Home Advancing haemostasis automation – successful implementation of robotic centrifugation and sample processing in a tertiary service hospital
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Advancing haemostasis automation – successful implementation of robotic centrifugation and sample processing in a tertiary service hospital

  • Nazanin Sédille-Mostafaie EMAIL logo , Hanna Engler , Susanne Lutz and Wolfgang Korte
Published/Copyright: December 15, 2012

Abstract

Background: Laboratories today face increasing pressure to automate operations due to increasing workloads and the need to reduce expenditure. Few studies to date have focussed on the laboratory automation of preanalytical coagulation specimen processing. In the present study, we examined whether a clinical chemistry automation protocol meets the preanalytical requirements for the analyses of coagulation.

Methods: During the implementation of laboratory automation, we began to operate a pre- and postanalytical automation system. The preanalytical unit processes blood specimens for chemistry, immunology and coagulation by automated specimen processing. As the production of platelet-poor plasma is highly dependent on optimal centrifugation, we examined specimen handling under different centrifugation conditions in order to produce optimal platelet deficient plasma specimens. To this end, manually processed models centrifuged at 1500 g for 5 and 20 min were compared to an automated centrifugation model at 3000 g for 7 min.

Results: For analytical assays that are performed frequently enough to be targets for full automation, Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed close agreement between different centrifugation methods, with a correlation coefficient between 0.98 and 0.99 and a bias between –5% and +6%. For seldom performed assays that do not mandate full automation, the Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed acceptable to poor agreement between different centrifugation methods.

Conclusions: A full automation solution is suitable and can be recommended for frequent haemostasis testing.


Corresponding author: Nazanin Sédille-Mostafaie, MD, Center for Laboratory Medicine, St. Gallen 9007, Switzerland, Phone: +41 71 494 3916, Fax: +41 71 494 3900,

References

1. Estey CA, Felder RA. Clinical evaluation of serial blood processing at point-of-care. Clin Chem 1997;43:360–2.10.1093/clinchem/43.2.360Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Roberts T, Smith M, Roberts B. Observations on centrifugation: application to centrifuge development. Clin Chem 1999;45: 1889–97.10.1093/clinchem/45.11.1889Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Holaman JW, Mifelin TE, Felder RA, Demers LA. Evaluation of an automated preanalytical robotic workstation at two academic health centers. Clin Chem 2002;48:540–8.10.1093/clinchem/48.3.540Search in Google Scholar

4. Felder RA. Immunoassay automation. J Clin Ligand Assay Soc 1999;22:13–24.Search in Google Scholar

5. Felder RA, Kost GJ. Modular stepwise automation and the future of diagnostic testing. MLO Med Lab Obs 1998;30:46,48,56.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Felder RA, Boyd JC, Margrey K, Holman W, Savory J. Robotics in the medical laboratory. Clin Chem 1990;36:1534–43.10.1093/clinchem/36.9.1534Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Hawker CD, Garr SB, Hamilton LT, Penrose JR, Ashwood ER, Weiss RL. Automated transport and sorting system in a large reference laboratory: part 1. Evaluation of needs and alternatives and development of a plan. Clin Chem 2002;48: 1751–60.10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1751Search in Google Scholar

8. Hawker CD, Roberts WL, Garr SB, Hamilton LT, Penrose JR, Ashwood ER, et al. Automated transport and sorting system in a large reference laboratory: part 2. Implementation of the system and performance measures over three years. Clin Chem 2002;48:1761–7.10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1761Search in Google Scholar

9. Markin RS, Whalen SA. Laboratory automatisation: trajectory, technology, and tactics. Clin Chem 2000;46:764–71.10.1093/clinchem/46.5.764Search in Google Scholar

10. Middleton SR. Developing an automation concept that is right for your laboratory. Clin Chem 2000;46:757–63.10.1093/clinchem/46.5.757Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Rosetti MD, Kumar A, Felder RA. Mobile robot simulation of mid-sized hospital delivery processes. Health Care Manage Sci 2000;3:201–13.10.1023/A:1019049609350Search in Google Scholar

12. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:750–9.10.1515/CCLM.2006.123Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Plebani M. Laboratory errors: how to improve pre- and post-analytical phases? Biochem Med 2007;17:5–9.10.11613/BM.2007.001Search in Google Scholar

14. Simundic AM, Nikolac N, Vukasovic I, Vrkic N. The prevalence of preanalytical errors in Croatian ISO 15189 accredited laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:1009–14.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000279341900016&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f310.1515/CCLM.2010.221Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Rattan A, Lippi G. Frequency and type of preanalytical errors in a laboratory medicine department in India. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008;46:1657–9.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000261386100030&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar

