Startseite Critical Efficiencies as Upward Pricing Pressure with Feedback Effects
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Critical Efficiencies as Upward Pricing Pressure with Feedback Effects

  • Bertram Neurohr EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 14. Oktober 2017

Abstract

Farrell and Shapiro’s upward pricing pressure (‘UPP’) is widely used in merger analysis due to its intuitiveness, despite not accounting for the interdependence between the merging firms’ pricing incentives (‘feedback effects’). However, ignoring feedback effects can have an impact on the way competition authorities rank mergers. The main result of this article is that UPP with feedback effects is equivalent to Werden’s critical efficiencies. Importantly, this link allows for the derivation of an expression that combines the intuition of UPP as the ‘value of diverted sales’ with the accuracy of critical efficiencies. Throughout, the focus is on the static unilateral effects of horizontal mergers with differentiated Bertrand competition.

Acknowledgments

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author. The author would like to thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

References

Farrell, J., and C. Shapiro. 2010. “Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition.” The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 10: 1.10.2202/1935-1704.1563Suche in Google Scholar

Hausman, J., S. Moresi, and M. Rainey. 2011. “Unilateral Effects of Mergers with General Linear Demand.” Economics Letters 111 (2): 119–121.10.1016/j.econlet.2010.10.015Suche in Google Scholar

Jaffe, S., and E.G. Weyl. 2013. “The First-Order Approach to Merger Analysis.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 5 (4): 188–218.10.1257/mic.5.4.188Suche in Google Scholar

Salop, S.C., and S. Moresi. 2009. “Updating the Merger Guidelines: Comments.” Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works 1662:Mimeographed.10.2139/ssrn.2756487Suche in Google Scholar

Schmalensee, R. 2009. “Should New Merger Guidelines Give UPP Market Definition?” CPI Antitrust Chronicle 12: 1.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, C. 1996. “Mergers with Differentiated Products.” Antitrust 10: 23.Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, C. 2010a. “The 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines: From Hedgehog to Fox in Forty Years.” Antitrust Law Journal 77 (1): 49–107.10.2139/ssrn.1675210Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, C. 2010b. Unilateral Effects Calculations. Available at http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/shapiro/unilateral.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

Werden, G.J. 1996. “A Robust Test for Consumer Welfare Enhancing Mergers among Sellers of Differentiated Products.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 44 (4): 409–413.10.2307/2950522Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-10-14

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 18.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejte-2017-0049/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen