Home Business & Economics Exchange rate pass-through and fiscal multipliers
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exchange rate pass-through and fiscal multipliers

  • Chak Hung Jack Cheng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 26, 2013

Abstract

This paper develops a small open economy model with nominal rigidities and search-matching frictions to study the implications of the degree of exchange rate pass-through for fiscal multipliers. I allow for delayed pass-through to both imported consumption goods prices and imported intermediate goods prices. The result shows that incomplete exchange rate pass-through to imported goods prices dampens the fiscal impact on output and unemployment. However, incomplete pass-through to imported input prices has little effect on the output and unemployment multipliers.


Corresponding author: Chak Hung Jack Cheng, Economics and Finance, Murray State University, 307K Business Building, Murray, Ky 42071, USA, Tel.: +270-809-6763, e-mail:

  1. 1

    See Baldacci and Gupta (2009).

  2. 2

    Although more recent studies find that exchange rate pass-through in emerging economies may have decreased in the past decade, the rate of pass-through in many emerging markets, such as Mexico and Chile, is still higher than that in developed countries. See Ca’Zorzi, Hahn, and Sanchez (2007).

  3. 3

    Also see Hummels, Ishii, and Yi (1998), Yi (2003) and Kleinert (2003).

  4. 4

    As pointed out by Devereux, Lane, and Xu (2006), strict CPI inflation targeting is essentially equivalent to a fixed exchange rate regime when exchange rate pass-through is high. In other words, with high exchange rate pass-through, adjustments of exchange rates to shocks are limited under inflation targeting. Thus, the result is in line with Ilzetzki, Mendoza, and Vegh (2013)’s finding that fiscal multipliers are larger in countries with fixed exchange rates.

  5. 5

    Also see, for example, Ramey and Shapiro (1998), Burnside, Eichenbaum, and Fisher (2004), Perotti (2008) and Ramey (2009).

  6. 6

    See Schmitt-Grohe and Uribe (2003) for further details.

  7. 7

    Without loss of generality, I assume that both and are constant and set their values to 1.

  8. 8

    See Petrongolo and Pissarides (2001) and Monacelli, Perotti, and Trigari (2010).

  9. 9

    The data for Mexico comes from OECD database.

  10. 10

    Instead of solely looking at how the multipliers are affected by each key parameter, I also examined the output and unemployment multipliers generated across different parameter sets. The main result remains robust.

References

Andolfatto, D. 1996. “Business Cycles and Labor-Market Search.” American Economic Review 86 (1): 112–132.Search in Google Scholar

Baldacci, E., and S. Gupta. 2009. “Fiscal Expansions: What Works.” Finance and Development 46 (4): 35–37.Search in Google Scholar

Best, G. 2013. “Fear of Floating or Monetary Policy as Usual? A Structural Analysis of Mexico’s Monetary Policy.” North American Journal of Economics and Finance 24: 45–62.10.1016/j.najef.2012.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Blanchard, O., and R. Perotti. 2002. “An Empirical Characterization of the Dynamic Effects of Changes in Government Spending and Taxes on Output.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1329–1368.10.1162/003355302320935043Search in Google Scholar

Boz, E., C. B. Durdu, and N. Li. 2012. Emerging Market Business Cycles: The Role of Labor Market Frictions. International Monetary Fund Working Paper No. 12/237.10.5089/9781475511208.001Search in Google Scholar

Burnside, C., M. Eichenbaum, and J. D. M. Fisher. 2004. “Fiscal Shocks and their Consequences.” Journal of Economic Theory 115: 89–117.10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00252-7Search in Google Scholar

Ca’Zorzi, M., E. Hahn, and M. Sanchez. 2007. “Exchange Rate Pass-Through in Emerging Markets.” European Central Bank Working Paper No.739.10.2139/ssrn.970654Search in Google Scholar

Calvo, G. A., and C. M. Reinhart. 2000. Fixing for your life. Brookings Trade Forum 2000.10.3386/w8006Search in Google Scholar

Devereux, M., P. Lane, and J. Xu. 2006. “Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy in Emerging Market Economies.” Economic Journal 116: 478–506.10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01089.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gali, J., D. J. Lopez-Salido, and J. Valles. 2007. “Understanding the Effects of Government Spending on Consumption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 5 (1): 227–270.10.1162/JEEA.2007.5.1.227Search in Google Scholar

Gertler, M., L. Sala, and A. Trigari. 2008. “An Estimated Monetary DSGE Model with Unemployment and Staggered Nominal Wage Bargaining.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40 (8): 1713–1764.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2008.00180.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hummels, D., J. Ishii, and K.-M. Yi. 1998. “Vertical Specialization and The Changing Nature of World Trade.” Economic Policy Review 4 (2): 79–99.Search in Google Scholar

Ilzetzki, E., E. G. Mendoza, and C. A. Vegh. 2013. “How Big (small?) are Fiscal Multipliers?” Journal of Monetary Economics 60: 239–254.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011Search in Google Scholar

Kleinert, J. 2003. “Growing Trade in Intermediate Goods: Outsourcing, Global Sourcing, or Increasing Importance of MNE Networks?” Review of International Economics 11 (3): 464–482.Search in Google Scholar

Li, N. 2011. “Cyclical Wage Movements in Emerging Markets Compared to Developed Economies: The Role of Interest Rates.” Review of Economic Dynamics 14: 686–704.10.1016/j.red.2011.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Monacelli, T., R. Perotti, and A. Trigari. 2010. “Unemployment Fiscal Multipliers.” Journal of Monetary Economics 57: 531–553.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.05.009Search in Google Scholar

Perotti, R. 2008. “In Search of the Transmission Mechanism for Fiscal Policy.” In: NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2007, edited by D. Acemoglu, K. Rogoff, and M. D. Woodford, 169–226. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.1086/ma.22.25554966Search in Google Scholar

Petrongolo, B., and C. Pissarides. 2001. “Looking into the Black Box: A Survey of the Matching Function.” Journal of Economic Literature 39(2): 390–431.10.1257/jel.39.2.390Search in Google Scholar

Ramey, V. A. 2009. “Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It’s all in The Timing.” NBER Working Paper No. 15464.10.3386/w15464Search in Google Scholar

Ramey, V. A., and M. D. Shapiro. 1998. Costly Capital Reallocation and the Effects of Government Spending. Carnegie Rochester Conference on Public Policy, 145–194.Search in Google Scholar

Ravn, M., S. Schmitt-Grohe, and M. Uribe. 2012. “Consumption, Government Spending and the Real Exchange Rate.” Journal of Monetary Economics 59: 215–234.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Rotemberg, J. 1982. “Monopolistic Price Adjustment and Aggregate Output.” Review of Economics Studies 44: 517–531.10.2307/2297284Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt-Grohe, S., and M. Uribe. 2003. “Closing Small Open Economy Models.” Journal of International Economics 61: 163–185.10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00056-9Search in Google Scholar

Shi, K., and J. Xu. 2010. “Intermediate Goods Trade and Exchange Rate Pass-Through.” Journal of Macroeconomics 32: 571–583.10.1016/j.jmacro.2010.03.001Search in Google Scholar

Yi, K.-M. 2003. “Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade?” Journal of Political Economy 111(1): 52–102.10.1086/344805Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-09-26
Published in Print: 2013-01-01

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Advances
  4. How have global shocks impacted the real effective exchange rates of individual euro area countries since the euro’s creation?
  5. Employment by age, education, and economic growth: effects of fiscal policy composition in general equilibrium
  6. Overeducation and skill-biased technical change
  7. Strategic wage bargaining, labor market volatility, and persistence
  8. Households’ uncertainty about Medicare policy
  9. Contributions
  10. Deconstructing shocks and persistence in OECD real exchange rates1)
  11. A contribution to the empirics of welfare growth
  12. Development accounting with wedges: the experience of six European countries
  13. Implementation cycles, growth and the labor market
  14. International technology adoption, R&D, and productivity growth
  15. Bequest taxes, donations, and house prices
  16. Business cycle accounting of the BRIC economies
  17. Privately optimal severance pay
  18. Small business loan guarantees as insurance against aggregate risks
  19. Output growth and unexpected government expenditures
  20. International business cycles and remittance flows
  21. Effects of productivity shocks on hours worked: UK evidence
  22. A prior predictive analysis of the effects of Loss Aversion/Narrow Framing in a macroeconomic model for asset pricing
  23. Exchange rate pass-through and fiscal multipliers
  24. Credit demand, credit supply, and economic activity
  25. Distortions, structural transformation and the Europe-US income gap
  26. Monetary policy shocks and real commodity prices
  27. Topics
  28. News-driven international business cycles
  29. Business cycle dynamics across the US states
  30. Required reserves as a credit policy tool
  31. The macroeconomic effects of the 35-h workweek regulation in France
  32. Productivity and resource misallocation in Latin America1)
  33. Information and communication technologies over the business cycle
  34. In search of lost time: the neoclassical synthesis
  35. Divorce laws and divorce rate in the US
  36. Is the “Great Recession” really so different from the past?
  37. Monetary business cycle accounting for Sweden
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2012-0014/pdf
Scroll to top button