Startseite Wirtschaftswissenschaften Does Nominal Wage Stickiness Affect Fiscal Multiplier in a Two-Agent New Keynesian Model?
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Does Nominal Wage Stickiness Affect Fiscal Multiplier in a Two-Agent New Keynesian Model?

  • Daisuke Ida EMAIL logo und Mitsuhiro Okano
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 20. August 2024

Abstract

This study examines the effect of nominal wage stickiness on the fiscal multiplier in a two-agent new Keynesian model. We demonstrate that in the case of sticky nominal wages, an increased share of liquidity-constrained (LC) consumers decreases the money-financed (MF) fiscal multiplier. Our model shows that the fiscal multiplier under an MF regime outperforms that under a debt-financed (DF) regime. Under empirically plausible calibration, the benchmark model indicates that the MF government-spending multiplier is 1.5–3.0, whereas the DF multiplier is 0.8–1.5. We also find that an increased share of LC consumers magnifies the tax-cut multiplier in the cases of MF and DF regimes despite nominal wage stickiness.

JEL Classification: E52; E58

Corresponding author: Daisuke Ida, Faculty of Economics, Momoyama Gakuin University, 1-1, Manabino, Izumi, Osaka 594-1198, Japan; and Research Fellow, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan, E-mail: 

We would like to thank Arpad Abraham and two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank Masataka Eguchi, Kohei Hasui, Shigeto Kitano, Ryuzo Miyao, Eiji Okano, and Masahiko Shibamoto for their helpful comments and suggestions. Ida was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers JP20K01784 and JP24K04971. Okano was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP20K13531. All remaining errors are our own.


Award Identifier / Grant number: JP20K01784

Award Identifier / Grant number: JP20K13531

Award Identifier / Grant number: JP24K04971

References

Adam, K., and R. M. Billi. 2006. “Optimal Monetary Policy Under Commitment with a Zero Bound on Nominal Interest Rates.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking: 1877–905. https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2006.0089.Suche in Google Scholar

Adam, K., and R. M. Billi. 2007. “Discretionary Monetary Policy and the Zero Lower Bound on Nominal Interest Rates.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 728–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2005.11.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Almgren, M., J.-E. Gallegos, J. Kramer, and R. Lima. 2022. “Monetary Policy and Liquidity Constraints: Evidence from the Euro Area.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 14: 309–40. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20200096.Suche in Google Scholar

Ascari, G., A. Colciago, and L. Rossi. 2017. “Limited Asset Market Participation, Sticky Wages and Monetary Policy.” Economic Inquiry 55: 878–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12424.Suche in Google Scholar

Auclert, A., M. Rognlie, and L. Straub. 2018. “The Intertemporal Keynesian Cross.” Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w25020Suche in Google Scholar

Auclert, A., B. Bardóczy, and M. Rognlie. 2021. “MPCs, MPEs, and Multipliers: A Trilemma for New Keynesian Models.” The Review of Economics and Statistics: 1–41.10.3386/w27486Suche in Google Scholar

Bernanke, B. S. 2003. “Some Thoughts on Monetary Policy in Japan: Remarks Before the Japan Society of Monetary Economics, Tokyo, Japan.” The Federal Reserve System. http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2003/20030531.Suche in Google Scholar

Bilbiie, F. O. 2008. “Limited Asset Market Participation, Monetary Policy and (Inverted) Aggregate Demand Logic.” Journal of Economic Theory 140: 162–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2007.07.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Bilbiie, F. O. 2009. “Nonseparable Preferences, Fiscal Policy Puzzles, and Inferior Goods.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 41: 443–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2009.00213.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Blanchard, O., and R. Perotti. 2002. “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117: 1329–68. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355302320935043.Suche in Google Scholar

Bodenstein, M., and J. Zhao. 2019. “On Targeting Frameworks and Optimal Monetary Policy.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 51: 2077–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12633.Suche in Google Scholar

Broer, T., P. Krusell, and E. Öberg. 2023. “Fiscal Multipliers: A Heterogenous-Agent Perspective.” Quantitative Economics 14: 799–816. https://doi.org/10.3982/qe1901.Suche in Google Scholar

Calvo, G. A. 1983. “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12: 383–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(83)90060-0.Suche in Google Scholar

Campolmi, A. 2014. “Which Inflation to Target? A Small Open Economy with Sticky Wages.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 18: 145–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1365100512000314.Suche in Google Scholar

Christiano, L. J., M. Eichenbaum, and C. L. Evans. 2005. “Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 113: 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1086/426038.Suche in Google Scholar

Cogan, J. F., T. Cwik, J. B. Taylor, and V. Wieland. 2010. “New Keynesian Versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34: 281–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2010.01.010.Suche in Google Scholar

Colciago, A. 2011. “Rule of Thumb Consumers Meet Sticky Wages.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 43: 325–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2011.00376.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Debortoli, D., and J. Galí. 2017. “Monetary Policy with Heterogeneous Agents: Insights from TANK Models.” Manuscript.Suche in Google Scholar

Eggertsson, G. B. 2011. “What Fiscal Policy is Effective at Zero Interest Rates?” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 25: 59–112. https://doi.org/10.1086/657529.Suche in Google Scholar

Eichenbaum, M., and J. D. Fisher. 2007. “Estimating the Frequency of Price Re-Optimization in Calvo-Style Models.” Journal of Monetary Economics 54: 2032–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2006.07.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Erceg, C. J., D. W. Henderson, and A. T. Levin. 2000. “Optimal Monetary Policy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts.” Journal of Monetary Economics 46: 281–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(00)00028-3.Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, M. 1969. The Optimum Quantity of Money: And Other Essays. Aldine Publishing Company. https://books.google.co.jp/books?id=WzGaAAAAIAAJ.Suche in Google Scholar

Galí, J. 2011. “The Return of the Wage Phillips Curve.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9: 436–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01023.x.Suche in Google Scholar

Galí, J. 2013. “Notes for a New Guide to Keynes (I): Wages, Aggregate Demand, and Employment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 11: 973–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12032.Suche in Google Scholar

Galí, J. 2020a. “The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus.” Journal of Monetary Economics 115: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.08.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Galí, J. 2020b. “Helicopter Money: The Time is Now.” In Mitigating the COVID Economic Crisis: Act Fast and Do Whatever, Vol. 31, 31–9. London: CEPR Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Galí, J., and T. Monacelli. 2016. “Understanding the Gains from Wage Flexibility: The Exchange Rate Connection.” The American Economic Review 106: 3829–68. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131658.Suche in Google Scholar

Galí, J., D. J. López-Salido, and V. Javier. 2007. “Understanding Effects of Government Spendig on Consumption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5: 227–70. https://doi.org/10.1162/jeea.2007.5.1.227.Suche in Google Scholar

Horvath, R., L. Kaszab, A. Marsal, and K. Rabitsch. 2020. “Determinants of Fiscal Multipliers Revisited.” Journal of Macroeconomics 63: 103162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2019.103162.Suche in Google Scholar

Ida, D. 2023. “Liquidity-Constrained Consumers and Optimal Monetary Policy in a Currency Union.” Journal of International Money and Finance 131: 102787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102787.Suche in Google Scholar

Ida, D. 2024. “Household Heterogeneity and the Price Puzzle in a New Keynesian Model.” Journal of Macroeconomics 79: 103587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2024.103587.Suche in Google Scholar

Ida, D., and M. Okano. 2023. “International Heterogeneity of Nominal Wages and Optimal Monetary Policy.” International Finance 26: 112–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/infi.12429.Suche in Google Scholar

Kaplan, G., G. L. Violante, and J. Weidner. 2014. “The Wealthy Hand-to-Mouth.” Technical report. National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w20073Suche in Google Scholar

Kaszab, L. 2016. “Rule-of-Thumb Consumers and Labor Tax Cut Policy at the Zero Lower Bound.” International Journal of Central Banking 12: 353–90.Suche in Google Scholar

Kopiec, P. 2022. “The Government Spending Multiplier in the Heterogeneous Agent New Keynesian Model.” European Economic Review 145: 104125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104125.Suche in Google Scholar

Lindquist, W., N. Ilahi, and J. Lee. 2021. “How Emerging European Economies Found a New Monetary Policy Tool.” IMF European Department, IMF Country Focus.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, S.-F., W.-C. Huang, and C.-C. Lai. 2022. “The Paradox of Toil at the Zero Lower Bound in a TANK Model.” European Economic Review 148: 104230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104230.Suche in Google Scholar

Nakamura, E., and J. Steinsson. 2008. “Five Facts About Prices: A Reevaluation of Menu Cost Models.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123: 1415–64. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1415.Suche in Google Scholar

Nakamura, E., and J. Steinsson. 2014. “Fiscal Stimulus in a Monetary Union: Evidence from us Regions.” The American Economic Review 104: 753–92. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.3.753.Suche in Google Scholar

Okano, E., and M. Eguchi. 2023. “The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus in a Small Open Economy.” IMF Economic Review: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41308-023-00219-6.Suche in Google Scholar

Owyang, M. T., V. A. Ramey, and S. Zubairy. 2013. “Are Government Spending Multipliers Greater During Periods of Slack? Evidence from Twentieth-Century Historical Data.” The American Economic Review 103: 129–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.129.Suche in Google Scholar

Punzo, C., and L. Rossi. 2023. “A Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus: Redistribution and Social Welfare.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 55 (2–3): 595–617, https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12926.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramey, V. A. 2019. “Ten Years After the Financial Crisis: What have we Learned from the Renaissance in Fiscal Research?” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 33: 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.89.Suche in Google Scholar

Ramey, V. A., and S. Zubairy. 2018. “Government Spending Multipliers in Good Times and in Bad: Evidence from us Historical Data.” Journal of Political Economy 126: 850–901. https://doi.org/10.1086/696277.Suche in Google Scholar

Reis, R., and S. Tenreyro. 2022. “Helicopter Money: What is it and What Does it Do?” Annual Review of Economics 14. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-020618.Suche in Google Scholar

Rhee, H.-J., and N. Turdaliev. 2013. “Optimal Monetary Policy in a Small Open Economy with Staggered Wage and Price Contracts.” Journal of International Money and Finance 37: 306–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.06.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2003. “An Estimated Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model of the Euro Area.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 1123–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603770383415.Suche in Google Scholar

Smets, F., and R. Wouters. 2007. “Shocks and Frictions in us Business Cycles: A Bayesian Dsge Approach.” The American Economic Review 97: 586–606. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.586.Suche in Google Scholar

Taylor, J. B. 1993. “Discretion Versus Policy Rules in Practice.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39: 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(93)90009-l.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsuruga, T., and S. Wake. 2019. “Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus: The Effects of Implementation Lag.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 104: 132–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2019.05.007.Suche in Google Scholar

Turner, A. 2015. “The Case for Monetary Finance-An Essentially Political Issue.” In 16th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference, 5–6.Suche in Google Scholar

Woodford, M. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830169Suche in Google Scholar

Woodford, M. 2011. “Simple Analytics of the Government Expenditure Multiplier.” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics 3: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.3.1.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-06-06
Accepted: 2024-07-19
Published Online: 2024-08-20

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 31.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2023-0213/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen