Home Business & Economics International technology adoption, R&D, and productivity growth
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

International technology adoption, R&D, and productivity growth

  • Seung Mo Choi EMAIL logo , Daniel Toro González and Peter Gray
Published/Copyright: June 20, 2013

Abstract

International knowledge diffusion is considered an important source of productivity growth. However, direct observations on such diffusion have not been available at the macro level. We analyze novel data on international technology trade. Our empirical analyses indicate a positive association between payments for international technology adoption and the growth of labor productivity. Those payments appear to be a stronger contributor than research and development (R&D) investments for a large group of economies. For economies with high productivity, technology adoption payments tend to be complementary to R&D investments.


Corresponding author: Seung Mo Choi, International Monetary Fund, 700 19th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20431, USA, e-mail:

  1. 1

    While we do not provide a further statistical analysis, it is also possible that subsidies to education (and other forms of human capital production such as on-the-job training and in-home training) can multiply the effects of R&D and TA, accelerating productivity growth. See Choi (2011) and James and Choi (2013) for a related discussion.

The comments of Tiago Cavalcanti (editor), Bob Lucas, Nancy Stokey, Chin Hee Hahn, Chad Syverson, Thomas Chaney, Robby Rosenman, Jill McCluskey, and two anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the International Monetary Fund, its Executive Board, or its management.

References

Aggarwal, Aradhana. 2000. “Deregulation, Technology Imports and In-House R&D Efforts: An Analysis of the Indian Experience.” Research Policy 29: 1081–1093.10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00074-8Search in Google Scholar

Akcigit, Ufuk, and William R. Kerr. 2010. “Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations.” NBER Working Paper 16443.10.3386/w16443Search in Google Scholar

Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. 2004. Economic Growth. 2nd ed. Boston, MA, USA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barro, Robert J., and Jong-Wha Lee. 2010. “A New Data Set of Educational Attainment in the World, 1950–2010.” NBER Working Paper 15902.Search in Google Scholar

Basant, Rakesh, and Brian Fikkert. 1996. “The Effects of R&D, Foreign Technology Purchase, and Domestic and International Spillovers on Productivity in Indian Firms.” Review of Economics and Statistics 78 (2): 187–199.10.2307/2109920Search in Google Scholar

Benkard, C. Lanier. 2000. “Learning and Forgetting: The Dynamics of Aircraft Production.” American Economic Review 90 (4): 1034–1054.10.1257/aer.90.4.1034Search in Google Scholar

Caselli, Francesco, and Daniel J. Wilson. 2004. “Importing Technology.” Journal of Monetary Economics 51: 1–32.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2003.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Choi, Seung Mo. 2011. “How Large are Learning Externalities?” International Economic Review 52 (4): 1077–1103.10.1111/j.1468-2354.2011.00660.xSearch in Google Scholar

Comin, Diego, and Bart Hobijn. 2004. “Neoclassical Growth and the Adoption of Technologies.” NBER Working Paper 10733.10.3386/w10733Search in Google Scholar

Comin, Diego, and Bart Hobijn. 2010. “An Exploration of Technology Diffusion.” American Economic Review 100 (5): 2031–2059.10.1257/aer.100.5.2031Search in Google Scholar

Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 1996. “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD.” Journal of International Economics 40: 251–278.10.1016/0022-1996(95)01407-1Search in Google Scholar

Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 1999. “International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement.” International Economic Review 40 (3): 537–570.10.1111/1468-2354.00028Search in Google Scholar

Eaton, Jonathan, and Samuel Kortum. 2001. “Trade in Capital Goods.” European Economic Review 45 (7): 1195–1235.10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00103-3Search in Google Scholar

Foster, Andrew D., and Mark R. Rosenzweig. 2010. “Microeconomics of Technology Adoption.” Annual Review of Economics 2 (1): 395–424.10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124433Search in Google Scholar

Griffith, Rachel, Stephen Redding, and John Van Reenen. 2004. “Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (4): 883–895.10.1162/0034653043125194Search in Google Scholar

Guellec, Dominique, and Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. 2001. “R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries.” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2001/3.Search in Google Scholar

Hagspiel, Verena, Kuno J. M. Huisman, and Claudia Nunes. 2010. “R&D Investment and Technology Adoption.” http://center.uvt.nl/staff/huisman/researchandtechnologyadoption.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, Chin Hee. 1995. “Technology Trade, R&D and Productivity Growth.” University of Chicago Dissertation Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Hines, James R., Jr. 1995. “Taxes, Technology Transfer, and the R&D Activities of Multinational Firms.” In The Effects of Taxation on Multinational Corporations, edited by Martin Feldstein, James R. Hines Jr. and R. Glenn Hubbard, Chap. 8 225–248. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Can, Anthony Arundel, and Hugo Hollanders. 2010. “How firms innovate: R&D, Non-R&D, and Technology Adoption.” United Nations University Working Paper 27.Search in Google Scholar

James, Charles, and Seung Mo Choi. 2013. “Is Human Capital Under-Produced?” http://user.chol.com/~estudiar/English/jameschoi.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Jones, Charles I., and John C. Williams. 1998. “Measuring the Social Return to R&D.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (4): 1119–1135.10.1162/003355398555856Search in Google Scholar

Katrak, Homi. 1997. “Developing Countries’ Imports of Technology, In-House Technological Capabilities and Efforts: An Analysis of the Indian Experience.” Journal of Development Economics 53: 67–83.10.1016/S0304-3878(97)00011-4Search in Google Scholar

Klenow, Peter J., and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 1997. “The Neoclassical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far?” NBER Macroeconomics Annual 12: 73–114.10.1086/654324Search in Google Scholar

Klenow, Peter J., and Andrés Rodríguez-Clare. 2005. “Externalities and Growth.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf. Elsevier, Vol. 1, Chap. 11: 817–861.Search in Google Scholar

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 1990. TBP Manual 1990: Proposed Standard Method of Compiling and Interpreting Technology Balance of Payments Data (1990).Search in Google Scholar

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2011. “Main Science and Technology Indicators.” Source OECD (2011). http://www.sourceoecd.com.Search in Google Scholar

Parente, Stephen L. 1995. “A Model of Technology Adoption and Growth.” Economic Theory 6 (3): 405–420.10.1007/BF01211784Search in Google Scholar

Parente, Stephen L., and Edward C. Prescott. 1994. “Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development.” Journal of Political Economy 102 (2): 298–321.10.1086/261933Search in Google Scholar

Peri, Giovanni. 2005. “Determinants of Knowledge Flows and Their Effect on Innovation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (2): 308–322.10.1162/0034653053970258Search in Google Scholar

Ray, Achintya. 2010. “Strategic Technology Adoption and Optimal R&D Under Asymmetric Information.” International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 36: 7–12.Search in Google Scholar

Ulku, Hulya. 2004. “R&D, Innovation and economic Growth: An Empirical Analysis.” IMF Working Paper WP/04/185.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-06-20
Published in Print: 2013-01-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Advances
  4. How have global shocks impacted the real effective exchange rates of individual euro area countries since the euro’s creation?
  5. Employment by age, education, and economic growth: effects of fiscal policy composition in general equilibrium
  6. Overeducation and skill-biased technical change
  7. Strategic wage bargaining, labor market volatility, and persistence
  8. Households’ uncertainty about Medicare policy
  9. Contributions
  10. Deconstructing shocks and persistence in OECD real exchange rates1)
  11. A contribution to the empirics of welfare growth
  12. Development accounting with wedges: the experience of six European countries
  13. Implementation cycles, growth and the labor market
  14. International technology adoption, R&D, and productivity growth
  15. Bequest taxes, donations, and house prices
  16. Business cycle accounting of the BRIC economies
  17. Privately optimal severance pay
  18. Small business loan guarantees as insurance against aggregate risks
  19. Output growth and unexpected government expenditures
  20. International business cycles and remittance flows
  21. Effects of productivity shocks on hours worked: UK evidence
  22. A prior predictive analysis of the effects of Loss Aversion/Narrow Framing in a macroeconomic model for asset pricing
  23. Exchange rate pass-through and fiscal multipliers
  24. Credit demand, credit supply, and economic activity
  25. Distortions, structural transformation and the Europe-US income gap
  26. Monetary policy shocks and real commodity prices
  27. Topics
  28. News-driven international business cycles
  29. Business cycle dynamics across the US states
  30. Required reserves as a credit policy tool
  31. The macroeconomic effects of the 35-h workweek regulation in France
  32. Productivity and resource misallocation in Latin America1)
  33. Information and communication technologies over the business cycle
  34. In search of lost time: the neoclassical synthesis
  35. Divorce laws and divorce rate in the US
  36. Is the “Great Recession” really so different from the past?
  37. Monetary business cycle accounting for Sweden
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2012-0035/pdf
Scroll to top button