Startseite Linguistik & Semiotik Towards a Model of Advanced Learners’ Vocabulary Acquisition: An Investigation of L2 Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention by Taiwanese English Majors
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Towards a Model of Advanced Learners’ Vocabulary Acquisition: An Investigation of L2 Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention by Taiwanese English Majors

  • Barry Lee Reynolds

    Barry Lee Reynolds is an assistant professor in the Education Center for Humanities and Social Sciences at National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan. He mainly teaches EAP undergraduate literacy courses. His research interests include both intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition, digital game based language learning, and second language writing instruction.

    EMAIL logo
    , Wei-Hua Wu

    Wei-Hua Wu is a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan and a junior high school English teacher in Taipei, Taiwan. She hopes to assist her teaching and facilitate her students’ learning by focusing her research on improvement of students’ English performance through strategic instruction.

    , Hui-Wen Liu

    Hui-Wen Liu, a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, has taught English as a foreign language to learners for over 12 years. She is mainly interested in researching motivational teaching strategies.

    , Shu-Yuan Kuo

    Shu-Yuan Kuo, a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, has taught English as a foreign language to children for over 7 years. He is interested in how cognitive proficiency in English among English teachers affects their instruction.

    und Ching-Hua Yeh

    Ching-Hua Yeh is a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan. Her current research interest is in what role vocabulary learning plays in second language acquisition.

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 27. Februar 2015

Abstract

Development of vocabulary is one of the fundamental elements for second language acquisition; it is important to meaning transfer and successful communication as well (Barcroft 2004). The purpose of the research reported in this paper was to investigate to what extent the characteristics of vocabulary affect Taiwanese English language majors’ second-language vocabulary acquisition and retention. This research builds upon similar research conducted by Willis and Ohashi (2012), which found a relationship between acquisition and a word’s frequency, cognateness, and length for Japanese learners of English. Our results indicate a significant relationship between acquisition and a word’s frequency, level of polysemy, and part of speech. Correlation results show that polysemy and frequency are both strongly related to acquisition. Nevertheless, a negative correlation between phonemes and acquisition was also shown. The findings indicate that high frequency words and polysemous words are both easily acquired and retained; in contrast, words with more phonemes require more effort by Taiwanese English language majors to learn and retain. Findings from a multiple regression analysis further suggest that high frequency polysemous nouns are easily acquired and retained by Taiwanese English language majors. Pedagogical implications concerning the variables investigated are provided.

About the authors

Barry Lee Reynolds

Barry Lee Reynolds is an assistant professor in the Education Center for Humanities and Social Sciences at National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan. He mainly teaches EAP undergraduate literacy courses. His research interests include both intentional and incidental vocabulary acquisition, digital game based language learning, and second language writing instruction.

Wei-Hua Wu

Wei-Hua Wu is a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan and a junior high school English teacher in Taipei, Taiwan. She hopes to assist her teaching and facilitate her students’ learning by focusing her research on improvement of students’ English performance through strategic instruction.

Hui-Wen Liu

Hui-Wen Liu, a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, has taught English as a foreign language to learners for over 12 years. She is mainly interested in researching motivational teaching strategies.

Shu-Yuan Kuo

Shu-Yuan Kuo, a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan, has taught English as a foreign language to children for over 7 years. He is interested in how cognitive proficiency in English among English teachers affects their instruction.

Ching-Hua Yeh

Ching-Hua Yeh is a graduate student in the Department of English at National Taipei University of Technology, Taiwan. Her current research interest is in what role vocabulary learning plays in second language acquisition.

Acknowledgement

This research is based upon work supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. under Grant No. MOST 103-2410-H-010-015-.

References

Anderson, R. C. & W. E.Nagy. 1984. How many words are there in printed school English?Reading Research Quarterly19(3). 304330.10.2307/747823Suche in Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. D., N.Thomson & M.Buchanan. 1975. Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior14(6). 575589.10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80045-4Suche in Google Scholar

Barcroft, J. 2004. Second language vocabulary acquisition: A lexical input processing approach. Foreign Language Annals37(2). 200208.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2004.tb02193.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bauer, L & P.Nation. 1993. Word families. International Journal of Lexicography6(4). 253279.10.1093/ijl/6.4.253Suche in Google Scholar

Bensoussan, M & B.Laufer. 1984. Lexical guessing in context in EFL reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading7(1). 1532.10.1111/j.1467-9817.1984.tb00252.xSuche in Google Scholar

Beretta, A, R.Fiorentino & D.Poeppel. 2005. The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: An MEG study. Cognitive Brain Research24(1). 5765.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.12.006Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, J. D. 2003. Norm-referenced item analysis (item facility and item discrimination). Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter7(2). 1619. Retrieved from http://jalt.org/test/PDF/Brown17.pdfSuche in Google Scholar

Brown, D. 2013. Types of words identified as unknown by L2 learners when reading. System41(4). 10431055. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.10.01310.1016/j.system.2013.10.013Suche in Google Scholar

