Startseite Homoclinic solutions for a differential inclusion system involving the p(t)-Laplacian
Artikel Open Access

Homoclinic solutions for a differential inclusion system involving the p(t)-Laplacian

  • Jun Cheng , Peng Chen EMAIL logo und Limin Zhang
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 5. Oktober 2022

Abstract

The aim of this article is to study nonlinear problem driven by the p ( t ) -Laplacian with nonsmooth potential. We establish the existence of homoclinic solutions by using variational principle for locally Lipschitz functions and the properties of the generalized Lebesgue-Sobolev space under two cases of the nonsmooth potential: periodic and nonperiodic, respectively. The resulting problem engages two major difficulties: first, due to the appearance of the variable exponent, commonly known methods and techniques for studying constant exponent equations fail in the setting of problems involving variable exponents. Another difficulty we must overcome is verifying the link geometry and certifying boundedness of the Palais-Smale sequence. To our best knowledge, our theorems appear to be the first such result about homoclinic solution for differential inclusion system involving the p ( t ) -Laplacian.

MSC 2010: 34C25; 58E30; 47H04

1 Introduction

In this article, we study the following nonlinear second-order p ( t ) -Laplacian system with nonsmooth potential

(1.1) d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) , u ( t ) 0 , as t ,

where p , a : R R + , f : R × R N R , u f ( t , u ) is locally Lipschitz. Here f ( t , x ) denotes the subdifferential of the locally Lipschitz function u f ( t , u ) .

In recent years, the study on p ( t ) -Laplacian problems has attracted more and more attention. The p ( t ) -Laplacian possesses more complicated phenomena than the p -Laplacian. For example, it is inhomogeneous, which causes many difficulties, and some classical theories and methods, such as the theory of Sobolev spaces, are not applicable. The study of various mathematical problems with variable exponent growth condition has received considerable attention in recent years; see [26,30,50,52]. One of the most studied models leading to problems of this type is the model of motion of electro-rheological fluids, which are characterized by their ability to drastically change the mechanical properties under the influence of an exterior electromagnetic field [59]. Problems with variable exponent growth conditions also appear in the mathematical modeling of stationary thermo-rheological viscous flows of non-Newtonian fluids and in the mathematical description of the filtration processes of an ideal barotropic gas through a porous medium [2,3]. Another field of application of equations with variable exponent growth conditions is image processing [10]. We refer the reader to [23,55, 56,57,58,60,61] for an overview and references on this subject, and to [12,13, 14,15,28,29,41,45,53,54] for the study of the p ( t ) -Laplacian equations and the corresponding variational problems.

Since many free boundary problems and obstacle problems may be reduced to partial differential equations (PDEs) with discontinuous nonlinearities, the existence of solutions for the problems with discontinuous nonlinearities has been widely investigated in recent years. Chang [4] extended the variational methods to a class of nondifferentiable functionals. In 2000, Kourogenis and Papageorgiou [35] obtained some nonsmooth critical point theorems. Subsequently, the nonsmooth version of the three critical points theorem and the nonsmooth Ricceri-type variational principle was established by Marano and Motreanu [36], who gave an application to elliptic problems involving the p -Laplacian with discontinuous nonlinearities. Kandilakis et al. [34] obtained the local linking theorem for locally Lipschitz functions. Dai [16] elaborated a nonsmooth version of the fountain theorem and gave an application to a Dirichlet-type differential inclusion. In 2019, Ge and Rădulescu [27] obtained infinitely many solutions for a nonhomogeneous differential inclusion with lack of compactness involving the p ( x ) -Laplacian.

It is well known that homoclinic orbits play an important role in analyzing the chaos of dynamical systems. If a system has transversely intersected homoclinic orbits, then it must be chaotic. If it has the smoothly connected homoclinic orbits, then it cannot stand the perturbation, and its perturbed system probably produces chaotic phenomena. Therefore, it is of practical importance and mathematical significance to consider the existence of homoclinic orbits of problem (1.1). When p ( t ) p , (1.1) reduces to p -Laplacian system:

(1.2) d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) a ( t ) u ( t ) p 2 u ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) ,

Hu and Papageorgious studied the existence of homoclinic solution using the theory of nonsmooth critical points and the idea of approximation [31,32] in the case of periodic nonsmooth potential with scalar equation. However, they did not prove the existence of homoclinic solutions and approached the problem differently from ours. Particularly, none of the works addressed the issues in the case of nonperiodic nonsmooth potential. With regard to the results of (1.1) in PDE, please refer to the literature [6,7,8, 9,17,19,22,33,42,47,48].

To the best of our knowledge, there is few paper discussing the homoclinic solutions of problem (1.1) with nonsmooth potential via nonsmooth critical point theory can be found in the existing literature. In order to fill in this gap, inspired by [28,37,41,57], we study problem (1.1) from a more extensive viewpoint. More precisely, we would study the existence of nontrivial homoclinic solutions of problem (1.1) with the generalized subquadratic and superquadratic in two cases of the nonsmooth potential: periodic and nonperiodic, respectively. Moreover, our results generalize and improve the ones in (1.2). The resulting problem engages two major difficulties: first, due to the appearance of the variable exponent, which is not homogeneous, some special techniques and sharp estimation of inequality will be needed to study this type of problem (1.1). Another difficulty we must overcome is verifying the link geometry and certifying boundedness of the sequence of solutions { u n } associated with problem (1.1). It is worth to point out that commonly known methods and techniques for studying constant exponent equations fail in the setting of problems involving variable exponents. In these cases, we have to use techniques which are simpler and more direct in this article.

Throughout this article, we formulate the hypotheses on p ( t ) , a ( t ) and basic assumptions on f ( t , u ) :

  1. p C ( R , R + ) and

    1 < p inf t R p ( t ) sup t R p ( t ) p + < ;

  2. a C ( R , R + ) and there exists a 0 > 0 such that a ( t ) a 0 > 0 for t R ;

    1. the function f ( t , ) : R R is measurable for all u R N and f ( t , 0 ) = 0 ;

    2. the function f ( , u ) : R N R is locally Lipschitz for a.e. t R .

Our approach is variationally based on the nonsmooth critical point theory (see Rădulescu and Repovš [51], Diening et al. [18] and the papers by Chang, Fan, Rădulescu, Papageorgiou, Papageorgiou and Zhao et al. [4,21,38,40,44]). For the convenience of the reader, in the next section we recall some basic definitions and facts from the theory, which we shall use in the sequel.

This article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present some necessary preliminary knowledge on the generalized gradient of the locally Lipschitz function and variable exponent Sobolev spaces. In Section 3, we establish and prove the existence of nontrivial homoclinic solution related to periodic problem (1.1). In Section 4, we establish and prove the existence of nontrivial homoclinic solution corresponding to nonperiodic problems (1.1) and (4.2), respectively.

Throughout the article, we make use of the following notations:

  • L s ( R ) ( 1 s < ) denotes the Lebesgue space with the norm u s = R u s d t 1 / s ;

  • For any x R and r > 0 , B r ( x ) { y R : y x < r } and B r = B r ( 0 ) ;

  • C 1 , C 2 , denote positive constants possibly different in different places.

2 Preliminaries

We start with some preliminary basic results on variable exponent Sobolev spaces. For more details we refer the readers to the book of Rădulescu and Repovš [51], Diening et al. [18] and the papers by Chang, Fan, Rădulescu, Papageorgiou, Papageorgiou and Zhao et al. [4,21,38,40,44].

2.1 Weighted variable exponential W a 1 , p ( t ) space

In order to discuss problem (1.1), we recall some known results from critical point theory and the properties of space W a 1 , p ( t ) for the convenience of the readers.

Let Ω be a subset of R ,

S ( Ω , R N ) { u : the function u : Ω R N is measurable }

and any two elements in S ( Ω , R N ) which are almost equal are considered the same element. Let p , a satisfy assumptions H (p), H (a), respectively.

Define L a p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) (denoted by L a p ( t ) ) as follows:

L a p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) = u S ( Ω , R N ) : Ω a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) d t <

endowed with the norm

u p ( t ) , a = inf λ > 0 : Ω a ( t ) u λ p ( t ) d t 1 .

If a ( t ) 1 , L a p ( t ) and the corresponding norm u p ( t ) , a are written simply by L p ( t ) , u p ( t ) .

Define W a 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) (denoted by W a 1 , p ( t ) ) as follows:

W a 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) = { u L a p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) : u ˙ L a p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) }

with the norm

u = inf λ > 0 : Ω u ˙ λ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u λ p ( t ) d t 1 .

In particular, if a ( t ) 1 , W a 1 , p ( t ) is reduced to

W 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) = { u L p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) : u ˙ L p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) }

and the norm

u = u p ( t ) + u ˙ p ( t ) .

We use W 0 1 , p ( t ) to represent the space of C 0 ( Ω , R N ) consisting of infinitely continuous differentiable functions with compact supports on Ω completion in W 1 , p ( t ) . We call the space L p ( t ) a generalized Lebesgue space, and it is a special kind of generalized Orlicz spaces. The space W 1 , p ( t ) is called a generalized Sobolev space, it is a special kind of generalized Orlicz-Sobolev spaces. For more details on the general theory of generalized Orlicz spaces and generalized Orlicz-Sobolev spaces, see [18,20,51] and references therein.

The following propositions summarize the main properties of this norm (see Alves and Liu [1], Rădulescu and Repovš [51] and Fan and Zhao [21]).

Proposition 2.1

L a p ( t ) , W a 1 , p ( t ) , W 0 1 , p ( t ) are reflexive Banach spaces with norms defined above when p > 1 .

Proposition 2.2

Let ρ ( u ) = Ω a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) d t for any u , v L a p ( t ) , then the following properties hold:

  1. ρ ( u ) = 0 u = 0 ;

  2. ρ ( u ) = ρ ( u ) ;

  3. ρ ( α u + β v ) α ρ ( u ) + β ρ ( v ) for any α , β 0 , α + β = 1 ;

  4. ρ ( u + v ) 2 p + ( ρ ( u ) + ρ ( v ) ) ;

  5. If λ > 1 , then

    λ p + ρ ( u ) ρ ( λ u ) λ p ρ ( u ) λ ρ ( u ) ρ ( u ) ;

  6. u p ( t ) , a = 1 if and only if ρ u λ = 1 , for any u L a p ( t ) { 0 } .

Proposition 2.3

For any u L a p ( t ) , the following properties hold:

  1. u p ( t ) , a < 1 ( = 1 ; > 1 ) ρ ( u ) < 1 ( = 1 ; > 1 ) ;

  2. If u p ( t ) , a > 1 , then u p ( t ) , a p ρ ( u ) u p ( t ) , a p + ;

  3. If u p ( t ) , a < 1 , then u p ( t ) , a p + ρ ( u ) u p ( t ) , a p ;

  4. u p ( t ) , a 0 ρ ( u ) 0 ;

  5. u p ( t ) , a ρ ( u ) .

Proposition 2.4

Let ϕ ( u ) = Ω ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t for any u W a 1 , p ( t ) , then the following properties hold:

  1. u < 1 ( = 1 ; > 1 ) ϕ ( u ) < 1 ( = 1 ; > 1 ) ;

  2. If u > 1 , then u p ϕ ( u ) u p + ;

  3. If u < 1 , then u p + ϕ ( u ) u p ;

  4. u 0 ϕ ( u ) 0 ;

  5. u ϕ ( u ) .

Proposition 2.5

Let ρ ( u ) = Ω a ( t ) u p ( t ) d t for any u L a p ( t ) , { u n } L a p ( t ) , then the following properties are equivalent:

  1. lim n u n u p ( t ) , a = 0 ;

  2. lim n ρ ( u n u ) = 0 ;

  3. u n u a.e. t Ω and lim n ρ ( u n ) = ρ ( u ) .

Proposition 2.6

( L p ( t ) ) = L q ( t ) with 1 / p ( t ) + 1 / q ( t ) = 1 and

Ω u ( t ) v ( t ) d t 2 u p ( t ) v q ( t ) , u L p ( t ) , v L q ( t ) ,

where ( L p ( t ) ) is the dual space of L p ( t ) .

Proposition 2.7

C 0 ( R , R N ) is dense in space W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Proposition 2.8

Let u W a 1 , p ( t ) , then

  1. u C ( R , R N ) and u ( t ) 0 as t . Moreover, the embedding W a 1 , p ( t ) L ( R , R N ) is continuous, and there exists a constant κ > 0 such that

    u L κ u , u W a 1 , p ( t ) ;

  2. If H(p),H(a) hold and a ( t ) + as t , then the embedding W a 1 , p ( t ) L ( R , R N ) is compact.

Consider the following functional:

I ( u ) = Ω 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t , u W a 1 , p ( t ) .

We know that I C 1 ( W a 1 , p ( t ) , R ) under condition H (a). Moreover,

I ( u ) , v = R ( u ˙ p ( t ) 2 u ˙ v ˙ + a ( t ) u p ( t ) 2 u v ) d t , u , v W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Proposition 2.9

I is a mapping of type ( S ) + , i.e., if

u n u a n d lim n ( I ( u n ) I ( u ) , u n u ) 0 ,

then u n has a convergent subsequence in W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Denote

(2.1) A = J : W a 1 , p ( t ) ( W a 1 , p ( t ) ) ,

then we have

A ( u ) , v = Ω ( u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) v ( t ) + a ( x ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u v ) d t

for all u , v W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Proposition 2.10

The mapping A is a strictly monotone, bounded homeomorphism and is of type ( S ) + in W a 1 , p ( t ) .

2.1.1 Periodic variable exponential W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) space

For any b > 0 , n 1 , let T n [ n b , n b ] . Define L 2 n b p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) (denoted by L 2 n b p ( t ) ) as follows:

L 2 n b p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) = u S ( T n , R N ) : n b n b a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) d t <

endowed with the norm

u p ( t ) = inf λ > 0 : n b n b a ( t ) u λ p ( t ) d t 1 .

Moreover, L 2 n b ( T n , R N ) (denoted by L 2 n b ) be a Banach space with the norm

u L 2 n b = ess sup { u ( t ) : t [ n b , n b ] } .

Define W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R n ) (denoted by W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ) as follows:

W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R n ) = { u L 2 n b p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) : u ˙ L 2 n b p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) }

endowed with the norm

u 1 = inf λ > 0 : n b n b u ˙ λ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u λ p ( t ) d t 1 .

In particular, if b + , L 2 n b p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) , L 2 n b ( T n , R N ) , W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R n ) are written simply by L a p ( t ) ( R , R N ) , L a ( R , R N ) , W a 1 , p ( t ) ( R , R n ) , respectively.

2.2 Nonsmooth analysis theory

The nonsmooth critical point theory for locally Lipschitz functionals is based on the subdifferential theory of Clark [11], Rădulescu [49], Gasiński and Papageorgiou [25].

Definition 2.11

Let X be a Banach space and let X be its topological dual. By we denote the duality brackets for the pair ( X , X ) . A function ϕ : X R is said to be locally Lipschitz, if for every x X there exist U N ( x ) and a constant k U > 0 , such that

ϕ ( y ) ϕ ( z ) k U y z X , y , z U .

Definition 2.12

For a given locally Lipschitz function ϕ : X R , the generalized directional derivative of φ at x X in the direction h X is defined by

ϕ 0 ( x ; h ) lim y x ; λ 0 sup ϕ ( y + λ h ) ϕ ( y ) λ = inf ε , δ > 0 sup x y X < δ , 0 < λ < δ ϕ ( y + λ h ) ϕ ( y ) λ .

Based on Definition 2.12, one can easily verify that the function h ϕ 0 ( x ; h ) is sublinear, Lipschitz continuous (see [11, Proposition 2.1.1]).

Definition 2.13

Let ϕ : X R be a locally Lipschitz function. Then generalized subdifferential of ϕ at x X is the nonempty set ϕ ( x ) X defined by

ϕ ( x ) = { x X : x , h ϕ 0 ( x ; h ) , h X } .

The multifunction x ϕ ( x ) is known as the generalized (or Clarke) subdifferential of ϕ . If ϕ , ψ : X R are locally Lipschitz functions, then ( ϕ + ψ ) ( x ) ϕ ( x ) + ψ ( x ) and for every λ R , ( λ ϕ ) ( x ) = λ ϕ ( x ) .

Definition 2.14

Let ϕ : X R be a locally Lipschitz function. A point x X is said to be a critical point of ϕ if 0 ϕ ( x ) .

If x X is a critical point of ϕ , then c = ϕ ( x ) is a critical value of ϕ . It is easy to see that, if x X is a local extremum of ϕ , then 0 ϕ ( x ) . Moreover, the multifunction x ϕ ( x ) is upper semicontinuous from X into X equipped with the w topology, i.e., for any U X w -open, the set { x X : ϕ ( x ) U } is open in X . For more details we refer to Clarke [11, Proposition 2.1.2].

Definition 2.15

The locally Lipschitz function ϕ : X R satisfies the nonsmooth Palais-Smale (PS) condition, if any sequence { x n } n 1 X such that

{ ϕ ( x n ) } n 1 is bounded and m ( x n ) 0 as n ,

has a strongly convergent subsequence, where m ( x n ) = min [ x : x ϕ ( x n ) ] .

Lemma 2.16

(Lebourg’s mean value Theorem [39]). Given the points x and y in X and a real-valued function ϕ which is Lipschitz continuous on an open set containing the segment [ x , y ] = { ( 1 t ) x + t y : t [ 0 , 1 ] } , there exist z = x + t 0 ( y x ) , with 0 < t 0 < 1 , and x ϕ ( z ) such that

ϕ ( y ) ϕ ( x ) = x , y x .

If ϕ C 1 ( X , R ) , then as we already mentioned ϕ ( x ) = { ϕ ( x ) } and so the above definition of the PS condition coincides with the classical (smooth) one. In the context of the smooth theory, Cerami introduced a weaker compactness condition which in our nonsmooth setting has the following form:

Definition 2.17

The locally Lipschitz function ϕ : X R satisfies the nonsmooth Cerami condition (C-condition), if any sequence { x n } n 1 X such that

{ ϕ ( x n ) } n 1 is bounded and ( 1 + x n ) m ( x n ) 0 as n ,

has a strongly convergent subsequence.

Lemma 2.18

(Weierstrass theorem [43]). Assume that φ is a locally Lipschitz functional on a Banach space X and φ : X R satisfies:

  1. φ is weakly lower semicontinuous;

  2. φ is coercive.

Then there exists x X such that φ ( x ) = min x X φ ( x ) .

Lemma 2.19

(Nonsmooth mountain pass theorem [35]). Let X be a reflexive Banach space, ϕ : X R a locally Lipschitz functional satisfying the PS-condition. Assume that there exist x 0 , x 1 X , c 0 R and ϱ > 0 such that x 1 x 0 > ϱ and

max { ϕ ( x 0 ) , ϕ ( x 1 ) } < c 0 = inf [ ϕ ( y ) : y x 0 = ϱ ] .

Then ϕ has a critical point x X with c = ϕ ( x ) c 0 , where c is given by

c = inf γ Γ 1 max t T ϕ ( γ ( t ) ) ,

Γ 1 = { γ C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , x ) : γ ( 0 ) = x 0 , γ ( 1 ) = x 1 } .

3 Periodic p ( t ) -Laplacian inclusion system

In this section, we establish the existence of homoclinic solutions with periodic assumption for problem (1.1). In this situation, our hypotheses on p , a and f are the following:

  1. p ( t ) is 2 b -periodic;

  2. a ( t ) is 2 b -periodic;

    1. the function f ( t , ) : R R is 2 b -periodic;

    2. for almost all t T = [ b , b ] , there exists a function α ( t ) C ( R ) L γ ( t ) γ ( t ) α ( t ) ( R ) such that

      ω a ( t ) ( 1 + u α ( t ) 1 ) , u R N , ω f ( t , u ( t ) ) ,

      where a L ( R ) , α + < γ < γ ( t ) < γ + < p ;

    3. there exist constants M , α , β > 0 such that

      0 p + + 1 α + β u ν f ( t , u ) f 0 ( t , u ; u ) t T , u M ,

      where ν < p ;

    4. there exist constants μ > p + , M > 0 such that

      μ f ( t , u ) f 0 ( t , u ; u ) t T , u M ;

    5. there exists a function q ( t ) > 0 such that

      lim u 0 ( w , u ) u p ( t ) 0 , lim u + inf f ( t , u ) u q ( t ) > 0 , t T , w f ( t , u ) ,

      where p + < q .

Our main results can be stated as follows.

Theorem 3.1

If hypotheses H(p), H(p) 1 , H(a), H(a) 1 , H(f), and H(f) 1 : (i), (ii), (iii), (iv) hold, then problem (1.1) has a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Theorem 3.2

If hypotheses H(p), H(p) 1 , H(a), H(a) 1 , H(f), and H(f) 1 : (i), (ii), (iii ), (iv) hold, then problem (1.1) has a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Proof of Theorem 3.1

We consider the following auxiliary periodic problem:

(3.1) d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) + a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) , a.e. t T n , u ( n b ) = u ( n b ) , u ˙ ( n b ) = u ˙ ( n b ) .

From [5], we know that problem (3.1) has a nontrivial solution u n C 2 n b 1 ( T n , R N ) . Let φ n : W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) R be defined by

(3.2) φ n ( u ) = n b n b 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t n b n b f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t = φ ˜ n ( u ) n b n b f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t .

We claim that φ n be the locally Lipschitz functional. In fact, for all u 1 , u 2 W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) , one has

(3.3) φ ˜ n ( u 1 ) φ ˜ n ( u 2 ) = φ ˜ n ( u ˜ ) ( u 1 u 2 ) ,

where u ˜ = s u 1 + ( 1 s ) u 2 , s ( 0 , 1 ) . Let Ω T n , fix u 0 W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) and

B r = { u W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) : u u 0 1 r } .

Note that B r is compact, which yields that there exists C 1 > 0 such that

(3.4) φ ˜ n ( u ˜ ) W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) C 1 ,

as r 0 . Then, it follows from (3.3) and (3.4), we obtain

(3.5) φ ˜ n ( u 1 ) φ ˜ n ( u 2 ) = φ ˜ n ( u ˜ ) ( u 1 u 2 ) φ ˜ n ( u ˜ ) W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( T n , R N ) u 1 u 2 1 C 1 u 1 u 2 1 ,

for all u 1 , u 2 W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) .

On the other hand, it follows from H(f) 1 : (ii) and Lemma 2.16, for all u 1 , u 2 W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) , we have

(3.6) f ( t , u 1 ) f ( t , u 2 ) a ( t ) ( 1 + u ˜ α ( t ) 1 ) u 1 u 2

and

a ( t ) u ˜ α ( t ) 1 ( γ ( t ) α ( t ) ) a ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 γ ( t ) α ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 + α ( t ) 1 γ ( t ) 1 u ˜ γ ( t ) 1 ,

which imply that there exist some constants C 2 , C 3 > 0 such that

(3.7) ( a ( t ) u ˜ α ( t ) 1 ) γ ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 C 2 a ( t ) γ ( t ) γ ( t ) α ( t ) + C 3 u ˜ γ ( t ) .

Then, in virtue of (3.6), (3.7) and Hölder inequality, one has

(3.8) n b n b f ( t , u 1 ) d t n b n b f ( t , u 2 ) d t n b n b a ( x ) ( 1 + u ˜ α ( t ) 1 ) u 1 u 2 d t a ( t ) γ ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 + a ( t ) u ˜ α ( t ) 1 γ ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 u 1 u 2 γ ( t ) C 4 u 1 u 2 1 .

Hence, from (3.2), (3.5) and (3.8), we obtain

φ n ( u ) = φ ˜ n ( u ) n b n b f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t C 1 u 1 u 2 1 + C 4 u 1 u 2 1 C 5 u 1 u 2 1 ,

which yields that φ n be the nonsmooth locally Lipschitz energy functional corresponding to problem (3.1). Therefore, it follows from (3.2), H(f): (ii) and H(f) 1 : (iii), (iv), for σ 1 , there exist C 6 , C 7 > 0 such that

φ 1 ( σ u ) = b b 1 p ( t ) ( σ u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) σ u p ( t ) ) d t b b f ( t , σ u ) d t σ p + b b 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t σ q b b u q ( t ) d t C 6 σ p + b b u p + d t + 2 b C 7 .

Since p + < q , there exists a constant σ 0 > 0 such that σ > σ 0 and u ¯ W 2 b 1 , p ( t ) ( T 1 , R N ) , we have φ 1 ( σ u ¯ ) < 0 .

Let u ˆ W 2 b 1 , p ( t ) ( T 1 , R N ) be defined as follows:

u ˆ ( t ) = u ¯ ( t ) , if t T 1 ; 0 , if t T n T 1 .

Note that f ( t , 0 ) = 0 , then for all σ σ 0 , we deduce that φ n ( σ u ˆ ) = φ 1 ( σ u ¯ ) .

As in [5], we see that the solution u n C 2 n b 1 ( T n , R N ) of problem (3.1) is obtained via the nonsmooth mountain pass theorem. One will immediately obtain the fact that there exists ρ > 0 such that

c n inf γ Γ n sup t [ 0 , 1 ] φ n ( γ ( t ) ) = φ n ( u n ) inf [ φ n ( u ) : u = ρ ] > 0 ,

where

Γ n = { γ C ( [ 0 , 1 ] , W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ) : γ ( 0 ) = 0 , γ ( 1 ) = σ u ˆ }

for σ σ 0 and 0 φ n ( u n ) for all n 1 . Extending by constant, as n 1 n 2 we see that

W n 1 1 , p ( t ) W n 2 1 , p ( t ) and Γ n 1 Γ n 2

and consequently

c n 2 c n 1 , n 1 < n 2 .

This way we have produced a decreasing sequence { c n } n 1 of critical values. For every n 1 , from (3.2), we have

(3.9) c n = φ n ( u n ) = n b n b 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t n b n b f ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t c 1 ,

which implies that

(3.10) n b n b p + p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t n b n b p + f ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t p + c 1 .

Then, it follows from (3.10), we obtain

(3.11) n b n b ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t n b n b p + f ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t p + c 1 .

Using (2.1), one has

A ( u n ) = w n , w n L 2 n b , w n ( t ) f ( t , u n ( t ) ) , a.e. t T n ,

which yields that

(3.12) n b n b ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t = n b n b w n ( t ) , u n ( t ) d t n b n b f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) d t .

Combining (3.11) with (3.12), we obtain

(3.13) n b n b ( p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ) d t p + c 1 .

By virtue of H(f) 1 : (iii), one has

f ( t , u n ) ( α + β u n ν ) ( p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ) , u n > M .

Hence, from H(f): (ii), (3.13) and Proposition 2.8 (i), there exists a constant ξ 0 which is independent of n such that

n b n b f ( t , u n ) d t = T n { u n > M } f ( t , u n ) d t + T n { u n M } f ( t , u n ) d t T n { u n > M } ( α + β u n ν ) ( p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ) d t + ξ 0 ( α + β u n ν ) T n { u n > M } ( p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ) d t + ξ 0 ( α + β u n ν ) n b n b ( p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ) d t + ξ 0 p + c 1 ( α + β κ ν u n ν ) + ξ 0 ,

which, together with (3.2), (3.9) and Proposition 2.4 (ii), imply that

1 p + u n p 1 p + n b n b ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t n b n b 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t = φ n ( u n ) + n b n b f ( t , u n ) d t c 1 + p + c 1 ( α + β κ ν u n ν ) + ξ 0 ,

for u n 1 . Since ν < p , there exists a constant ξ 1 which is independent of n such that

(3.14) n b n b 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t c 1 + p + c 1 ( α + β κ ν ξ 1 ν ) + ξ 0 ξ 2 ,

where ξ 2 is a constant which is independent of n . Thus, by (3.14), we obtain

(3.15) u n W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) ξ 3 ,

where ξ 3 > 0 is independent of n . Moreover, by an argument as in the proof of [46, (2.19)], there exists a constant ξ 4 which is independent of n such that

(3.16) u n L 2 n b ξ 4 .

In what follows, we extend by periodicity u n and w n to all of R . From (3.15) and the fact that the embedding W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) C ( T n , R N ) is compact, we may assume that

(3.17) u n u in C loc ( R , R N ) ,

hence u C ( R , R N ) . In view of hypothesis H(f) 1 : (ii), one has

w n ( t ) a ( 1 + u n ( t ) α ( t ) 1 ) = ξ 5 ,

where ξ 5 > 0 is a constant which is independent of n . Passing to a subsequence if needed, we may assume that w n w in L a ( R , R N ) and w n w in L 2 n b q ( t ) ( T n , R N ) , where 1 / p ( t ) + 1 / q ( t ) = 1 . It is obvious that w L a ( R , R N ) L loc q ( t ) ( R , R N ) , thus w ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) in T n for all n 1 and w ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) on R .

For any τ > 0 , we have

τ τ u n ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) d t 0 , as n ,

which shows that

(3.18) lim n τ τ u n ( t ) p ( t ) d t = τ τ u ( t ) p ( t ) d t .

Choose n 0 1 such that [ τ , τ ] T n 0 = [ n 0 b , n 0 b ] and for n n 0 , from (3.15), we derive

(3.19) τ τ u n ( t ) p ( t ) d t n 0 b n 0 b u n ( t ) p ( t ) d t max { ξ 3 p + , ξ 3 p } = ξ 3 0 .

Thus, from (3.18) and (3.19), one has

(3.20) τ τ u ( t ) p ( t ) d t ξ 3 0 .

By the arbitrariness of τ > 0 , from (3.20), we deduce that u L p ( t ) .

Let θ C 0 ( R , R N ) , then supp θ T n for large n 1 , which together with (3.15), performs integration by parts and Proposition 2.6, we have

R ( u n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t = R ( θ ( t ) , u ˙ n ( t ) ) d t = n b n b ( u ˙ n ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t u ˙ n L 2 n b p ( t ) θ L 2 n b q ( t ) ξ 3 θ L 2 n b q ( t ) .

Note that ( u n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) ( u ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) in C loc ( R , R N ) . By (3.16), we have

( u n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) u n L 2 n b θ ˙ ( t ) ξ 4 θ ˙ ( t ) a.e. on T n = [ n b , n b ] .

Let

η ( t ) = ξ 4 θ ˙ ( t ) , if t supp θ ; 0 , if t supp θ .

Then, η L 1 ( R ) and ( u n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) η ( t ) a.e. on R for all n . Therefore, by generalized Lebesgue-dominated convergence theorem, we see that

R ( u n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t R ( u ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t

and

R ( u ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t ξ 3 θ L 2 n b q ( t ) .

It follows from [5] that u W a 1 , p ( t ) ( R , R N ) .

Recall that w n w L loc q ( t ) ( R , R N ) , which leads to

(3.21) R ( w n ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t R ( w ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t .

Furthermore, by (3.17), one has

(3.22) R ( a ( t ) u n ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u n ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t R ( a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t .

Since u n is a solution of problem (3.1), then we obtain d d t ( u ˙ n ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n ( t ) ) L 2 n b p ( t ) . So it follows that u ˙ n ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n ( t ) W 2 n b 1 , p ( t ) for all n 1 . By (3.22) and Proposition 2.1, let

u ˙ n p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n v in W loc 1 , p ( t ) ( R , R N ) ,

then we have

(3.23) u ˙ n p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n v in C loc ( R , R N ) .

Define the continuous functional λ : R R by

λ ( u ) = u p ( t ) 2 u , u C loc ( R , R N ) .

Then, from (3.23) that

u ˙ n = λ 1 ( u ˙ n p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n ) λ 1 ( v ) in L loc 1 ( R , R N ) ,

which shows that λ 1 ( v ) = u ˙ , so we have v = u ˙ p ( t ) 2 u ˙ . Also, integration by parts yields that

(3.24) R ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t = R d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) , θ ( t ) d t .

Hence, it follows from (3.24), we obtain

(3.25) R ( u ˙ n ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t R d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) , θ ( t ) d t .

For any n 1 , we have

(3.26) R ( u ˙ n ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ n ( t ) , θ ˙ ( t ) ) d t + R ( a ( t ) u n ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u n ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t = R ( w n ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t .

Letting n , then from (3.21), (3.22), (3.25), and (3.26), we obtain

R d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) θ ( t ) d t + R a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) θ ( t ) d t = R ( w ( t ) , θ ( t ) ) d t .

From the arbitrary of θ C 0 ( R , R N ) , we can deduce that

d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) + a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) = w ( t ) , a.e. t R

and w L loc q ( t ) ( R , R N ) , w ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) .

Next, we show that u ( ± ) = u ˙ ( ± ) = 0 .

Recall that Proposition 2.8 (i), since u W a 1 , p ( t ) ( R , R N ) , we have u ( t ) 0 as t . Because w ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) , by virtue of H(f) 1 : (ii), one has

(3.27) w ( t ) a 1 ( t ) ( 1 + u ( t ) α ( t ) 1 ) .

Note that u W a 1 , p ( t ) ( R , R N ) , then u p ( t ) 2 u L q ( t ) ( R , R N ) , so w L q ( t ) ( R , R N ) . Therefore, u ˙ p ( t ) 2 u ˙ W a 1 , q ( t ) ( R , R N ) . Again from Proposition 2.8 (i) that u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 1 0 as t . Thus, we obtain u ˙ ( t ) 0 , i.e., u ˙ ( ± t ) = 0 as t .

Finally, we show that u ( t ) 0 . For all n 1 , from (3), we have

(3.28) a 0 n b n b u n p ( t ) d t n b n b ( w n ( t ) , u n ( t ) ) d t .

Let

(3.29) h n ( t ) = ( w n ( t ) , u n ( t ) ) u n ( t ) p ( t ) , if u n ( t ) 0 ; 0 , if u n ( t ) = 0 .

Then, it follows from (3.28) and (3.29) that

a 0 n b n b u n p ( t ) d t n b n b h n ( t ) u n ( t ) p ( t ) d t ess sup T n h n n b n b u n ( t ) p ( t ) d t .

By virtue of hypothesis H(f) 1 : (iv), for a given ε > 0 , we can find δ > 0 such that

(3.30) ( w n ( t ) , u n ( t ) ) u n ( t ) p ( t ) ε , u n ( t ) p ( t ) δ , t T n , ω f ( t , u n ) .

If u = 0 , then it follows from (3.17) that

(3.31) u n ( t ) 0 in C loc ( R , R N )

and so we can find n 0 1 such that

u n ( t ) p ( t ) δ , t T n , n n 0 .

Thus for all n n 0 and almost all t T n , we have h n ( t ) ε and so

a 0 esssup T n h n = esssup R h n ε , n n 0 .

In the above derivation process, we use the fact that u n and ω n are extended by periodicity to all of R . Let ε 0 reach a contradiction since 0 < a 0 . This proves that u 0 .□

Proof of Theorem 3.2

Similar to the proof of Theorem 3.1, we can prove Theorem 3.2, so we omit its course.□

Example 3.1

Let p ( t ) = 5 2 + 1 2 sin t for t R , and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) u 3 ln ( 1 + u ) , ( t , u ) [ π , π ] × R N ,

where a ( t ) satisfies H(a), H(a) 1 with b = π . It is evident that f is locally Lipschitz and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) 3 u u ln ( 1 + u ) + u 2 u 1 + u .

Then

f 0 ( t , u ; u ) = 3 + u ( 1 + u ) ln ( 1 + u ) f ( t , u ) 3 + 1 1 + u f ( t , u ) p + + 1 1 + u f ( t , u ) ,

which implies that f satisfies H(f) 1 :(iii) with α = β = ν = 1 . Hence, from Theorem 3.1, problem (1.1) has a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Example 3.2

Let p ( t ) = 5 2 + 1 2 sin t for t R , and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) u 7 / 2 ln ( 1 + u ) , ( t , u ) [ π , π ] × R N .

Similar to Example 3.1, problem (1.1) has a nontrivial homoclinic solution by Theorem 3.2.

4 Nonperiodic p ( t ) -Laplacian inclusion system

In this section, we investigate the question of existence of homoclinic (to zero) solutions without periodic assumptions. Namely, we examine the following two types of problems:

(4.1) d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) ,

and another problem

(4.2) d d t ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ˙ ( t ) ) a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) 2 u ( t ) f 1 ( t , u ( t ) ) f 2 ( t , u ( t ) ) ,

where a satisfy the following hypothesis:

  1. lim t + a ( t ) = + .

Note that a C ( R , R + ) is coercive, then H (a) 2 ̲ is satisfied, namely,

  1. there exists r > 0 such that

    lim y meas ( { t B r ( y ) : a ( t ) b } ) = 0 for any b > 0 .

For the nonlinearity f , we suppose the following hypotheses:

    1. for almost all t R , there exist a function α ( t ) C ( R ) L γ ( t ) γ ( t ) α ( t ) ( R ) such that

      ω a ( t ) ( 1 + u α ( t ) 1 ) , u R N , ω f ( t , u ( t ) ) ,

      where a L ( R ) , α + < γ < γ ( t ) < γ + < p ;

    2. there exist two functions a i ( t ) < a ( t ) ( i = 1 , 2 ) such that

      ω a 1 ( t ) α 1 ( t ) u α 1 ( t ) 1 , t R , u 1 ,

      and

      ω a 2 ( t ) α 2 ( t ) u α 2 ( t ) 1 , t R , u 1 ,

      where ω f ( t , u ( t ) ) , a i ( t ) C ( R , R + ) and α i ( t ) C ( R , R + ) L γ ( t ) γ ( t ) α i ( t ) ( R ) , α i + < γ < γ ( t ) < γ + < p ;

    3. there exist constants M , α , β > 0 such that

      0 p + + 1 α + β u ν f ( t , u ) f 0 ( t , u ; u ) ( t , u ) R × R N ,

      where ν < p ;

    4. there exist constants μ > p + , M > 0 such that

      μ f ( t , u ) f 0 ( t , u ; u ) ( t , u ) R × R N ;

    5. there exists a function q ( t ) > 0 such that

      lim u 0 w u p + 1 = 0 , lim u + inf f ( t , u ) u q ( t ) > 0 , t R , w f ( t , u ) ,

      where p + < q .

Theorem 4.1

If hypotheses H(p), H(a), H(f) and H(f) 2 : (ii), (iii), (iv) hold, then problem (4.1) has at least a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Theorem 4.2

If hypotheses H(p), H(a), H(f) and H(f) 2 : ( i i ) , ( i i i ) , ( i v ) hold, then problem (4.1) has at least a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Remark 4.3

Note that H(f) 2 ̲ : (ii) is weaker than [27, f 1 ], by virtue of hypothesis H (a) 2 ̲ , we cannot immediately obtain [27, Theorem 1.2] for problem (4.1) with symmetrical condition f ( t , u ) = f ( t , u ) for all ( t , u ) R × R N .

Theorem 4.4

If hypotheses H(p), H(a), H(a) 2 , H(f), H(f) 2 : ( i i ) and the following condition hold:

  1. there exist an open subset Ω R and function γ ( t ) such that

    f ( t , u ) η u γ ( t ) , ( t , u ) Ω × R N , u 1 ,

    where γ ( t ) satisfies H(p) and γ + < p , η > 0 is a constant.

Then problem (4.1) has at least a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

With regard to problem (4.2), in this situation, assume that p , a and f 1 satisfy all the conditions in Theorem 4.2 and f 2 satisfies the following conditions:

    1. the function f 2 ( t , ) : R R is measurable for all u R N and f 2 ( t , 0 ) = 0 ;

    2. the function f 2 ( , u ) : R N R is locally Lipschitz for a.e. t R ;

    3. for almost all t R , there exists a function α ( t ) C ( R ) L γ ( t ) γ ( t ) α ( t ) ( R ) such that

      ω a ( t ) ( 1 + u α ( t ) 1 ) , u R N , ω f 2 ( t , u ( t ) ) ,

      where a L ( R ) , α + < γ < γ ( t ) < γ + < p ;

    4. there exists a constant ϱ [ p + , μ ) such that

      f 2 0 ( t , u ; u ) ϱ f 2 ( t , u ) , ( t , u ) R × R N .

Theorem 4.5

If hypotheses H(p), H(a) , H(f) 3 hold, then problem (4.2) has at least a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Proof of Theorem 4.1

In order to prove Theorems 4.1, 4.2 and 4.4, we first define a functional φ : W a 1 , p ( t ) R as follows:

(4.3) φ ( u ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) + a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t .

Using the same type of reasoning as the proof of Theorem 3.1, it is easy to verify that φ is the nonsmooth Lipschitz energy functional corresponding to problem (1.1).

Let { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) be such that

(4.4) φ ( u n ) M 1 and m ( u n ) 0 as n + ,

where M 1 > 0 is a constant. Our proofs are divided into two steps.

Step 1: u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Since φ ( u n ) W 1 , p ( t ) is weakly compact and norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, according to Weierstrass theorem (Lemma 2.18). We can find u n φ ( u n ) such that m ( u n ) = u n for n 1 .

Define nonlinear operator : W a 1 , p ( t ) ( W a 1 , p ( t ) ) as follows:

( u ) , v = R u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 ( u ˙ ( t ) , v ˙ ( t ) ) d t , u , v W a 1 , p ( t ) .

According to the literature [21], is monotonic and semicontinuous, so it is maximal monotone (see also [24]), therefore, u n = ( u n ) w n for n 1 , and w n f ( t , u n ) , w n L p ( t ) , where 1 / p ( t ) + 1 / p ( t ) = 1 .

In another way, by the selection of sequence { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) , we obtain

(4.5) u n , u n ε n , ε n 0 ,

which yields that

(4.6) R ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t + R ω n u n d t ε n .

Note that w n , u n f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) , using this fact and by (4.3), (4.4) and (4.6), one has

(4.7) p + M 1 p + φ ( u n ) u n , u n R p + p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t p + R f ( t , u n ) d t R ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t + R w n u n d t R [ p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ] d t .

For any ( t , u n ) R × ( R N { 0 } ) , by H(f) 2 : (iii), we have

(4.8) f ( t , u n ( t ) ) ( α + β u n ( t ) ν ) [ p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ] .

Hence, without loss of generality, we assume that u n 1 . Otherwise, u n is bounded. It follows from (4.3), (4.4), (4.7), (4.8), Propositions 2.4 (ii) and 2.8 (i) that

(4.9) 1 p + u n p R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t = φ ( u n ) + R f ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t φ ( u n ) + R ( α + β u n ( t ) ν ) [ p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ] d t M 1 + ( α + β u n ν ) R [ p + f ( t , u n ) f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ] d t M 1 + p + M 1 ( α + β u n ν ) M 1 + p + M 1 ( α + β κ ν u n ν ) .

Note that ν < p , in light of (4.9), it is easy to show that { u n } is bounded. So passing to a subsequence if necessary, it can be assumed that u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) , u n u in L p ( t ) . Because (4.5), then

( u n ) , u n u R w n ( u n u ) d t ε n , n 1 .

By virtue of the fact that { w n } n 1 is bounded in L p ( t ) , then limsup n ( u n ) , u n u 0 . By Proposition 2.9, we deduce that u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Step 2: φ satisfies nonsmooth mountain pass theorem.

Let ε > 0 be small enough, in view of hypotheses H(f) 2 : (ii), (iv), one has

f ( t , u ) ε u p + + c ( ε ) u α ( t ) , ( t , u ) R × R N .

Let u = ρ be small enough, then by Proposition 2.4, we have

(4.10) φ ( u ) 1 p + R ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t ε R u p + d t c ( ε ) R u α ( t ) d t 1 p + u p + ε c p + p + u p + c ( ε ) c α α u α

for the above ε , let ε c p + p + < 1 2 p + , where c p + ( c α ) is the embedding constant from W a 1 , p ( t ) to L p + ( L α ) . Then, from (4.10), we obtain

φ ( u ) 1 2 p + u p + c ( ε ) c α α u α .

Note that p + < α , then there exists a constant r > 0 such that φ ( u ) r when u = ρ for ρ small enough.

By H(f) 2 : (ii), (iv), we see that

(4.11) f ( t , u ) u q ( t ) , t R , u M

and

(4.12) f ( t , u ) c 0 a ( t ) , t R , u < M ,

respectively. Thus, for any u W 1 , p ( t ) { 0 } and σ > 1 , from (4.3), (4.11) and (4.12), we obtain

φ ( σ u ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( σ u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) σ u p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , σ u ) d t σ p + R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t σ q R u q ( t ) d t + c 0 R a ( t ) d t .

Since p + < q , it is easy to show that φ ( σ u ) as σ + . Because φ ( 0 ) = 0 and φ satisfies Lemma 2.19, hence there exists at least one nontrivial critical point, that is, system (4.1) has at least one homoclinic orbit.□

Proof of Theorem 4.2

Applying the proof of Theorem 4.1, we deduce that φ is the nonsmooth Lipschitz energy functional corresponding to problem (1.1).

Let { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) be such that

(4.13) φ ( u n ) M 1 and m ( u n ) 0 as n + ,

where M 1 > 0 as given in (4.4). As φ ( u n ) W 1 , p ( t ) is weakly compact and the norm is weakly lower semicontinuous, by Lemma 2.18, we can choose u n φ ( u n ) such that m ( u n ) = u n for n 1 .

Define nonlinear operator : W a 1 , p ( t ) ( W a 1 , p ( t ) ) as follows:

( u ) , v = R u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 ( u ˙ ( t ) , v ˙ ( t ) ) d t , u , v W a 1 , p ( t ) .

According to the literature [21], is monotonic and semicontinuous, so it is maximal monotone (see also [24]), therefore u n = ( u n ) w n for n 1 , and w n f ( t , u n ) , w n L p ( t ) , where 1 / p ( t ) + 1 / p ( t ) = 1 .

In another way, by the selection of sequence { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) , we obtain

(4.14) u n , u n ε n , ε n 0 ,

which yields

(4.15) p + R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t + R ω n u n d t ε n .

Note that w n , u n f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) , using this fact and by (4.3), (4.13) and (4.15), one has

μ M 1 + ε n μ φ ( u n ) + u n , u n = μ R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u n ) d t + u n , u n = μ R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u n ) d t p + R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t + R ω n u n d t ( μ p + ) R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t R ( μ f ( t , u n ) + f 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ) d t ,

which leads to

(4.16) ( μ p + ) R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t μ M 1 + ε n + R ( μ f ( t , u n ( t ) ) + f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) ) d t .

By H(f) 2 : (ii), there exist two functions a 1 ( t ) , b 1 ( t ) L ( R ) + such that

f ( t , u n ( t ) ) a 1 ( t ) + b 1 ( t ) u n ( t ) α ( t ) .

Recall that u f ( t , u ) is local Lipschitz, there exists c ( t ) L ( R ) + such that

f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) c ( t ) u n ( t ) , u R N .

Thus, there exist a 2 > 0 , b 2 L ( R ) + such that

μ f ( t , u n ( t ) ) + f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) a 2 b 2 ( t ) , t R , u n < M ,

which implies that there exists a constant C 3 > 0 such that

(4.17) { u n < M } ( μ f ( t , u n ( t ) ) + f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) ) d t C 3 .

Combining with (4.17) and H(f) 2 : ( iii ) , we can deduce

(4.18) R ( μ f ( t , u n ( t ) ) + f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) ) d t = { u n < M } ( μ f ( t , u n ( t ) ) + f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) ) d t + { u n M } ( μ f ( t , u n ( t ) ) + f 0 ( t , u n ( t ) ; u n ( t ) ) ) d t C 3 .

Hence, from (4.16) and (4.18), we obtain

(4.19) ( μ p + ) R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t C 4 .

Note that μ > p + , it follows from (4.19) that { u n } n 1 W 1 , p ( t ) is bounded. So passing to a subsequence if necessary, it can be assumed that u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) , u n u in L p ( t ) . Because (4.14), then

( u n ) , u n u R w n ( u n u ) d t ε n , n 1 .

By virtue of the fact that { w n } n 1 is bounded in L p ( t ) , then

limsup n ( u n ) , u n u 0 .

By Proposition 2.9, we obtain u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) .

Next, we need only to verify that φ satisfies nonsmooth mountain pass theorem, i.e., Lemma 2.19, the proof is similar to Theorem 4.1, so we omitted its course.□

Proof of Theorem 4.4

Consider the functional φ : W a 1 , p ( t ) R be defined as (4.3), i.e.,

(4.20) φ ( u ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) + a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t φ ˜ ( u ) R f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t .

First, we prove that φ is the nonsmooth Lipschitz energy functional corresponding to problem (1.1). However, similar arguments as Theorem 4.1, it is easy to see that φ ˜ is the locally Lipschitz functional. So we only need to show R f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t is the locally Lipschitz functional.

Let Ω R , from H(f) 2 : (ii) and Lemma 2.16, for all u 1 , u 2 W a 1 , p ( t ) ( Ω , R N ) , one has

(4.21) f ( t , u 1 ) f ( t , u 2 ) a i ( t ) α i ( t ) u ˜ α ( t ) 1 u 1 u 2 , i = 1 , 2

and

a i ( t ) α i ( t ) u ˜ α i ( t ) 1 ( γ ( t ) α i ( t ) ) a i ( t ) α i ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 γ ( t ) α i ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 + α i ( t ) 1 γ ( t ) 1 u ˜ γ ( t ) 1 , i = 1 , 2 ,

which yields that

(4.22) ( a i ( t ) α i ( t ) u ˜ α i ( t ) 1 ) γ ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 C 8 a ( t ) γ ( t ) γ ( t ) α i ( t ) + C 9 u ˜ γ ( t ) , i = 1 , 2 ,

where u ˜ = s u 1 + ( 1 s ) u 2 , s ( 0 , 1 ) , C 8 , C 9 > 0 . Then, from (4.21), (4.22) and Hölder inequality, we obtain

R f ( t , u 1 ) d t R f ( t , u 2 ) d t R a i ( t ) α i ( t ) u ˜ α ( t ) 1 u 1 u 2 d t a i ( t ) α i ( t ) u ˜ α ( t ) 1 γ ( t ) γ ( t ) 1 u 1 u 2 γ ( t ) C 10 u 1 u 2 , i = 1 , 2 .

Hence, φ is the nonsmooth Lipschitz energy functional corresponding to problem (1.1).

Next, our proofs are divided into three steps.

Step 1: φ is coercive.

It follows from H(f) 2 : ( ii ) that

(4.23) f ( t , u ) a 1 ( t ) u α 1 ( t ) , u 1 ; a 2 ( t ) u α 2 ( t ) , u > 1 .

Let u 1 , it follows from (4.3), Propositions 2.2, 2.4, and 2.6 that

(4.24) φ ( u ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u ) d t 1 p + u p { t : u 1 } f ( t , u ) d t { t : u > 1 } f ( t , u ) d t 1 p + u p { t : u 1 } a 1 ( t ) u α 1 ( t ) d t { t : u > 1 } a 2 ( t ) u α 2 ( t ) d t 1 p + u p C 11 { t : u 1 } b α 1 ( t ) p ( t ) a α 1 ( t ) p ( t ) u α 1 ( t ) d t C 12 { t : u > 1 } b α 2 ( t ) p ( t ) a α 2 ( t ) p ( t ) u α 2 ( t ) d t 1 p + u p 2 C 11 b α 1 ( t ) p ( t ) L r 1 ( t ) u p ( t ) , a α ˜ 1 2 C 12 b α 2 ( t ) p ( t ) L r 2 ( t ) u p ( t ) , a α ˜ 2 1 p + u p 2 C 11 b α 1 ( t ) p ( t ) L r 1 ( t ) u α ˜ 1 2 C 12 b α 2 ( t ) p ( t ) L r 2 ( t ) u α ˜ 2 ,

where C i + 10 = sup t R a i ( t ) ( i = 1 , 2 . ) , b ( t ) = a ( t ) 1 , 1 / r i ( t ) + α i ( t ) / p ( t ) = 1 , and α ˜ i [ α i , α i + ] is a constant. From H(f) 2 : ( ii ) , we know α i < α i + < p , so α i ˜ < p . Hence, by H(a) 2 , we have φ ( u ) + as u + . Thus, φ is bounded below.

Step 2: φ is sequence weakly lower semicontinuous.

Without loss of generality, we assume that u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) , so from Proposition 2.8 (ii), we have u n u in L ( R ) , which implies that

u n u and f ( t , u n ( t ) ) f ( t , u ( t ) ) , t R .

By Fatou lemma, we have

(4.25) lim n sup R f ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t .

Hence, from (4.3) and (4.25), we obtain

(4.26) liminf n φ ( u n ) liminf n R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t limsup n R f ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , u ( t ) ) d t = φ ( u ) ,

which shows that φ is sequence weakly lower semicontinuous.

Using Lemma 2.18, there is a global minimum point u 0 W a 1 , p ( t ) such that

φ ( u 0 ) = min u W a 1 , p ( t ) φ ( u ) .

Step 3: φ ( u 0 ) < 0 .

Let u 0 ( W 0 1 , p ( t ) W a 1 , p ( t ) ) { 0 } with u 0 = 1 , by (4.3) and condition (v), for 0 < s < 1 , we obtain

φ ( s u 0 ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( s u ˙ 0 p ( t ) + a ( t ) s u 0 p ( t ) ) d t R f ( t , s u 0 ( t ) ) d t s p p Ω f ( t , s u 0 ( t ) ) d t s p p η s γ + Ω u 0 ( t ) γ ( t ) d t .

Note that 1 < γ + < p , it is easy to show that φ ( s u 0 ) < 0 as s > 0 small enough.□

Proof of Theorem 4.5

Define a functional ψ : W a 1 , p ( t ) R as follows:

(4.27) ψ ( u ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) + a ( t ) u ( t ) p ( t ) ) d t R f 1 ( t , u ( t ) ) d t + R f 2 ( t , u ( t ) ) d t .

Arguments as in proof of Theorems 4.1 and 4.5, we can easily obtain ψ as the nonsmooth Lipschitz energy functional corresponding to problem (4.2).

Let { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) be such that

(4.28) ψ ( u n ) M 2 and m ( u n ) 0 as n + ,

where M 2 > 0 is a constant. Because ψ ( u n ) W 1 , p ( t ) is weakly compact and the norm is weakly lower semicontinuous. By Lemma 2.18, we can choose u n ψ ( u n ) such that m ( u n ) = u n for n 1 .

Define nonlinear operator : W a 1 , p ( t ) ( W a 1 , p ( t ) ) as follows:

( u ) , v = R u ˙ ( t ) p ( t ) 2 ( u ˙ ( t ) , v ˙ ( t ) ) d t , u , v W a 1 , p ( t ) .

According to the literature [21], is monotonic and semicontinuous, so it is maximal monotone (see also [24]), therefore, u n = ( u n ) w n 1 + w n 2 for n 1 , and w n 1 f 1 ( t , u n ) , w n 2 f 2 ( t , u n ) , w n 1 , w n 2 L p ( t ) , where 1 / p ( t ) + 1 / p ( t ) = 1 .

In another way, by the selection of sequence { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) , we obtain

(4.29) u n , u n ε n , ε n 0 .

Then, it follows from (4.27), (4.28), (4.29), H(f) 2 : (iii ) and H(f) 3 : (iv), we can show that

(4.30) M 2 + ε n μ ψ ( u n ) 1 μ u n , u n = R 1 p ( t ) 1 μ ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t R f 1 ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t + R f 2 ( t , u n ( t ) ) d t + 1 μ R ( w n 1 , u n w n 2 , u n ) d t R 1 p ( t ) 1 μ ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t + 1 μ R [ f 1 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) μ f 1 ( t , u n ) ] d t + 1 μ R [ μ f 2 ( t , u n ) f 2 0 ( t , u n ; u n ) ] d t 1 p + 1 μ R ( u ˙ n p ( t ) + a ( t ) u n p ( t ) ) d t .

Note that μ > p + , by virtue of (4.30) and Proposition 2.4, we have { u n } n 1 W a 1 , p ( t ) is bounded, so we assume that u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) and u n u in L p ( t ) .

Thanks to (4.29), thus

(4.31) ( u n ) , u n u R w n 1 ( u n u ) d t + R w n 2 ( u n u ) d t ε n , n 1 .

Recall that w n 1 , w n 2 L p ( t ) ( R , R N ) , so we have

(4.32) R w n 1 ( u n u ) d t 0 , R w n 2 ( u n u ) d t 0 ,

as n . Then, by (4.31) and (4.32), we obtain

(4.33) limsup n ( u n ) , u n u 0 .

Combining with (4.33) and Proposition 2.9, we deduce that u n u in W a 1 , p ( t ) . So φ satisfies PS condition.

Step 2: ψ satisfies nonsmooth mountain pass theorem.

For any ε > 0 , by H(f) 2 : (ii), (iv), one has

(4.34) f 1 ( t , u ) ε u p + + c ( ε ) u α ( t ) , ( t , u ) R × R N .

Choose u = ρ is small enough, from (4.27), (4.34) and Proposition 2.4, we obtain

ψ ( u ) 1 p + R ( u ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) u p ( t ) ) d t ε R u p + d t c ( ε ) R u α ( t ) d t 1 p + u p + ε c p + p + u p + c ( ε ) c α α u α

for ε > 0 , let ε c p + p + < 1 2 p + , where c p + ( c α ) is the embedding constant from W a 1 , p ( t ) to L p + ( L α ) . Then,

ψ ( u ) 1 2 p + u p + c ( ε ) c α α u α .

Note that p + < α , there exists a constant r > 0 such that φ ( u ) r as u = ρ , when ρ is small enough.

As in [41], it follows from H(f) 2 : (iii ) and H(f) 3 : (iv) that

(4.35) f 1 ( t , σ u ) σ μ f 1 ( t , u ) , ( t , u ) R × R N

and

(4.36) f 2 ( t , σ u ) σ ϱ f 2 ( t , u ) , ( t , u ) R × R N .

Let ω W a 1 , p ( t ) be such that

(4.37) ω ( t ) = 1 , as t 1 ; 0 , as t 2 ; 1 , as t ( 1 , 2 ] .

In view of (4.36) and Proposition 2.8 (i), one has

2 2 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t = { t [ 2 , 2 ] : ω > 1 } f 2 ( t , ω ) d t + { t [ 2 , 2 ] : ω 1 } f 2 ( t , ω ) d t { t [ 2 , 2 ] : ω > 1 } f 2 t , ω ω ω ϱ d t + 2 2 max ω 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t

(4.38) ω L ( R ) ϱ 2 2 max ω = 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t + 2 2 max ω 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t κ ϱ ω ϱ 2 2 max ω = 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t + 2 2 max ω 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t = M 3 ω ϱ + M 4 ,

where

M 3 = κ ϱ 2 2 max ω = 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t , M 4 = 2 2 max ω 1 f 2 ( t , ω ) d t .

When σ > 1 , by (4.35), we have

(4.39) 2 2 f 1 ( t , σ ω ( t ) ) d t σ μ 2 2 f 1 ( t , ω ( t ) ) d t = m σ μ ,

where m = 1 1 f ( t , ω ) d t > 0 . Thus, it follows from (4.27), (4.36), (4.37), (4.38), (4.39) and Proposition 2.4 (ii), we derive

(4.40) ψ ( σ ω ) = R 1 p ( t ) ( σ ω ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) σ ω p ( t ) ) d t + R [ f 2 ( t , σ ω ( t ) ) f 1 ( t , σ ω ( t ) ) ] d t σ p + p R ( ω ˙ p ( t ) + a ( t ) ω p ( t ) ) d t + 2 2 f 2 ( t , σ ω ) d t 2 2 f 1 ( t , σ ω ) d t σ p + p ω p + + M 3 σ ϱ ω ϱ + M 4 σ ϱ m σ μ .

Since μ > ϱ > p + , m > 0 , from (4.40), we can choose σ 0 > 1 such that e = σ 0 ω W a 1 , p ( t ) and φ ( e ) < 0 . Hence, from Lemma 2.19, there exists at least one nontrivial critical point, that is, system (4.2) has at least one homoclinic orbit.□

Example 4.1

Let p ( t ) = 3 2 + 2 π arctan t for t R , and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) ( 1 + a ( t ) ) 1 u 5 / 2 ln ( 1 + u ) , ( t , u ) R × R N ,

where a ( t ) satisfies H(a) , H(a) 2 . It is evident that f is locally Lipschitz and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) ( 1 + a ( t ) ) 1 5 2 u 1 / 2 u ln ( 1 + u ) + u 3 / 2 u 1 + u .

As

f 0 ( t , u ; u ) = 5 2 + u ( 1 + u ) ln ( 1 + u ) f ( t , u ) 5 2 + 1 1 + u f ( t , u ) > p + + 1 1 + u f ( t , u ) ,

f satisfies H(f) 2 : (iii) with α = β = ν = 1 . Thus, we can show that f satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 4.1.

Moreover, it is similar to obtain that f satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 4.2 with μ = 5 2 .

Example 4.2

Let p ( t ) = 5 + 1 1 + t 2 for t R , and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) 1 [ u 4 sin t + 4 + u 2 sin t + 2 ] , ( t , u ) R × R N ,

where a ( t ) = 1 + t 2 satisfies H(a) , H(a) 2 . Obviously, f is locally Lipschitz and

f ( t , u ) = a ( t ) 1 ( 2 sin t + 2 ) [ 2 u 4 sin t + 2 u + u 2 sin t + 1 u ] .

Since

f ( t , u ) 3 ( 2 sin t + 2 ) 1 + t 2 u 2 sin t + 1 , u 1 ; 3 ( 4 sin t + 4 ) 2 ( 1 + t 2 ) u 4 sin t + 3 , u 1 .

Then f satisfies H(f) 2 : ( ii ) with

α 1 ( t ) = 2 sin t + 2 , α 2 ( t ) = 4 sin t + 4 , a 1 ( t ) = 3 1 + t 2 , a 2 ( t ) = 3 2 ( 1 + t 2 ) .

Let Ω = ( 2 , 2 ) , γ ( t ) = 2 sin t + 2 , one has

f ( t , u ) 1 5 u 2 sin t + 2 , u 1 .

Hence, from Theorem 4.4, problem (4.1) has at least a nontrivial homoclinic solution.

Example 4.3

Let p ( t ) = 3 2 + 2 π arctan t for t R , f = f 1 f 2 and

f 1 ( t , u ) = a 1 ( t ) ( 1 + a 1 ( t ) ) 1 u 7 / 2 ln ( 1 + u ) , ( t , u ) R × R N ,

f 2 ( t , u ) = a 2 ( t ) [ sin t u 2 + u 3 ] , ( t , u ) R × R N ,

where a i ( t ) ( i = 1 , 2 . ) satisfies H(a) , H(a) 2 and H(f) 2 : ( ii ) , (v), respectively. It is visible that f is locally Lipschitz, f f 1 f 2 and

f 2 0 ( t , u ; u ) = a 2 ( t ) [ 2 sin t u 2 + 3 u 3 ] 3 f 2 ( t , u ) ,

which implies, f 2 satisfies H(f) 3 : (iv) with ϱ = 3 and μ = 7 2 . It is easy to verify that f satisfies the hypothesis of Theorem 4.5.

  1. Funding information: This work is partially supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China(2021CFB473).

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] C. O. Alves and S. B. Liu, On superlinear p(x)-Laplacian equations in RN, Nonlinear Anal. 73 (2010), no. 8, 2566–2579. 10.1016/j.na.2010.06.033Suche in Google Scholar

[2] S. N. Antontsev and J. F. Rodrigues, On stationary thermo-rheological viscous flows, Ann. Univ. Ferrara Sez. VII Sci. Mat. 52 (2006), no. 1, 19–36. 10.1007/s11565-006-0002-9Suche in Google Scholar

[3] S. N. Antontsev and S. I. Shmarev, A model porous medium equation with variable exponent of nonlinearity: existence, uniqueness and localization properties of solutions, Nonlinear Anal. 60 (2005), no. 3, 515–545. 10.1016/j.na.2004.09.026Suche in Google Scholar

[4] K. C. Chang, Variational methods for nondifferentiable functionals and their applications to partial differential equations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 80 (1981), no. 1, 102–129. 10.1016/0022-247X(81)90095-0Suche in Google Scholar

[5] P. Chen and X. H. Tang, Periodic solutions for a differential inclusion problem involving the p(t)-Laplacian, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (2021), no. 1, 799–815. 10.1515/anona-2020-0156Suche in Google Scholar

[6] P. Chen, X. Tang and L. Zhang, Non-Nehari Manifold Method for Hamiltonian Elliptic System with Hardy Potential: Existence and Asymptotic Properties of Ground State Solution, J. Geom. Anal. 32 (2022), no. 2, 46. 10.1007/s12220-021-00739-5Suche in Google Scholar

[7] P. Chen, H. Chen and X. Tang, Ground states of K-component coupled nonlinear Schrödinger equations with inverse-square potential, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B 43 (2022), no. 3, 319–342. 10.1007/s11401-022-0325-6Suche in Google Scholar

[8] P. Chen, L. Mei and X. Tang, Nonstationary homoclinic orbit for an infinite-dimensional fractional reaction-diffusion system, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B 27 (2022), no. 10, 5389–5409.10.3934/dcdsb.2021279Suche in Google Scholar

[9] P. Chen and X. Tang, Ground states for a system of nonlinear Schrödinger equations with singular potentials, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 42 (2022), no. 10, 5105–5136. 10.3934/dcds.2022088Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Y. M. Chen, S. Levine and M. Rao, Variable exponent, linear growth functionals in image restoration, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66 (2006), no. 4, 1383–1406. 10.1137/050624522Suche in Google Scholar

[11] F. H. Clarke, Optimization and nonsmooth analysis volume 5 of Classics in Applied Mathematics. k Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, second edition, 1990. Suche in Google Scholar

[12] G. W. Dai, Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion problem in RN involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 71 (2009), no. 3–4, 1116–1123. 10.1016/j.na.2008.11.024Suche in Google Scholar

[13] G. W. Dai, Infinitely many solutions for a hemivariational inequality involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 71 (2009), no. 1–2, 186–195. 10.1016/j.na.2008.10.039Suche in Google Scholar

[14] G. W. Dai, Infinitely many solutions for a Neumann-type differential inclusion problem involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009), no. 6, 2297–2305. 10.1016/j.na.2008.03.009Suche in Google Scholar

[15] G. W. Dai, Three solutions for a Neumann-type differential inclusion problem involving the p(x)-Laplacian. Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009), no. 10, 3755–3760. 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.031Suche in Google Scholar

[16] G. W. Dai, Nonsmooth version of Fountain theorem and its application to a Drichlet-type differential inclusion problem, Nonlinear Anal. 72 (2010), no. 3-4, 1454–1461. 10.1016/j.na.2009.08.029Suche in Google Scholar

[17] H. Dang and S. F. Oppenheimer, Existence and uniqueness results for some nonlinear boundary value problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 198 (1996), no. 1, 35–48. 10.1006/jmaa.1996.0066Suche in Google Scholar

[18] L. Diening, P. Harjulehto, P. Hästö, and M. Ružička, Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces with variable exponents, volume 2017 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011.10.1007/978-3-642-18363-8Suche in Google Scholar

[19] T. L. Dinu, Entire solutions of multivalued nonlinear Schrödinger equations in Sobolev spaces with variable exponent, Nonlinear Anal. 65 (2006), no. 7, 1414–1424. 10.1016/j.na.2005.10.022Suche in Google Scholar

[20] X. L. Fan and X. Fan, A Knobloch-type result for p(t)-Laplacian systems. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 282 (2003), no. 2, 453–464. 10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00376-1Suche in Google Scholar

[21] X. L. Fan and D. Zhao, On the spaces Lp(x)(Ω) and Wm,p(x)(Ω), J. Math. Anal. Appl. 263 (2001), no. 2, 424–446. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7617Suche in Google Scholar

[22] M. E. Filippakis, Existence and multiplicity results for nonlinear nonautonomous second-order systems, Nonlinear Anal. 68 (2008), no. 6, 1611–1626. 10.1016/j.na.2006.12.046Suche in Google Scholar

[23] M. Galewski and D. O’Regan, Impulsive boundary value problems for p(t)-Laplacian’s via critical point theory, Czechoslovak Math. J. 62 (2012), no. 4, 951–967. 10.1007/s10587-012-0076-8Suche in Google Scholar

[24] J. P. GarcíaAzorero, I. PeralAlonso, and J. J. Manfredi, Sobolev versus Hölder local minimizers and global multiplicity for some quasilinear elliptic equations. Commun. Contemp. Math. 2 (2000), no. 3, 385–404. 10.1142/S0219199700000190Suche in Google Scholar

[25] L. Gasiński and N. S. Papageorgiou, Nonsmooth critical point theory and nonlinear boundary value problems, vol. 8 of Series in Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2005. 10.1201/9781420035032Suche in Google Scholar

[26] B. Ge and L. L. Liu, Infinitely many solutions for differential inclusion problems in RN involving the p(x)-Laplacian, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 67 (2016), no. 1, Art. 8. 10.1007/s00033-015-0612-0Suche in Google Scholar

[27] B. Ge and V. D. Rădulescu, Infinitely many solutions for a non-homogeneous differential inclusion with lack of compactness, Adv. Nonlinear Stud. 19 (2019), no. 3, 625–637. 10.1515/ans-2019-2047Suche in Google Scholar

[28] B. Ge, X. P. Xue, and Q. M. Zhou, The existence of radial solutions for differential inclusion problems in RN involving the p(x)-Laplacian, Nonlinear Anal. 73 (2010), no. 3, 622–633. 10.1016/j.na.2010.03.041Suche in Google Scholar

[29] B. Ge, X. P. Xue, and Q. M. Zhou, Existence of periodic solutions for a differential inclusion systems involving the p(t)-Laplacian, Acta Math. Sci. Ser. B (Engl. Ed.) 31 (2011), no. 5, 1786–1802. 10.1016/S0252-9602(11)60361-5Suche in Google Scholar

[30] B. Ge, Q. M. Zhou, X.P. Xue, Infinitely many solutions for a differential inclusion problem in RN involving p(x)-Laplacian and oscillatory terms, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 63 (2012), no. 4, 691–711. 10.1007/s00033-012-0192-1Suche in Google Scholar

[31] S. C. Hu and N. S. Papageorgiou, Positive Periodic and Homoclinic Solutions for Nonlinear Differential Equations with Nonsmooth Potential, Positivity 10 (2006), no. 10, 343–363. 10.1007/s11117-005-0028-8Suche in Google Scholar

[32] S. C. Hu and N. S. Papageorgiou, Solutions and multiple solutions for problems with the p-Laplacian, Monatsh. Math. 150 (2007), no. 4, 309–326. 10.1007/s00605-006-0432-6Suche in Google Scholar

[33] A. Iannizzotto and V. D. Rădulescu, Positive homoclinic solutions for the discrete p-Laplacian witha coercive weight function, Differ. Integral Equ. 27 (2014), no. 1–2, 35–44. Suche in Google Scholar

[34] D. Kandilakis, N. C. Kourogenis and N. S. Papageorgiou, Two nontrivial critical points for nonsmooth functionals via local linking and applications, J. Global Optim. 34 (2006), no. 2, 219–244. 10.1007/s10898-005-3884-7Suche in Google Scholar

[35] N. C. Kourogenis and N. S. Papageorgiou, Nonsmooth critical point theory and nonlinear elliptic equations at resonance, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A. 69 (2000), no. 2, : 245–271. 10.1017/S1446788700002202Suche in Google Scholar

[36] S. A. Marano and D. Motreanu, Infinitely many critical points of non-differentiable functions and applications to a Neumann-type problem involving the p-Laplacian, J. Differ. Equ. 182 (2002), no. 1, 108–120. 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4092Suche in Google Scholar

[37] J. Mawhin and M. Willem, Critical point theory and Hamiltonian systems volume 74 of Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2061-7Suche in Google Scholar

[38] M. Mihăilescu, V. D. Rădulescu and S. Tersian, Homoclinic solutions of difference equations with variable exponents, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 38 (2011), no. 2, 277–289. Suche in Google Scholar

[39] D. Motreanu and V. Rădulescu, Variational and non-variational methods in nonlinear analysis and boundary value problems vol. 67 of Nonconvex Optimization and its Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003. 10.1007/978-1-4757-6921-0Suche in Google Scholar

[40] E. H. Papageorgiou and N. S. Papageorgiou, Existence of solutions and of multiple solutions for nonlinear nonsmooth periodic systems, Czechoslovak Math. J. 54 (2004), no. 2, 347–371. 10.1023/B:CMAJ.0000042374.53530.7eSuche in Google Scholar

[41] E. H. Papageorgiou and N. S. Papageorgiou, Non-linear second-order periodic systems with non-smooth potential, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 114 (2004), no. 3, 269–298. 10.1007/BF02830004Suche in Google Scholar

[42] E. H. Papageorgiou and N. S. Papageorgiou, Two nontrivial solutions for quasilinear periodic equations, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 (2004), no. 2, 429–434. 10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07076-XSuche in Google Scholar

[43] N. S. Papageorgiou and S. Th. Kyritsi-Yiallourou, Handbook of applied analysis vol. 19 of Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, Springer, New York, 2009. 10.1007/b120946Suche in Google Scholar

[44] N. S. Papageorgiou, V. D. Rădulescu, and D. D. Repovš. Periodic solutions for a class of evolution inclusions, Comput. Math. Appl. 75 (2018), no. 8, 3047–3065. 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.01.031Suche in Google Scholar

[45] C. Y. Qian, Z. F. Shen and M. B. Yang, Existence of solutions for p(x)-Laplacian nonhomogeneous Neumann problems with indefinite weight, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 11 (2010), no. 1, 446–458. 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.11.019Suche in Google Scholar

[46] P. H. Rabinowitz, Homoclinic orbits for a class of Hamiltonian systems, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A. 114 (1990), no. 1-2, 33–38. 10.21236/ADA210562Suche in Google Scholar

[47] V. D. Rădulescu, Mountain pass theorems for nondifferentiable functions and applications, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 69 (1993), no. 6, 193–198. 10.3792/pjaa.69.193Suche in Google Scholar

[48] V. D. Rădulescu, A Lusternik-Schnirelmann type theorem for locally Lipschitz functionals with applications to multivalued periodic problems, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 71 (1995), no. 7, 164–167. 10.3792/pjaa.71.164Suche in Google Scholar

[49] V. D. Rădulescu, Qualitative analysis of nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations: monotonicity, analytic, and variational methods vol. 6 of Contemporary Mathematics and Its Applications, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, New York, 2008. 10.1155/9789774540394Suche in Google Scholar

[50] V. D. Rădulescu, Nonlinear elliptic equations with variable exponent: old and new, Nonlinear Anal. 12 (2015), no. 1, 336–369. 10.1016/j.na.2014.11.007Suche in Google Scholar

[51] V. D. Rădulescu and D. D. Repovš, Partial differential equations with variable exponents, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics. Variational methods and qualitative analysis, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015. 10.1201/b18601Suche in Google Scholar

[52] S. Samko, On a progress in the theory of Lebesgue spaces with variable exponent: maximal and singular operators. Integral Transforms Spec. Funct. 16 (2005), no. 5–6, 461–482. 10.1080/10652460412331320322Suche in Google Scholar

[53] C. L. Tang and X. P. Wu, Periodic solutions for second-order systems with not uniformly coercive potential, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 259 (2001), no. 2, 386–397. 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7401Suche in Google Scholar

[54] X. J. Wang and R. Yuan, Existence of periodic solutions for p(t)-Laplacian systems, Nonlinear Anal. 70 (2009), no. 2, 866–880. 10.1016/j.na.2008.01.017Suche in Google Scholar

[55] Y. Wang, Existence of periodic solutions for ordinary differential systems in Musielak-Orlicz-Sobolev spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 48 (2020), no. 2, Art. 124070. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.124070Suche in Google Scholar

[56] X. J. Yang, Multiple periodic solutions of a class of p-Laplacian, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 314 (2006), no. 1, 17–29. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2005.03.061Suche in Google Scholar

[57] Q. H. Zhang, Existence of radial solutions for p(x)-Laplacian equations in RN, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2016 pages Paper No. 211 (2016), 506–516. Suche in Google Scholar

[58] S. G. Zhang, Periodic solutions for a class of second-order Hamiltonian systems with p(t)-Laplacian, Bound. Value Probl. 2016, Paper No. 211, 20, 2016. 10.1186/s13661-016-0720-6Suche in Google Scholar

[59] V. V. Zhikov, Averaging of functionals of the calculus of variations and elasticity theory, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 50 (1986), no. 4, 675–710. 10.1070/IM1987v029n01ABEH000958Suche in Google Scholar

[60] V. V. Zhikov, On some variational problems, Russian 5 (1998), no. 1, 105–116. Suche in Google Scholar

[61] V. V. Zhikov, S. M. Kozlov, and O. A. Oleĭnik Homogenization of Differential Operators and Integral Functionals, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994. 10.1007/978-3-642-84659-5Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-02-25
Revised: 2022-05-04
Accepted: 2022-07-31
Published Online: 2022-10-05

© 2023 Jun Cheng et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On sufficient “local” conditions for existence results to generalized p(.)-Laplace equations involving critical growth
  3. On the critical Choquard-Kirchhoff problem on the Heisenberg group
  4. On the local behavior of local weak solutions to some singular anisotropic elliptic equations
  5. Viscosity method for random homogenization of fully nonlinear elliptic equations with highly oscillating obstacles
  6. Double-phase parabolic equations with variable growth and nonlinear sources
  7. Logistic damping effect in chemotaxis models with density-suppressed motility
  8. Bifurcation diagrams of one-dimensional Kirchhoff-type equations
  9. Standing wave solution for the generalized Jackiw-Pi model
  10. Weak-strong uniqueness and energy-variational solutions for a class of viscoelastoplastic fluid models
  11. Eigenvalue inequalities for the buckling problem of the drifting Laplacian of arbitrary order
  12. Homoclinic solutions for a differential inclusion system involving the p(t)-Laplacian
  13. Equivalence between a time-fractional and an integer-order gradient flow: The memory effect reflected in the energy
  14. Bautin bifurcation with additive noise
  15. Small solitons and multisolitons in the generalized Davey-Stewartson system
  16. Nonstationary Poiseuille flow of a non-Newtonian fluid with the shear rate-dependent viscosity
  17. A global compactness result with applications to a Hardy-Sobolev critical elliptic system involving coupled perturbation terms
  18. On a strongly damped semilinear wave equation with time-varying source and singular dissipation
  19. Singularity for a nonlinear degenerate hyperbolic-parabolic coupled system arising from nematic liquid crystals
  20. Stability of stationary solutions to the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations with surface tension
  21. Uniform decay estimates for the semi-linear wave equation with locally distributed mixed-type damping via arbitrary local viscoelastic versus frictional dissipative effects
  22. Symmetry and nonsymmetry of minimal action sign-changing solutions for the Choquard system
  23. Periodic and quasi-periodic solutions of a four-dimensional singular differential system describing the motion of vortices
  24. Multiple nontrivial solutions of superlinear fractional Laplace equations without (AR) condition
  25. Existence and blow-up of solutions in Hénon-type heat equation with exponential nonlinearity
  26. Existence and concentration behavior of positive solutions to Schrödinger-Poisson-Slater equations
  27. On the fractional Korn inequality in bounded domains: Counterexamples to the case ps < 1
  28. Gradient estimates for nonlinear elliptic equations involving the Witten Laplacian on smooth metric measure spaces and implications
  29. Dynamical analysis of a reaction–diffusion mosquito-borne model in a spatially heterogeneous environment
  30. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a quasilinear system with locally superlinear condition
  31. Nontrivial solution for Klein-Gordon equation coupled with Born-Infeld theory with critical growth
  32. Modeling Wolbachia infection frequency in mosquito populations via a continuous periodic switching model
  33. Infinitely many localized semiclassical states for nonlinear Kirchhoff-type equation
  34. Fujita-type theorems for a quasilinear parabolic differential inequality with weighted nonlocal source term
  35. Approximations of center manifolds for delay stochastic differential equations with additive noise
  36. Periodic solutions to a class of distributed delay differential equations via variational methods
  37. Groundstate for the Schrödinger-Poisson-Slater equation involving the Coulomb-Sobolev critical exponent
  38. Existence of nontrivial solutions for the Klein-Gordon-Maxwell system with Berestycki-Lions conditions
  39. Global Sobolev regular solution for Boussinesq system
  40. Normalized solutions for the p-Laplacian equation with a trapping potential
  41. Nonlinear elliptic–parabolic problem involving p-Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator with critical exponent
  42. Blow-up for compressible Euler system with space-dependent damping in 1-D
  43. High energy solutions of general Kirchhoff type equations without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz type condition
  44. On the dynamics of grounded shallow ice sheets: Modeling and analysis
  45. A survey on some vanishing viscosity limit results
  46. Blow-up for logarithmic viscoelastic equations with delay and acoustic boundary conditions
  47. Generalized Liouville theorem for viscosity solutions to a singular Monge-Ampère equation
  48. Front propagation in a double degenerate equation with delay
  49. Positive solutions for a class of singular (pq)-equations
  50. Higher integrability for anisotropic parabolic systems of p-Laplace type
  51. The Poincaré map of degenerate monodromic singularities with Puiseux inverse integrating factor
  52. On a system of multi-component Ginzburg-Landau vortices
  53. Existence and concentration of solutions to Kirchhoff-type equations in ℝ2 with steep potential well vanishing at infinity and exponential critical nonlinearities
  54. Multiplicity results for fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff systems involving critical nonlinearities
  55. On double phase Kirchhoff problems with singular nonlinearity
  56. Estimates for eigenvalues of the Neumann and Steklov problems
  57. Nodal solutions with a prescribed number of nodes for the Kirchhoff-type problem with an asymptotically cubic term
  58. Dirichlet problems involving the Hardy-Leray operators with multiple polars
  59. Incompressible limit for compressible viscoelastic flows with large velocity
  60. Characterizations for the genuine Calderón-Zygmund operators and commutators on generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces
  61. Non-local gradients in bounded domains motivated by continuum mechanics: Fundamental theorem of calculus and embeddings
  62. Noncoercive parabolic obstacle problems
  63. Touchdown solutions in general MEMS models
  64. Existence and nonexistence of nontrivial solutions for the Schrödinger-Poisson system with zero mass potential
  65. Short-time existence of a quasi-stationary fluid–structure interaction problem for plaque growth
  66. Fine bounds for best constants of fractional subcritical Sobolev embeddings and applications to nonlocal PDEs
  67. Symmetries of Ricci flows
  68. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a second-order nonlinear discrete equation of Emden-Fowler type
  69. On the topological gradient method for an inverse problem resolution
  70. Supersolutions to nonautonomous Choquard equations in general domains
  71. Uniform complex time heat Kernel estimates without Gaussian bounds
  72. Global existence for time-dependent damped wave equations with nonlinear memory
  73. Normalized solutions for a critical fractional Choquard equation with a nonlocal perturbation
  74. Reversed Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities with weights on the Heisenberg group
  75. Lamé system with weak damping and nonlinear time-varying delay
  76. Global well posedness for the semilinear edge-degenerate parabolic equations on singular manifolds
  77. Blowup in L1(Ω)-norm and global existence for time-fractional diffusion equations with polynomial semilinear terms
  78. Boundary regularity results for minimisers of convex functionals with (p, q)-growth
  79. Parametric singular double phase Dirichlet problems
  80. Special Issue on Nonlinear analysis: Perspectives and synergies
  81. Editorial to Special issue “Nonlinear analysis: Perspectives and synergies”
  82. Identification of discontinuous parameters in double phase obstacle problems
  83. Global boundedness to a 3D chemotaxis-Stokes system with porous medium cell diffusion and general sensitivity
  84. On regular solutions to compressible radiation hydrodynamic equations with far field vacuum
  85. On Cauchy problem for fractional parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model
  86. The evolution of immersed locally convex plane curves driven by anisotropic curvature flow
  87. Stability of combination of rarefaction waves with viscous contact wave for compressible Navier-Stokes equations with temperature-dependent transport coefficients and large data
  88. On concave perturbations of a periodic elliptic problem in R2 involving critical exponential growth
  89. Existence of solutions for a double-phase variable exponent equation without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition
Heruntergeladen am 1.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2022-0272/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen