Startseite Public debt and growth in the euro area: evidence from parametric and nonparametric Granger causality
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Public debt and growth in the euro area: evidence from parametric and nonparametric Granger causality

  • Silvestro Di Sanzo EMAIL logo und Mariano Bella
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 16. März 2015

Abstract

Many studies in the empirical literature show that public debt is negatively correlated with economic growth but there is no paper that studies the causal links between these variables using rigorous tests based on Granger’s ideas. Accordingly, we investigate the causal links between debt-to-GDP ratio and economic growth using both linear parametric and nonlinear nonparametric Granger causality tests. We focus on 12 euro countries for the period 1970–2012. Our empirical results suggest a unidirectional causality running from debt to economic growth for Spain and Portugal and a bidirectional causality for Belgium, Germany, Greece, Ireland and Italy. No causality in either direction is identified for Austria, Finland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Finally, for France, the tests provide evidence for a unidirectional causality running from GDP growth to debt-to-GDP ratio. In addition, the nonlinear tests indicate that overlooking nonlinearities may result in misleading conclusions about Granger causality. Caveats of the analysis, as well as policy conclusions, are also discussed.

JEL Classification: C-14; C-22; E-62; H-63

Corresponding author: Silvestro Di Sanzo, Confcommercio, Research Department, Piazza G. G. Belli, 2, Rome 00152, Italy, e-mail:

References

Baek, E., and W. Brock. 1992. “A General Test for Granger Causality: Bivariate Model.” Technical Report, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison.Suche in Google Scholar

Barnett, W. A., R. A. Gallant, M. J. Hinich, J. A. Jungeilges, D. T. Kaplan, and M. J. Jensen. 1997. “A Single-Blind Controlled Competition Among Tests for Nonlinearity and Chaos.” Journal of Econometrics 82: 157–192.10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00081-XSuche in Google Scholar

Barro, R. J. 1974. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?” Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–1117.10.1086/260266Suche in Google Scholar

Baum, A., M. Poplawski-Ribeiro, and A. Weber. 2012. “Fiscal Multipliers and the State of the Economy.” IMF Working Papers 12/286.10.5089/9781475565829.001Suche in Google Scholar

Blanchard, O. J., and L. H. Summers. 1986. Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, 15–78. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.1086/654013Suche in Google Scholar

Brock, W. A., D. A. Hsieh, and B. LeBaron. 1991. Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos, and Instability. Statistical Theory and Economic Evidence. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Brock, W. A., W. D. Dechert, J. A. Scheinkman, and B. LeBaron. 1996. “A Test for Independence Based on the Correlation Dimension.” Econometrics Review 15: 197–235.10.1080/07474939608800353Suche in Google Scholar

Checherita-Westphal, C., and P. Rother. 2012. “The Impact of High Government Debt on Economic Growth and its Channels: An Empirical Investigation for The Euro Area.” European Economic Review 56 (7): 1392–1405.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007Suche in Google Scholar

DeLong, B. J., and L. H. Summers. 2012. Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy. The Brookings Institution. Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036.Suche in Google Scholar

Di Sanzo, S., and A. Pérez-Alonso. 2011. “Unemployment and Hysteresis: A Nonlinear Unobserved Components Approach.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 15 (1): 24–50.Suche in Google Scholar

Diks, C., and V. Panchenko. 2005. “A Note on the Hiemstra–Jones Test for Granger Noncausality.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 9 (2): 1–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Diks, C., and V. Panchenko. 2006. “A New Statistic and Practical Guidelines for Nonparametric Granger Causality Testing.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30: 1647–1669.10.1016/j.jedc.2005.08.008Suche in Google Scholar

Elmendorf, D., and N. Mankiw. 1999. “Government Debt.” In Handbook of Macroeconomics 1C, edited by J. Taylor and M. Woodford, 1615–1669. Amsterdam, North-Holland.10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10038-7Suche in Google Scholar

Ferreira, C. 2009. “Public Debt and Economic Growth: A Granger Causality Panel Data Approach.” WP 24/2009, Technical University of Lisbon.Suche in Google Scholar

Granger, C. W. J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37: 424–438.10.2307/1912791Suche in Google Scholar

Granger, C. W. J. 1980. “Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint.” Journalof Economic Dynamics and Control 2: 329–352.10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-XSuche in Google Scholar

Grassberger, P., and I. Procassia. 1983. “Measuring the Strangeness Attractors.” Physica D 9: 189–208.10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1Suche in Google Scholar

Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hiemstra, C., and J. D. Jones. 1994. “Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price–Volume Relation.” Journal of Finance 49: 1639–1664.Suche in Google Scholar

Kumar, M. S., and J. Woo. 2010. “Public Debt and Growth.” IMF Working Paper 10/174.10.5089/9781455201853.001Suche in Google Scholar

Lütkepohl, H. 1982. “Non-Causality Due to Omitted Variables.” Journal of Econometrics 19: 367–378.10.1016/0304-4076(82)90011-2Suche in Google Scholar

Lütkepohl, H. 2006. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-540-27752-1Suche in Google Scholar

Panizza, U., and A. F. Presbitero. 2013. “Public Debt and Economic Growth in Advanced Economies: A Survey.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 149 (2): 175–204.10.1007/BF03399388Suche in Google Scholar

Perron, P. 1989. “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis.” Econometrica 57 (6): 1361–1401.10.2307/1913712Suche in Google Scholar

Reinhart, C. M., and K. S. Rogoff. 2010. “Growth in a Time of Debt.” American Economic Review 100 (2): 573–578.10.1257/aer.100.2.573Suche in Google Scholar

Sims, C. A., J. H. Stock, and M. W. Watson. 1990. “Inference in Linear Time Series Models with Some Unit Roots.” Econometrica 58 (1):113–144.10.2307/2938337Suche in Google Scholar

Toda, H. Y., and P. C. B. Phillips. 1993. “Vector Autoregression and Causality.” Econometrica 61 (6):1367–1393.10.2307/2951647Suche in Google Scholar

Zivot, E. and D. Andrews. 1992. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock and The Unit Root Hypothesis.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 251–270.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-3-16
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Heruntergeladen am 23.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2014-0028/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen