Home Calcium signaling in prostate cancer cells of increasing malignancy
Article Open Access

Calcium signaling in prostate cancer cells of increasing malignancy

  • Carla Marchetti EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 24, 2022

Abstract

Calcium signaling controls a large variety of cell functions, including proliferation and apoptosis, and plays a major role in neoplastic transformation. Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men. The transition to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), a lethal form that is still lacking an effective cure, could be influenced by fine tuning intracellular calcium ([Ca2+]i) homeostasis. This study investigates [Ca2+]i dynamics in metastatic PCa cell lines that mimic the progression of PCa to CRPC: (i) well differentiated LNCaP cells that require androgen for survival, and (ii) poorly differentiated, highly aggressive androgen-insensitive prostate cancer (AIPC) PC3 and DU145 cells. In AIPC cells, ATP induces a fast rise in [Ca2+]i, due to release from intracellular stores and sensitive to phospholipase C inhibitors, while LNCaP cells do not respond to ATP challenge. Moreover, AIPC cells showed a reduced capacity to store Ca2+ in thapsigargin-sensitive stores and limited store-operated calcium entry, with respect to androgen-dependent LNCaP cells. Finally, green tea extract causes [Ca2+]i elevation and inhibits proliferation in PC3 and DU145 cells, but is ineffective in LNCaP cells. The consequences of these differences are discussed and interpreted in this study with reference to previously proposed models for Ca2+ dependence of prostate carcinogenesis.

Introduction

Calcium signaling controls a large variety of cell functions, including fertilization, learning and memory, contraction, secretion and gene expression, as well as proliferation and apoptosis [1]. It plays a key role in several pathologies and is correlated to abnormal tissue growth and invasion in neoplastic transformation [2,3].

Due to its multifaceted action, intracellular Ca2+ level ([Ca2+]i) is regarded as the leading factor of major cellular functions, but also a difficult-to-control parameter [4]. In malignant transformation, [Ca2+]i signaling can induce cell survival or trigger apoptosis, but it is generally believed that [Ca2+]i oscillations promote cell proliferation and survival, whereas sustained cytosolic [Ca2+]i induces cell death by apoptosis [5,6]. So, in principle, it might be possible to antagonize the malignant transformation and proliferation of cancer cells with disturbing cell [Ca2+]i dynamics, targeting the altered Ca-modulating proteins, and channels during cancer development.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men in the industrialized countries [7,8]. Androgen deprivation, the mainstay of treatment for advanced PCa, frequently but not always, results in tumor remission, while in many cases, the disease progresses to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), a lethal form lacking an effective cure [9,10]. Recent studies have provided evidence that in malignant transformation, PCa cells do not simply become androgen-independent, but rather become more sensitive to androgen and androgen precursors or bypass the androgen receptor [11–13].

In any case, the transition to CRPC involves a significant modification of the Ca2+-dependent elements that mediate cell apoptotic pathways [14,15]. In previous studies, transition to CRPC phenotype was found to be associated with a significantly lowered filling of intracellular Ca2+ stores (endoplasmic reticulum (ER)), which was due to under expression of sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (SERCA) pump, combined with enhanced Ca2+ leak and decreased store-operated Ca2+ entry store-operated calcium entry (SOCE) [1619].

For a long time, three established metastatic prostate carcinoma cell lines (DU145, PC3, and LNCaP) were the system of choice for many experimental approaches [20]. PC3 cells are a characteristic of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, an aggressive variant of PCa, which is harmful for androgen-receptor and prostate-specific antigen and does not respond to hormonal therapy [21]. In contrast, LNCaP cells share common features with adenocarcinoma cells [22] and require a concentration of four orders of higher magnitude 5α-dihydrotestosterone for survival with respect to PC3 and DU145 cells [23].

These three PCa cell lines are suitable models to investigate the Ca2+ signaling machinery in the progression of cancer and how to enhance the proapoptotic potential of malignant cells in the treatment of advanced PCa [14,17]. In this respect, there is a growing interest in the natural compounds that can provide chemical agents to improve PCa cure [13]. For example, we have recently described how green tea extract and green tea catechins may stimulate entry of very small amounts of Ca2+ from outside and initiate Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR) [24,25], a mechanism that was also described for different substances and can be a characteristic of hormone-refractory PCa cells [26,27] and could antagonize proliferation of these cells.

This study investigates some functional differences that may be significant for increasing malignant behavior and identifying specific targets to stimulate apoptosis in CRPC cells.

Methods

Chemicals

Analytical grade chemicals were purchased from Merck Life Science (Sigma-Aldrich, Milano, Italy), unless otherwise specified. Food/cosmetic grade ethanol 70/water 30 extract of Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze (green tea, CAS 84650-60-2), in the form of dry powder, was purchased from Farmalabor Srl, Canosa di Puglia, Italy. Dry extract was titrated in 50% polyphenols and contained approx. 20% (–)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) w/w according to the manufacturer’s specifications, as well as total catechins ≥30% w/w, epicatechin gallate ≥4% w/w and caffeine ≤3% w/w.

Cell models and viability assay

Human LNCaP, DU145 and PC3 prostate carcinoma cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD) and maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM glutamine, at 37°C, in 5% CO2, fully humidified atmosphere. LNCaP cell-medium was also supplemented with 10 mM 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 4.5 mg/mL glucose.

Cell viability was determined using the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Cells were settled in 96-well plates for 24 h and exposed to various agents for 48 h as specified. After the stipulated time, cells were incubated with 100 µL/mL MTT; 5 mg/mL phosphate buffered saline was added to the cell culture medium without serum for 3 h at 37°C; the cells were treated with a solution of 1 N HCl–isopropanol (1:24, v/v) and mixed to dissolve the dark-blue formazan crystals, formed as a result. After a few minutes at room temperature, the plates were read at 550 nm in a V Max microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunyvale, CA).

Intracellular calcium measurements

Cytosolic Ca2+ concentration was measured by loading cells with the intracellular fluorescent Ca2+ chelator Fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester (Fura-2, AM) (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and using a microspectrophotometry fluorescence-ratio setup, equipped with a perfusion system [24,28]. Cells were plated on poly-l-lysine-coated glass coverslips and incubated with 5 μM Fura-2, AM in a physiological saline (see below) at 37°C for 40 min. After that time, the coverslips were washed and mounted on the stage of an inverted microscope (Axiovert Zeiss, Germany), where they were continually superfused with different solutions. Cells were illuminated using a xenon lamp through a wavelength selector monochromator; emission was observed through an X40 quartz objective and recorded by a photomultiplier. The ratio R = E340/E380 was calculated every 40 ms to acquire a time-dependent internal Ca2+ sensitive signal. At the end of each experiment, cells were incubated with 2 µM ionomycin in 1 mM Ca2+ until the ratio reached a maximum value of R max, then 10 mM ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) was applied until the ratio reached a minimum value (R min). Finally, MnCl2 (5 mM) was added to the bath to quench the Fura-2 fluorescence and determine the background fluorescence values. The fluorescence emissions relative to each excitation wavelength (E 340 and E 380 respectively) were corrected for this background signal before ratio R determination. Internal Ca2+ was calculated according to the Grynkiewicz equation [29].

The physiological standard bath solution contained (in mM): NaCl 140, KCl 5.4, CaCl2 1.0, MgCl2 1.0, HEPES 10, and glucose 10. The pH was adjusted at 7.4 with NaOH. The Ca2+-free solution (indicated as EGTA in the figures) had the same composition with 0 CaCl2 added, 4 MgCl2 and 2 EGTA.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using Sigma Plot software (Systat Software Inc.) and shown as mean ± SD for cytotoxicity assays and mean ± SEM in all other experiments. Statistical significance was evaluated using Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test, as indicated by the software.

Results

The first functional difference between the different cell types was the response to stimulation by ATP. In both PC3 and DU145 cells, application of ATP (10 µM) induced a rapid and elevated [Ca2+]i rise, which was not dependent on external Ca2+, but it was entirely due to the release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores (Figure 1). As reported in PC3 cells [24], the aminosteroid U73122 (1-(6-((17β-3-methoxyestra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-yl)amino)hexyl)-1H-pyrrole-2,5-dione), a potent inhibitor of phospholipase C (PLC) enzymes and inositol trisphosphate (IP3)-mediated Ca2+ release, completely abolished the Ca2+ peak following ATP application in PC3 and this observation was confirmed in DU145 cells, with undetectable [Ca2+]i rise with 5 µM U73122 in four experiments. Therefore the ATP-driven internal Ca2+ rise is dependent on IP3 production in CRPC cells and mediated through P2Y receptors. In contrast, in androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells, ATP never determined a sizeable [Ca2+]i rise, either in the presence or in the absence of Ca2+ in the external bath. In addition, when external Ca2+ was restored (1 mM), after ATP treatment in EGTA, an increase in [Ca2+]i was always observed in LNCaP cells, but not in PC3 and DU145 cells (Figure 1).

Figure 1 
               The effect of ATP application on [Ca2+]i in PCa cells. (a) Internal [Ca2+]i spikes in Fura-2 loaded DU145 and PC3 cells exposed to 10 µM ATP for 20 s in 0Ca-EGTA external solution (EGTA) and in basal (1 mM) external Ca. The same protocol did not cause any [Ca2+]i rise in LNCaP cells, but [Ca2+]i increased when external Ca2+ returned to the control value (1 mM). (b) Internal Ca2+ level following 10 µM ATP application in the presence and absence of external Ca in the three cell lines, expressed as ΔCa = [Ca2+]i(ATP) – [Ca2+]i(basal). Lines represent SEM over the number of experiments, which were LNCaP n = 9, PC3 n = 7, DU145 n = 4. (c) [Ca2+]i level following ATP application in 0 Ca EGTA external solution in the three cell lines, as in B (ATP), and after external Ca2+ 1 mM was restored (STND). Despite the low response to ATP, a SOCE response was always present in LNCaP cells, but not in the other two, ATP-respondent cell types. Number of experiments were LNCaP n = 7, PC3 n = 9, DU145 n = 4. Lines represent SEM.
Figure 1

The effect of ATP application on [Ca2+]i in PCa cells. (a) Internal [Ca2+]i spikes in Fura-2 loaded DU145 and PC3 cells exposed to 10 µM ATP for 20 s in 0Ca-EGTA external solution (EGTA) and in basal (1 mM) external Ca. The same protocol did not cause any [Ca2+]i rise in LNCaP cells, but [Ca2+]i increased when external Ca2+ returned to the control value (1 mM). (b) Internal Ca2+ level following 10 µM ATP application in the presence and absence of external Ca in the three cell lines, expressed as ΔCa = [Ca2+]i(ATP) – [Ca2+]i(basal). Lines represent SEM over the number of experiments, which were LNCaP n = 9, PC3 n = 7, DU145 n = 4. (c) [Ca2+]i level following ATP application in 0 Ca EGTA external solution in the three cell lines, as in B (ATP), and after external Ca2+ 1 mM was restored (STND). Despite the low response to ATP, a SOCE response was always present in LNCaP cells, but not in the other two, ATP-respondent cell types. Number of experiments were LNCaP n = 7, PC3 n = 9, DU145 n = 4. Lines represent SEM.

This observation is in agreement with differences in Ca2+ storing and releasing capacity between two different cell types. In LNCaP cells, in a Ca2+-free EGTA-containing external solution, the SERCA blocker thapsigargin caused a transient [Ca2+]i rise and emptying of sensitive stores. When extracellular Ca2+ was restored, [Ca2+]i increased rapidly and sizably due to SOCE. These effects where blunted in PC3 and DU145 cells, which showed a reduced capacity to store Ca2+ in thapsigargin-sensitive stores and limited SOCE, with respect to androgen-dependent LNCaP cells (Figure 2).

Figure 2 
               [Ca2+]i level in the three cell lines following treatment with thapsigargin (1 µM, Tha) in 0 Ca EGTA (EGTA) and in control Ca2+ (1 mM). Traces on the left show two representative experiments, in PC3 (black trace) and LNCaP (red trace) cells, respectively. The [Ca2+]i level decreased slightly, but not significantly, when switching from basal external Ca2+ (1 mM) to 0 Ca-EGTA in all cell types. Following thapsigargin application in 0 Ca-EGTA bath, [Ca2+]i rise was larger in LNCaP than PC3 and DU145 and [Ca2+]i level was significantly different from basal level only in these cell type. When external Ca2 was restored to 1 mM, [Ca2+]i increased as a consequence of SOCE and this response was more pronounced in LNCaP cells than in the other cell lines. Lines represent SEM over the number of experiments, which were LNCaP and PC3 n = 16, DU145 n = 10. (*) indicates significantly different from basal Ca level p < 0.001 by paired t-test.
Figure 2

[Ca2+]i level in the three cell lines following treatment with thapsigargin (1 µM, Tha) in 0 Ca EGTA (EGTA) and in control Ca2+ (1 mM). Traces on the left show two representative experiments, in PC3 (black trace) and LNCaP (red trace) cells, respectively. The [Ca2+]i level decreased slightly, but not significantly, when switching from basal external Ca2+ (1 mM) to 0 Ca-EGTA in all cell types. Following thapsigargin application in 0 Ca-EGTA bath, [Ca2+]i rise was larger in LNCaP than PC3 and DU145 and [Ca2+]i level was significantly different from basal level only in these cell type. When external Ca2 was restored to 1 mM, [Ca2+]i increased as a consequence of SOCE and this response was more pronounced in LNCaP cells than in the other cell lines. Lines represent SEM over the number of experiments, which were LNCaP and PC3 n = 16, DU145 n = 10. (*) indicates significantly different from basal Ca level p < 0.001 by paired t-test.

In LNCaP, SOCE was antagonized by gadolinium (Gd, 1 µM) and by 4-methyl-‘-[3,5-bis[trifluoromethyl]-1H-pyrazol-1-yl]-1,2,3-thiadiazole-5-carbox-anilide (YM-58483, 5 μM), an highly specific SOCE inhibitor [30] (Figure 3).

Figure 3 
               Effect of modifiers on the SOCE [Ca2+]i response in LNCaP cells. On the left, traces show  the effect of YM-58483 (above) and 1 µM Gd (below) on LNCaP SOCE response. The graph on the right shows the summary of the effects on SOCE [Ca2+]i response of the two modifiers in LNCaP cells. Lines represent SEM over the indicated number of experiments.
Figure 3

Effect of modifiers on the SOCE [Ca2+]i response in LNCaP cells. On the left, traces show the effect of YM-58483 (above) and 1 µM Gd (below) on LNCaP SOCE response. The graph on the right shows the summary of the effects on SOCE [Ca2+]i response of the two modifiers in LNCaP cells. Lines represent SEM over the indicated number of experiments.

Previous studies have shown that both (–)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), the main green tea catechin, and green tea extract (GTE) cause [Ca2+]i elevation and inhibit proliferation in PC3 and DU145 cells [24,25]. The first step of GTE-induced toxicity was mediated by a [Ca2+]i increase, through release from thapsigargin-sensitive and insensitive stores. Viability experiments indicated that in these cells, GTE was able to inhibit proliferation with IC50 close to 62 µg/mL, which corresponds to a concentration of approximately 30 µM EGCG in the extract. In contrast, in LNCaP cells, EGCG and GTE hardly induced any Ca rise in five experiments (not shown) and viability measured by MTT assay was much less sensitive to GTE, with an estimated IC50 close to 850 µg/mL (Figure 4).

Figure 4 
               Dose–response data of cell viability obtained with the MTT assay after exposure of PCa cells to different concentrations of green tea extract (1.5, 15, 45, and 150 µg/mL GTE) for 48 h. Bars represent mean ± SD of percent MTT-formazan absorbance (see Materials and Methods section), normalized to the control absorbance (proliferation in the absence of GTE). In PC3 and DU145 cells, the IC50 was 62 and 63 µg/mL, respectively. In LNCaP cells, the additional dose of 300 µg/mL GTE was tested and of IC50 was estimated 862 µg/mL.
Figure 4

Dose–response data of cell viability obtained with the MTT assay after exposure of PCa cells to different concentrations of green tea extract (1.5, 15, 45, and 150 µg/mL GTE) for 48 h. Bars represent mean ± SD of percent MTT-formazan absorbance (see Materials and Methods section), normalized to the control absorbance (proliferation in the absence of GTE). In PC3 and DU145 cells, the IC50 was 62 and 63 µg/mL, respectively. In LNCaP cells, the additional dose of 300 µg/mL GTE was tested and of IC50 was estimated 862 µg/mL.

The main differences in Ca2+ signaling described in this study are summarized in Figure 5.

Figure 5 
               The three main differences in Ca2+ signaling between hormone treatment refractory and sensitive cells: response to purinergic stimulation, [Ca2+]i storing and releasing capacity and sensitivity to GTE catechins.
Figure 5

The three main differences in Ca2+ signaling between hormone treatment refractory and sensitive cells: response to purinergic stimulation, [Ca2+]i storing and releasing capacity and sensitivity to GTE catechins.

Discussion

The malignant, hormone-refractory, or more precisely, castration-resistant stage of PCa is characterized by inhibition of apoptosis and abnormal cell proliferation. Several models have established the central role of Ca2+ signaling in this progression [14,15,31,32]. This study outlined some aspects of cytosolic Ca2+ imbalance that define the most aggressive stage of PCa and characterize the different behavior of hormone-refractory cells.

Purinergic receptors are overexpressed in some types of cancer cells and tissues and specific subtypes are implicated in numerous oncogenic processes [33,34]. A role of P2Y receptors was postulated in PC3 and DU145 cells [35,36]. The expression of P2Y1 receptors was confirmed by subsequent studies in these cells [37,38] and experiments suggested that their activation may inhibit growth and induce cell death [37]. In LNCaP cells, ATP did not stimulate any cytosolic Ca2+ peak [36] and no effect of nucleotides on either IP3 or cyclic AMP was detectable, despite a significant expression of P2Y2 and P2Y11 transcripts [39].

This study is in agreement with previous observations and confirms that in PC3 and DU145 cells, ATP mediates the activation of PLC and IP3-driven transient cytosolic release of Ca2+, without involvement of Ca2+ influx from the external medium. In contrast, in LNCaP cells, ATP did not induce any transient Ca2+ peak, either in the presence or in the absence of external Ca2+. The possibility to use P2Y1 receptor agonists as a therapeutic drug for treating refractory PCa is linked to the ability of these activated receptors to promote apoptosis which was recently investigated [38]. So it appears that if these receptors can be considered to modulate [Ca2+]i in PCa cell, they would represent a more specific target for CRPC cells.

Previous studies investigated the mechanism of SOCE during PCa progression to malignity [18]. It was proposed that the enhanced expression of ORAI3 subunit, which forms heteromultimeric ORAI1/ORAI3 store-independent channels [19], promotes PCa cell proliferation and confers apoptosis resistance [31].

Our data confirmed that the hormone-sensitive LNCaP cells are well equipped to activate SOCE, while hormone-refractory PCa cells are less capable to accumulate and release less Ca2+ from ER stores and have reduced SOCE. Another study has suggested that lowering the ER Ca2+-store content is a mechanism by which hormone-refractory cells escape death in the absence of androgenic stimulation [40].

Interestingly, in LNCaP cells, external Ca2+ withdrawal and ATP application appeared to be effective stimulators of SOCE even in the absence of a net [Ca2+]i transient. This observation may be explained by a close connection between ER and mitochondria [41,42]. The contact between these two compartments is significantly favored by the overexpression of the voltage-dependent anion channels (VDACs), located on the outer mitochondrial membrane [43]. VDACs, also called mitochondria porins, enhance Ca2+ signal propagation into the mitochondria, increasing the extent of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake [44]. In LNCaP cells, various evidences suggested that VDACs are involved in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway [45] and control LNCaP cells that appear to overexpress the mitochondria porins with respect to similar cells that had already started the transition to CRPC status [46]. ER depletion and Ca2+ overloading of the mitochondria has been found to play an important role in triggering apoptotic cell death [47].

As hormone-refractory PCa cells have lost the normal control on apoptotic stimuli, targeting the key players determining Ca2+ homeostasis to enhance the pro-apoptotic potential of malignant cells may prove to be a useful strategy in the treatment of advanced PCa [17]. For this, great attention is devoted to bioactive natural compounds that, through oxidation-induced alterations in Ca2+ signaling, may induce apoptosis [13]. It has been recently seen that the major green tea catechin, EGCG, induces a [Ca2+]i increase in PC3 and DU145 cells through intracellular Ca2+ release triggered by a moderate Ca2+ influx from the outside [24]. This mechanism is dependent on CICR through ryanodine receptors (RyRs), with an important contribution of IP3-driven Ca2+ release from ER.

Both EGCG and total GTE have a similar way of action in these cells and reduce cell viability following a 48 h exposure [24,25]. In contrast, the results presented in this study show that GTE is much less effective in diminishing viability in LNCaP cells and this may be linked to the presence of different specific RyRs. While little is known about expression and function of RyRs in PC3 cells, both LNCaP and DU145 cells have been reported to express functional RyRs [48,49]. Different RyR isoforms are expressed differently and a comparison with nontumorogenic cell lines suggested that the expression of the RyRs and tumor aggression is not related to specific RyR isoforms, but may be linked to the activity and number of receptors [49].

In summary (Figure 5), ATP-driven Ca2+ transients are a peculiar response of hormone-refractory cells, which appear to have lost the full SOCE capacity. While SOCE, with presumptive ensuing mitochondrial overload, would drive LNCaP cells toward the apoptotic demise, in PC3 and DU145 cells, an external stimulus such as natural compounds from green tea is required for triggering a consistent [Ca2+]i elevation and switching the cell fate from proliferation to apoptosis.

The differences in Ca2+ signaling between hormone-sensitive and hormone-refractory cancer cells are complex and hardly described by as simple a scheme as that depicted in Figure 5. However, a better comprehension of the individual players in the intricate malfunctioning of malignant PCa cells is essential to define a more specific, less invasive and hopefully, effective therapy.

  1. Funding information: This work was supported by National Research Council of Italy (CNR, Rome) and did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

  2. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Berridge MJ, Lipp P, Bootman MD. The versatility and universality of calcium signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000;1:11–21.10.1038/35036035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Stewart TA, Yapa KTDS, Monteith GR. Altered calcium signaling in cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta – Biomembr. 2015;1848:2502–11.10.1016/j.bbamem.2014.08.016Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Marchi S, Pinton P. Alterations of calcium homeostasis in cancer cells. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2016;29:1–6.10.1016/j.coph.2016.03.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Monteith GR, McAndrew D, Faddy HM, Roberts-Thomson SJ. Calcium and cancer: targeting Ca2+ transport. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7:519–30.10.1038/nrc2171Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Bidaux G, Flourakis M, Shuba Y. Ion channels in death and differentiation of prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1295–304.10.1038/sj.cdd.4402162Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Roderick HL, Cook SJ. Ca2+ signalling checkpoints in cancer: remodelling Ca2+ for cancer cell proliferation and survival. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:361–75.10.1038/nrc2374Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33.10.3322/caac.21654Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Carioli G, Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Boffetta P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2021 with focus on pancreatic and female lung cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:478–87.10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Feldman BJ, Feldman D. The development of androgen-independent prostate cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:34–45.10.1038/35094009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Saraon P, Jarvi K, Diamandis EP. Molecular alterations during progression of prostate cancer to androgen independence. Clin Chem. 2011;57:1366–75.10.1373/clinchem.2011.165977Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Lonergan P, Tindall D. Androgen receptor signaling in prostate cancer development and progression. J Carcinog. 2011;10:20.10.4103/1477-3163.83937Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Auchus RJ, Sharifi N. Sex hormones and prostate cancer. Annu Rev Med. 2020;71:33–45.10.1146/annurev-med-051418-060357Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Bai B, Chen Q, Jing R, He X, Wang H, Ban Y, et al. Molecular basis of prostate cancer and natural products as potential chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:1–40.10.3389/fphar.2021.738235Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Prevarskaya N, Skryma R, Shuba Y. Ca2+ homeostasis in apoptotic resistance of prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;322:1326–35.10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.037Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Flourakis M, Prevarskaya N. Insights into Ca2+ homeostasis of advanced prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys Acta – Mol Cell Res. 2009;1793:1105–9.10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.01.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Thebault S, Flourakis M, Vanoverberghe K, Vandermoere F, Roudbaraki M, Lehen'kyi V, et al. Differential role of transient receptor potential channels in Ca2+ entry and proliferation of prostate cancer epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:2038–47.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0376Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Vanoverberghe K, Vanden Abeele F, Mariot P, Lepage G, Roudbaraki M, Bonnal JL, et al. Ca2+ homeostasis and apoptotic resistance of neuroendocrine-differentiated prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:321–30.10.1038/sj.cdd.4401375Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Flourakis M, Lehen'kyi V, Beck B, Raphaël M, Vandenberghe M, Abeele FV, et al. Orai1 contributes to the establishment of an apoptosis-resistant phenotype in prostate cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2010;1:e75.10.1038/cddis.2010.52Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Dubois C, Vanden Abeele F, Lehen'kyi V, Gkika D, Guarmit B, Lepage G, et al. Remodeling of channel-forming ORAI proteins determines an oncogenic switch in prostate cancer. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:19–32.10.1016/j.ccr.2014.04.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Van Bokhoven A, Varella-Garcia M, Korch C, Johannes WU, Smith EE, Miller HL, et al. Molecular characterization of human prostate carcinoma cell lines. Prostate. 2003;57:205–25.10.1002/pros.10290Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Tai S, Sun Y, Squires JM, Zhang H, Oh WK, Liang CZ, et al. PC3 is a cell line characteristic of prostatic small cell carcinoma. Prostate. 2011;71:1668–79.10.1002/pros.21383Search in Google Scholar

[22] Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E, Karr JP, Rosenthal H, Chu TM, et al. LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 1983;43:1809–18.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Gregory CW, Johnson RT Jr, Mohler JL, French FS, Wilson EM. Androgen receptor stabilization in recurrent prostate cancer is associated with hypersensitivity to low androgen. Cancer Res. 2001;61:2892–8.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Marchetti C, Gavazzo P, Burlando B. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate mobilizes intracellular Ca2+ in prostate cancer cells through combined Ca2+ entry and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release. Life Sci. 2020;258:118232.10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118232Search in Google Scholar

[25] Marchetti C. Green tea catechins and intracellular calcium dynamics in prostate cancer cells. AIMS Mol Sci. 2021;8:1–12.10.3934/molsci.2021001Search in Google Scholar

[26] Petrou T, Olsen HL, Thrasivoulou C, Masters JR, Ashmore JF, Ahmed A. Intracellular calcium mobilization in response to ion channel regulators via a calcium-induced calcium release mechanism. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2017;360:378–87.10.1124/jpet.116.236695Search in Google Scholar

[27] Reyes-Corral M, Sørensen NM, Thrasivoulou C, Dasgupta P, Ashmore JF, Ahmed A. Differential free intracellular calcium release by class II antiarrhythmics in cancer cell lines. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2019;369:152–62.10.1124/jpet.118.254375Search in Google Scholar

[28] Marchetti C, Ribulla S, Magnelli V, Patrone M, Burlando B. Resveratrol induces intracellular Ca2+ rise via T-type Ca2+ channels in a mesothelioma cell line. Life Sci. 2016;148:125–31.10.1016/j.lfs.2016.01.048Search in Google Scholar

[29] Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem. 1985;260:3440–50.10.1016/S0021-9258(19)83641-4Search in Google Scholar

[30] Ishikawa J, Ohga K, Yoshino T, Takezawa R, Ichikawa A, Kubota H, et al. A pyrazole derivative, YM-58483, potently inhibits store-operated sustained Ca2+ influx and IL-2 production in T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 2003;170:4441–9.10.4049/jimmunol.170.9.4441Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[31] Monteith GR. Prostate cancer cells alter the nature of their calcium influx to promote growth and acquire apoptotic resistance. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:1–2.10.1016/j.ccr.2014.06.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Dubois C, Vanden Abeele F, Prevarskaya N. Targeting apoptosis by the remodelling of calcium-transporting proteins in cancerogenesis. FEBS J. 2013;280:5500–10.10.1111/febs.12246Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Woods LT, Forti KM, Shanbhag VC, Camden JM, Weisman GA. P2Y receptors for extracellular nucleotides: contributions to cancer progression and therapeutic implications. Biochem Pharmacol. 2021;187:114406.10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114406Search in Google Scholar

[34] Reyna-Jeldes M, Díaz-Muñoz M, Madariaga JA, Coddou C, Vázquez-Cuevas FG. Autocrine and paracrine purinergic signaling in the most lethal types of cancer. Purinergic Signal. 2021;17:345–70.10.1007/s11302-021-09785-8Search in Google Scholar

[35] Fang WG, Pirnia F, Bang YJ, Myers CE, Trepel JB. P2-purinergic receptor agonists inhibit the growth of androgen-independent prostate carcinoma cells. J Clin Invest. 1992;89:191–6.10.1172/JCI115562Search in Google Scholar

[36] Wasilenko WJ, Cooper J, Palad AJ, Somers KD, Blackmore PF, Rhim JS, et al. Calcium signaling in prostate cancer cells: Evidence for multiple receptors and enhanced sensitivity to bombesin/GRP. Prostate. 1997;30:167–73.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(19970215)30:3<167::AID-PROS4>3.0.CO;2-JSearch in Google Scholar

[37] Wei Q, Costanzi S, Liu Q-Z, Gao ZG, Jacobson KA. Activation of the P2Y1 receptor induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82:418–25.10.1016/j.bcp.2011.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[38] Le HTT, Rimpilainen T, Konda Mani S, Murugesan A, Yli-Harja O, Candeias NR, et al. Synthesis and preclinical validation of novel P2Y1 receptor ligands as a potent anti-prostate cancer agent. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1–11.10.1038/s41598-019-55194-8Search in Google Scholar

[39] Janssens R, Boeynaems JMM. Effects of extracellular nucleotides and nucleosides on prostate carcinoma cells. Br J Pharmacol. 2001;132:536–46.10.1038/sj.bjp.0703833Search in Google Scholar

[40] Boutin B, Tajeddine N, Monaco G, Molgo J, Vertommen D, Rider M, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ content decrease by PKA-dependent hyperphosphorylation of type 1 IP3 receptor contributes to prostate cancer cell resistance to androgen deprivation. Cell Calcium. 2015;57:312–20.10.1016/j.ceca.2015.02.004Search in Google Scholar

[41] Rizzuto R, Pinton P, Carrington W, Fay FS, Fogarty KE, Lifshitz LM, et al. Close contacts with the endoplasmic reticulum as determinants of mitochondrial Ca2+ responses. Science. 1998;280:1763–6.10.1126/science.280.5370.1763Search in Google Scholar

[42] Pinton P, Giorgi C, Siviero R, Zecchini E, Rizzuto R. Calcium and apoptosis: ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer in the control of apoptosis. Oncogene. 2008;27:6407–18.10.1038/onc.2008.308Search in Google Scholar

[43] Rapizzi E, Pinton P, Szabadkai G, Wieckowski MR, Vandecasteele G, Baird G, et al. Recombinant expression of the voltage-dependent anion channel enhances the transfer of Ca2+ microdomains to mitochondria. J Cell Biol. 2002;159:613–24.10.1083/jcb.200205091Search in Google Scholar

[44] Rizzuto R, Marchi S, Bonora M, Aguiari P, Bononi A, De Stefani D, et al. Ca2+ transfer from the ER to mitochondria: When, how and why. Biochim Biophys Acta - Bioenerg. 2009;1787:1342–51.10.1016/j.bbabio.2009.03.015Search in Google Scholar

[45] Thinnes FP. Neuroendocrine differentiation of LNCaP cells suggests: VDAC in the cell membrane is involved in the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. Mol Genet Metab. 2009;97:241–3.10.1016/j.ymgme.2009.04.010Search in Google Scholar

[46] Liu Z, Bengtsson S, Krogh M, Marquez M, Nilsson S, James P, et al. Somatostatin effects on the proteome of the LNCaP cell-line. Int J Oncol. 2007;30:1173–9.10.3892/ijo.30.5.1173Search in Google Scholar

[47] Giorgi C, Baldassari F, Bononi A, Bonora M, De Marchi E, Marchi S, et al. Mitochondrial Ca2+ and apoptosis. Cell Calcium. 2012;52:36–43.10.1016/j.ceca.2012.02.008Search in Google Scholar

[48] Mariot P, Prevarskaya N, Roudbaraki MM, Le Bourhis X, Van Coppenolle F, Vanoverberghe K, et al. Evidence of functional ryanodine receptor in apoptosis of prostate cancer (LNCaP) cells. Prostate. 2000;43:205–14.10.1002/(SICI)1097-0045(20000515)43:3<205::AID-PROS6>3.0.CO;2-MSearch in Google Scholar

[49] Kobylewski SE, Henderson KA, Eckhert CD. Identification of ryanodine receptor isoforms in prostate DU-145, LNCaP, and PWR-1E cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;425:431–5.10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.07.119Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-24
Revised: 2022-03-03
Accepted: 2022-03-04
Published Online: 2022-03-24

© 2022 Carla Marchetti, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of genetic markers for identification of the Lr46/Yr29 “slow rusting” locus in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
  3. NADPH-derived ROS generation drives fibrosis and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition in systemic sclerosis: Potential cross talk with circulating miRNAs
  4. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on the telomere length: A mini meta-analysis of clinical trials
  5. Analysis of differentially expressed genes and signaling pathways involved in atherosclerosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  6. The epigenetic dimension of protein structure
  7. Gamma-induced mutants of Bacillus and Streptomyces display enhanced antagonistic activities and suppression of the root rot and wilt diseases in pulses
  8. Corticosterone potentiates ochratoxin A-induced microglial activation
  9. Supercomplex supercomplexes: Raison d’etre and functional significance of supramolecular organization in oxidative phosphorylation
  10. Insights into functional connectivity in mammalian signal transduction pathways by pairwise comparison of protein interaction partners of critical signaling hubs
  11. The effects of supplementation of Nannochloropsis oculata microalgae on biochemical, inflammatory and antioxidant responses in diabetic rats
  12. Molecular epidemiology of human papillomavirus in pregnant women in Burkina Faso
  13. Review Articles
  14. Interaction of cervical microbiome with epigenome of epithelial cells: Significance of inflammation to primary healthcare
  15. Seaweeds’ pigments and phenolic compounds with antimicrobial potential
  16. The capture of host cell’s resources: The role of heat shock proteins and polyamines in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) pathway to viral infection
  17. Erratum
  18. Erratum to “Plant growth-promoting properties of bacterial endophytes isolated from roots of Thymus vulgaris L. and investigate their role as biofertilizers to enhance the essential oil contents”
  19. Special Issue on XXV Congress of the Italian Society for Pure and Applied Biophysics
  20. Low-temperature librations and dynamical transition in proteins at differing hydration levels
  21. The phosphoinositide PI(3,5)P2 inhibits the activity of plant NHX proton/potassium antiporters: Advantages of a novel electrophysiological approach
  22. Targeted photoimmunotherapy for cancer
  23. Calorimetry of extracellular vesicles fusion to single phospholipid membrane
  24. Calcium signaling in prostate cancer cells of increasing malignancy
  25. Oxygen diffusion pathways in mutated forms of a LOV photoreceptor from Methylobacterium radiotolerans: A molecular dynamics study
  26. A photosensitizing fusion protein with targeting capabilities
  27. Ion channels and neuronal excitability in polyglutamine neurodegenerative diseases
  28. Is styrene competitive for dopamine receptor binding?
  29. Diffusion of molecules through nanopores under confinement: Time-scale bridging and crowding effects via Markov state model
  30. Quantitative active super-resolution thermal imaging: The melanoma case study
  31. Innovative light sources for phototherapy
  32. Electrophysiological study of the effects of side products of RuBi-GABA uncaging on GABAA receptors in cerebellar granule cells
  33. Subcellular elements responsive to the biomechanical activity of triple-negative breast cancer-derived small extracellular vesicles
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmc-2022-0012/html
Scroll to top button