Startseite Allgemein ‘Religion’ and the Concept of the Buddha Way: Semantics of the Religious in Dōgen
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

‘Religion’ and the Concept of the Buddha Way: Semantics of the Religious in Dōgen

  • Raji C. Steineck EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Januar 2018
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

In recent decades, the concept of religion, and specifically its application to non-Western historic cultural formations has come unter critical scrutiny. This paper proposes the study of semantic fields as a method to explore the self-understanding of historic formations of what, in modern parlance, counts as religion, and thus, as a testing strategy for the concept of religion that is employed in scholarly analysis. It uses the said method to analyse three works by the medieval Japanese Buddhist monk Dōgen (1200–1253), who came to be revered as founder of the still extant Sōtō school of Zen Buddhism. By putting his notion of the ‘Buddha Way’ (butsudō) into strong relief, it provides a basis for comparison with modern concepts of religion. The conclusion is that Dōgen’s ideas conform to a surprisingly large extent with modern ideas. This may be one reason for his popularity in modern times. But Dōgen should not be taken to represent the general world-view of medieval Japan. Further comparative analyses of other corpora remain necessary to gauge the applicability of ‘religion’ as a category for the analysis of medieval Japanese culture.

Bibliography

Adam, Jean-Michel (2005): Les Textes: Types et Prototypes. 2. Aufl. Paris: Armand Colin.Suche in Google Scholar

Asad, Talal (2001): “Reading a Modern Classic: W. C. Smith’s ‘The Meaning and End of Religion’”. History of Religions 40.3: 205–222.10.1086/463633Suche in Google Scholar

Bielefeldt, Carl (1985): “Recarving the Dragon: History and Dogma in the Study of Dōgen”. In: Dōgen Studies. Edited by William LaFleur. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 21–54.10.1515/9780824841355-002Suche in Google Scholar

Bodiford, William (2006): “Remembering Dōgen: Eiheiji and Dōgen Hagiography”. The Journal of Japanese studies 32.1: 1–22.10.1353/jjs.2006.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Dumoulin, Heinrich / Heisig, James W. / Knitter, Paul F. (1990): Zen Buddhism: A History. Japan. Vol. 2. New York: MacMillan.Suche in Google Scholar

Faure, Bernard (1987): “The Daruma-Shū, Dōgen and Sōtō Zen”. Monumenta Nipponica 42.1: 25–55.10.2307/2385038Suche in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, Timothy (1997): “A critique of ‘religion’ as a cross-cultural category”. Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 9.2: 91–110.10.1163/157006897X00070Suche in Google Scholar

Ford Campany, Robert (2003): “On the Very Idea of Religions (In the Modern West and in Early Medieval China)”. History of Religions 42: 287–319.10.1086/378757Suche in Google Scholar

Foulk, Theodore Griffith (1999): “Sung Controversies Concerning the ‘Seperate Transmission’ of Ch’an”. In: Buddhism in the Sung. Edited by Peter Gregory and Daniel Aaron Getz. Studies in East Asian Buddhism 13. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 220–29410.1515/9780824843649-009Suche in Google Scholar

Funaoka Makoto 船岡誠. (2014): Dōgen: michi wa mukyū nari 道元~道は無窮なり. Kyōto: Mineruba Shobō.Suche in Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen (2012): “Modernity: An Unfinished Project [1980]”. In: Contemporary Sociological Theory. Edited by Craig Calhoun. Chichester: Wiley, 444–450.Suche in Google Scholar

Hakamaya Noriaki 袴谷憲昭 (1992): Dōgen to bukkyō: Jūnikanbon “Shōbōgenzō” no Dōgen 道元と仏教 : 十二巻本『正法眼蔵』の道元. Tōkyō: Daizō shuppan.Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Steven (1985): Existential and Ontological Dimensions of Time in Heidegger and Dōgen. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Steven (1994): “Critical Buddhism (Hihan Bukkyō) and the Debate Concerning the 75-Fascicle and 12-Fascicle Shōbōgenzō Texts”. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 21.1: 37–72.10.18874/jjrs.21.1.1994.37-72Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Steven (1997): “The Dōgen Canon. Dōgen’s Pre-Shōbōgenzō Writings and the Question of Change in His Later Works”. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 24.1–2: 39–85.10.18874/jjrs.24.1-2.1997.39-85Suche in Google Scholar

Heine, Steven (2006): Did Dōgen Go to China? What Dōgen Wrote and When He Wrote It. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0195305701.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Ishii Seijun 石井清純 (2002): “Eiheiji senjutsu bunken ni miru Dōgen Zenji no sōdan un’ei 永平寺撰述文献に見る道元禅師の僧団運営”. In: Dōgen Zenji kenkyū ronshū: Dōgen Zenji 750kai dai onki kinen shuppan 道元襌師研究論集 : 道元禪師七百五十回大遠忌記念出版. Edited by Daihonzan Eiheiji daionkikyoku bunka jigyō senmon bukai shuppan iinkai 大本山永平寺大遠忌局文化事業専門部会出版委員会,. Tōkyō: Daishūkan shoten, 409–440.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman (1960) “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics”. In: Style in Language. Edited by Thomas A. Sebeok. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 350–377.Suche in Google Scholar

Josephson, Jason Ānanda (2006): “When Buddhism Became a ‘Religion’: Religion and Superstition in the Writings of Inoue Enryō”. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 33.1: 143–168.10.18874/jjrs.33.1.2006.143-168Suche in Google Scholar

Kant, Immanuel (1998): Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hrsg. von Jens Timmermann. Hamburg: Meiner.10.28937/978-3-7873-2112-4Suche in Google Scholar

King, Richard (1999): Orientalism and Religion: Post-Colonial Theory, India and “The Mystic East”. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuroda, Toshio (1996): “The development of the kenmitsu system as Japan’s medieval orthodoxy”. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23.3–4: 233–269.10.18874/jjrs.23.3-4.1996.233-269Suche in Google Scholar

Leighton / Taigen Daniel / Shohaku Okumura (ed.) (1996): Dōgen’s Pure standards for the Zen community : a translation of Eihei Shingi. Albany N.Y.: State University of New York Press.10.2307/jj.18253654Suche in Google Scholar

Leighton / Taigen Daniel / Shohaku Okumura (ed.) (2004): Dōgen’s Extensive Record a Translation of the Eihei Koroku. Boston: Wisdom Publicaions.Suche in Google Scholar

Löbner, Sebastian (2002): Understanding semantics. (Understanding language series). London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Matsumoto Shirō 松本史朗 (2000): Dōgen shisō ron 道元思想論. Tōkyō: Daizō shuppan.Suche in Google Scholar

Matsuo, Kenji (1997): “What is Kamakura New Buddhism? Official Monks and Reclusive Monks”. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 24.1–2: 179–189.10.18874/jjrs.24.1-2.1997.179-189Suche in Google Scholar

Nishijima, Gudō (trans.) (1994–1999). Master Dogen’s Shobogenzo. 4 Vols. London: Windbell.Suche in Google Scholar

Ōkubo Dōshū 大久保道舟 (1966): Dōgen Zenji den no kenkyū 道元禪師傳の研究. 2. rev. Aufl. Tōkyō: Chikuma Shobō.Suche in Google Scholar

Ōkubo Dōshū 大久保道舟 (1969): Dōgen Zenji zenshū 道元禅師全集. Tōkyō: Chikuma Shobō.Suche in Google Scholar

Osborne, Peter (1992): “Modernity Is a Qualitative, Not a Chronological Category”. New Left Review 192: 65.Suche in Google Scholar

Shields, James Mark (2010): “Beyond Belief: Japanese Approaches to the Meaning of Religion”. Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 39.2: 133–149.10.1177/0008429810364118Suche in Google Scholar

Shinohara Hisao 篠原寿雄 (1990): Gakudōyōshinshū: Dōgen gakushū to shugyō no kokoroe 学道用心集: 道元学習と修行のこころえ. Tōkyō: Daitō Shuppansha.Suche in Google Scholar

Smith, Jonathan Z (1997): Imagining religion from Babylon to Jonestown. (Chicago studies in the history of Judaism). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Snodgrass, Judith (2003): Presenting Japanese Buddhism to the West. Orientalism, Occidentalism, and the Columbian Exposition. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Steineck, Christian (2009a): “Rituale in der Bildung der Sōtō-Schule”. Hōrin – Vergleichende Studien zur japanischen Kultur 15.2008: 277–294.Suche in Google Scholar

Steineck, Christian (2009b): “Das Bendōwa von Dōgen: Narratologische Analyse Eines Doktrinären Textes”. Asiatische Studien : Zeitschrift Der Schweizerischen Gesellschaft Für Asienkunde=Études Asiatiques: Revue de La Société Suisse d’études Asiatiques. 63.3: 571–595.Suche in Google Scholar

Steineck, Raji C (2011): “Genres der mittelalterlichen Zen-buddhistischen Literatur. Wie schreibt man ‘nicht gestützt auf Zeichen’?”. In: Was sind Genres? Nicht-abendländische Kategorisierungen von Gattungen. Hrsg. von Stephan Conermann und Amr El Hawary. Berlin: Eb-Verlag (Ebv), 215–242.Suche in Google Scholar

Steineck, Raji C (2014): “Enlightened Authorship: The Case of Dōgen”. In: That wonderful Composite called Author. Edited by Christian Schwermann and Raji C. Steineck. Leiden: Brill, 195–219.10.1163/9789004279421Suche in Google Scholar

Steineck, Raji C (2015): “Zen in der Kunst der Persuasion: Zur Rhetorik einer mittelalterlichen Lehrschrift”. In: Rhetorik im Vormodernen Japan. Edited by Heidi Buck-Albulet. München: Iudicium, 127–149.Suche in Google Scholar

Steineck, Raji C (2018): “A Zen Philosopher? – Notes on the Philosophical Reading of Dōgen’s Shōbōgenzō”. In: The Concept of Philosophy in Asia and the Islamic World, vol. I. Edited by Raji C. Steineck et al. Leiden&Boston: Brill, 527–556.10.1163/9789004360112Suche in Google Scholar

Sueki, Fumihiko (1996): “A Reexamination of the Kenmitsu Taisei Theory”. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 23.3–4: 449–466.10.18874/jjrs.23.3-4.1996.449-466Suche in Google Scholar

Tanahashi, Kazuaki (ed.) (1985): Moon in a dewdrop. San Francisco: North Point Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Waddell, Norman / Abe, Masao (1971): “Dōgen’s Bendōwa, Translated with Introduction”. Eastern Buddhist (New Series) 4: 124–157.Suche in Google Scholar

Watsuji Tetsurō 和辻哲郎 (1992) [1926]: Nihon seishinshi kenkyū 日本精神史研究. Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.Suche in Google Scholar

Watsuji, Tetsuro / Bein, Steve (2011): Purifying Zen: Watsuji Tetsuro’s Shamon Dogen. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.10.21313/hawaii/9780824835101.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-01-26
Published in Print: 2018-04-25

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 8.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/asia-2017-0059/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen