The Menaechmi

References

Acerbi, F. 2010. “Two Approaches to Foundations in Greek Mathematics: Apollonius and Geminus.” Science in Context 23: 151–86, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889710000037.Suche in Google Scholar

Allman, G. J. 1889. Greek Geometry from Thales to Euclid. Dublin: Hodges, Figgis, & Co.Suche in Google Scholar

Björnbo, A. 1913. “Hippias von Elis.” RE 8: 1706–7.Suche in Google Scholar

Bodnár, I. 2007. Oenopides of Chius: A Survey of the Modern Literature with a Collection of the Ancient Testimonia. Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Wissenschaftsgeschichte. Preprint 327.Suche in Google Scholar

Bowen, A. C. 1983. “Menaechmus Versus the Platonists: Two Theories of Science in the Early Academy.” Ancient Philosophy 3: 12–29, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19833116.Suche in Google Scholar

Dörrie, H., and M. Baltes. 1987. Der Platonismus in der Antike, Bd. 1. Stuttgart: Frommann-Holzboog.Suche in Google Scholar

Heath, T. L. 1921. A History of Greek Mathematics, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Knorr, W. R. 1986. The Ancient Tradition of Geometric Problems. Boston: Birkhäuser.Suche in Google Scholar

Kouremenos, T. 1994. “Poseidonius and Geminus on the Foundations of Mathematics.” Hermes 122: 437–50.Suche in Google Scholar

Lasserre, F. 1987. De Léodamas de Thasos à Philippe d’Oponte. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Mejer, J. 1981. “Demetrius of Magnesia: On Poets and Authors of the Same Name.” Hermes 109: 447–72.Suche in Google Scholar

Merton, R. K. 1968. “The Matthew Effect in Science.” Science 159: 56–63, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.Suche in Google Scholar

Montucla, J.-E. 1758. Histoire des mathématiques. T. 1. Paris: C. A. Jombert.Suche in Google Scholar

Mueller, I. 1991. “On the Notion of a Mathematical Starting Point in Plato, Aristotle, and Euclid.” In Science and Philosophy in Classical Greece, edited by A. C. Bowen, 59–97. New York: Garland.Suche in Google Scholar

Mugler, C. 1958. Dictionnaire historique de la terminologie géométriques des Grecs. Paris: Klicksieck.Suche in Google Scholar

Pesch, J. G. V. 1900. De Procli fontibus (Diss.). Leiden: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. 1884. “Die Fragmente des Mathematikers Menaechmus.” Philologus 42: 72–81, https://doi.org/10.1515/phil-1884-0105.Suche in Google Scholar

Sefrin-Weis, H., ed. and transl. (2010). Pappus of Alexandria. Book 4 of the Collection. London: Springer.10.1007/978-1-84996-005-2Suche in Google Scholar

Tannery, P. 1887. La géométrie grecque. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Suche in Google Scholar

Tarán, L. 1987. “Proclus on the Old Academy.” In Proclus. – Lecteur et interprète des Anciens, edited by J. Pépin, and H. D. Saffrey, 227–76. Paris: CNRS.Suche in Google Scholar

Tittel, K. 1895. De Gemini Stoici studiis mathematicis quaestiones philologae (Diss.). Leipzig: Hoffmann.Suche in Google Scholar

Tittel, K. 1912. “Geminos.” RE 7: 1026–50.Suche in Google Scholar

Vitrac, B. 2005. “Les classifications des sciences mathématiques en Grèce ancienne.” Archives de Philosophie 68: 269–301, https://doi.org/10.3917/aphi.682.0269.Suche in Google Scholar

Vitrac, B. 2009. “Mécanique et mathématiques à Alexandrie: Le cas de Héron.” Oriens-Occidens 7: 155–99.Suche in Google Scholar

von Fritz, K. 1937. “Oinopides.” RE 17: 2258–72.10.3406/rscir.1937.1736Suche in Google Scholar

Zhmud, L. 2006. The Origin of the History of Science in Classical Antiquity. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110194326Suche in Google Scholar