To copy verbatim, paraphrase or summarize – listeners’ methods of discourse representation while recalling academic lectures

References

Alderson, John Charles. 2000. Assessing reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732935Search in Google Scholar

Allison, Desmond & Steve Tauroza. 1995. The effect of discourse organization on lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes 14(2). 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(95)00007-e.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, John Robert. 1976. Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, John Robert. 2014. Cognitive psychology and its implications, 8th edn. New York: Worth.Search in Google Scholar

Baddeley, Alan D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bejar, Isaac, Dan Douglas, Joan Jamieson, Susan Nissan & Jean Turner. 2000. TOEFL 2000 listening framework: A working paper. In TOEFL monograph series, vol. 19. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Search in Google Scholar

Bernhardt, Elizabeth B. 1991. Reading development in a second language. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Best, Rachel M., Michael Rowe, Yasuhiro Ozuru & Danielle McNamara. 2005. Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders 25(1). 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363-200501000-00007.Search in Google Scholar

Bhagat, Rahul & Eduard Hovy. 2013. What is a paraphrase? Computational Linguistics 39(3). 463–472. https://doi.org/10.1162/coli_a_00166.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian. 2008. Selective listening. System 36(1). 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2007.11.002.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Ann L. & Jeanne D. Day. 1983. Macrorules for summarizing texts: The development of expertise. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22(1). 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(83)80002-4.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, James & Theodore, S. Rodgers. 2002. Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Gillian & George Yule. 1983. Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226Search in Google Scholar

Buck, Gary. 2001. Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732959Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace L. 1979. The flow of thought and the flow of language. In Talmy Givón (ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax, 159–181. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368897_008Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Yuh-Fang. 2006. On the use of the immediate recall task as a measure of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing 23(4). 520–543. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt340oa.Search in Google Scholar

DeCarrico, Jeanette & James R. Nattinger. 1988. Lexical phrases for the comprehension of academic lectures. English for Specific Purposes 7(2). 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(88)90027-0.Search in Google Scholar

Dunkel, Patricia A. & James N. Davis. 1994. The effects of rhetorical signaling cues on the recall of English lecture information by speakers of English as a native or second language. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives, 55–74. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.007Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, Karl & Herbert, A. Simon. 1993. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5657.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Field, John. 2008. Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Field, John. 2011. Into the mind of the academic listener. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(2). 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.04.002.Search in Google Scholar

Field, John. 2013. Cognitive validity. In Ardeshir Geranpayeh & Lynda Taylor (eds.), Examining listening, 77–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flowerdew, John. 1994. Research of relevance to second language lecture comprehension-an overview. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives, 7–29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.004Search in Google Scholar

Goh, Christine C. M. 2000. A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System 28(1). 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(99)00060-3.Search in Google Scholar

Goh, Christine C. M. 2002. Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System 30(2). 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0346-251x(02)00004-0.Search in Google Scholar

Hagaman, Jessica L., Kathryn J. Casey & Robert Reid. 2016. Paraphrasing strategy instruction for struggling readers. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 60(1). 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2014.966802.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, Christa & Christine Jensen. 1994. Evaluating lecture comprehension. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives, 241–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.019Search in Google Scholar

Jin, Yan & Jason Fan. 2011. Test for English majors (TEM) in China. Language Testing 28(4). 589–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211414852.Search in Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter. 1974. The representation of meaning in memory. London: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kintsch, Walter & Teun A. van Dijk. 1978. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review 85(5). 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Sylvie. 1988. Information processing among conference interpreters: A test of the depth-of-processing hypothesis. Meta 33(3). 377–387. https://doi.org/10.7202/003380ar.Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Given. 2009. Speaking up: Six Korean students’ oral participation in class discussions in US graduate seminars. English for Specific Purposes 28(3). 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.01.007.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, Tony. 1998. Theoretical perspectives on listening. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 18. 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500003457.Search in Google Scholar

Lynch, Tony. 2011. Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(2). 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Moravcsik, Julia E. & Walter Kintsch. 1993. Writing quality, reading skills and domain knowledge as factors in text comprehension. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 47(2). 360–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0078823.Search in Google Scholar

Mueller, Pam A. & Daniel M. Oppenheimer. 2014. The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science 25(6). 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.Search in Google Scholar

NACFLT. 2004. Syllabus for TEM8. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Search in Google Scholar

Olsen, Leslie A. & Thomas N. Huckin. 1990. Point-driven understanding in engineering lecture comprehension. English for Specific Purposes 9. 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(90)90027-a.Search in Google Scholar

Peng, Chuan, Jianda Liu & Hongwen Cai. 2022. Aligning China’s standards of English language ability with the Common European Framework of reference for languages. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 31(6). 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00617-2.Search in Google Scholar

Rickheit, Gert, Wolfgang Schnotz & Hans Strohner. 1985. The concept of inference in discourse comprehension. In Gert Rickheit & Hans Strohner (eds.), Advances in psychology 29: Inferences in text processing, 3–49. Amsterdam: North-Holland.10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62731-4Search in Google Scholar

Riley, Gail L. & James F. Lee. 1996. A comparison of recall and summary protocols as measures of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing 13(2). 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229601300203.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, Peter. 1995. Attention, memory, and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning 45(2). 283–331. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x.Search in Google Scholar

Rost, Michael. 1994. Online summaries as representations of lecture understanding. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives, 93–127. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.009Search in Google Scholar

Rost, Michael. 2016. Teaching and researching listening, 3rd edn. New York and Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315732862Search in Google Scholar

Sachs, Jacqueline Dene Strunk. 1967. Recognition memory for syntactic and semantic aspects of connected discourse. Perception & Psychophysics 2(9). 437–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208784.Search in Google Scholar

Shi, Ling, Ismaeil Fazel & Nasrin Kowkabi. 2018. Paraphrasing to transform knowledge in advanced graduate student writing. English for Specific Purposes 51. 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.001.Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, Joseph. 2018. Did you take “good” notes?: On methods for evaluating student notetaking performance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 35. 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Siegel, Joseph. 2019. Notetaking in English language teaching: Highlighting contrasts. TESOL Journal 10(1). e406. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.406.Search in Google Scholar

Simon, Herbert A. 1974. How big is a chunk? Science 183(4124). 482–488. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4124.482.Search in Google Scholar

Song, Min-Young. 2011. Note-taking quality and performance on an L2 academic listening test. Language Testing 29(1). 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211415379.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, Susan Elizabeth. 2003. Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(1). 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-1585(02)00036-x.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1975. Recalling and summarizing complex discourse. Mimeographed: University of Amsterdam.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1980. Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 1981. Episodes as units of discourse analysis. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk, 177–195. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. & Walter Kintsch. 1977. Cognitive psychology and discourse. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), Current trends in textlinguistics, 61–80. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110853759.61Search in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. & Walter Kintsch. 1983. Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Haiping. 2018. Testing lecture comprehension through listening-to-summarize cloze tasks: The trio of task demands, cognitive processes and language competence. Singapore: Springer Nature.10.1007/978-981-10-6202-5Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Haiping & Guoxing Yu. 2021. Test-takers’ cognitive processes during a listen-to-summarize cloze task. International Journal of Listening 35(1). 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2018.1473040.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Magnus. 2003. Discovery listening – improving perceptual processing. ELT Journal 57(4). 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.4.335.Search in Google Scholar

Young, Lynne. 1994. University lectures – macro-structure and micro-features. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic listening: Research perspectives, 159–176. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139524612.013Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Guoxing. 2005. Towards a model of using summarization tasks as a measure of reading comprehension. Bristol, England: University of Bristol Unpublished PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Yu, Guoxing. 2013. The use of summarization tasks: Some lexical and conceptual analyses. Language Assessment Quarterly 10. 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.750659.Search in Google Scholar

Zare, Javad, Sedigheh Karimpour & Khadijeh Aqajani Delavar. 2023. Classroom concordancing and English academic lecture comprehension: An implication of data-driven learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning 36(5–6). 885–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1953081.Search in Google Scholar

Zare, Javad & Zahra Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki. 2017. Genre awareness and academic lecture comprehension: The impact of teaching importance markers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 27. 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.03.001.Search in Google Scholar