Chang, C. H. 2011. Language learning strategy profile of university foreign language majors in Taiwan. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching8(2). 201215.Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, A. H. 2011. Parents’ perspectives on the effects of the primary EFL education policy in Taiwan. Current Issues in Language Planning12(2). 205224.10.1080/14664208.2011.606783Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, C. M. & C. J.Chung. 2008. Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers and Education51(2). 624645.10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.011Suche in Google Scholar

Chen, C & J.Truscott. 2010. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition. Applied Linguistics31(5). 693713.10.1093/applin/amq031Suche in Google Scholar

Chern, C. L. 2002. English language teaching in Taiwan today. Asia Pacific Journal of Education22(2). 97105.10.1080/0218879020220209Suche in Google Scholar

Chuenjundaeng, J & J.Ward. 2009. Suffix knowledge: Acquisition and applications. System37(1). 461469. doi:10.1016/j.system.2009.01.004Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, I. F. 2013. Crammed to learn English: What are learners’ motivation and approach?The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher22(4). 585592.10.1007/s40299-013-0061-5Suche in Google Scholar

Chung, I. F. & Y. C.Huang. 2009. The implementation of communicative language teaching: An investigation of students’ viewpoints. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher18(1). 6778.10.3860/taper.v18i1.1036Suche in Google Scholar

Coady, J & T.Huckin. 1999. Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: A review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21(2). 181193.10.1017/S0272263199002028Suche in Google Scholar

Daulton, F. E. 2003. The effects of Japanese loanwords on written English production. JALT Hokkaido Journal7. 312.Suche in Google Scholar

Durkin, K & J.Manning. 1989. Polysemy and the subjective lexicon: Semantic relatedness and the salience of intraword senses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research18(6). 577612.10.1007/BF01067161Suche in Google Scholar

Eckerth, J. & P.Tavakoli. 2012. The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research16(2). 227252.10.1177/1362168811431377Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 1999. Learning a Second Language Through Interaction. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, N. 2012. What can we count in language, and what counts in language acquisition, cognition, and use? In S. T.Gries & D.Divjak (eds.), Frequency effects in language learning and processing, 734. Germany: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110274059.7Suche in Google Scholar

Fidell, L. S. & B. G.Tabachnick. 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Suche in Google Scholar

Gentner, D. 1982. Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Suche in Google Scholar

Haastrup, K. 1989. The learner as word processor. AILA Review6. 3446.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidari-Shahreza, M. A. & M.Tavakoli. 2012. The effects of repetition and L1 lexicalization on incidental vocabulary acquisition by Iranian EFL learners. The Language Learning Journal. Epub ahead of print 27 July 2012. doi:10.1080/09571736.2012.708051Suche in Google Scholar

Henriksen, B. 1999. Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21(02). 303317.10.1017/S0272263199002089Suche in Google Scholar

Huttenlocher, J. & F.Lui. 1979. The semantic organization of some simple nouns and verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior18(2). 141162.10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90091-4Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, N. 2004. Semantic transfer and its implications for vocabulary teaching in a second language. The Modern Language Journal88(3). 416432.10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00238.xSuche in Google Scholar

Kao, C. -W. 2007. Applying strategy training to a remedial English program in a vocational school. Journal of Yuanpei University14. 2536.Suche in Google Scholar

Klepousniotou, E. & S. R.Baum. 2007. Disambiguating the ambiguity advantage effect in word recognition: An advantage for polysemous but not homonymous words. Journal of Neurolinguistics20(1). 124.10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.02.001Suche in Google Scholar

Kweon, S. O. & H. R.Kim. 2008. Beyond raw frequency: Incidental vocabulary acquisition in extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language20(2). 191215.Suche in Google Scholar

Lado, R. 1955. Patterns of difficulty in vocabulary. Language Learning6(1–2). 2341.10.1111/j.1467-1770.1955.tb00829.xSuche in Google Scholar

Lan, R. & R. L.Oxford. 2003. Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL41(4). 339380.10.1515/iral.2003.016Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. 1988. The concept of ‘synforms’(similar lexical forms) in vocabulary acquisition. Language and Education2(2). 113132.10.1080/09500788809541228Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. 1989. A factor of difficulty in vocabulary learning: Deceptive transparency. AILA Review6(1). 1020.Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. 1990. Why are some words more difficult than others?—some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching28(4). 293308.10.1515/iral.1990.28.4.293Suche in Google Scholar

Laufer, B. & B.Roitblat. 2011. Incidental vocabulary acquisition: The effects of task type, word occurrence and their combination. Language Teaching Research15(4). 391411.10.1177/1362168811412019Suche in Google Scholar

Li, F. 2010. Relationship between EFL learners’ belief and learning strategy use by English majors in vocational colleges. Journal of Language Teaching and Research1(6). 858866.10.4304/jltr.1.6.858-866Suche in Google Scholar

Liao, B. S. 2007. Teaching of English and translation. Taipei: Showwe Information Co., Ltd.Suche in Google Scholar

