Abstract
The article analyzes arguments, made by John J. Mearsheimer and others, that the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022 was largely caused by Western policy. It finds that these arguments rely on a partially false and incomplete reading of history. To do so, the article identifies a range of premises that are both foundational to Mearsheimer’s claims and based on implied or explicit historical interpretations. This includes the varying policies of Ukraine toward NATO and the EU as well as the changing Russian perceptions thereof; the political upheavals in Ukraine in early 2014 that were immediately succeeded by the annexation of Crimea and the war in Donbass; and the supposed absence of Russian ‘imperialism’ toward Ukraine prior to 2014. Finding that these interpretations do not hold up in light of relevant and available data, the article qualifies and contextualizes the validity of Mearsheimer’s arguments, points to superior ones, and highlights the need for case-specific expertise when using explanatory theory to make sense of politically salient ongoing events.
References
Allison, R. 2014. “Russian ‘Deniable’ Intervention in Ukraine: How and Why Russia Broke the Rules.” International Affairs 90 (6): 1255–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12170.Suche in Google Scholar
BBC News . 2012. “Ukraine Election ‘Reversed Democracy’, OSCE Says.” October 29, 2012, sec. Europe. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-20120888.Suche in Google Scholar
BBC News . 2014. “Ukraine Crisis: Transcript of Leaked Nuland-Pyatt Call.” February 7, 2014, sec. Europe. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-26079957.Suche in Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. 1994. “The Premature Partnership.” Foreign Affairs 73 (2): 67–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045920.Suche in Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. 2000. “Living with Russia.” The National Interest 61: 5–16.Suche in Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. 2009. “Opinion|NATO and World Security.” The New York Times, August 19, 2009, sec. Opinion. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/20/opinion/20iht-edbrzezinski.html.Suche in Google Scholar
Brzezinski, Z. 2012. Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar
Czuperski, M., J. Herbst, E. Higgins, A. Polyakova, and D. Wilson. 2015. Hiding in Plain Sight: Putin’s War in Ukraine. Washington, DC: Atlantic Council of the United States.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2018. “Conflict Between Russia and its Neighbors Since 1992: The Cases of Belarus and Ukraine.” Uptake Working Papers, 10.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2020. “Trump, Merkel, and Putin. Lessons and Legacies for Transatlantic Cooperation Toward Russia.” AICGS. American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. Johns Hopkins University (blog). December 23, 2020. https://www.aicgs.org/publication/trump-merkel-and-putin/.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2021a. “Bilateral Defence and Security Cooperation Despite Disintegration: Does the Brexit Process Divide the United Kingdom and Germany on Russia?” European Journal of International Security 6 (1): 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2020.18.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2021b. “Russian Active Measures against Ukraine (2004) and Estonia (2007).” In Russian Active Measures – Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Soviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 224, edited by O. Bertelsen, 177–213. Stuttgart: Columbia University Press and Ibidem.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2022a. “Did Germany Contribute to Deterrence Failure against Russia in Early 2022?” Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 16 (3): 152–71. https://doi.org/10.51870/tlxc9266.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2022b. “Inertia and Reactiveness in Germany’s Russia Policy: From the 2021 Federal Election to the Invasion of Ukraine in 2022.” German Politics and Society 40 (4): 135–51. https://doi.org/10.3167/gps.2022.400407.Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2023a. “Realismus Als Theorie Und Heuristik: Die Ukrainisch-Russisch-Deutsche Dreiecksbeziehung Seit 1992.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 30 (1).10.5771/0946-7165-2023-1-85Suche in Google Scholar
Driedger, J. J. 2023b. “Risk Acceptance and Offensive War: The Case of Russia Under the Putin Regime.” Contemporary Security Policy 44 (2): 199–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2164974.Suche in Google Scholar
Edinger, H. 2022. “Offensive Ideas: Structural Realism, Classical Realism and Putin’s War on Ukraine.” International Affairs 98 (6): 1873–93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac217.Suche in Google Scholar
Gallup.Com . 2014. “Ukrainians Approve of New President.” December 18, 2014, sec. World. https://news.gallup.com/poll/180233/ukrainians-approve-new-president.aspx.Suche in Google Scholar
Giuliano, E. 2018. “Who Supported Separatism in Donbas? Ethnicity and Popular Opinion at the Start of the Ukraine Crisis.” Post-Soviet Affairs 34 (2–3): 158–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.2018.1447769.Suche in Google Scholar
Gleditsch, K. S. 2022. “One Without the Other? Prediction and Policy in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 66 (3): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqac036.Suche in Google Scholar
Götz, E. 2016. “Neorealism and Russia’s Ukraine Policy, 1991–Present.” Contemporary Politics 22 (3): 301–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2016.1201312.Suche in Google Scholar
Harding, L. 2014. “Kiev’s Protesters: Ukraine Uprising Was No Neo-Nazi Power-Grab.” The Guardian, March 13, 2014, sec. World News.Suche in Google Scholar
Hosaka, S. 2019. “Welcome to Surkov’s Theater: Russian Political Technology in the Donbas War.” Nationalities Papers 47 (5): 750–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2019.70.Suche in Google Scholar
Interfax-Ukraine. 2013. “Poll: Yanukovych to Lose to Opposition Candidates in Second Round of Presidential Elections.” Kyiv Post, December 25, 2013, sec. Ukraine. https://www.kyivpost.com/post/9324.Suche in Google Scholar
Interfax-Ukraine. 2014. “Svoboda Party Members in Ukrainian Government Resign.” December 11, 2014.Suche in Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies. 2006. The Military Balance 2006. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
International Institute for Strategic Studies. 2012. The Military Balance 2012. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Likhachev, V. 2015. “The ‘Right Sector’ and Others: The Behavior and Role of Radical Nationalists in the Ukrainian Political Crisis of Late 2013 — Early 2014.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 48 (2–3): 257–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2015.07.003.Suche in Google Scholar
Lustick, I. S. 2022. “Geopolitical Forecasting and Actionable Intelligence.” Survival 64 (1): 51–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2032959.Suche in Google Scholar
McFaul, M., S. Sestanovich, and J. J. Mearsheimer. 2014. “Faulty Powers: Who Started the Ukraine Crisis?” Foreign Affairs 93: 167–78.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 1993. “The Case for a Ukrainian Nuclear Deterrent.” Foreign Affairs 72 (3): 50–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045622.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 1994. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19 (3): 5–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, 1st ed. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2014. “Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions that Provoked Putin.” Foreign Affairs 93: 1–12.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2018. Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven: Yale University Press.10.2307/j.ctv5cgb1wSuche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2019. “Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal International Order.” International Security 43 (4): 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2021. “The Inevitable Rivalry. America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics.” Foreign Affairs.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2022a. “The Causes and Consequences of the Ukraine Crisis.” The National Interest.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J. 2022b. “Playing with Fire in Ukraine. The Underappreciated Risks of Catastrophic Escalation.” Foreign Affairs.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J., and S. M. Walt. 2003. “An Unnecessary War.” Foreign Policy.10.2307/3183521Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J., and S. M. Walt. 2007. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, 1st ed. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.10.2139/ssrn.891198Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J., and S. M. Walt. 2013. “Leaving Theory behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing Is Bad for International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 427–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494320.Suche in Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, J. J., and S. M. Walt. 2016. “The Case for Offshore Balancing.” Foreign Affairs 95 (July/August): 70–83.Suche in Google Scholar
Parent, J. M., and S. Rosato. 2015. “Balancing in Neorealism.” International Security 40 (2): 51–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00216.Suche in Google Scholar
Radchenko, S. 2020. “‘Nothing but Humiliation for Russia’: Moscow and NATO’s Eastern Enlargement, 1993–1995.” Journal of Strategic Studies 43 (6–7): 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2020.1820331.Suche in Google Scholar
Reuters . 2012a. “Strasbourg Court Raps Ukraine Over Tymoshenko Ally.” July 3, 2012, sec. World News. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-france-ukraine-lutsenko-rights-idUKBRE8620PL20120703.Suche in Google Scholar
Reuters . 2012b. “Ukraine High Court to Rule on Tymoshenko Appeal.” August 29, 2012, sec. World News. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-ukraine-tymoshenko-appeal-idUKBRE87S00Q20120829.Suche in Google Scholar
Reuters . 2012c. “Ukraine Votes, Yanukovich’s Party Expected to Keep Majority.” October 28, 2012. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-ukraine-election-idUKBRE89Q0ED20121028.Suche in Google Scholar
Reznik, O. 2016. “From the Orange Revolution to the Revolution of Dignity: Dynamics of the Protest Actions in Ukraine.” East European Politics & Societies 30 (4): 750–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325416650255.Suche in Google Scholar
Shekhovtsov, A., and A. Umland. 2014. “The Maidan and beyond: Ukraine’s Radical Right.” Journal of Democracy 25 (3): 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2014.0051.Suche in Google Scholar
The Central Election Commission of Ukraine. 2018. “Головна.” August 28, 2018. https://cvk.gov.ua/.Suche in Google Scholar
The Telegraph . 2014. “Ukraine’s Defence Chief Resigns as Troops Leave Crimea.” March 25, 2014. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/ukraine/10722676/Ukraines-defence-chief-resigns-as-troops-leave-Crimea.html.Suche in Google Scholar
The University of Chicago, dir. Why Is Ukraine the West’s Fault? Featuring John Mearsheimer. 2015. YouTube.Suche in Google Scholar
Vanderhill, R. 2013. Promoting Authoritarianism Abroad. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.10.1515/9781626370104Suche in Google Scholar
Wæver, O. 2009. “Waltz’s Theory of Theory.” International Relations 23 (2): 201–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117809104635.Suche in Google Scholar
Walt, S. M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Waltz, K. N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2011. Belarus: The Last Dictatorship in Europe. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Wilson, A. 2017. “Explaining Ukraine.” In The Routledge Handbook of East European Politics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687681-4Suche in Google Scholar
Woronowycz, R. 2003. “Dispute Over Tuzla Changes Ukraine’s Stance Toward Russia.” The Ukrainian Weekly, November 2, 2003.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Editorial
- Focus: Democracy under Polarization
- Democracy, Civility, and Semantic Descent
- Informal Networked Deliberation: How Mass Deliberative Democracy Really Works
- From Prejudice to Polarization and Rejection of Democracy
- Ethics and Affect in Resistance to Democratic Regressions
- A Polarization-Containing Ethics of Campaign Advertising
- General Part
- The Stopping Power of Sources
- Discussion
- Practice Theory as a Tool for Critical Social Theory
- The Society of Singularities: Reply to Four Critics
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Editorial
- Editorial
- Focus: Democracy under Polarization
- Democracy, Civility, and Semantic Descent
- Informal Networked Deliberation: How Mass Deliberative Democracy Really Works
- From Prejudice to Polarization and Rejection of Democracy
- Ethics and Affect in Resistance to Democratic Regressions
- A Polarization-Containing Ethics of Campaign Advertising
- General Part
- The Stopping Power of Sources
- Discussion
- Practice Theory as a Tool for Critical Social Theory
- The Society of Singularities: Reply to Four Critics