Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Binmore, Boundedly Rational
-
Published/Copyright:
May 14, 2016
Abstract
It is argued that a truly Humean approach to social interaction and to normative reflection on how we should interact needs to get even closer to the facts than the Binmore program suggests. In view of the facts Binmore’s normative conclusions on bargaining as well as on the nature of the equilibria of the game of life both seem precarious.
Published Online: 2016-05-14
Published in Print: 2006-05-01
© 2006 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Justice as a Natural Phenomenon
- Fairness as Justice
- Genes, Memes and Justice
- The Genetics of Cooperation
- Binmore’s Humeanism
- Making Sense of Categorical Imperatives
- Justice: Political Not Natural
- Binmore’s Egalitarianism
- The Psychology of Justice
- Ken Binmore’s Natural Justice
- On Kenneth Binmore’s Natural Justice
- Binmore, Boundedly Rational
- Natural Justice: Response to Comments
Articles in the same Issue
- Justice as a Natural Phenomenon
- Fairness as Justice
- Genes, Memes and Justice
- The Genetics of Cooperation
- Binmore’s Humeanism
- Making Sense of Categorical Imperatives
- Justice: Political Not Natural
- Binmore’s Egalitarianism
- The Psychology of Justice
- Ken Binmore’s Natural Justice
- On Kenneth Binmore’s Natural Justice
- Binmore, Boundedly Rational
- Natural Justice: Response to Comments
