Abstract
Conventional macroeconomic theory is based on the idea that demand shocks can only have temporary effects on unemployment, however several European economies display highly persistent unemployment dynamics. The theory of hysteresis points out that, under certain conditions, demand disturbances can have permanent effects. We find strong evidence of unemployment hysteresis in advanced economies since the 1990s. Relying on an identification scheme instigated by an insider/outsider model, we exploit the heterogeneity in impulse responses to demand shocks to investigate what labor institutions soften or amplify these responses. Our results indicate that strengthening labor institutions that promote a faster adjustment of real wages, removing disincentives for firms to hire and for workers to be employed, and improving the matching between labor supply and demand can lessen the effects of adverse demand shocks and lead to a faster reversion of unemployment rates to pre-shock levels.
References
Amisano, Gianni, and Massimiliano Serati. 2003. “What Goes Up Some-times Stays Up: Shocks and Institutions as Determinants of Unemployment Persistence.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 50 (4): 440–470.10.1111/1467-9485.5004005Suche in Google Scholar
Ball, Laurence, Brad DeLong, and Larry Summers. 2014. Fiscal Policy and Full Employment.Suche in Google Scholar
Ball, Laurence M. 2009. “Hysteresis in Unemployment: Old and New Evidence.” In National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 14818.10.3386/w14818Suche in Google Scholar
Balmaseda, Manuel, Juan José Dolado, and J David Lopez-Salido. 2000. “The Dynamic Effects of Shocks to Labour Markets: Evidence from OECD Countries.” Oxford Economic Papers 52 (1): 3–23.10.1093/oep/52.1.3Suche in Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier J. 2018. “Should We Reject the Natural Rate Hypothesis?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (1): 97–120.10.1257/jep.32.1.97Suche in Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier J., and Lawrence H. Summers. 1987. “Hysteresis in Unemployment.” European Economic Review 31 (1-2): 288–295.10.1016/0014-2921(87)90042-0Suche in Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier J., and Justin Wolfers. 2000. “The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: the Aaggregate Evidence.” The Economic Journal 110 (462): 1–33.10.1111/1468-0297.00518Suche in Google Scholar
Cerra, Valerie, and Sweta Chaman Saxena. 2008. “Growth Dynamics: The Myth of Economic Recovery.” American Economic Review 98 (1): 439–457.10.1257/aer.98.1.439Suche in Google Scholar
Cerra, Valerie, and Sweta Chaman Saxena. 2017. “Business Cycle and its Policy Implications.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper 17/250.10.5089/9781484325759.001Suche in Google Scholar
Christiano, Lawrence J., Martin S. Eichenbaum, and Mathias Trabandt. 2016. “Unemployment and Business Cycles.” Econometrica 84 (4): 1523–1569.10.3982/ECTA11776Suche in Google Scholar
Cœuré, B. 2017. “Scars or Scratches? Hysteresis in the Euro Area.” Speech at the International Center for Monetary and Banking Studies, Geneva.Suche in Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton. 1968. “The Role of Monetary Policy.” American Economic Review 58: 1–17.Suche in Google Scholar
Galí, Jordi. 2015. “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem Revisited.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 21430.10.3386/w21430Suche in Google Scholar
Grigoli, Francesco, Zsoka Koczan, and Petia Topalova. 2018a. “A Cohort-Based Analysis of Labor Force Participation for Advanced Economies.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper 18/120.10.5089/9781484355251.001Suche in Google Scholar
Grigoli, Francesco, Zsoka Koczan, and Petia Topalova. 2018b. “Drivers of Labor Force Participation in Advanced Economies: Macro and Micro Evidence.” International Monetary Fund Working Paper 18/150.10.5089/9781484361528.001Suche in Google Scholar
Im, Kyung So, M. Hashem Pesaran, and Yongcheol Shin. 2003. “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of Econometrics 115 (1): 53–74.10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7Suche in Google Scholar
Johansen, Søren. 1991. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 59: 1551–1580.10.2307/2938278Suche in Google Scholar
Layard, Richard, and Stephen Nickell. 1987. The Labour Market. Clarendon.Suche in Google Scholar
Lewis, Jeffrey B., and Drew A. Linzer. 2005. “Estimating Regression Models in which the Dependent Variable is based on Estimates.” Political Analysis 13 (4): 345–364.10.1093/pan/mpi026Suche in Google Scholar
Lindbeck, Assar, and Dennis J. Snower. 1986. “Wage Setting, Unemployment, and Insider-Outsider Relations.” The American Economic Review 76 (2): 235–239.Suche in Google Scholar
Ljungqvist, Lars, and Thomas J. Sargent. 1995. “Welfare States and Unemployment.” Economic Theory 6 (1): 143–160.10.1007/BF01213944Suche in Google Scholar
Maddala, Gangadharrao S., and Shaowen Wu. 1999. “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (S1): 631–652.10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631Suche in Google Scholar
Mortensen, Dale T., and Christopher A. Pissarides. 1999. “Unemployment Responses to ‘Skill-Biased’ Technology Shocks: The Role of Labour Market Policy.” The Economic Journal 109 (455): 242–265.10.1111/1468-0297.00431Suche in Google Scholar
Nickell, Stephen, Luca Nunziata, and Wolfgang Ochel. 2005. “Unemployment in the OECD Since the 1960s. What Do We Know?” The Economic Journal 115 (500): 1–27.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00958.xSuche in Google Scholar
Nunziata, Luca. 2002. Unemployment, Labour Market Institutions and Shocks. No 2002-W16, Economics Papers from Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford.Suche in Google Scholar
Osterwald-Lenum, Michael. 1992. “A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics 54 (3): 461–472.10.1111/j.1468-0084.1992.tb00013.xSuche in Google Scholar
Pedroni, Peter. 2013. “Structural Panel VARs.” Econometrics 1 (2): 180–206.10.3390/econometrics1020180Suche in Google Scholar
Pesaran, M. Hashem, and Ron Smith. 1995. “Estimating Long-Run Relationships from Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels.” Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 79–113.10.1016/0304-4076(94)01644-FSuche in Google Scholar
Petrosky-Nadeau, Nicolas, and Lu Zhang. 2017. “Solving the Diamond–Mortensen–Pissarides Model Accurately.” Quantitative Economics 8 (2): 611–650.10.3982/QE452Suche in Google Scholar
Pissarides, Christopher A. 2000. Equilibrium Unemployment Theory. MIT press.Suche in Google Scholar
Pizzinelli, Carlo, Konstantinos Theodoridis, and Francesco Zanetti. 2018. “State Dependence in Labor Market Fluctuations: Evidence, Theory, and Policy Implications.”Suche in Google Scholar
Thomas, Carlos, and Francesco Zanetti. 2009. “Labor Market Reform and Price Stability: An Application to the Euro Area.” Journal of Monetary Economics 56 (6): 885–899.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2009.06.002Suche in Google Scholar
White, Halbert. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48: 817–838.10.2307/1912934Suche in Google Scholar
Zanetti, Francesco. 2011a. “Labor Market Institutions and Aggregate Fluctuations in a Search and Matching Model.” European Economic Review 55 (5): 644–658.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.10.001Suche in Google Scholar
Zanetti, Francesco. 2011b. “Labour Policy Instruments and the Cyclical Behaviour of Vacancies and Unemployment.” Economica 78 (312): 779–787.10.1111/j.1468-0335.2010.00872.xSuche in Google Scholar
Zivot, Eric, and Donald W. K. Andrews. 2002. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, the Oil-Price Shock, and the Unit-Root Hypothesis.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20 (1): 25–44.10.1198/073500102753410372Suche in Google Scholar
Author Note
The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the IMF or IMF policy. We thank, without implicating, Valerie Cerra, Bertrand Gruss, Alvar Kangur, Lin Li, Malhar Nabar, Maury Obstfeld, Jiri Podpiera, Gonzalo Varela, and the participants to the 21st Dynamic Econometrics Conference at George Washington University for their comments and suggestions.
©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Contributions
- An empirical study on the New Keynesian wage Phillips curve: Japan and the US
- Risk averse banks and excess reserve fluctuations
- Advances
- Signaling in monetary policy near the zero lower bound
- Contributions
- Robust learning in the foreign exchange market
- Foreign official holdings of US treasuries, stock effect and the economy: a DSGE approach
- Discretion rather than rules? Outdated optimal commitment plans versus discretionary policymaking
- Agency costs and the monetary transmission mechanism
- Advances
- Optimal monetary policy in a model of vertical production and trade with reference currency
- The financial accelerator and marketable debt: the prolongation channel
- The welfare cost of inflation with banking time
- Prospect Theory and sentiment-driven fluctuations
- Contributions
- Household borrowing constraints and monetary policy in emerging economies
- The macroeconomic impact of shocks to bank capital buffers in the Euro Area
- The effects of monetary policy on input inventories
- The welfare effects of infrastructure investment in a heterogeneous agents economy
- Advances
- Collateral and development
- Contributions
- Financial deepening in a two-sector endogenous growth model with productivity heterogeneity
- Is unemployment on steroids in advanced economies?
- Monitoring and coordination for essentiality of money
- Dynamics of female labor force participation and welfare with multiple social reference groups
- Advances
- Technology and the two margins of labor adjustment: a New Keynesian perspective
- Contributions
- Changing demand for general skills, technological uncertainty, and economic growth
- Job competition, human capital, and the lock-in effect: can unemployment insurance efficiently allocate human capital
- Fiscal policy and the output costs of sovereign default
- Animal spirits in an open economy: an interaction-based approach to the business cycle
- Ramsey income taxation in a small open economy with trade in capital goods
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Contributions
- An empirical study on the New Keynesian wage Phillips curve: Japan and the US
- Risk averse banks and excess reserve fluctuations
- Advances
- Signaling in monetary policy near the zero lower bound
- Contributions
- Robust learning in the foreign exchange market
- Foreign official holdings of US treasuries, stock effect and the economy: a DSGE approach
- Discretion rather than rules? Outdated optimal commitment plans versus discretionary policymaking
- Agency costs and the monetary transmission mechanism
- Advances
- Optimal monetary policy in a model of vertical production and trade with reference currency
- The financial accelerator and marketable debt: the prolongation channel
- The welfare cost of inflation with banking time
- Prospect Theory and sentiment-driven fluctuations
- Contributions
- Household borrowing constraints and monetary policy in emerging economies
- The macroeconomic impact of shocks to bank capital buffers in the Euro Area
- The effects of monetary policy on input inventories
- The welfare effects of infrastructure investment in a heterogeneous agents economy
- Advances
- Collateral and development
- Contributions
- Financial deepening in a two-sector endogenous growth model with productivity heterogeneity
- Is unemployment on steroids in advanced economies?
- Monitoring and coordination for essentiality of money
- Dynamics of female labor force participation and welfare with multiple social reference groups
- Advances
- Technology and the two margins of labor adjustment: a New Keynesian perspective
- Contributions
- Changing demand for general skills, technological uncertainty, and economic growth
- Job competition, human capital, and the lock-in effect: can unemployment insurance efficiently allocate human capital
- Fiscal policy and the output costs of sovereign default
- Animal spirits in an open economy: an interaction-based approach to the business cycle
- Ramsey income taxation in a small open economy with trade in capital goods