Startseite Altertumswissenschaften & Ägyptologie Plato’s Use of Mogis (Scarcely, with Toil) and the Accessibility of the Divine
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Plato’s Use of Mogis (Scarcely, with Toil) and the Accessibility of the Divine

  • Ryan M. Brown ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 1. Februar 2023
Apeiron
Aus der Zeitschrift Apeiron Band 56 Heft 3

Abstract

At key moments in the Phaedrus and the Republic, Socrates qualifies our capacity to “see” the highest realities (the “place of being,” the “Good beyond being”) with the adverb “mogis” (mogis kathorosa, Phdr. 248a; mogis horisthai, Rep. 517b). Mogis can be used to indicate either the toilsome difficulty of some undertaking or the subject’s proximity to failing to accomplish the undertaking. Socrates uses mogis to qualify the nature of the human soul’s capacity to make the intellectual ascent and see the divine, but it is not prima facie clear whether the qualification is meant to express (1) the difficulty we have in undertaking the intellectual ascent (a comment on the effort required) or (2) the fact that the human soul’s capacity to make the intellectual ascent will, on account of its limitations, only “just barely” be achieved, if at all. After discussing the uses of mogis in classical literature and surveying Plato’s uses of mogis across the corpus, I interpret Plato’s use of mogis at Phaedrus 248a, arguing that mogis kathorosa should be translated as “only gets a good look at the things that are with much toil” rather than the more common “scarcely able to gaze upon the things that are.” I then turn to the parallel passage at Republic 517b and argue against a prominent account, put forward by John Sallis, among others, of Plato’s understanding of divine inaccessibility. Whereas Sallis et al. argue that Plato’s use of mogis indicates that which is to be seen at the acme of the ascent is only “barely glimpsed” on account of the fact that it “withdraws” from our view, I argue instead that Plato’s use of mogis indicates that though we can “get a good look” at the highest realities, that good look is qualified by their inexhaustible excess. The human capacity to see the highest realities is qualified because there is “always more to see,” not because that which is there to be seen “withdraws” from view, and still less because there is some intrinsic limitation to human intellectual vision that prevents us from apprehending the highest realities. Accordingly, the divine is accessible but never exhaustible.


Corresponding author: Ryan M. Brown, Honors Program, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Ave., Villanova, PA 19085-1603, USA, E-mail:

References

Altman, W. 2013. Plato the Teacher: The Crisis of the Republic. New York: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Aristotle. 2011. De Anima, Trans. Mark Shiffman. Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Beekes, R. 2010. Etymological Dictionary of Greek, Vol. I–II. Boston: Brill.Suche in Google Scholar

Belfiore, E. 2012. Socrates’ Daimonic Art: Love for Wisdom in Four Platonic Dialogues. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139051712Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, R. M. 2022a. “The Liberation of Virtue in Plato’s Phaedrus.” In Aretē in Plato and Aristotle, edited by R. M. Brown, and J. R. Elliott, 45–74. Parnassos Press.10.2307/j.ctv2w8kbjt.8Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, R. M. 2022b. “The Lovers’ Formation in Plato’s Phaedrus.” Epoché 27 (1): 19–50, https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche2022812217.Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, R. M. (forthcoming). “The Thematic Significance of the Scenery in Plato’s Phaedrus.” Ancient Philosophy.Suche in Google Scholar

Buccioni, E. 2002. “The Psychical Forces in Plato’s Phaedrus.” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3): 331–57, https://doi.org/10.1080/09608780210143182.Suche in Google Scholar

Clarke, W. N. 2008. “The Limitation of Act by Potency in St. Thomas: Aristotelianism or Neoplatonism?” In Explorations in Metaphysics: Being, God, Person, 65–88. South Bend: University of Notre Dame Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Conti, L. 2017. “Sobre la expresión del esfuerzo y de la aproximación: Análisis de μόγις y μόλις en Griego Antiguo.” Emerita: Revista de Lingüística y Filología Clásica 85 (1): 1–25, https://doi.org/10.3989/emerita.2017.01.1538.Suche in Google Scholar

Ewegen, S. M. 2020. The Way of the Platonic Socrates. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.10.2307/j.ctv14npk04Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. 1990. Listening to the Cicadas: A Study of Plato’s Phaedrus. New York: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. R. F. 1985. “The Struggle in the Soul: Plato, Phaedrus 253c7–255a1.” Ancient Philosophy 5: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil19855122.Suche in Google Scholar

Griswold, C. 1986. Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Phaedrus. New Haven: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hall, J. 2018. “Plato’s Phaedrus after Descartes’ Passions: Reviving Reason’s Political Force.” Lo Sguardo 27: 75–93.Suche in Google Scholar

Heidegger, M. 2015. Being and Truth, Trans., G. Fried, and R. Polt. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, D. 1995. Finitude and Transcendence in the Platonic Dialogues. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, D. 2008. Plato and the Question of Beauty. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnstone, M. 2020. “Plato on the Enslavement of Reason.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3): 382–94, https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2019.53.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirkland, S. 2004. “Socrates contra scientiam, pro fabula.” Epoché 8 (2): 313–32, https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche2004828.Suche in Google Scholar

Nicholson, G. 1998. “The Ontology of Plato’s Phaedrus.” Dionysius 16: 9–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0263-2373(98)00030-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Perl, E. 1999. “The Presence of the Paradigm: Immanence and Transcendence in Plato’s Theory of Forms.” The Review of Metaphysics 53 (2): 339–62.Suche in Google Scholar

Perl, E. 2007. Theophany: The Neoplatonic Philosophy of Dionysius the Areopagite. Albany: State University of New York Press.10.1353/book5201Suche in Google Scholar

Plato. 1972. Plato’s Phaedrus, edited by R. Hackforth. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316036396Suche in Google Scholar

Plato. 1991. The Republic of Plato, edited by A. Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Plato. 1997. Complete Works, Edited by J. M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett.Suche in Google Scholar

Plato. 1998. Phaedrus, Trans. James Nichols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Plato. 2003. Phaedrus, Trans. Stephen Scully. Newburyport, MA: Focus Philosophy Library.Suche in Google Scholar

Roochnik, D. 1990. The Tragedy of Reason: Toward A Platonic Conception of Logos. New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Sallis, J. 1996. Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues, 3rd ed Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sallis, J. 2008. The Verge of Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schindler, D. C. 2008. Plato’s Critique of Impure Reason: On Goodness and Truth in the Republic. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Schindler, D. C. 2020. “Disclosing Beauty: on Order and Disorder in Plato’s Symposium.” In Beauty and the Good: Recovering the Classical Tradition from Plato to Duns Scotus, edited by A. M. Ramos, 19–48. Washington: Catholic University of America Press.10.2307/j.ctv193rr2r.6Suche in Google Scholar

Schumacher, E. F. 1977. A Guide for the Perplexed. New York: Harper & Row.Suche in Google Scholar

Werner, D. 2013. Myth and Philosophy in Plato’s Phaedrus. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139108737Suche in Google Scholar

White, D. 1993. Rhetoric and Reality in Plato’s Phaedrus. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2023-02-01
Published in Print: 2023-07-26

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 20.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/apeiron-2022-0093/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen