Abstract
Many studies in the empirical literature show that public debt is negatively correlated with economic growth but there is no paper that studies the causal links between these variables using rigorous tests based on Granger’s ideas. Accordingly, we investigate the causal links between debt-to-GDP ratio and economic growth using both linear parametric and nonlinear nonparametric Granger causality tests. We focus on 12 euro countries for the period 1970–2012. Our empirical results suggest a unidirectional causality running from debt to economic growth for Spain and Portugal and a bidirectional causality for Belgium, Germany, Greece, Ireland and Italy. No causality in either direction is identified for Austria, Finland, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. Finally, for France, the tests provide evidence for a unidirectional causality running from GDP growth to debt-to-GDP ratio. In addition, the nonlinear tests indicate that overlooking nonlinearities may result in misleading conclusions about Granger causality. Caveats of the analysis, as well as policy conclusions, are also discussed.
References
Baek, E., and W. Brock. 1992. “A General Test for Granger Causality: Bivariate Model.” Technical Report, Iowa State University and University of Wisconsin, Madison.Suche in Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A., R. A. Gallant, M. J. Hinich, J. A. Jungeilges, D. T. Kaplan, and M. J. Jensen. 1997. “A Single-Blind Controlled Competition Among Tests for Nonlinearity and Chaos.” Journal of Econometrics 82: 157–192.10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00081-XSuche in Google Scholar
Barro, R. J. 1974. “Are Government Bonds Net Wealth?” Journal of Political Economy 82: 1095–1117.10.1086/260266Suche in Google Scholar
Baum, A., M. Poplawski-Ribeiro, and A. Weber. 2012. “Fiscal Multipliers and the State of the Economy.” IMF Working Papers 12/286.10.5089/9781475565829.001Suche in Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. J., and L. H. Summers. 1986. Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem. NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1986, 15–78. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.1086/654013Suche in Google Scholar
Brock, W. A., D. A. Hsieh, and B. LeBaron. 1991. Nonlinear Dynamics, Chaos, and Instability. Statistical Theory and Economic Evidence. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Brock, W. A., W. D. Dechert, J. A. Scheinkman, and B. LeBaron. 1996. “A Test for Independence Based on the Correlation Dimension.” Econometrics Review 15: 197–235.10.1080/07474939608800353Suche in Google Scholar
Checherita-Westphal, C., and P. Rother. 2012. “The Impact of High Government Debt on Economic Growth and its Channels: An Empirical Investigation for The Euro Area.” European Economic Review 56 (7): 1392–1405.10.1016/j.euroecorev.2012.06.007Suche in Google Scholar
DeLong, B. J., and L. H. Summers. 2012. Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy. The Brookings Institution. Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, 1775 Massachusetts Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20036.Suche in Google Scholar
Di Sanzo, S., and A. Pérez-Alonso. 2011. “Unemployment and Hysteresis: A Nonlinear Unobserved Components Approach.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 15 (1): 24–50.Suche in Google Scholar
Diks, C., and V. Panchenko. 2005. “A Note on the Hiemstra–Jones Test for Granger Noncausality.” Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 9 (2): 1–7.Suche in Google Scholar
Diks, C., and V. Panchenko. 2006. “A New Statistic and Practical Guidelines for Nonparametric Granger Causality Testing.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30: 1647–1669.10.1016/j.jedc.2005.08.008Suche in Google Scholar
Elmendorf, D., and N. Mankiw. 1999. “Government Debt.” In Handbook of Macroeconomics 1C, edited by J. Taylor and M. Woodford, 1615–1669. Amsterdam, North-Holland.10.1016/S1574-0048(99)10038-7Suche in Google Scholar
Ferreira, C. 2009. “Public Debt and Economic Growth: A Granger Causality Panel Data Approach.” WP 24/2009, Technical University of Lisbon.Suche in Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. 1969. “Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods.” Econometrica 37: 424–438.10.2307/1912791Suche in Google Scholar
Granger, C. W. J. 1980. “Testing for Causality: A Personal Viewpoint.” Journalof Economic Dynamics and Control 2: 329–352.10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-XSuche in Google Scholar
Grassberger, P., and I. Procassia. 1983. “Measuring the Strangeness Attractors.” Physica D 9: 189–208.10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1Suche in Google Scholar
Hamilton, J. D. 1994. Time Series Analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Hiemstra, C., and J. D. Jones. 1994. “Testing for Linear and Nonlinear Granger Causality in the Stock Price–Volume Relation.” Journal of Finance 49: 1639–1664.Suche in Google Scholar
Kumar, M. S., and J. Woo. 2010. “Public Debt and Growth.” IMF Working Paper 10/174.10.5089/9781455201853.001Suche in Google Scholar
Lütkepohl, H. 1982. “Non-Causality Due to Omitted Variables.” Journal of Econometrics 19: 367–378.10.1016/0304-4076(82)90011-2Suche in Google Scholar
Lütkepohl, H. 2006. New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.10.1007/978-3-540-27752-1Suche in Google Scholar
Panizza, U., and A. F. Presbitero. 2013. “Public Debt and Economic Growth in Advanced Economies: A Survey.” Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics 149 (2): 175–204.10.1007/BF03399388Suche in Google Scholar
Perron, P. 1989. “The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis.” Econometrica 57 (6): 1361–1401.10.2307/1913712Suche in Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. M., and K. S. Rogoff. 2010. “Growth in a Time of Debt.” American Economic Review 100 (2): 573–578.10.1257/aer.100.2.573Suche in Google Scholar
Sims, C. A., J. H. Stock, and M. W. Watson. 1990. “Inference in Linear Time Series Models with Some Unit Roots.” Econometrica 58 (1):113–144.10.2307/2938337Suche in Google Scholar
Toda, H. Y., and P. C. B. Phillips. 1993. “Vector Autoregression and Causality.” Econometrica 61 (6):1367–1393.10.2307/2951647Suche in Google Scholar
Zivot, E. and D. Andrews. 1992. “Further Evidence on the Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock and The Unit Root Hypothesis.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10: 251–270.Suche in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Advances
- International specialization and the return to capital
- How the wage-education profile got more convex: evidence from Mexico
- Contributions
- Africa’s missed agricultural revolution: a quantitative study of the policy options
- Structural transformation and productivity in Latin America
- Public debt and growth in the euro area: evidence from parametric and nonparametric Granger causality
- Transition dynamics in the neoclassical growth model: the case of South Korea
- Household saving in Australia
- An ordered probit analysis of monetary policy inertia
- Fiscal shocks, the real exchange rate and the trade balance: some evidence for emerging economies
- Topics
- Remittances and financial institutions: is there a causal linkage?
- Club convergence in Latin America
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Advances
- International specialization and the return to capital
- How the wage-education profile got more convex: evidence from Mexico
- Contributions
- Africa’s missed agricultural revolution: a quantitative study of the policy options
- Structural transformation and productivity in Latin America
- Public debt and growth in the euro area: evidence from parametric and nonparametric Granger causality
- Transition dynamics in the neoclassical growth model: the case of South Korea
- Household saving in Australia
- An ordered probit analysis of monetary policy inertia
- Fiscal shocks, the real exchange rate and the trade balance: some evidence for emerging economies
- Topics
- Remittances and financial institutions: is there a causal linkage?
- Club convergence in Latin America