The Non-kinetic Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of Ἐνέργεια

References

Anagnostopoulos, A. 2011. “Senses of Dunamis and the Structure of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Θ.” Phronesis 56 (4): 388–425, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852811x588705.Search in Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, A. 2017. “Change, Agency and the Incomplete in Aristotle.” Phronesis 62 (2): 170–209, https://doi.org/10.1163/15685284-12341323.Search in Google Scholar

Anagnostopoulos, A. 2023. “Aristotle’s First Moves Regarding Perception: A Reading of (Most of) De Anima 2.5.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 105: 68–117. https://doi.org/10.1515/agph-2020-0143.Search in Google Scholar

Avezzù, G. 1982. Alcidamante: Orazioni e frammenti, Vol. 6. Rome: Bollettino dell’ Istituto di Filologia Greca Supplemento.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, S. H. 2015. “The Concept of Ergon: Towards an Achievement Interpretation of Aristotle’s ‘Function Argument’.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 48: 227–66, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0006.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198735540.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206704.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 1958. “Genesi e sviluppo della dottrina della potenza e dell’atto in Aristotele.” Studia Patavina. Rivista di Filosofia e Teologia 3: 477–505.Search in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 1990. “Il concetto di atto nella Metafisica di Aristotele.” In L’Atto Aristotelico e le sue ermeneutiche, edited by M. Sánchez Sorondo, 43–61. Rome: Herder–Università Lateranense.Search in Google Scholar

Berti, E. 2017. Aristotele, Metafisica. Rome: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Blair, G. A. 1967. “The Meaning of ‘Energeia’ and ‘Entelecheia’ in Aristotle.” International Philosophical Quarterly 7: 101–17, https://doi.org/10.5840/ipq19677110.Search in Google Scholar

Blair, G. A. 1992. Energeia and Entelecheia. ‘Act’ in Aristotle. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bolton, R. 1975. “Plato’s Distinction between Being and Becoming.” The Review of Metaphysics 29 (1): 66–95.Search in Google Scholar

Bonitz, H. 1870. Index Aristotelicus. Berlin: Reimer.Search in Google Scholar

Brague, R. 1991. “Note sur la définition du mouvement (Physique III, 1–3).” In La Physique d’Aristote et les conditions d’une science de la nature, edited by F. De Gantand P. Souffrin, 107–20. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Search in Google Scholar

Broadie, S. 2010. “Where Is the Activity? (An Aristotelian Worry about the Telic Status of Energeia).” In Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle. Essays in Honor of Allan Gotthelf, edited by J. G. Lennoxand R. Bolton, 198–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511919275.012Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. 2002. “De anima II 5.” Phronesis 47 (1): 28–90, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852802760075693.Search in Google Scholar

Burnyeat, M. F. 2008. “Kinesis vs. Energeia: A Much-Read Passage in (But Not of) Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 219–91.10.1093/oso/9780199544875.003.0008Search in Google Scholar

Charles, D. 1986. “Aristotle: Ontology and Moral Reasoning.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 123–144.Search in Google Scholar

Charles, D. 2015. “Aristotle’s Processes.” In Aristotle’s Physics. A Critical Guide, edited by M. Leunissen, 186–205. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Charlton, W. 1990. “Aristotle and the Uses of Actuality.” Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 5: 1–22.10.1163/2213441789X00036Search in Google Scholar

Code, A. 2003. “Changes, Powers and Potentialities in Aristotle.” In Desire, Identity and Existence, edited by N. Reshotko, 251–271: Kelowna: Academic Printing.10.2307/j.ctv10kmfns.19Search in Google Scholar

Coope, U. 2009. “Change and its Relation to Actuality and Potentiality.” In A Companion To Aristotle, edited by G. Anagnostopoulos, 277–91. Malden: Blackwell.10.1002/9781444305661.ch17Search in Google Scholar

De Strycker, É. 1968. “Concepts-clés et terminologie dans les livres ii à vii des Topiques” In Aristotle on Dialectic. The Topics, edited by G. E. L. Owen, 141–63. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Düring, I. 1961. Aristotle’s Protrepticus: An Attempt at Reconstruction. Goteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1994. “Aristotle’s Notion of Potentiality in Metaphysics Θ.” In Unity, Identity, and Explanation in Aristotle’s Metaphysics, edited by T. Scaltsas, D. Charles, and M. L. Gill, 173–93. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00262329Search in Google Scholar

Gerson, L. P. 2006. “The ‘Holy Solemnity’ of Forms and the Platonic Interpretation of Sophist.” Ancient Philosophy 26 (2): 291–304, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20062624.Search in Google Scholar

Gill, M. L. 1989. Aristotle on Substance: The Paradox of Unity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, F. 1991. “Aristotle on Pleasure and Perfection.” Phronesis 35 (1): 141–59, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852891321052750.Search in Google Scholar

Gonzalez, F. 2019. “Being as Activity. A Defence of the Importance of Metaphysics 1048B18–35 for Aristotle’s Ontology.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 56: 123–91, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851059.003.0004.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. 1987. Aristotle’s Two Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, D. W. 1995. “The Development of Aristotle’s Concept of Actuality: Comments on a Reconstruction by Stephen Menn.” Ancient Philosophy 15 (2): 551–64, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199515210.Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. 1928. Review of P. Gohlke. Gnomon 4: 625–37.Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, W. ed. (1957). Aristotelis Metaphysica, Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M. R., and D. S. Hutchinson. 2005. “Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: 193–294.Search in Google Scholar

Kalbfleisch, C. ed. (1907). Simplicii in Aristotelis Categorias Commentarium, Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca, Vol. VIII. Berlin: Reimer.10.1515/9783110805000Search in Google Scholar

Kosman, L. A. 1969. “Aristotle’s Definition of Motion.” Phronesis 14 (1): 40–62, https://doi.org/10.1163/156852869x00037.Search in Google Scholar

Kosman, L. A. 1984. “Substance, Being, and Energeia.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 2: 121–49.Search in Google Scholar

Kosman, L. A. 2013. The Activity of Being: An Essay on Aristotle’s Ontology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674075023Search in Google Scholar

Lefebvre, D. 2018. Dynamis. Sens et genèse de la notion aristotélicienne de puissance. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle, Metaphysics Book Θ, Translated with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258589Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 1994. “The Origins of Aristotle’s Concept of Ἐνέργεια: Ἐνέργεια and Δύναμις.” Ancient Philosophy 14 (1): 73–114, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199414150.Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2002. “Aristotle’s Definition of Soul and the Programme of the De Anima.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 22: 83–139.10.1093/oso/9780199255894.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2009. “Aporiai 13–14.” In Aristotle: Metaphysics Beta. Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by M. Crubellier, and A. Laks, 211–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199546770.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Menn, S. 2021. “Aristotle on the Many Senses of Being.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 59: 187–264, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198859000.003.0005.Search in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 1991. “Événement et poiêsis. La theorie aristotélicienne des événements naturels.” Raisons Pratiques 2: 177–201, https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionsehess.9648.Search in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 2002. “Actions et mouvements chez Aristote.” Philosophie 73 (2): 12–35, https://doi.org/10.3917/philo.073.0012.Search in Google Scholar

Natali, C. 2013. “A Note on Metaphysics Θ 6, 1048b18–36.” Rhizomata 1: 104–114.10.1515/rhiz-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar

Pistelli, H. G. 1888. Iamblichi Protrepticus. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Politis, V., and J. Su. 2015. “Aristotle on Being as Activity.” Metascience 24 (2): 213–8, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-014-9929-0.Search in Google Scholar

Reiske, J. J. ed. (1773). Oratorum Graecorum, Vol. VIII. Leipzig: Sommer.Search in Google Scholar

Rist, J. M. 1989. The Mind of Aristotle: A Study in Philosophical Growth. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.3138/9781487575120Search in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. ed. (1924). Aristotle’s Metaphysics: Revised text with introduction and commentary, Vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Schankula, H. A. S. 1971. “Plato and Aristotle: εὐδαιμονία, ἕξις or ἐνέργεια?” Classical Philology 66 (4): 244–6, https://doi.org/10.1086/365783.Search in Google Scholar

Sentesy, M. 2020. Aristotle’s Ontology of Change. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctvzgb7d8Search in Google Scholar

Unlu, H. 2021. “Dynamis and Energeia in Aristotle’s Metaphysics.” European Journal of Philosophy 29 (1): 1–15.Search in Google Scholar

Witt, C. 2006. “Analogy and Motion in Metaphysics Theta 6.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, edited by R. Bosley, and C. Y. Panayides, 111–24: Cyprus: Intercollege Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yepes Stork, R. 1989. “El origen de la energeia en Aristóteles.” Anuario Filosófico 22 (1): 93–112.10.15581/009.22.30028Search in Google Scholar