Abstract
This study examines the effect of nominal wage stickiness on the fiscal multiplier in a two-agent new Keynesian model. We demonstrate that in the case of sticky nominal wages, an increased share of liquidity-constrained (LC) consumers decreases the money-financed (MF) fiscal multiplier. Our model shows that the fiscal multiplier under an MF regime outperforms that under a debt-financed (DF) regime. Under empirically plausible calibration, the benchmark model indicates that the MF government-spending multiplier is 1.5–3.0, whereas the DF multiplier is 0.8–1.5. We also find that an increased share of LC consumers magnifies the tax-cut multiplier in the cases of MF and DF regimes despite nominal wage stickiness.
Funding source: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Award Identifier / Grant number: JP20K01784
Award Identifier / Grant number: JP20K13531
Award Identifier / Grant number: JP24K04971
References
Adam, K., and R. M. Billi. 2006. “Optimal Monetary Policy Under Commitment with a Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking: 1877–905. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0089.Suche in Google Scholar
Adam, K., and R. M. Billi. 2007. “Discretionary Monetary Policy and the Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 728–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar
Almgren, M., J.-E. Gallegos, J. Kramer, and R. Lima. 2022. “Monetary Policy and Liquidity Constraints: Evidence from the Euro Area.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 14: 309–40. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20200096.Suche in Google Scholar
Ascari, G., A. Colciago, and L. Rossi. 2017. “Limited Asset Market Participation, Sticky Wages and Monetary Policy.” Economic Inquiry 55: 878–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12424.Suche in Google Scholar
Auclert, A., M. Rognlie, and L. Straub. 2018. “The Intertemporal Keynesian Cross.” Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w25020Suche in Google Scholar
Auclert, A., B. Bardóczy, and M. Rognlie. 2021. “MPCs, MPEs, and Multipliers: A Trilemma for New Keynesian Models.” The Review of Economics and Statistics: 1–41.10.3386/w27486Suche in Google Scholar
Bernanke, B. S. 2003. “Some Thoughts on Monetary Policy in Japan: Remarks Before the Japan Society of Monetary Economics, Tokyo, Japan.” The Federal Reserve System. http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2003/20030531.Suche in Google Scholar
Bilbiie, F. O. 2008. “Limited Asset Market Participation, Monetary Policy and (Inverted) Aggregate Demand Logic.” Journal of Economic Theory 140: 162–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.07.008.Suche in Google Scholar
Bilbiie, F. O. 2009. “Nonseparable Preferences, Fiscal Policy Puzzles, and Inferior Goods.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 41: 443–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00213.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Blanchard, O., and R. Perotti. 2002. “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 1329–68. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043.Suche in Google Scholar
Bodenstein, M., and J. Zhao. 2019. “On Targeting Frameworks and Optimal Monetary Policy.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 51: 2077–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12633.Suche in Google Scholar
Broer, T., P. Krusell, and E. Öberg. 2023. “Fiscal Multipliers: A Heterogenous-Agent Perspective.” Quantitative Economics 14: 799–816. https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1901.Suche in Google Scholar
Calvo, G. A. 1983. “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 383–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0.Suche in Google Scholar
Campolmi, A. 2014. “Which Inflation to Target? A Small Open Economy with Sticky Wages.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 18: 145–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100512000314.Suche in Google Scholar
Christiano, L. J., M. Eichenbaum, and C. L. Evans. 2005. “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 113: 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/426038.Suche in Google Scholar
Cogan, J. F., T. Cwik, J. B. Taylor, and V. Wieland. 2010. “New Keynesian Versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34: 281–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.01.010.Suche in Google Scholar
Colciago, A. 2011. “Rule of Thumb Consumers Meet Sticky Wages.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 43: 325–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00376.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Debortoli, D., and J. Galí. 2017. “Monetary Policy with Heterogeneous Agents: Insights from TANK Models.” Manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar
Eggertsson, G. B. 2011. “What Fiscal Policy is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 25: 59–112. https://doi.org/10.1086/657529.Suche in Google Scholar
Eichenbaum, M., and J. D. Fisher. 2007. “Estimating the Frequency of Price Re-Optimization in Calvo-Style Models.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 2032–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.07.004.Suche in Google Scholar
Erceg, C. J., D. W. Henderson, and A. T. Levin. 2000. “Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts.” Journal of Monetary Economics 46: 281–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(00)00028-3.Suche in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1969. The Optimum Quantity of Money: And Other Essays. Aldine Publishing Company. https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=WzGaAAAAIAAJ.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, J. 2011. “The Return of the Wage Phillips Curve.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9: 436–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01023.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, J. 2013. “Notes for a New Guide to Keynes (I): Wages, Aggregate Demand, and Employment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11: 973–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12032.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, J. 2020a. “The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus.” Journal of Monetary Economics 115: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, J. 2020b. “Helicopter Money: The Time is Now.” In Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever, Vol. 31, 31–9. London: CEPR Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, J., and T. Monacelli. 2016. “Understanding the Gains from Wage Flexibility: The Exchange Rate Connection.” The American Economic Review 106: 3829–68. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131658.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, J., D. J. López-Salido, and V. Javier. 2007. “Understanding Effects of Government Spendig on Consumption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5: 227–70. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.1.227.Suche in Google Scholar
Horvath, R., L. Kaszab, A. Marsal, and K. Rabitsch. 2020. “Determinants of Fiscal Multipliers Revisited.” Journal of Macroeconomics 63: 103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2019.103162.Suche in Google Scholar
Ida, D. 2023. “Liquidity-Constrained Consumers and Optimal Monetary Policy in a Currency Union.” Journal of International Money and Finance 131: 102787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102787.Suche in Google Scholar
Ida, D. 2024. “Household Heterogeneity and the Price Puzzle in a New Keynesian Model.” Journal of Macroeconomics 79: 103587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2024.103587.Suche in Google Scholar
Ida, D., and M. Okano. 2023. “International Heterogeneity of Nominal Wages and Optimal Monetary Policy.” International Finance 26: 112–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12429.Suche in Google Scholar
Kaplan, G., G. L. Violante, and J. Weidner. 2014. “The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth.” Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w20073Suche in Google Scholar
Kaszab, L. 2016. “Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and Labor Tax Cut Policy at the Zero Lower Bound.” International Journal of Central Banking 12: 353–90.Suche in Google Scholar
Kopiec, P. 2022. “The Government Spending Multiplier in the Heterogeneous Agent New Keynesian Model.” European Economic Review 145: 104125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104125.Suche in Google Scholar
Lindquist, W., N. Ilahi, and J. Lee. 2021. “How Emerging European Economies Found a New Monetary Policy Tool.” IMF European Department, IMF Country Focus.Suche in Google Scholar
Liu, S.-F., W.-C. Huang, and C.-C. Lai. 2022. “The Paradox of Toil at the Zero Lower Bound in a TANK Model.” European Economic Review 148: 104230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104230.Suche in Google Scholar
Nakamura, E., and J. Steinsson. 2008. “Five Facts About Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 1415–64. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1415.Suche in Google Scholar
Nakamura, E., and J. Steinsson. 2014. “Fiscal Stimulus in a Monetary Union: Evidence from us Regions.” The American Economic Review 104: 753–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.753.Suche in Google Scholar
Okano, E., and M. Eguchi. 2023. “The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus in a Small Open Economy.” IMF Economic Review: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-023-00219-6.Suche in Google Scholar
Owyang, M. T., V. A. Ramey, and S. Zubairy. 2013. “Are Government Spending Multipliers Greater During Periods of Slack? Evidence from Twentieth-Century Historical Data.” The American Economic Review 103: 129–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.129.Suche in Google Scholar
Punzo, C., and L. Rossi. 2023. “A Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus: Redistribution and Social Welfare.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 55 (2–3): 595–617, https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12926.Suche in Google Scholar
Ramey, V. A. 2019. “Ten Years After the Financial Crisis: What have we Learned from the Renaissance in Fiscal Research?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 33: 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.89.Suche in Google Scholar
Ramey, V. A., and S. Zubairy. 2018. “Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from us Historical Data.” Journal of Political Economy 126: 850–901. https://doi.org/10.1086/696277.Suche in Google Scholar
Reis, R., and S. Tenreyro. 2022. “Helicopter Money: What is it and What Does it Do?” Annual Review of Economics 14. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-020618.Suche in Google Scholar
Rhee, H.-J., and N. Turdaliev. 2013. “Optimal Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts.” Journal of International Money and Finance 37: 306–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.007.Suche in Google Scholar
Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2003. “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 1123–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603770383415.Suche in Google Scholar
Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2007. “Shocks and Frictions in us Business Cycles: A Bayesian Dsge Approach.” The American Economic Review 97: 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.586.Suche in Google Scholar
Taylor, J. B. 1993. “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l.Suche in Google Scholar
Tsuruga, T., and S. Wake. 2019. “Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus: The Effects of Implementation Lag.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 104: 132–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2019.05.007.Suche in Google Scholar
Turner, A. 2015. “The Case for Monetary Finance-An Essentially Political Issue.” In 16th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, 5–6.Suche in Google Scholar
Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830169Suche in Google Scholar
Woodford, M. 2011. “Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.3.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Advances
- Corporate Tax Rates, Allocative Efficiency, and Aggregate Productivity
- Contributions
- Endogenous Financial Friction and Growth
- Decomposing Structural Change
- Industry Impacts of US Unconventional Monetary Policy
- Monetary Policy Transmission in Canada – A High Frequency Identification Approach
- Child Labor, Corruption, and Development
- Inflation Uncertainty from Firms’ Perspective, Overconfidence and Credibility of Monetary Policy
- Does Nominal Wage Stickiness Affect Fiscal Multiplier in a Two-Agent New Keynesian Model?
- To Create or to Redistribute? That is the Question
- Estimating Expected Asset Returns with the Present Value Model of Consumption and Fed Forecasts
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Advances
- Corporate Tax Rates, Allocative Efficiency, and Aggregate Productivity
- Contributions
- Endogenous Financial Friction and Growth
- Decomposing Structural Change
- Industry Impacts of US Unconventional Monetary Policy
- Monetary Policy Transmission in Canada – A High Frequency Identification Approach
- Child Labor, Corruption, and Development
- Inflation Uncertainty from Firms’ Perspective, Overconfidence and Credibility of Monetary Policy
- Does Nominal Wage Stickiness Affect Fiscal Multiplier in a Two-Agent New Keynesian Model?
- To Create or to Redistribute? That is the Question
- Estimating Expected Asset Returns with the Present Value Model of Consumption and Fed Forecasts