:2768–73.10.1038/sj.onc.1205363Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Hellström I, Raycraft J, Hayden-Ledbetter M, Ledbetter JA, Schummer M, McIntosh M, et al. The HE4 (WFDC2) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma. Cancer Res 2003;63:3695–700.Search in Google Scholar

9. Galgano MT, Hampton GM, Frierson HF Jr. Comprehensive analysis of HE4 expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Mod Pathol 2006;19:847–53.10.1038/modpathol.3800612Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Moore RG, McMeekin DS, Brown AK, DiSilvestro P, Miller MC, Allard WJ, et al. A novel multiple marker bioassay utilizing HE4 and CA125 for the prediction of ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:40–6.10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.08.031Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Huhtinen K, Suvitie P, Hiissa J, Junnila J, Huvila J, Kujari H, et al. Serum HE4 concentration differentiates malignant ovarian tumours from ovarian endometriotic cysts. Br J Cancer 2009;100:1315–9.10.1038/sj.bjc.6605011Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Escudero JM, Auge JM, Filella X, Torne A, Pahisa J, Molina R. Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 with cancer antigen 125 as a tumor marker in patients with malignant and nonmalignant diseases. Clin Chem 2011;57:1534–44.10.1373/clinchem.2010.157073Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Moore RG, Miller MC, Disilvestro P, Landrum LM, Gajewski W, Ball JJ, et al. Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm in women with a pelvic mass. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:280–8.10.1097/AOG.0b013e318224fce2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Macuks R, Baidekalna I, Donina S. An ovarian cancer malignancy risk index composed of HE4, CA125, ultrasonographic score, and menopausal status: use in differentiation of ovarian cancers and benign lesions. Tumour Biol 2012;33:1811–7.10.1007/s13277-012-0440-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Moore RG, Miller MC, Steinhoff MM, Skates SJ, Lu KH, Lambert-Messerlian G, et al. Serum HE4 levels are less frequently elevated than CA125 in women with benign gynecologic disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:351.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.029Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Nagy B Jr, Krasznai ZT, Csoban M, Antal-Szalmás P, Hernádi Z, Kappelmayer J. The emerging value of HE4 in the discrimination of ovarian cancer from other malignant and benign pelvic masses [abstract]. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49(Suppl 1):S261.10.1258/acb.2011.011258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Bingle L, Cross SS, High AS, Wallace WA, Rassl D, Yuan G, et al. WFDC2 (HE4): a potential role in the innate immunity of the oral cavity and respiratory tract and the development of adenocarcinomas of the lung. Respir Res 2006;7:61–71.10.1186/1465-9921-7-61Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

18. Tokuishi K, Yamashita S, Ohbo K, Kawahara K. Splice variant HE4-V3 expression is associated with favorable prognosis in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol 2012;33:103–9.10.1007/s13277-011-0252-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Yamashita S, Tokuishi K, Hashimoto T, Moroga T, Kamei M, Ono K, et al. Prognostic significance of HE4 expression in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol 2011;32:265–71.10.1007/s13277-010-0118-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Iwahori K, Suzuki H, Kishi Y, Fujii Y, Uehara R, Okamoto N, et al. Serum HE4 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for lung cancer. Tumour Biol 2012;33:1141–9.10.1007/s13277-012-0356-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Yamashita S, Tokuishi K, Moroga T, Yamamoto S, Ohbo K, Miyahara S, et al. Serum level of HE4 is closely associated with pulmonary adenocarcinoma progression. Tumour Biol 2012;3:2365–70.10.1007/s13277-012-0499-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Anastasi E, Granato T, Marchei GG, Viggiani V, Colaprisca B, Comploj S, et al. Ovarian tumor marker HE4 is differently expressed during the phases of the menstrual cycle in healthy young women. Tumour Biol 2010;31:411–5.10.1007/s13277-010-0049-1Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, et al; International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer International Staging Committee; Participating Institutions. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol 2007;2:706–14.10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812f3c1aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

24. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:S1–266.Search in Google Scholar

25. Oremek GM, Sauer-Eppel H, Bruzdziak TH. Value of tumour and inflammatory markers in lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2007;27:1911–5.Search in Google Scholar

26. Grunnet M, Sorensen JB. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as tumor marker in lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2012;76:138–43.10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.11.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Molina R, Filella X, Auge JM. Tumour markers in lung cancer. Eur Oncol Dis 2006;1:106–9.Search in Google Scholar

28. Stieber P, Hatz R, Holdenrieder S, Molina R, Nap M, von Pawel J, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in lung cancer. NACB: practice guidelines and recommendations for use of tumor markers in the clinic. Lung Cancer 2006. Available from: http://www.aacc.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/NACB/LMPG/tumor/chp3p_lung. pdf.Search in Google Scholar

29. Yu S, Yang HJ, Xie SQ, Bao YX. Diagnostic value of HE4 for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50: 1439–46.10.1515/cclm-2011-0477Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Kirchhoff C. Molecular characterization of epididymal proteins. Rev Reprod 1998;3:86–95.10.1530/ror.0.0030086Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Hertlein L, Stieber P, Kirschenhofer A, Krocker K, Nagel D, Lenhard M, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in benign and malignant diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50: 2181–8.10.1515/cclm-2012-0097Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Zanotti L, Bignotti E, Calza S, Bandiera E, Ruggeri G, Galli C, et al. Human epididymis protein 4 as a serum marker for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma and prediction of clinical outcome. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:2189–98.10.1515/cclm-2011-0757Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Moore RG, Miller MC, Eklund EE, Lu KH, Bast RC Jr, Lambert-Messerlian G. Serum levels of the ovarian cancer biomarker HE4 are decreased in pregnancy and increase with age. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;206:349.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

34. Nagy B Jr, Krasznai ZT, Balla H, Csobán M, Antal-Szalmás P, Hernádi Z, et al. Elevated human epididymis protein 4 concentrations in chronic kidney disease. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:377–80.10.1258/acb.2011.011258Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Gizzo S, Ancona E, Saccardi C, D’Antona D, Nardelli GB, Plebani M. Could kidney glomerular filtration impairment represent the “Achilles heel” of HE4 serum marker? A possible further implication. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e45–6.10.1515/cclm-2013-0660Search in Google Scholar PubMed

36. Li X, Asmitananda T, Gao L, Gai D, Song Z, Zhang Y, et al. Biomarkers in the lung cancer diagnosis: a clinical perspective. Neoplasma 2012;59:500–7.10.4149/neo_2012_064Search in Google Scholar PubMed

37. Giovanella L, Piantanida R, Ceriani L, Bandera M, Novario R, Bianchi L, et al. Immunoassay of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and serum fragments of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA 21.1) as tumor markers in small cell lung cancer: clinical evaluation and biological hypothesis. Int J Biol Markers 1997;12:22–6.10.1177/172460089701200105Search in Google Scholar

38. Ando S, Kimura H, Iwai N, Shima M, Ando M, Kuriyama T. Optimal combination of seven tumour markers in prediction of advanced stage at first examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 2001;21:3085–92.Search in Google Scholar

39. Dowling P, Clarke C, Hennessy K, Torralbo-Lopez B, Ballot J, Crown J, et al. Analysis of acute-phase proteins, AHSG, C3, CLI, HP and SAA, reveals distinctive expression patterns associated with breast, colorectal and lung cancer. Int J Cancer 2012;131:911–23.10.1002/ijc.26462Search in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Mrázová V, Mocák J, Varmusová E, Kavková D, Bednárová A. Use of multidimensional data analysis for prediction of lung malignity. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2009;50:210–5.10.1016/j.jpba.2009.04.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

41. Lee HJ, Kim YT, Park PJ, Shin YS, Kang KN, Kim Y, et al. A novel detection method of non-small cell lung cancer using multiplexed bead-based serum biomarker profiling. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012;143:421–7.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.10.046Search in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Farlow EC, Vercillo MS, Coon JS, Basu S, Kim AW, Faber LP, et al. A multi-analyte serum test for the detection of non-small cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2010;103:1221–8.10.1038/sj.bjc.6605865Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

43. Liu W, Yang J, Chi PD, Zheng X, Dai SQ, Chen H, et al. Evaluating the clinical significance of serum HE4 levels in lung cancer and pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013;17:1346–53.10.5588/ijtld.13.0058Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2014-1-11
Accepted: 2014-4-9
Published Online: 2014-5-15
Published in Print: 2014-11-19

©2014 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. From symptoms to biomarkers: a change of paradigm
  4. Reviews
  5. Biochemical markers in early diagnosis and management of systemic amyloidoses
  6. The accuracy of the anti-mitochondrial antibody and the M2 subtype test for diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis: a meta-analysis
  7. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  8. Selection of an optimal method for co-isolation of circulating DNA and miRNA from the plasma of pregnant women
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. Harmonisation of seven common enzyme results through EQA
  11. Harmonization in hemolysis detection and prevention. A working group of the Catalonian Health Institute (ICS) experience
  12. Adopting European Network for Health Technology Assessments (EunetHTA) core model for diagnostic technologies for improving the accuracy and appropriateness of blood gas analyzers’ assessment
  13. Impact of assay design on test performance: lessons learned from 25-hydroxyvitamin D
  14. Anti-ruthenium antibodies mimic macro-TSH in electrochemiluminescent immunoassay
  15. The relationship between the Spine Deformity Index, biochemical parameters of bone metabolism and vascular calcifications: results from the Epidemiological VERtebral FRACtures iTalian Study (EVERFRACT) in dialysis patients
  16. Quantification of polyclonal free light chains in clinical samples using a single turbidimetric immunoassay
  17. Global coagulation tests: their applicability for measuring direct factor Xa- and thrombin inhibition and reversal of anticoagulation by prothrombin complex concentrate
  18. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  19. The importance of individual biology in the clinical use of serum biomarkers for ovarian cancer
  20. The quality of diagnostic testing may be impaired during shipment of lithium-heparin gel tubes
  21. Cancer Diagnostics
  22. Serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a tumor marker in men with lung cancer
  23. Intestinal permeability in patients with metastatic colon cancer treated with patupilone
  24. Cardiovascular Diseases
  25. European multicenter analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT STAT high sensitive troponin I immunoassay
  26. Infectious Diseases
  27. Early indicators of severity and construction of a risk model for prognosis based upon laboratory parameters in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome
  28. Corrigendum
  29. Automated indirect immunofluorescence antinuclear antibody analysis is a standardized alternative for visual microscope interpretation
  30. Letters to the Editor
  31. The future of the laboratory information system – what are the requirements for a powerful system for a laboratory data management?
  32. Hypernatraemia in disguise
  33. Interference of therapeutic monoclonal immunoglobulins in the investigation of M-proteins
  34. The impact of exercise on the variation of serum free light chains
  35. Response to Jacobs: N Latex FLC serum free light-chain assays in patients with renal impairment
  36. Reply to Berlanga et al. (DOI 10.1515/cclm-2014-0420)
  37. Mean platelet volume in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: is mean platelet volume ready as a surrogate marker?
  38. False-positive D-dimer result in a latex-enhanced immunoassay caused by interfering human anti-mouse antibodies
  39. D-Dimer in normal pregnancy: determination of reference values for three commercially available assays
  40. Paraoxonase 2 sequence variation (c.311 C>G) is associated with a modest decrease in circulating LDL size in children and adolescents
  41. The effect of volume of hydrochloric acid preservation on 24-hour urinary catecholamine test
  42. Congress Abstracts
  43. Congress of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  44. The 3rd EFLM-UEMS Congress
  45. 46th National Congress of the Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (SIBioC – Laboratory Medicine)
Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0041/html
Scroll to top button