Lin, H., T.Chen & F. M.Dwyer. 2006. Effects of static visuals and computer‐generated animations in facilitating immediate and delayed achievement in the EFL classroom. Foreign Language Annals39(2). 203219.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2006.tb02262.xSuche in Google Scholar

Macalister, J. & S.Webb. 2013. Is text written for children useful for L2 extensive reading?TESOL Quarterly47(4). 300322. doi:10.1002/tesq.70Suche in Google Scholar

Marinellie, S. A. & C. J.Johnson. 2004. Nouns and verbs: A comparison of definitional style. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research33(3). 217235.10.1023/B:JOPR.0000027963.80639.88Suche in Google Scholar

Mason, J. M., E.Kniseley & J.Kendall. 1979. Effects of polysemous words on sentence comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly15(1). 4965.10.2307/747431Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, J. 2008. Vocabulary uptake from informal learning tasks. Language Learning Journal36(2). 227237.10.1080/09571730802390742Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, J. 2009. Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition, Vol. 45. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692092Suche in Google Scholar

Milton, J. & H.Daller. 2007. The interface between theory and learning in vocabulary acquisition. In Annual conference of the European second language association, Newcastle, UK, 11–14 September 2007.Suche in Google Scholar

Morimoto, S. & S.Loewen. 2007. A comparison of the effects of image-schema-based instruction and translation-based instruction on the acquisition of L2 polysemous words. Language Teaching Research11(3). 347372.10.1177/1362168807081181Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?The Canadian Modern Language Review63(1). 5982.10.3138/cmlr.63.1.59Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S.2012. The BNC/COCA word family lists.Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. & D.Beglar. 2007. A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher31(7). 913.Suche in Google Scholar

Nation, P. & K. M.Wang. 1999. Graded readers and vocabulary. Reading in a Foreign Language12(2). 355380.Suche in Google Scholar

Nickels, L. & D.Howard. 2004. Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology21(1). 5778.10.1080/02643290342000122Suche in Google Scholar

Omaggio, A. C. 1979. Pictures and second language comprehension: Do they help?Foreign Language Annals12(2). 107116.10.1111/j.1944-9720.1979.tb00153.xSuche in Google Scholar

Paribakht, T. S. 2005. The influence of first language lexicalization on second language lexical inferencing: A study of Farsi‐speaking learners of English as a foreign language. Language Learning55(4). 701748.10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00321.xSuche in Google Scholar

Reynolds, B. L. 2012. Comments on Anthony Bruton, Miguel García López, and Raquel Esquiliche Mesa’s “incidental L2 vocabulary learning: An impracticable term?TESOL Quarterly46(4). 812816. doi:10.1002/tesq.64Suche in Google Scholar

Reynolds, B. L. 2013. Comments on Stuart Webb and john Macalister’s “is text written for children useful for L2 extensive reading?”. TESOL Quarterly47(4). 849852. doi:10.1002/tesq.145Suche in Google Scholar

Reynolds, B. L. & D.Wible. 2014. Frequency in incidental vocabulary acquisition research: An undefined concept and some consequences. TESOL Quarterly48(4). 843361. doi:10.1002/tesq.197Suche in Google Scholar

Rott, S. 1999. The effect of exposure frequency on intermediate language learners’ incidental vocabulary acquisition and retention through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition21(4). 589619.10.1017/S0272263199004039Suche in Google Scholar

Rowe, M. L., R. D.Silverman & B. E.Mullan. 2013. The role of pictures and gestures as nonverbal aids in preschoolers’ word learning in a novel language. Contemporary Educational Psychology38(2). 109117.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.12.001Suche in Google Scholar

Su, M. H. M. 2005. A study of EFL technological and vocational college students’ language learning strategies and their self-perceived English proficiency. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching2(1). 4456.Suche in Google Scholar

Tonzar, C., L.Lotto & R.Job. 2009. L2 vocabulary acquisition in children: Effects of learning method and cognate status. Language Learning59(3). 623646.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00519.xSuche in Google Scholar

Tsai, C. C & I. C.Chang. 2009. An examination of EFL vocabulary learning strategies of students at the University of Technology of Taiwan. International Forum of Teaching and Studies5(2). 3238.Suche in Google Scholar

Tsan, S. C. 2008. Analysis of English learning strategies of Taiwanese students at national Taiwan normal university. Educational Journal of Thailand2(1). 8494.Suche in Google Scholar

Verspoor, M. & W.Lowie. 2003. Making sense of polysemous words. Language Learning53(3). 547586.10.1111/1467-9922.00234Suche in Google Scholar

Weekes, B. S. 1997. Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A50(2). 439456.10.1080/713755710Suche in Google Scholar

Willis, M. & Y.Ohashi. 2012. A model of L2 vocabulary learning and retention. The Language Learning Journal40(1). 125137.10.1080/09571736.2012.658232Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, M. N. 2007. Language learning strategies for junior college students in Taiwan: Investigating ethnicity and proficiency. Asian EFL Journal9(2). 3557.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2015-2-27
Published in Print: 2015-3-1

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton

Heruntergeladen am 31.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/applirev-2015-0006/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen