Home Medicine Serum HER-2 predicts response and resistance to trastuzumab treatment in breast cancer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Serum HER-2 predicts response and resistance to trastuzumab treatment in breast cancer

  • Eva Rabing Brix Petersen EMAIL logo , Patricia Diana Sørensen , Erik Hugger Jakobsen , Jonna Skov Madsen and Ivan Brandslund
Published/Copyright: February 18, 2013

Abstract

Background: Serum HER2 (S-HER2) was approved in 2003 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for monitoring trastuzumab treatment in tissue HER2 positive breast cancer patients. Information of the value of S-HER2 is scarce. We hypothesised that S-HER2 would reflect the clinical effect of trastuzumab.

Methods: We followed 48 patients eligible for trastuzumab treatment for up to 6 years or until death. S-HER2 was measured on an ADVIA Centaur System and S-Trastuzumab was measured by an in-house developed fluorescent enzyme immunoassay system on the ImmunoCap 100.

Results: A decrease in S-HER2 of ≥20% was correlated to no progression in the disease in 20 out of 21 clinical courses (p<0.0001). An increase in S-HER2 of ≥20% was correlated to progression in the disease in 40 out of 44 clinical courses (p<0.0001). Patients with no recurrence after trastuzumab treatment (n=18) had a median S-HER2 concentration of 10.5 μg/L, whereas patients alive with recurrence (n=13) had a median S-HER2 of 20.1 μg/L (p=0.002). Patients who died prompted by recurrence (n=17) had a median S-HER2 of 232.4 μg/L at latest measurement before death (p=<0.0001) compared to patients without recurrence. In two patients with S-HER2 values above 1000 μg/L the concentrations of S-trastuzumab were measured below the target trough concentration in serum of 10 mg/L.

Conclusions: Decreasing values of S-HER2 predicts response to treatment whereas increasing levels predict resistance. S-HER2 above 1000 μg/L warns that standard doses of trastuzumab may be insufficient as reflected by low concentrations of S-trastuzumab.


Corresponding author: Eva Rabing Brix Petersen, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Kabbeltoft 25, 7100 Vejle, Denmark, Phone: +45 79 406500, Fax: +45 79 406871

The authors would like to thank Peer Horn, PhD student, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, for valuable laboratory help and advice, Camilla Davidsen and Sara Egsgaard, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, for excellent laboratory work and Gitte Møller, Department of Oncology, for providing relevant patient details.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: Ivan Brandslund has received compensation from Siemens for lecturing on S-HER2 for customers and employees.

Honorarium: None declared.

References

1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer 2010;127:2893–917.10.1002/ijc.25516Search in Google Scholar

2. The Danish Cancer Registry 2010, Danish Health and Medicines Authority.Search in Google Scholar

3. Coleman MP, Forman D, Bryant H, Butler J, Rachet B, Maringe C, et al. Cancer survival in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and the UK, 1995–2007 (The International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership): an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet 2011;377:127–38.10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62231-3Search in Google Scholar

4. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90.10.3322/caac.20107Search in Google Scholar

5. Tsé C, Gauchez AS, Jacot W, Lamy PJ. HER2 shedding and serum HER2 extracellular domain: biology and clinical utility in breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2012;38:133–42.10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.03.008Search in Google Scholar

6. Singer CF, Köstler WJ, Hudelist G. Predicting the efficacy of trastuzumab-based therapy in breast cancer: current standards and future strategies. Biochim Biophys Acta 2008; 1786:105–13.10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.02.003Search in Google Scholar

7. Pauletti G, Godolphin W, Press MF, Slamon DJ. Detection and quantitation of HER-2/neu gene amplification in human breast cancer archival material using fluorescence in situ hybridization. Oncogene 1996;13:63–72.Search in Google Scholar

8. Slamon DJ, Clark GM, Wong SG, Levin WJ, Ullrich A, McGuire WL. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science 1987;235:177–82.10.1126/science.3798106Search in Google Scholar

9. Seshadri R, Matthews C, Dobrovic A, Horsfall DJ. The significance of oncogene amplification in primary breast cancer. Int J Cancer 1989;43:270–2.10.1002/ijc.2910430218Search in Google Scholar

10. Sjögren S, Inganäs M, Lindgren A, Holmberg L, Bergh J. Prognostic and predictive value of c-erbB-2 overexpression in primary breast cancer, alone and in combination with other prognostic markers. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:462–9.10.1200/JCO.1998.16.2.462Search in Google Scholar

11. Popescu NC, King CR, Kraus MH. Localization of the human erbB-2 gene on normal and rearranged chromosomes 17 to bands q12-21.32. Genomics 1989;4:362–6.10.1016/0888-7543(89)90343-1Search in Google Scholar

12. Akiyama T, Sudo C, Ogawara H, Toyoshima K, Yamamoto T. The product of the human c-erbB-2 gene: a 185-kilodalton glycoprotein with tyrosine kinase activity. Science 1986;232:1644–6.10.1126/science.3012781Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Yarden Y. The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer. Signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Eur J Cancer 2001;37(Suppl 4):S3–8.10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00230-1Search in Google Scholar

14. Carney WP. Hidden HER-2/neu-positive breast cancer: how to maximize detection. IDrugs 2009;12:238–42.Search in Google Scholar

15. Department of Health & Human Services, FDA: Premarket Notification ADVIA Centaur HER-2 neu Immunoassay 30.1.2003.Search in Google Scholar

16. FDA, FY 2003 ODE/OIVD Annual Report Part 1 – Advances in Patient Care.Search in Google Scholar

17. Sørensen PD, Jakobsen EH, Langkjer ST, Bokmand S, Østergaard B, Olsen DA, et al. Serum HER-2 concentrations for monitoring women with breast cancer in a routine oncology setting. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1117–23.10.1515/CCLM.2009.241Search in Google Scholar

18. Tafe LJ, Tsongalis GJ. The human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 50:23–30.Search in Google Scholar

19. FDA: Trastuzumab Product Approval Information – Licensing Action 9/25/98.Search in Google Scholar

20. Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med 2001;344:783–92.10.1056/NEJM200103153441101Search in Google Scholar

21. Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, Baughman S, Benz CC, Dantis L, et al. Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:737–44.10.1200/JCO.1996.14.3.737Search in Google Scholar

22. Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab as a single agent in first-line treatment of HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:719–26.10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.719Search in Google Scholar

23. Gianni L, Eiermann W, Semiglazov V, Manikhas A, Lluch A, Tjulandin S, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab followed by adjuvant trastuzumab versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced breast cancer (the NOAH trial): a randomised controlled superiority trial with a parallel HER2-negative cohort. Lancet 2010;375:377–84.10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61964-4Search in Google Scholar

24. Molina R, Escudero JM, Muñoz M, Augé JM, Filella X. Circulating levels of HER-2/neu oncoprotein in breast cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:5–21.10.1515/cclm.2011.822Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Melichar B, Plebani M. Editorial. Targeted therapy for HER-2: personalized medicine for her, too. Clin Chem Lab Med 2012;50:1–4.10.1515/cclm.2011.724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–16.10.1093/jnci/92.3.205Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009;45:228–47.10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Olsen DA, Østergaard B, Bokmand S, Wamberg PA, Jakobsen EH, Brandslund I. HER-2 protein concentrations in breast cancer cells increase before immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis turn positive. Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:177–82.10.1515/CCLM.2007.034Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Siemens healthcare diagnostics/Serum HER2/neu package insert.Search in Google Scholar

30. Lauterlein JJ, Petersen ER, Olsen DA, Østergaard B, Brandslund I. Quantification of HER2 autoantibodies in the amplification phenomenon of HER2 in breast cancer. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:877–83.10.1515/CCLM.2011.135Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Witzel I, Loibl S, von Minckwitz G, Mundhenke C, Huober J, Hanusch C, et al. Monitoring serum HER2 levels during neoadjuvant trastuzumab treatment within the GeparQuattro trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010;123: 437–45.10.1007/s10549-010-1030-9Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Maple L, Lathrop R, Bozich S, Harman W, Tacey R, Kelley M, et al. Development and validation of ELISA for herceptin detection in human serum. J Immunol Methods 2004;295:169–82.10.1016/j.jim.2004.09.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Tokuda Y, Watanabe T, Omuro Y, Ando M, Katsumata N, Okumura A, et al. Dose escalation and pharmacokinetic study of a humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1999;81:1419–25.10.1038/sj.bjc.6690343Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2012-8-30
Accepted: 2013-1-17
Published Online: 2013-02-18
Published in Print: 2013-07-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Editorials
  4. Biomarkers in the treatment of cancer: opportunities and pitfalls
  5. Multicenter reference intervals studies: a promising perspective for the future?
  6. Hemolysis-resistant reagent: another part of the puzzle for preventing errors in laboratory testing
  7. Review
  8. Exhaled breath condensate: a comprehensive update
  9. Mini Review
  10. Psoriasis, a new challenge for laboratory medicine
  11. Opinion Paper
  12. CA 19-9: handle with care
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Performance evaluation of human cytokines profiles obtained by various multiplexed-based technologies underlines a need for standardization
  15. The iron regulatory hormone hepcidin is decreased in pregnancy: a prospective longitudinal study
  16. Red blood cell distribution width is a potential prognostic index for liver disease
  17. Development of a novel, hemolysis-resistant reagent for assessment of α-amylase in biological fluids
  18. Performance of cassette-based blood gas analyzers to monitor blood glucose and lactate levels in a surgical intensive care setting
  19. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  20. The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (1) strategy and major results of standardized analytes
  21. The Asian project for collaborative derivation of reference intervals: (2) results of non-standardized analytes and transference of reference intervals to the participating laboratories on the basis of cross-comparison of test results
  22. Cancer Diagnostics
  23. Study of an elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 concentration in a large health check-up cohort in China
  24. Glycoproteomic identification of potential glycoprotein biomarkers in ovarian cancer proximal fluids
  25. Comparison of serum calcitonin and procalcitonin in detecting medullary thyroid carcinoma among patients with thyroid nodules
  26. Serum HER-2 predicts response and resistance to trastuzumab treatment in breast cancer
  27. Elevated tumor markers in patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis
  28. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in healthy Korean non-smokers
  29. Assessment of SOX17 DNA methylation in cell free DNA from patients with operable gastric cancer. Association with prognostic variables and survival
  30. Sensitivity of CA 15-3, CEA and serum HER2 in the early detection of recurrence of breast cancer
  31. Cardiovascular Diseases
  32. Association of nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor 3 inflammasome and adverse clinical outcomes in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
  33. Diabetes
  34. α1-Microglobulin/albumin ratio may improve interpretation of albuminuria in statin-treated patients
  35. Infectious Diseases
  36. The role of procalcitonin and IL-6 in discriminating between septic and non-septic causes of ALI/ARDS: a prospective observational study
  37. Letters to the Editor
  38. Carryover does not affect results of Beckman Coulter highly-sensitive-AccuTnI assay on Access 2
  39. Adding calcium to EDTA plasma samples prior to analysis could solve the compatibility issue in commercially available ELISAs that are standardized for serum
  40. Interference of luteinizing hormone in the urinary point-of-care human chorionic gonadotropin test
  41. Standardize the serum albumin assay now: calibrate it to 60% of the serum total protein assay
  42. Interference of M-paraprotein in automated urea assays
  43. A case of mistaken diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia due to pseudothrombocytopenia
  44. Delta check: a must in the management of hyponatremia
  45. A novel cost effective algorithm for antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing in an outpatient setting
Downloaded on 7.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2012-0558/html
Scroll to top button