16. Jacobsz LA, Zemlin AE, Roos MJ, Erasmus RT. Chemistry and haematology sample rejection and clinical impact in a tertiary laboratory in Cape Town. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:2047–50.10.1515/CCLM.2011.743Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Molenaar PJ, Leyte A. Pre-acquisition system assessment of the Sysmex®Coagulation System CS-2100i and comparison with end-user verification; a model for the regional introduction of new analysers and methods. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:1479–89.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000294841100014&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f310.1515/CCLM.2011.615Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Meyer MS, Guinet C. Laboratory assessment of new anticoagulants. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:761–72.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000289465700003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar

19. Sølvik UØ, Røraas TH, Petersen PH, Stavelin AV, Monsen G, Sandberg S. Effect of coagulation factors on discrepancies in International Normalized Ratio results between instruments. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1611–20.http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000309954500020&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. https://www.beckmancoulter.com/wsrportal/wsr/diagnostics/clinical-products/automation/automate-800-and-600-sample-processing-systems/index.htm.Search in Google Scholar

21. Adcock DM, Hoefner DM, Kottke-Marchant K, Marlar RA, Szamosi DI, Warunek DJ. Collection, transport and processing of blood specimens for coagulation testing and general performance of coagulation assays. Approved Guideline, 5th ed. Vol. 23, No. 35. Wayne, PA: CLSI, 2008:H21–A5.Search in Google Scholar

22. Jones BA, Bekeris LG, Nakhleh RE, Walsh MK, Valenstein PN. Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services. A College of American Pathologist Q-probes study of 138 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:38–43.10.5858/133.1.38Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2012-09-18
Accepted: 2012-11-17
Published Online: 2012-12-15
Published in Print: 2013-06-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Letters to the Editor
  2. Evaluation of a novel room temperature RNA storage tube for use in a real-time quantitative PCR assay
  3. Evaluation of the Universal Master Mix (STAT-NAT DNA-Mix) for reliable molecular testing
  4. HbA1c: performance of the Sebia Capillarys 2 Flex Piercing
  5. A case of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS): type IgD-lambda
  6. Evidence-based use of serum protein electrophoresis in laboratory medicine
  7. Plasma volume shifts during multiday racing
  8. Structured handoff at shift change in a clinical laboratory increases patient safety
  9. Instrument-dependent interference of Howell-Jolly bodies in reticulocyte enumeration
  10. Reply to Gore et al.: Plasma volume shift during multiday racing
  11. Recommendations for appropriate serum electrophoresis requests: the Italian approach
  12. Masthead
  13. Masthead
  14. Editorials
  15. Biomarkers for sepsis: an unfinished journey
  16. Laboratory demand management of repetitive testing – time for harmonisation and an evidenced based approach
  17. Reviews
  18. Non-invasive prenatal diagnostics of aneuploidy using next-generation DNA sequencing technologies, and clinical considerations
  19. The diagnostic utility of brain natriuretic peptide in heart failure patients presenting with acute dyspnea: a meta-analysis
  20. Opinion Paper
  21. Opinion paper on innovative approach of biomarkers for infectious diseases and sepsis management in the emergency department
  22. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  23. Microarray with LNA-probes for genotyping of polymorphic variants of Gilbert’s syndrome gene UGT1A1(TA)n
  24. Selection of the optimal manual method of cell free fetal DNA isolation from maternal plasma
  25. A multiplex assay to rapidly exclude HLA-DQ2.5 and HLA-DQ8 expression in patients at risk for celiac disease
  26. Low cost biosensor-based molecular differential diagnosis of α-thalassemia (Southeast Asia deletion)
  27. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  28. Managing laboratory test ordering through test frequency filtering
  29. Critical review of laboratory investigations in clinical practice guidelines: proposals for the description of investigation
  30. Long-term stability of laboratory tests and practical implications for quality management
  31. Coffee consumption, serum γ-glutamyltransferase, and glucose tolerance status in middle-aged Japanese men
  32. Biological variation and prognosis usefulness of new biomarkers in liver transplantation
  33. Switching between parathormone (PTH) assays: the impact on the diagnosis of renal osteodystrophy
  34. A comparison between two different in vitro basophil activation tests for gluten- and cow’s milk protein sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like patients
  35. A proficiency testing program of hemoglobin analysis in prevention and control of severe hemoglobinopathies in Thailand
  36. Advancing haemostasis automation – successful implementation of robotic centrifugation and sample processing in a tertiary service hospital
  37. ADAM12s and PP13 as first trimester screening markers for adverse pregnancy outcome
  38. Analysis of serous body fluids using the CELL-DYN Sapphire hematology analyzer
  39. Cancer Diagnostics
  40. Association and prognostic value of serum inflammation markers in patients with leukoplakia and oral cavity cancer
  41. Do laboratories follow heart failure recommendations and guidelines and did we improve? The CARdiac MArker Guideline Uptake in Europe (CARMAGUE)
  42. Cardiovascular Diseases
  43. Additional diagnostic and prognostic value of copeptin ultra-sensitive for diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in older patients presenting to the emergency department1)
  44. Moderate elevations of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and B-type natriuretic peptide in chronic hemodialysis patients are associated with mortality
Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2012-0625/html
Scroll to top button