Home On the critical Choquard-Kirchhoff problem on the Heisenberg group
Article Open Access

On the critical Choquard-Kirchhoff problem on the Heisenberg group

  • Xueqi Sun , Yueqiang Song and Sihua Liang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 2, 2022

Abstract

In this paper, we deal with the following critical Choquard-Kirchhoff problem on the Heisenberg group of the form:

M ( u 2 ) ( Δ H u + V ( ξ ) u ) = H N u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u Q λ 2 u + μ f ( ξ , u ) ,

where M is the Kirchhoff function, Δ H is the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group H N , f is a Carathéodory function, μ > 0 is a parameter and Q λ = 2 Q λ Q 2 is the critical exponent in the sense of Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality. We first establish a new version of the concentration-compactness principle for the Choquard equation on the Heisenberg group. Then, combining with the mountain pass theorem, we obtain the existence of nontrivial solutions to the aforementioned problem in the case of nondegenerate and degenerate cases.

MSC 2010: 35J20; 35R03; 46E35

1 Introduction and main results

In this paper, we are interested in the existence of solutions to the following Choquard-Kirchhoff type problem on the Heisenberg group of the form:

(1.1) M ( u 2 ) [ Δ H u + V ( ξ ) u ] = H N u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u Q λ 2 u + μ f ( ξ , u ) ,

where M is the Kirchhoff function, Δ H u is the Kohn Laplacian on H N , f is a Carathéodory function, μ > 0 is a parameter, 0 < λ < Q , Q = 2 N + 2 and Q λ = 2 Q λ Q 2 is the critical exponent in the sense of Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality (see (2.5) in Section 2).

In the Euclidean, we note that there has been an increasing amount of research on the Choquard equation. It is well known that the following Choquard equation

Δ u + u = 1 x u 2 u in R 3

was first established in the pioneering work of Fröhlich [14] and Pekar [34] for the modeling of quantum polaron. At the same time, the Choquard equation is also the celebrated Schrödinger-Newton equation in models coupling the Schrödinger equation of quantum physics combining with nonrelativistic Newtonian gravity. Moreover, as described by Fröhlich [14] and Pekar, this model is consistent with the study of the interaction of free electrons in ionic lattices with phonons related to lattice deformations of lattices or with the polarization produced on the media (interaction of an electron with its own hole). For more details, we refer to [10,23,46].

Recently, there has been a lot of interest in studying critical Choquard type equations. Indeed, the critical problem was initially studied in the seminal paper of Brézis and Lieb [7], which was used to deal with the Laplacian equations. After that, there are many generalizations of reference [7] in many directions. In particular, the study of critical Kirchhoff-type problems is more meaningful. For example, Liang et al. [25] considered multiplicity results for Choquard-Kirchhoff type equations with Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev critical exponents,

a + b R N u 2 d x Δ u = α k ( x ) u q 2 u + β R N u ( y ) 2 μ x y μ u 2 μ 2 u , x R N ,

where a > 0 , b 0 , 0 < μ < N , N 3 , α and β are positive real parameters, 2 μ = ( 2 N μ ) / ( N 2 ) is the critical exponent in the sense of Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality. With the help of variational methods under suitable conditions, the authors discussed the multiplicity of solutions to the aforementioned equation. By variational methods, Pucci et al. [35] were concerned with existence of nonnegative solutions of the Schrödinger-Choquard-Kirchhoff-type fractional p -Laplacian. Moreover, there are also some authors working on the degenerate Kirchhoff problem. Wang et al. [47] dealt with the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the critical Kirchhoff-type p -Laplacian problems in the degenerate case by using the mountain pass theorem and an abstract critical point theorem based on the cohomological index. Song and Shi [45] obtained the existence of infinitely many solutions for a class of degenerate p -fractional Kirchhoff equations with critical Hardy-Sobolev nonlinearities by means of the Kajikiya’s new version of the symmetric mountain pass lemma. Subsequently, Liang et al. [26] were concerned with the existence and multiplicity of solutions for the Kirchhoff problem with the fractional Choquard-type in the degenerate Kirchhoff case. On some interesting results recovering the degenerate case of Kirchhoff-type problems, we refer to [3,8,37,49] and the references therein for more details in bounded domains and in the whole space.

On the other hand, our motivation to study problem (1.1) mainly comes from the significant applications of the Heisenberg group. For example, Liang and Pucci [27] got the existence of multiple solutions of the critical Kirchhoff-Poisson systems in the Heisenberg group by using the symmetric mountain pass theorem. Pucci and Temperini in [39] studied the ( p , q ) critical systems on the Heisenberg group and obtained the existence of entire nontrivial solutions by using the concentration-compactness principle on the vectorial Heisenberg context and variational methods. In [38], they completed the results in [39] and dealt with some kind of elliptic systems involving critical nonlinearities and Hardy terms on the Heisenberg group. In [41], the author proved the existence of nontrivial nonnegative solutions for the Schrödinger-Hardy system in the Heisenberg group by an application of the mountain pass theorem and the Ekeland variational principle. In addition, Bordoni and Pucci in [6] obtained the existence solutions of a class of Schrödinger-Hardy system driven by two possibly different Laplacian operators in the Heisenberg group. For more interesting results, please refer to [31,32,40, 41,42,43]. However, once we turn our attention to the critical Choquard-Kirchhoff problem in nondegenerate and degenerate cases on the Heisenberg group, we immediately see that the literature is relatively scarce. Recently, Goel and Sreenadh [18] considered the following Dirichlet problem with Choquard type nonlinearity of the form:

Δ H u = a u + Ω u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u Q λ 2 in Ω , u = 0 on Ω ,

where Δ H is the Kohn Laplacian on the Heisenberg group H N and Ω is a smooth bounded subset of the Heisenberg group H N with C 2 boundary. Here, Q λ = 2 Q λ Q 2 and a is a positive real parameter. They proved the Brézis-Nirenberg type result for the aforementioned problem and the regularity of solutions and nonexistence of solutions depending on the range of a by the mountain pass theorem, the linking theorem and iteration techniques and boot-strap method.

When people consider the critical Choquard equation over unbounded domain, it is crucial for people to think of using the concentration-compactness principle for the Choquard equation to solve difficulties caused by the lack of compactness. Therefore, the study of critical Choquard equations is deeply associated with the concentration phenomena, which can take place when one looks for the sequences of approximated solutions. Lions established the celebrated concentration-compactness principles in classical Sobolev space [28,29,30] to describe the lack of compactness for the injection from D 1 , 2 ( R N ) to L 2 ( R N ) . More precisely, Lions [28] stated the concentration-compactness principles at finite points in the Euclidean. Later, the concentration-compactness principle at infinity was extended by Chabrowski [9], Bianchi et al. [5], Ben-Naoum et al. [4], which provided some quantitative information about the loss of mass of a sequence at infinity in the Euclidean. To prove the existence of solutions for the critical Choquard equation with upper critical exponent 2 μ , Gao et al. [15] established the concentration-compactness principle involving the convolution type nonlinearities. However, the aforementioned concentration-compactness principles are established on the Euclidean Spaces. To the best of our knowledge, there seems to be no relevant results that describe the possible concentration properties of a weakly convergent sequence both at finite points and infinity on the Heisenberg group. Moreover, there also seems no application of such a concentration-compactness principle for studying the critical Choquard equation on the Heisenberg group.

Inspired by the aforementioned papers, we are devoted to proving the existence results for problem (1.1). To achieve the purposes, we first establish a version of concentration-compactness principle for the Choquard equation on the Heisenberg group that be able to verify the ( P S ) c condition at special levels c . Then, together with the mountain pass theorem, we obtain the existence and multiplicity of solutions for problem (1.1) in the nondegenerate case and the degenerate case on the Heisenberg group.

To this end, we suppose that the Kirchhoff function M : R 0 + R 0 + is a continuous and nondecreasing function, and f , V satisfy the following assumptions:

  1. There exists m 0 > 0 such that inf t 0 M ( t ) = m 0 .

  2. There exists τ [ 1 , Q λ / 2 ) such that

    M ( t ) t τ M ˜ ( t ) , t R 0 + ,

    where M ˜ ( t ) = 0 t M ( s ) d s .

  3. There exists m 1 > 0 such that M ( t ) m 1 t τ 1 for all t R + and M ( 0 ) = 0 .

Here, we call problem (1.1) is nondegenerate if a > 0 , b 0 , while problem (1.1) is degenerate if a = 0 , b > 0 . A typical example of M is given by M ( t ) = a + b t τ 1 for t R 0 + , where a R 0 + , b R 0 + and a + b > 0 .
  1. f : H N × R + R is a Carathéodory function such that f is a odd with respect to the second variable.

  2. There exists q ( 2 τ , Q λ ) such that f ( ξ , t ) ε t 2 τ 1 + C ε t q 1 for all ( ξ , t ) H N × R + .

  3. There exists σ ( 2 τ , Q λ ) such that 0 < σ F ( ξ , t ) f ( ξ , t ) t for t R + , where F ( ξ , t ) = 0 t f ( ξ , s ) d s .

    V : H N R + is a continuous function, and there exists V 0 > 0 such that V V 0 > 0 in H N .

Now, we first state the following main results for problem (1.1) in the nondegenerate case.

Theorem 1.1

Let (V) hold. Assume that M satisfies ( M 1 ) ( M 2 ) , f satisfies ( f 1 ) ( f 3 ) . Then there exists μ 1 > 0 such that for any μ μ 1 problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Theorem 1.2

Let (V) hold. Under the assumptions of Theorem 1.1, and assume one of the following conditions holds:

  1. there exists a positive constant m > 0 such that, for each m 0 > m and μ > 0 ;

  2. there exists a positive constant μ 2 > 0 such that, for all μ > μ 2 and m 0 > 0 .

Then, problem (1.1) has at least n pairs of nontrivial weak solutions in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Moreover, we also obtain the following existence results for problem (1.1) in the degenerate case.

Theorem 1.3

Let (V) hold. If M satisfies ( M 2 ) ( M 3 ) , f verifies ( f 1 ) ( f 3 ) , then there exists μ 3 > 0 such that for any μ μ 3 , problem (1.1) has a nontrivial solution in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Theorem 1.4

Let (V) hold.Under the assumptions of Theorem 1.3, and suppose one of the following conditions holds:

  1. there exists a positive constant m > 0 such that for each m 1 > m and μ > 0 ;

  2. there exists a positive constant μ 4 > 0 such that, for all μ > μ 4 and m 1 > 0 .

Then, problem (1.1) has at least n pairs of nontrivial weak solutions in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some notations and preliminary results connected to the Heisenberg setting. In Section 3, we shall give the proof of the concentration-compactness principle for the Choquard equation on the Heisenberg group. In Section 4, we are devoted to proving the Palais-Smale condition at some special energy levels. In Section 5, we deal with the existence and multiplicity results for problem (1.1) in the nondegenerate case. In Section 6, we are interested in the proof of Theorems 1.3 and 1.4, that is, to the proof of existence and multiplicity of solutions for problem (1.1) in the degenerate case.

2 Notations and preliminaries

2.1 The Heisenberg group

First, we give some basic properties of the Heisenberg group. We also can refer to [16,20,24,33] for a complete treatment on the Heisenberg group functional setting. Let H N = R N × R N × R , N N be the Heisenberg Lie group of topological dimension 2 N + 1 , that is, the Lie group that has R 2 N + 1 as a background manifold, endowed with the non-Abelian group law:

τ : H N H N , τ ξ ( ξ ) = ξ ξ ,

with

ξ ξ = ( x + x , y + y , t + t + 2 ( x y y x ) ) , ξ , ξ H n .

The inverse is given by ξ 1 = ξ , so that ( ξ ξ ) 1 = ( ξ ) 1 ξ 1 .

The vector fields for j = 1 , , N ,

X j = x j + 2 y j t , Y j = y j 2 x j t , T = t ,

establishes a basis for the Heisenberg regular commutative relation satisfying the real Lie algebra of left invariant vector fields on the Heisenberg group H N . That means,

[ Y j , Y k ] = [ X j , X k ] = [ Y j , T ] = [ X j , T ] = 0 , [ X j , Y j ] = 4 δ j k T .

A vector field in the span of [ X j , Y j ] j = 1 N is called horizontal.

The horizontal gradient of a C 1 function u : H N R is defined by

D H u = j = 1 N [ ( X j u ) X j + ( Y j u ) Y j ] .

Obviously, D H u is an element of the span of { X j , Y j } j = 1 N . We consider the natural inner product in the span of { X j , Y j } j = 1 N given by

( X , Y ) H = j = 1 n ( x j y j + x ˜ j y ˜ j ) ,

where X = { x j X j + x ˜ j Y j } j = 1 N and Y = { y j X j + y ˜ j Y j } j = 1 N . Therefore, the corresponding Hilbertian norm is defined as follows:

D H u H = ( D H u , D H u ) H

for the horizontal vector field D H u .

For any horizontal vector field function X = X ( ξ ) , X = { x j X j + x ˜ j Y j } j = 1 N of class C 1 ( H N , R 2 N ) , the horizontal divergence of X is defined by

div H X = j = 1 N [ X j ( x j ) + Y j ( x ˜ j ) ] .

Analogously, if u C 2 ( H N ) , then the second-order self-adjoint operator Δ H u in H N is given by

Δ H u = j = 1 N ( X j 2 + Y j 2 ) u = j = 1 N 2 x j 2 + 2 y j 2 + 4 y j 2 x j t 4 x j 2 y j t u + 4 z 2 2 u t 2

is usually called subelliptic Laplacian or Kohn Laplacian on H N . According to the celebrated Theorem 1.1, thanks to Hörmander [19], we know that the operator Δ H is hypoelliptic. Notably, Δ H u = div H D H u for each u C 2 ( H N ) . At the same time, inspired by the seminal paper of Hörmander [19] on the sum of squares of vector fields and type operators, Folland [12] obtained the fundamental solution of the operator Δ H .

As we all know, the generalization of the Kohn-Spencer Laplacian is the horizontal p -Laplacian on the Heisenberg group, p ( 1 , ) , given by

Δ H , p φ = div H ( D H φ H p 2 D H φ ) ,

for all φ C c ( H N ) .

For s > 0 , there is a dilation naturally associated with the Heisenberg group structure, which is usually defined by δ s ( ξ ) = ( s x , s y , s 2 t ) . Therefore, δ s ( ξ 0 ξ ) = δ s ( ξ 0 ) δ s ( ξ ) . Moreover, for all ξ = ( x , y , t ) H N , it is easy to verify that the Jacobian determinant of dilatations δ s : H N H N is constant and equal to R 2 N + 2 . That is why the natural number Q = 2 N + 2 is called homogeneous dimension of H N and the homogeneous dimension Q acts as the equivalent topological dimension in Euclidean spaces.

The Korányi norm is derived from an anisotropic dilation on the Heisenberg group and defined as follows:

r ( ξ ) = r ( z , t ) = ( z 4 + t 2 ) 1 4 , ξ = ( z , t ) H N .

Thus, the homogeneous degree of the Korányi norm is equal to 1, with respect to dilations

δ θ : ( z , t ) ( θ z , θ 2 t ) , θ > 0 .

We shall define Korányi distance by

d H ( ξ , ξ ) = r ( ξ 1 ξ ) , ( ξ , ξ ) H N × H N .

The Korányi open ball of radius R centered at ξ 0 is { B R ( ξ 0 ) = ξ H N : d H ( ξ , ξ 0 ) < R } . For the sake of simplicity, we denote B R = B R ( O ) , where B R ( O ) represents the Korányi open ball centered at the natural origin with radius R .

For any measurable set E , the Haar measure d ξ of Heisenber group H N that consists with the ( 2 N + 1 ) -Lebesgue measure and is invariant under left translations. Therefore, as shown in [24], the topological dimension 2 N + 1 of H N is strictly less than its Hausdorff dimension Q = 2 N + 2 . Moreover, it is Q -homogeneous with respect to dilations:

δ θ ( E ) = θ Q E , d ( δ θ ξ ) = θ Q d ξ .

2.2 Classical Sobolev spaces in the Heisenberg group

Let Γ 2 ( Ω ) be the space of all continuous functions u on Ω such that X j u , Y j u , X j 2 u and Y j 2 u are all continuous in Ω , which can be continuously extended up to Ω . Folland and Stein [11] introduced the space S 1 2 ( H N ) , which is connected to Vector fields X j and Y j and the space S 1 2 ( H N ) is similar to space H 1 ( R N ) . More precisely, the space

S 1 2 ( H N ) = { u L 2 ( H N ) : X j u , Y j u L 2 ( H N ) for all j = 1 , 2 , , N }

is a Hilbert space with inner product

u , v = H N H u H v d ξ + H N u v d ξ .

Therefore, the norm in S 1 2 ( H N ) is defined as follows:

u S 1 2 ( H N ) 2 = H N H u 2 d ξ + H N u 2 d ξ .

The space S ˚ 1 2 ( Ω ) is the closure of C c ( Ω ) in S 1 2 ( H N ) . Therefore, it follows from a Poincare type inequality that S ˚ 1 2 ( Ω ) is a Hilbert space equipped with the norm u S ˚ 1 2 ( Ω ) 2 = Ω H u 2 d ξ . At the same time, we aslo define a function space

S V , 1 2 ( H N ) u S 1 2 ( H N ) : H N V ( ξ ) u ( ξ ) 2 d ξ < ,

equipped with the norm

u = u S V , 1 2 ( H N ) ( H u 2 2 + u 2 , V 2 ) 1 2 , u 2 , V 2 = H N V ( ξ ) u 2 d ξ .

Folland and Stein [11] obtained the following Sobolev type inequality: there exists a positive constant C Q such that

(2.1) u Q C Q u S 1 2 ( H N ) for all u S 1 2 ( H N ) ,

where Q for the L Q ( H N ) -norm and Q = 2 Q Q 2 . Moreover, if Ω is bounded then the embedding S ˚ 1 2 ( Ω ) L ν ( Ω ) is continuous for all ν [ 1 , Q ] . In addition, these embeddings are compact for ν < Q and the embedding is not compact for ν = Q .

The best constant for the embedding S 1 2 ( H N ) L Q ( H N ) is defined as follows:

S = inf u S 1 2 ( H N ) \ { 0 } H N H u 2 d ξ : H N u Q d ξ = 1 .

By (2.1), we know that S > 0 . Also, for any nonempty open set Ω H N , we obtain

(2.2) S = inf u S ˚ 1 2 ( Ω ) \ { 0 } H N H u 2 d ξ : H N u Q d ξ = 1 .

That means, infimum is achieved in the case Ω = H N .

In [21,22], Jersion and Lee showed that the function:

(2.3) Z ( ξ ) = Z ( x , y , t ) = B 0 ( t 2 + ( 1 + x 2 + y 2 ) 2 ) ( Q 2 ) / 4

is such that S Q 2 = Z 2 = Z Q Q , where B 0 is a positive constant. More precisely, any minimizer of S takes the following form:

Z β ω ( ξ ) = β Q 2 2 Z ( δ β ( ω 1 ξ ) )

for suitably β > 0 and ω H N . In [18], the best constant S H G is defined by

(2.4) S H G = inf u S ˚ 1 2 ( H N ) \ { 0 } H N H u 2 d ξ H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ 1 Q λ ,

where Q λ = 2 Q λ Q 2 .

Lemma 2.1

[18] The best constant S H G is achieved if and only if

u ( ξ ) = u ( x , y , t ) = C Z ( δ θ ( a 1 ξ ) ) ,

where C > 0 is a fixed constant, a H N , θ ( 0 , ) are parameters and Z is defined in (2.3) Moreover,

S H G = S ( C ( Q , λ ) ) 1 Q λ ,

where S is the best constant defined in (2.2).

If

W ( ξ ) = S ( Q λ ) ( 2 Q ) 4 ( Q λ + 2 ) C ( Q , λ ) 2 Q 2 ( Q λ + 2 ) Z ( ξ ) ,

then W is unique minimizer of S H G and satisfies the following:

Δ H u = H N u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u Q λ 2 u in H N

and

H N H W 2 d ξ = H N H N W ( ξ ) Q λ W ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = S H G 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

Lemma 2.2

[13] Let 0 < λ < Q . There is a function k L w 2 Q Q + λ ( H N ) such that

η 1 ξ λ = H N k ( η 1 σ ) k ( ξ 1 σ ) d σ for all ξ , η H N ,

where the function k is a real valued, even and homogeneous of degree ( Q + λ ) / 2 .

Lemma 2.3

[18] Assume 0 < λ < Q and X F L = { u : H N R : u F L < } , where

u F L H N H N u Q λ u Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ 1 2 Q λ .

Then F L defines a norm on X F L . Furthermore, ( X F L , F L ) is a Banach space.

Lemma 2.4

[18] Let 0 < λ < Q . If { u n } is bounded sequence in L 2 Q Q 2 ( H N ) such that u n u a.e. in H N as n . Then, as n , the following holds

H N ( ξ λ u n Q λ ) u n Q λ d ξ H N ( ξ λ u n u Q λ ) u n u Q λ d ξ H N ( ξ λ u Q λ ) u Q λ d ξ .

Proposition 2.1

(Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality) [11] Let r , s > 1 and 0 < λ < Q with 1 / r + λ / Q + 1 / s = 2 , f L r ( H N ) and h L s ( H N ) . There exists a sharp constant C ( t , r , λ , Q ) , independent of f , h , such that

(2.5) H N H N f ( ξ ) h ( η ) η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ C ( t , r , λ , Q ) f r h s .

If r = s = 2 Q / ( 2 Q λ ) , then

C ( t , r , λ , Q ) = C ( λ , Q ) = π N + 1 2 N 1 N ! λ Q N ! Γ ( ( Q λ ) / 2 ) Γ 2 ( ( 2 Q λ ) / 2 ) ,

where Γ is the usual Gamma function. Equality holds in (2.5) if and only if f ( constant ) h and

h ( ξ ) = c U ( δ θ ( a 1 ξ ) )

for some c C , θ > 0 , a H N (unless f 0 or g 0 ) and U is defined as follows:

(2.6) U ( ξ ) = U ( x , y , t ) = ( t 2 + ( 1 + x 2 + y 2 ) 2 ) ( 2 Q λ ) / 4 for all ξ = ( x , y , t ) H N .

By using Proposition 2.1, the following integral

(2.7) H N H N u ( ξ ) α u ( η ) α η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ

is well defined if u α ∈ Lr for some r > 1 such that 2 r + λ Q = 2 . It implies that if u S 1 2 ( H N ) , then with the help of Sobolev-type inequality, (2.7) is defined only if

2 r α 2 Q Q 2 .

That is,

2 Q λ Q α 2 Q λ Q 2 Q λ .

Due to this fact, it is quite natural to call 2 Q λ Q the lower critical exponent and Q λ 2 Q λ Q 2 the upper critical exponent on the Heisenberg group.

Together with the assumption V ( ξ ) V 0 > 0 implies that S V , 1 2 ( H N ) is a reflexive Banach space, see [36, Lemma 10] for the proof in the Euclidean context, with minor changes in the Heisenberg setting, and the continuous embedding of S V , 1 2 ( H N ) S 1 2 ( H N ) L ν ( H N ) for all 2 ν Q . In particular, we have the following theorem thanks to the assumption ( V ) (see [6,41]).

Theorem 2.1

[10] For any 2 < ν < Q , there is a compact embedding

S V , 1 2 ( H N ) L ν ( B R ) ,

where

R > 0 .

3 The concentration-compactness principle

In this section, we first give the results of the concentration compactness principle involving convolution type nonlinearities on the Heisenberg group.

Theorem 3.1

Let { u n } be a bounded sequence in S ˚ 1 2 ( H N ) converging weakly and a.e. to some u and ω , ζ , be the bounded nonnegative measures. Assume that

H N u n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u n ( ξ ) Q λ ν , H u n 2 ω , u n Q ζ ,

weakly in the sense of measure, where ν is a bounded positive measure, ω and ζ are bounded nonnegative measures and ω , ζ are real numbers on H N and define

ν lim R lim ¯ n ξ R H N u n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ , ζ lim R lim ¯ n ξ R u n Q d ξ , ω lim R lim ¯ n ξ R H u n 2 d ξ .

Then, there exists a countable sequence of points { z j } j J H N , and families of positive numbers { ν j : j J } , { ζ j : j J } and { ω j : j J } such that

(3.1) ν = H N u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u ( ξ ) Q λ + Σ j J ν j δ z j , j J ν j 1 Q λ < ,

(3.2) ω H u 2 + Σ j J ω j δ z j ,

(3.3) ζ u Q + Σ j J ζ j δ z j

and

(3.4) S H G ν j 1 Q λ ω j , ν j Q 2 Q λ C ( Q , λ ) Q 2 Q λ ζ j ,

where δ ξ is the Dirac-mass of mass 1 concentrated at ξ H N .

For the energy at infinity, we have

(3.5) lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = ν + H N d ν ,

(3.6) lim ¯ n H u n 2 2 = H N d ω + ω ,

(3.7) lim ¯ n H u n Q Q = H N d ζ + ζ

and

(3.8) C ( Q , λ ) 2 Q 2 Q λ ν 2 Q 2 Q λ ζ H N d ζ + ζ , S H G 2 ν 2 Q λ ω H N d ω + ω .

Moreover, if u = 0 and H N d ω = S H G H N d ν 1 Q λ , then ν is concentrated at a single point.

Remark 3.1

In [20], it is worth noting that the concentration-compactness principle is extended for the first time from the Euclidean setting to the general context of Carnot groups, which gives us much inspiration into the concentration-compactness results on Heisenberg group. Notably, Heisenberg group is the special class of Carnot groups. In Theorem 3.1, we extends the concentration-compactness principle involving the convolution type nonlinearities from the Euclidean setting to the Heisenberg group. The strategy is similar to the one in the papers of [15]; however, there are some complications due to the non-Euclidean context. At the same time, the whole Heisenberg group H N is endowed with noncompact families of dilations and translations, which makes a loss of compactness occur due to the concentration at infinity. To deal with this type of phenomena, we also prove a variant of the concentration-compactness principle of Lions [28], that is the concentration-compactness principle involving the convolution type nonlinearities at infinity on the Heisenberg group.

Proof of Theorem 3.1

Since { u n } is a bounded sequence in S ˚ 1 2 ( H N ) converging weakly to u , denote by v n u n u , we have v n ( ξ ) 0 a.e. in H N and v n 0 weakly in S ˚ 1 2 ( H N ) . Applying Lemma 2.4, in the sense of measure, we obtain

H v n 2 ϖ ω H u 2 , H N v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η v n ( ξ ) Q λ κ ν H N u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u ( ξ ) Q λ , v n Q ς ζ u Q .

To prove the possible concentration at finite points, we show that

(3.9) H N ( ξ λ φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ ) φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ H N ( ξ λ v n ( ξ ) Q λ ) φ ( ξ ) Q λ φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ 0 ,

where φ C c ( H N ) . In fact, we denote

Ψ n ( ξ ) ( ξ λ φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ ) φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ ( ξ λ v n ( ξ ) Q λ ) φ ( ξ ) Q λ φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ .

Since φ C c ( H N ) , we have for every δ > 0 there exists M > 0 such that

(3.10) ξ M Ψ n ( ξ ) d ξ < δ , n 1 .

Combining the Riesz potential defines a linear operator and the fact that v n ( ξ ) 0 a.e. in H N , we obtain that

H N v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η 0 a.e. in H N ,

and so we have Ψ n ( ξ ) 0 a.e. in H N . Notice that

Ψ n ( ξ ) = H N ( φ ( η ) Q λ φ ( ξ ) Q λ ) v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ H N ( ξ , η ) v n ( η ) Q λ d η φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ .

For almost all ξ , there exists R > 0 large enough such that

H N ( ξ , η ) v n ( η ) Q λ d η = η R ( ξ , η ) v n ( η ) Q λ d η φ ( ξ ) Q λ η R v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η .

As observed in [22] that ( ξ , η ) L r ( B R ) for each ξ , where r < Q λ 1 if λ > 1 , r + if 0 < λ 1 . Using the Young inequality, there exists s > 2 Q λ such that

B M B R ( ξ , η ) v n ( η ) Q λ d η s d ξ 1 s C φ ( ξ , η ) r v n Q λ 2 Q 2 Q λ C φ ,

where M is given in (3.10). Obviously, for R > 0 large enough

B M φ ( ξ ) Q λ η R v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η s d ξ 1 s C ,

and so, we have

B M H N ( ξ , η ) v n ( η ) Q λ d η s d ξ 1 s C φ .

Therefore, we can obtain for θ > 0 small enough

B M Ψ n ( ξ ) 1 + θ d ξ B M H N ( ξ , η ) v n ( η ) Q λ d η s d ξ 1 s B M φ v n Q d ξ 2 Q λ 2 Q C φ .

By this and Ψ n ( ξ ) 0 a.e. in H N , we have

B M Ψ n ( ξ ) d ξ 0 as n .

Combining this and (3.10), we have

H N Ψ n ( ξ ) d ξ 0 .

By the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, we have

(3.11) H N H N φ v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ C ( Q , λ ) φ v n Q 2 Q λ for all φ C c ( H N ) .

According to (3.9), we obtain

H N φ ( ξ ) 2 Q λ H N v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η v n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ C ( Q , λ ) φ v n Q 2 Q λ + o ( 1 ) .

Passing to the limit as n , we obtain

(3.12) H N φ ( ξ ) 2 Q λ d κ C ( Q , λ ) H N φ Q d ς 2 Q λ Q .

Applying Lemma 1.2 in [28], we know (3.3) holds.

Taking φ = χ { z j } j J , in (3.12), we have

ν j Q 2 Q λ C ( Q , λ ) Q 2 Q λ ζ j , j J .

Combining with definition of S H G , we also have

H N H N φ v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η φ v n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ Q 2 2 Q λ S H G H N H ( φ v n ) 2 d ξ .

By (3.9) and v n 0 in L loc 2 ( H N ) , we can obtain

H N H N φ ( ξ ) 2 Q λ v n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η v n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ Q 2 2 Q λ S H G H N φ 2 H v n 2 d ξ + o ( 1 ) .

Passing to the limit as n , we have

(3.13) H N φ ( ξ ) 2 Q λ d κ Q 2 2 Q λ S H G H N φ 2 d ϖ .

Using Lemma 1.2 in [28] again, we obtain that (3.2) holds. Now, by taking φ χ { z j } , j J , in (3.13), we obtain

S H G ν j 1 Q λ ω j , j J .

Thus, we proved (3.1) and (3.4) hold.

In the following, we shall prove the possible loss of mass at infinity. Using the same technique as in [4], one can prove (3.6) and (3.7). Let ψ C c ( H N ) be such that 0 ψ 1 , ψ = 0 in B 1 and ψ = 1 in B 2 c . Taking R > 1 and put ψ R ( ξ ) = ψ ( δ 1 / R ( ξ ) ) , ξ H N . For every R > 1 , we have

lim ¯ n H N H N v n ( η ) Q λ v n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ H N H N u ( η ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ ψ R ( ξ ) η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ ( 1 ψ R ( ξ ) ) η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ H N H N u ( η ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ ψ R ( ξ ) η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + H N ( 1 ψ R ) d ν + H N H N u ( η ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ ( 1 ψ R ( ξ ) ) η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ H N H N u ( η ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ .

When R , by Lebesgue’s theorem, we can obtain that

lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = ν + H N d ν .

Moreover, by the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequality, we have

ν = lim R lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η ψ R u n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ C ( Q , λ ) lim R lim ¯ n H N u n Q d ξ H N ψ R u n Q d ξ 2 Q λ 2 Q = C ( Q , λ ) ζ H N d ζ + ζ 2 Q λ 2 Q ,

which implies

C ( Q , λ ) 2 Q 2 Q λ ν 2 Q 2 Q λ ζ H N d ζ + ζ .

Similarly, by the definition of S H G and ν , we have

ν = lim R lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η ψ R u n ( ξ ) Q λ d ξ C ( Q , λ ) lim R lim ¯ n H N u n Q d ξ H N u n ψ R Q d ξ 2 Q λ 2 Q S H G Q λ lim R lim ¯ n H N H u n 2 d ξ H N H ( ψ R u n ) 2 d ξ Q λ 2 = S H G Q λ ω H N d ω + ω Q λ 2 ,

which means that

S H G 2 ν 2 Q λ ω H N d ω + ω .

Moreover, if u = 0 , then κ = ν and ϖ = ω . Then the Hölder inequality and (3.13) show that, for φ C 0 ( H N ) ,

H N φ ( ξ ) 2 Q λ d ν Q 2 2 Q λ S H G H N d ω Q λ + 2 2 Q λ H N φ 2 Q λ d ω Q 2 2 Q λ .

Therefore, we can deduce that

ν = S H G Q λ H N d ω Q λ + 2 Q 2 ω .

It follows from (3.13) that, for φ C c ( H N ) ,

(3.14) H N φ ( ξ ) 2 Q λ d ν Q 2 2 Q λ H N d ν Q λ + 2 2 Q λ H N φ 2 d ν .

Hence, for each open set Ω , we have

ν ( Ω ) Q 2 2 Q λ ν ( H N ) Q λ + 2 2 Q λ ν ( Ω ) .

It follows that ν is concentrated at a single point.□

4 Verification of ( P S ) c condition

The functional associated with problem (1.1) is defined as follows:

(4.1) I μ ( u ) = 1 2 M ˜ ( u 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ μ H N F ( ξ , u ) d ξ

for all u S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

In what follows, we give the definition of (weak) solutions for problem (1.1)

(4.2) M ( u 2 ) u , v = H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( η ) Q λ 2 u ( η ) v ( η ) η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ H N f ( ξ , u ) v d ξ

for any u , v S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

To obtain the existence of solutions of problem (1.1), we are able to recover the lack of compactness by applying Theorem 3.1. Some techniques for finding the solutions are borrowed from [17].

Lemma 4.1

Let (V) hold. Assume that M satisfies ( M 1 ) ( M 2 ) , and f satisfies ( f 1 ) ( f 3 ) . Let { u n } n S V , 1 2 ( H N ) be a Palais-Smale sequence of functional I μ , that is,

I μ ( u n ) c μ and I μ ( u n ) 0 in ( S r , 1 2 ( H N ) ) ,

as n , where ( S V , 1 2 ( H N ) ) is the dual of S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . If 2 < p < Q λ and

0 < c μ < 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 ,

where S H G comes from Theorem 3.1, then there exists a subsequence of { u n } n strongly convergent in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Proof

By I μ ( u n ) c μ and I μ ( u n ) 0 in ( S V , 1 2 ( H N ) ) , there exists C > 0 such that

C + C u n I μ ( u n ) 1 σ I μ ( u n ) , u n = 1 2 M ˜ ( u n 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ μ H N F ( ξ , u n ) d ξ 1 σ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 + 1 σ H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ σ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n d ξ .

It follows from ( M 2 ) and ( f 3 ) that

C + C u n 1 2 τ 1 σ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 1 2 τ 1 σ m 0 u n 2 ,

and this fact together with 2 2 τ < σ implies that { u n } n is bounded in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . Then there exists u S V , 1 2 ( H N ) such that, up to a subsequence, it follows that

(4.3) u n u in S r , 1 2 ( H N ) u n u a.e. in H N , u n Q λ 2 u n u Q λ 2 u weakly in L Q Q λ 1 ( H N ) , u n β .

Fix ε > 0 . By ( f 2 ) , we obtain that

H N f ( ξ , u n ) ( u n u ) d ξ H N ( ε u n 2 τ 1 u n u + C ε u n q 1 u n u ) d ξ C ε u n u 2 τ 2 τ ( B ε ( z i ) ) + C C ε u n u q q ( B ε ( z i ) ) C ε + C C ε u n u q q ( B ε ( z i ) ) .

Since q ( 2 τ , Q λ ) , Theorem 2.1 implies that u n u q 0 as n . Therefore, we obtain that

limsup n H N f ( ξ , u n ) ( u n u ) d ξ C ε .

That means

lim n H N f ( ξ , u n ) ( u n u ) d ξ = 0

being ε > 0 arbitrary.

Now we claim that

(4.4) u n u in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) as n .

In fact, it follows from Theorem 3.1 that there exists an at most countable set of distinct points { ξ j } j J , nonnegative numbers { ν j } j J , { ω j } j J , such that

(4.5) ν = H N u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η u ( ξ ) Q λ + j J ν j δ z j , j J ν j δ z j < , ω H u 2 + j J ω j δ z j .

Next, to prove (4.4), we proceed by three steps.

Step 1. Fix j J . Then we prove that either ν j = 0 or

(4.6) ν j ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

Let φ C c ( H N ) such that 0 φ 1 , φ ( O ) = 1 and supp φ = B 1 ¯ . Take ε > 0 and put φ ε ( ξ ) = φ ( δ 1 / ε ( ξ ) ) , ξ H N . Clearly, { φ ε u n } is bounded in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) and I μ ( u n ) , φ ε u n 0 as n . Therefore,

(4.7) M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n φ ε = H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ φ ε η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n φ ε d ξ .

Observe that

(4.8) u n , u n φ ε = H N H u n H ( u n φ ε ) + H N u n 2 φ ε d ξ = H N H u n 2 φ ε d ξ + H N u n 2 φ ε d ξ .

It is easy to see that

(4.9) lim n H N H u n 2 φ ε d ξ = H N φ ε d ω H N H u 2 φ ε d ξ + ω j , lim ε 0 + lim n H N V ξ u n 2 φ ε d ξ = 0 , lim ε 0 + lim n H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n φ ε d ξ = 0

and

(4.10) lim n H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ φ ε η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = H N φ ε d ν + ν j .

Combining (4.9), ( M 1 ) and u n β , we obtain that

lim ε 0 + lim n M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n φ ε M ( β 2 ) ω j m 0 ω j .

By ( M 1 ) , we obtain ν j m 0 ω j . For all j J , it follows from S H G ν j 1 Q λ ω j that

ν j = 0 or ν j ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

Step 2. We claim that (4.6) cannot occur, so ν j = 0 for all j J .

By contradiction, we assume that there exists j such that (4.6) holds true. Since I μ ( u n ) c μ and I μ ( u n ) 0 , as n , it follows that

(4.11) c μ = lim n I μ 1 2 τ I μ ( u n ) , u n .

Moreover, by ( M 2 ) and ( f 3 ) , we have

(4.12) I μ ( u n ) 1 2 τ I μ ( u n ) , u n = 1 2 M ˜ ( u n 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ μ H N F ( ξ , u n ) d ξ 1 2 τ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 + 1 2 τ H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ 2 τ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n d ξ 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ φ ε η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ ,

due to τ 1 , σ ( 2 τ , Q λ ) , μ > 0 and 0 φ ε 1 , φ ε ( ξ ) = φ ( δ 1 / ε ξ ) is given earlier.

Combining (4.11) with (4.12), we obtain that

c μ = lim n I μ ( u n ) = lim n I μ 1 2 τ I μ ( u n ) , u n 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ H N φ ε d ν ,

from which, by letting ε 0 + and using (4.5), it implies that

c μ 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ν j 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 ,

which contradicts the assumption. Hence, ν j = 0 for any j J .

Step 3. The assertion (4.4) holds.

We show that u n u in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . Assume that ψ C c ( H N ) satisfies ψ [ 0 , 1 ] and ψ ( ξ ) = 0 for ξ < R , ψ ( ξ ) = 1 for ξ > 2 R , take R > 0 and put ψ R ( ξ ) = ψ ( δ 1 / R ( ξ ) ) , ξ H N .

As in the proof of Theorem 3.1, we have

(4.13) ν = lim R lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ ψ R η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ

and

(4.14) ω = lim R lim ¯ n H N H u n 2 ψ R d ξ .

Thus, a similar discussion as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 gives that

(4.15) S H G 2 ν 2 Q λ ω 2 .

It follows from I μ ( u n ) , u n as n that

(4.16) M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n ψ R = H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ ψ R η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n ψ R d ξ + o ( 1 ) .

Let’s estimate each of (4.16). We deduce from (4.13) and (4.14) that

(4.17) lim R lim n M ( u n 2 ) H N H u n 2 ψ R d ξ + H N V ξ u n 2 ψ R d ξ lim R lim n m 0 H N H u n 2 ψ R d ξ + o ( 1 ) = m 0 ω .

Clearly,

(4.18) lim R lim n H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n ψ R d ξ = 0

and

(4.19) lim R lim n H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ ψ R η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = ν .

Inserting (4.17)–(4.19) to (4.16), letting R and n in (4.16), we can obtain that

ν m 0 ω ,

this together with (4.15) yields that

ν ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 ,

which implies that ν = 0 or

(4.20) ν ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

Assume (4.20) holds true. Since H u n 2 2 , u n Q λ Q λ are bounded, up to a subsequence, we can assume that H u n 2 2 , u n Q λ Q λ are both convergent. Therefore, by (4.13) and (4.14), we have that

lim ¯ n H u n 2 2 = H N d ω + ω

and

lim ¯ n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ = H N d ν + ν .

Thus, we have

c μ = lim n I μ 1 2 τ I μ ( u n ) , u n lim n 1 2 τ 1 2 τ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 + 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ 1 2 τ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n d ξ H N F ( ξ , u n ) d ξ 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ d ν + 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ν 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ν 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 ,

due to σ ( 2 τ , Q λ ) , μ > 0 and (4.20), which is a contradiction. Hence, ν = 0 . In view of J = , we have

H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ H N H N u ( η ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ .

Furthermore, by Lemma 2.4, we obtain that

(4.21) lim n H N H N u n u Q λ u n u Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ 0 .

Now we define an operator as follows:

(4.22) L ( v ) , w = H N H v H w d ξ + H N V ξ v w d ξ ,

for all v , w S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . Clearly, L is a bounded linear operator, being

L ( v ) , w v w ,

by the Hölder inequality. Hence, the weak convergence of u n u in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) implies that

(4.23) lim n L u n , u = L u , u and lim n L u , u n u = 0 .

Clearly, I μ ( u n ) , u n u 0 as n . Hence, by (4.23), one has

M ( u n 2 ) L ( u n ) L ( u ) , u n u = H N ( ξ λ u n u Q λ ) u n u Q λ d ξ + H N f ( ξ , u n ) ( u n u ) d ξ .

Therefore, by (4.3), we obtain that

(4.24) M ( β 2 ) lim n u n u = 0 .

It follows from ( M 1 ) that u n u in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . Therefore, (4.4) holds true. The proof is thus completed.□

5 Non-degenerate case for problem (1.1)

5.1 Proof of Theorem 1.1

Now we state the general version of the Mountain Pass theorem in [1,2], which will be used later.

Theorem 5.1

Let E be a Banach space and I C 1 ( E ) , with I ( 0 ) = 0 . Suppose that

  1. there exist ρ , α > 0 such that I ( u ) α for all u E with u E = ρ ;

  2. there exist e E satisfying e E > ρ such that I ( e ) < 0 .

Denote

Γ = { γ C ( [ 0 , 1 ] ; E ) : γ ( 0 ) = 0 , γ ( 1 ) = e } .

Then

c = inf γ Γ max t [ 0 , 1 ] I ( γ ( t ) ) α ,

and there exists a ( P S ) c sequence { u n } n E .

Next, we show that I μ satisfies geometric properties ( i ) and ( i i ) of Theorem 5.1.

Lemma 5.1

The functional I μ satisfies the assumptions ( i )–( i i ) in Theorem 5.1.

Proof

For each μ > 0 , by the Sobolev embedding S V , 1 2 ( H N ) L ν ( H N ) , we have for all u S V , 1 2 ( H N ) :

I μ ( u ) = 1 2 M ˜ ( u 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ μ H N F ( ξ , u ) d ξ m 0 2 u 2 1 2 Q λ u 2 Q λ S H G Q λ μ σ H N f ( ξ , u ) u d ξ m 0 2 u 2 1 2 Q λ u 2 Q λ S H G Q λ μ σ H N ε u 2 τ + C ε u q d ξ m 0 2 u 2 1 2 Q λ u 2 Q λ S H G Q λ C C ε μ σ u q ,

where C is a positive constant. Then, we can take ρ , α > 0 such that I μ ( u ) α for u = ρ , due to 2 2 τ < q < Q λ and μ > 0 . Therefore, ( i ) in Theorem 5.1 holds true.

In the following, we verify condition ( i i ) in Theorem 5.1. Let v S ˚ 1 2 ( H N ) be a function, with v = 1 . By ( M 2 ) , we have

(5.1) M ˜ ( t ) M ˜ ( 1 ) t τ for all t 1 .

Then by ( f 3 ) , there holds

I μ ( t v ) M ˜ ( 1 ) t 2 τ μ 2 Q λ H N ( ξ λ t v Q λ ) t v Q λ d ξ μ H N F ( ξ , t v ) d ξ M ˜ ( 1 ) t 2 τ t 2 Q λ μ 2 Q λ S H G Q λ v 2 Q λ = M ˜ ( 1 ) t 2 τ μ 2 Q λ S H G Q λ t 2 Q λ ,

and hence, I μ ( t v ) as t , since 2 τ < 2 Q λ . Therefore, there exists t 0 large enough such that I μ ( t v ) < 0 . Then we take e = t 0 v and I μ ( e ) < 0 . Hence, ( i i ) of Theorem 5.1 holds true. This completes the proof.□

Proof of Theorem 1.1

We claim that

(5.2) 0 < c μ = inf γ Γ max t [ 0 , 1 ] I μ ( γ ( t ) ) < 1 2 τ 1 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 ,

for large enough μ . Now we assume (5.2) holds true, then Lemmas 4.1, 5.1 and Theorem 5.1 give the existence of nontrivial critical points of I μ .

Choosing v 0 S V , 1 2 ( H N ) , such that v 0 = 1 and for given by (ii) in Lemma 5.1, we have lim t I μ ( t v 0 ) . Then there exists t μ such that

I μ ( t μ v 0 ) = sup t 0 I μ ( t v 0 ) for some t μ > 0 .

Hence, t μ satisfies

(5.3) M ( t μ 2 ) t μ 2 = H N ( ξ λ t μ v 0 Q λ ) t μ v 0 Q λ d ξ + μ H N f ( ξ , t μ v 0 ) t μ v 0 d ξ .

Let us first claim that { t μ } μ is bounded. From (5.3), we immediately obtain

M ( t μ 2 ) t μ 2 H N ( ξ λ t μ v 0 Q λ ) t μ v 0 Q λ d ξ ,

due to μ > 0 and assumption ( f 3 ) . The fact that Q λ > 2 yields the claim.

Fix any sequences { μ n } n such that μ n as n . Obviously, { t μ n } n is bounded. Hence, there exist t 0 > 0 and a subsequence, still denoted by { μ n } n , such that t μ n t 0 as n . Thus, there exists C > 0 such that

(5.4) t μ n 2 M ( t μ n 2 ) C for all n .

Next, we claim that t 0 0 as μ .

Arguing by contradiction, we assume that t 0 > 0 . Then, by ( f 1 ) and the boundedness of { t μ n } n , there exists C > 0 such that

0 < f ( ξ , t μ n v 0 ) t μ v 0 C ( t μ n v 0 2 τ + t μ n v 0 q ) L 1 ( H N ) ,

and f ( ξ , t μ n v 0 ) t μ n v 0 f ( ξ , t 0 v 0 ) t 0 v 0 by the continuity of f ( ξ , ) . Therefore, Lebesgue’s dominated convergence theorem yields

(5.5) lim n H N f ( ξ , t μ n v 0 ) t μ n v 0 d ξ = H N f ( ξ , t 0 v 0 ) t 0 v 0 d ξ > 0 .

Hence, (5.5) gives

(5.6) H N ( ξ λ t μ n v 0 Q λ ) t μ n v 0 Q λ d ξ + μ n H N f ( ξ , t μ n v 0 ) t μ n v 0 d ξ as n .

Furthermore, it follows from (5.3) that

M ( t 0 2 ) t 0 2 = ,

which is absurd. Therefore, t μ 0 as μ . Moreover, we deduce from (5.3) that

lim μ H N ( ξ λ t μ v 0 Q λ ) t μ v 0 Q λ d ξ 0

and

μ lim μ H N f ( ξ , t μ v 0 ) t μ v 0 d ξ = 0 .

From this, t μ 0 as μ and the definition of I μ , we obtain that

lim μ ( sup t 0 I μ ( t v 0 ) ) = lim μ I μ ( t μ v 0 ) = 0 .

Then there exists μ 1 such that for any μ μ 1 ,

sup t 0 I μ ( t v 0 ) < 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

If we take e = T v 0 , with T large enough to verify I μ ( e ) < 0 , then we obtain

0 < c μ max t [ 0 , 1 ] I μ ( γ ( t ) ) by taking γ ( t ) = t T v 0 .

Therefore,

0 < c μ sup t 0 I μ ( t v 0 ) < 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2

for μ large enough. The proof of Theorem 1.1 is hence completed.□

5.2 Proof of Theorem 1.2

We shall use the Krasnoselskii’s genus theory introduced by Krasnoselskii in [44] to prove Theorem 1.2. Let X be a Banach space and denote by Λ the class of all closed subsets A X \ { 0 } that are symmetric with respect to the origin, that is, u A implies u A .

Theorem 5.2

[44] Let X be an infinite dimensional Banach space and I C 1 ( X ) be an even functional, with I ( 0 ) = 0 . Assuming that X = Y Z , where Y is finite dimensional, and that I satisfies

  1. There exists constant ρ , α > 0 such that I ( u ) α for all u B ρ Z ;

  2. There exists Θ > 0 such that I satisfies the ( P S ) c condition for all c , with c ( 0 , Θ ) ;

  3. For any finite dimensional subspace X ˜ X , there is R = R ( X ˜ ) > 0 such that I ( u ) 0 on X ˜ B R .

Assume furthermore that Y is k dimensional and Y = span { v 1 , , v k } . For n k , inductively choose v n + 1 E n = span { v 1 , , v n } . Let R n = R ( E n ) and Ω n = B R n E n . Define

G n = { ψ C ( Ω n , X ) : ψ B R n E n = i d and ψ is odd }

and

Γ j = { ψ ( Ω n V ¯ ) : ψ G n , n j , V Λ , γ ( V ) n j } ,

where γ ( V ) is the Krasnoselskii genus of V . For j N , set

c j = inf E Γ j max u E I ( u ) .

Thus, 0 c j c j + 1 and c j < Θ for j > k , then we obtain c j is a critical value of I. Furthermore, if c j = c j + 1 = = c j + m = c < Θ for j > k , then γ ( K c ) m + 1 , where

K c = { u X : I ( u ) = c and I ( u ) = 0 } .

Proof of Theorem 1.2

We will apply Theorem 5.2 to I μ . We know that S V , 1 2 ( H N ) is a reflexive Banach space and I μ C 1 ( S V , 1 2 ( H N ) ) . From (4.1), the functional I μ satisfies I μ ( 0 ) = 0 . We shall divide the proof into the next four steps.

Step 1. The proof is similar to the proof of ( i ) and ( i i ) in Theorem 5.1. We can obtain that I μ satisfies ( a ) and ( c ) of Theorem 5.2.

Step 2. We claim that there exists a sequence ( ϒ n ) n R + with ϒ n ϒ n + 1 such that

c n μ = inf E Γ n max u E I μ ( u ) < ϒ n .

To this aim, using an argument given in [48], according to the definition of c n μ , we obtain

c n μ = inf E Γ n max u E I μ ( u ) inf E Γ n max u E 1 2 M ˜ ( u 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ .

Set

ϒ n = inf E Γ n max u E 1 2 M ˜ ( u 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ .

Then ϒ n < and ϒ n ϒ n + 1 , by the definition of Γ n .

Step 3. We claim that problem (1.1) has at least k pairs of weak solutions.

To achieve this goal, we distinguish two cases:

Case I. Fix μ > 0 . Choosing m 0 so large that

sup n ϒ n < 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

Case II. Using a similar discussion as in (5.2), there exists μ 2 > 0 such that

c n μ ϒ n < 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2

for all μ > μ 2 .

Therefore, in any case, we have

0 < c 1 μ c 2 μ c n μ < ϒ n < 1 2 τ 1 2 Q λ ( m 0 S H G ) 2 Q λ Q λ + 2 .

An application of [44] guarantees that the levels c 1 μ c 2 μ c n μ are critical values of I μ .

If c j μ = c j + 1 μ for some j = 1 , 2 , , k 1 , so by Theorem 4.2 and Remark 2.12 in [1], the set K c j μ contains infinitely many distinct points and hence problem (1.1) has infinitely many weak solutions. Therefore, problem (1.1) has at least k pairs of solutions. This ends the proof.□

6 Degenerate case for problem (1.1)

In this section, we are devoted to investigate the degradation of problem (1.1). To this end, we always suppose that M satisfies ( M 2 ) and ( M 3 ) , and f verifies ( f 1 ) ( f 3 ) . We shall give the following lemma, which is crucial to prove the existence results for problem (1.1).

Lemma 6.1

Suppose that the functions M , V and f satisfy (V), ( M 2 )–( M 3 ) and ( f 1 )–( f 3 ), respectively. Let { u n } n S V , 1 2 ( H N ) be a Palais-Smale sequence of functional I μ , that is,

I μ ( u n ) c μ and I μ ( u n ) 0 in ( S V , 1 2 ( H N ) )

as n , where ( S V , 1 2 ( H N ) ) is the dual of S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . If

(6.1) 0 < c λ < 1 2 1 2 Q λ ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ ,

then there exists a subsequence of { u n } n strongly convergent in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Proof

Since the degenerate nature of problem (1.1), two situations must be considered:

Case 1: inf n 1 u n = 0 . Here, either 0 is an accumulation point for the real sequence { u n } n and so there is a subsequence of { u n } n strongly converging to u = 0 , or 0 is an isolated point of { u n } n and so there exists a subsequence, still denoted by { u n } n , such that inf n 1 u n > 0 . The first case cannot occur since it implies that the trivial solution is a critical point at level c μ . This is impossible, being 0 = I μ ( 0 ) = c μ > 0 . Therefore, only the latter case can occur, so that there is a subsequence, still denoted by { u n } n such that inf n 1 u n > 0 .

Case 2: d inf n 1 u n > 0 .

First, we need to prove sequence { u n } n is bounded in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Since I μ ( u n ) c μ and I μ ( u n ) 0 as n , together with ( M 2 ) , ( M 3 ) and ( f 3 ) , we have

(6.2) c μ + 1 + o ( 1 ) + u n 2 = I μ ( u n ) 1 σ I μ ( u n ) , u n = 1 2 M ˜ ( u n 2 ) 1 σ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 + μ H N 1 σ f ( ξ , u n ) u n F ( ξ , u n ) d ξ + 1 σ 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ 1 2 τ 1 σ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 + μ H N 1 σ f ( ξ , u n ) u n F ( ξ , u n ) d ξ + 1 σ 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ 1 2 τ 1 σ M ( u n 2 ) u n 2 1 2 τ 1 σ m 1 u n 2 τ .

Combining with 2 τ 2 , this fact shows that sequence { u n } n is bounded in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) .

Now, we shall prove that either ν j = 0 or

ν j ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ .

Taking a smooth cut-off function φ ε as Lemma 4.1. Obviously, { u n } n is bounded in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) and I μ ( u n ) , u n φ ε 0 as n . Therefore,

(6.3) M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n φ ε = H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ φ ε η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n φ ε d ξ .

Using a similar discussion as (4.9) in Lemma 4.1 and (6.2), we can obtain that

(6.4) lim ε 0 + lim n H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n φ ε d ξ = 0 .

With the help of ( M 3 ) and (6.3), there holds

(6.5) M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n φ ε M H N H u n 2 φ ε d ξ + H N u n 2 φ ε d ξ H N H u n 2 φ ε d ξ + H N u n 2 φ ε d ξ m 1 H N H u n 2 φ ε d ξ + H N u n 2 φ ε d ξ τ .

Next, we shall analyze each term at the right-hand side of (6.5). In fact, by Theorem 3.1, we have

(6.6) lim n H N H u n 2 φ ε d ξ = H N φ ε d ω H N H u 2 φ ε d ξ + ω j

and

(6.7) lim ε 0 + lim n H N u n 2 φ ε d ξ = lim ε 0 + lim n B ε u n 2 φ ε d ξ = 0 .

Inserting (6.6) and (6.7) into (6.5), we have

lim ε 0 + lim n M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n φ ε m 1 ω j τ .

Therefore, by (6.3) and (6.4), we have

ν j m 1 ω j τ .

Inserting this into (6.3), we can deduce that either ν j = 0 or

(6.8) ν j ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ .

Assume by contradiction that (6.8) holds true. The similar to the proof of Lemma 4.1, conditions ( M 2 ) and ( f 3 ) imply that

(6.9) c μ 1 2 1 2 Q λ H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ φ ε η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ .

Moreover,

c μ 1 2 1 2 Q λ ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ .

This contradicts the assumption (6.1). So ν j = 0 for any j J .

In the following, we will proof that u n u in S V , 1 2 ( H N ) . Choosing a smooth cut-off function ψ R as in Lemma 4.1. Since I ( u n ) , u n ψ R 0 as n . Hence,

(6.10) M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n ψ R = H N H N u n ( ξ ) Q λ u n ( η ) Q λ ψ R η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ + μ H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n ψ R d ξ .

Similar to the arguments in Lemma 4.1, we have

lim R lim n H N f ( ξ , u n ) u n ψ R d ξ = 0 .

Using a similar discussion as in (6.5) and letting R and n , we obtain that

(6.11) lim R lim n M ( u n 2 ) u n , u n φ ε m 1 ω τ .

Together with this fact and (3.8), it implies that either ν = 0 or

(6.12) ν ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ .

By contradiction, we suppose that (6.12) holds true. Similar to the proof of (4.12), we have

(6.13) c μ 1 2 1 2 Q λ ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ .

This is impossible. Thus, ν = 0 .

In view of J = , we can obtain that

lim n H N H N u n ( η ) Q λ u n ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ H N H N u ( η ) Q λ u ( ξ ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ .

That is,

lim n H N ( ξ λ u n Q λ ) u n Q λ d ξ H N ( ξ λ u Q λ ) u Q λ d ξ .

By Lemma 2.4, it follows from the last equality and (4.3) that

H N ( ξ λ u n u Q λ ) u n u Q λ d ξ 0 ,

as n . Hence, we obtain that

H N ( ξ λ u n Q λ ) u n Q λ 2 u n ( u n u ) d ξ 0

and

H N f ( ξ , u n ) ( u n u ) d ξ 0 .

Let L ( v ) be defined as in (4.22). Then it follows from (4.24) and I μ ( u n ) , u n u 0 that

lim n M ( u n 2 ) [ L ( u n ) , u n u L ( u ) , u n u ] = 0 .

By ( M 1 ) , we obtain

lim n [ L ( u n ) , u n u L ( u ) , u n u ] = 0 .

Therefore,

lim n H N H ( u n u ) 2 d ξ + H N V ξ u n u 2 d ξ = lim n ( L ( u n ) , u n u L ( u ) , u n u ) = 0 .

Therefore, u n u strongly in S r , 1 2 ( H N ) . This finishes the proof.□

Lemma 6.2

The functional I μ satisfies the assumptions ( i ) and ( i i ) of Theorem 5.1.

Proof

For each μ > 0 , by ( M 2 )–( M 3 ), ( f 2 ) and Sobolev imbedding inequality, for any u S V , 1 2 ( H N ) , we have

(6.14) I μ = 1 2 M ˜ ( u 2 ) 1 2 Q λ H N H N u ( ξ ) Q λ u ( η ) Q λ η 1 ξ λ d η d ξ μ H N F ( ξ , u ) d ξ 1 2 τ M ( u 2 ) u 2 1 2 Q λ u 2 Q λ S H G Q λ μ σ H N f ( ξ , u ) u d ξ 1 2 τ m 1 u 2 τ 1 2 Q λ u 2 Q λ S H G Q λ μ σ H N ε u 2 τ + C ε u q d ξ 1 2 τ m 1 u 2 τ 1 2 Q λ u 2 Q λ S H G Q λ C μ C ε σ u q ,

where C is a positive constant. Hence, we can choose ρ , α > 0 such that I μ ( u ) α for u = ρ , since 2 τ < 2 Q λ and 2 τ < q . Then ( i ) in Theorem 5.1 holds true. Similar to Lemma 5.1, we can obtain that ( i i ) of Theorem 5.1 still holds.□

Proof of Theorem 1.3

By using the same discussion as the proof for Theorem 5.1, we have that

c μ = inf γ Γ max t [ 0 , 1 ] I μ ( γ ( t ) ) < 1 2 1 2 Q λ ( m 1 S H G τ ) 2 Q λ ( 2 τ ) Q λ + 2 τ .

The rest of the proof is similar to that of Theorem 1.1.□

Proof of Theorem 1.4

The proof of Theorem 1.4 is similar to that of Theorem 1.2.□

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for his/her useful comments and suggestions which help to improve and clarify the paper greatly.

  1. Funding information: X. Sun was supported by the Graduate Scientific Research Project of Changchun Normal University (SGSRPCNU [2022], Grant No. 056). Y. Song was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12001061) and the Research Foundation of Department of Education of Jilin Province (Grant No. JJKH20220822KJ). S. Liang was supported by the Foundation for China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2019M662220), the Research Foundation of Department of Education of Jilin Province (Grant No. JJKH20210874KJ) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (Grant No. YDZJ202201ZYTS582).

  2. Author contributions: Both authors contributed equally and significantly in this paper.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1] A. Ambrosetti and P. Rabinowitz, Dual variational methods in critical point theory and applications, J. Funct. Anal. 14 (1973), 349–381. 10.1016/0022-1236(73)90051-7Search in Google Scholar

[2] J. P. Aubin and I. Ekeland, Applied Nonlinear Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1984. Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Autuori, A. Fiscella, and P. Pucci, Stationary Kirchhoff problemsinvolving a fractional operator and a critical nonlinearity, Nonlinear Anal. 125 (2015), 699–714. 10.1016/j.na.2015.06.014Search in Google Scholar

[4] A. K. Ben-Naoum, C. Troestler, and M. Willem, Extrema problems with critical Sobolev exponents on unbounded domains, Nonlinear Anal. 26 (1996), 823–833. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)00324-BSearch in Google Scholar

[5] G. Bianchi, J. Chabrowski, and A. Szulkin, On symmetric solutions of an elliptic equation with a nonlinearity involving critical Sobolev exponent, Nonlinear Anal. 25 (1995), 41–59. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)E0070-WSearch in Google Scholar

[6] S. Bordoni and P. Pucci, Schrödinger-Hardy systems involving two Laplacian operators in the Heisenberg group, Bull. Sci. Math. 146 (2018), 50–88. 10.1016/j.bulsci.2018.03.001Search in Google Scholar

[7] H. Brézis and E. Lieb, A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and convergence of functionals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (1983), 486–490. 10.1007/978-3-642-55925-9_42Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Caponi and P. Pucci, Existence theorems for entire solutions ofstationary Kirchhoff fractional p-Laplacian equations, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 195 (2016), 2099–2129. 10.1007/s10231-016-0555-xSearch in Google Scholar

[9] J. Chabrowski, Concentration-compactness principle at infinity and semilinear elliptic equations involving critical and subcritical Sobolev exponents, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 3 (1995), 493–512. 10.1007/BF01187898Search in Google Scholar

[10] A. Elgart and B. Schlein, Mean field dynamics of boson stars, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 60 (2007), 500–545. 10.1002/cpa.20134Search in Google Scholar

[11] G. B. Folland and E. M. Stein, Estimates for the ∂¯b complex and analysis on the Heisenberg group, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 27 (1974), 429–522. 10.1002/cpa.3160270403Search in Google Scholar

[12] G. B. Folland, A fundamental solution for a subelliptic operator, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 79 (1973), no. 2, 373–376. 10.1090/S0002-9904-1973-13171-4Search in Google Scholar

[13] R. L. Frank and E. H. Lieb, Sharp constants in several inequalities on the Heisenberg group, Ann. Math. 176 (2012), 349–381. 10.4007/annals.2012.176.1.6Search in Google Scholar

[14] H. Fröhlich, Theory of electrical breakdown in ionic crystal, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 160 (1937), 230–241. 10.1098/rspa.1937.0106Search in Google Scholar

[15] F. Gao, E. Da Silva, M. Yang, and J. Zhou, Existence of solutions for critical Choquard equations via the concentration-compactness method, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 150 (2020), 921–954. 10.1017/prm.2018.131Search in Google Scholar

[16] N. Garofalo and E. Lanconelli, Frequency functions on the Heisenberg group, the uncertainty principle and unique continuation, Ann. Inst. Fourier. 40 (1990), 313–356. 10.5802/aif.1215Search in Google Scholar

[17] J. Garcia Azorero and I. Peral Alonso, Multiplicity of solutions for elliptic problemswith critical exponent or with a nonsymmetric term, Tran. Amer. Math. Soc. 323 (1991), 877–895. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1991-1083144-2Search in Google Scholar

[18] D. Goel and K. Sreenadh, Existence and nonexistence results for Kohn Laplacian withHardy-Littlewood-Sobolev critical exponents, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 486 (2020), 123915. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2020.123915Search in Google Scholar

[19] L. Hörmander, Hypoelliptic second-order differential equations, Acta Math. 119 (1967), no. 1, 147–171. 10.1007/BF02392081Search in Google Scholar

[20] S. P. Ivanov and D. N. Vassilev, Extremals for the Sobolev Inequality and the Quaternionic Contact Yamabe Problem, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2011. 10.1142/7647Search in Google Scholar

[21] D. Jerison and J. M. Lee, Extremals for the Sobolev inequality on the Heisenberg group and the CR Yamabe problem, J. Am. Math. Soc. 1 (1988), 1–13. 10.1090/S0894-0347-1988-0924699-9Search in Google Scholar

[22] D. Jerison and J. M. Lee, Intrinsic CR normal coordinates and the CR Yamabe problem, J. Differ. Geom. 29 (1989), 303–343. 10.4310/jdg/1214442877Search in Google Scholar

[23] K. R. W. Jones, Gravitational self-energy as the litmus of reality, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 10 (1995), 657–667. 10.1142/S0217732395000703Search in Google Scholar

[24] G. P. Leonardi and S. Masnou, On the isoperimetric problem in the Heisenberg group Hn, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 184 (2005), 533–553. 10.1007/s10231-004-0127-3Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Liang, P. Pucci, and B. Zhang, Multiple solutions for critical Choquard-Kirchhoff type equations, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 10 (2021), 400–419. 10.1515/anona-2020-0119Search in Google Scholar

[26] S. Liang, D. D. Repovs, and B. Zhang, Fractional magnetic Schrödinger-Kirchhoff problems with convolution and critical nonlinearities, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 43 (2020), 2473–2490. 10.1002/mma.6057Search in Google Scholar

[27] S. Liang and P. Pucci, Multiple solutions for critical Kirchhoff-Poisson systems in the Heisenberg group, Appl. Math. Lett. 127 (2022), 107846. 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107846Search in Google Scholar

[28] P. L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations, The limit case, Part 1, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 1 (1985), 145–201. 10.4171/RMI/6Search in Google Scholar

[29] P. L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations, The limit case, Part 2, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 1 (1985), 45–121. 10.4171/RMI/12Search in Google Scholar

[30] P. L. Lions, The concentration-compactness principle in the calculus of variations, The locally compact case, Part 2, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 1 (1984), 223–283. 10.1016/s0294-1449(16)30422-xSearch in Google Scholar

[31] Z. Liu and D. Zhang, A new Kirchhoff-Schrödinger-Poisson type system on the Heisenberg group, Differ. Integral Equ. 34 (2021), 621–639. 10.57262/die034-1112-621Search in Google Scholar

[32] Z. Liu, L. Tao, D. Zhang, S. Liang, and Y. Song, Critical nonlocal Schrödinger-Poisson system on the Heisenberg group, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 11 (2022), 482–502. 10.1515/anona-2021-0203Search in Google Scholar

[33] A. Loiudice, Improved Sobolev inequalities on the Heisenberg group, Nonlinear Anal. 62 (2005), 953–962. 10.1016/j.na.2005.04.015Search in Google Scholar

[34] S. Pekar, Untersuchung uber die Elektronentheorie der Kristalle, Akademie Verlag, Berlin, 1954. 10.1515/9783112649305Search in Google Scholar

[35] P. Pucci, M. Xiang, and B. Zhang, Existence results for Schrödinger-Choquard-Kirchhoff equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian, Adv. Calc. Var. 12 (2019), 253–27510.1515/acv-2016-0049Search in Google Scholar

[36] P. Pucci, M. Xiang, and B. Zhang, Multiple solutions for nonhomogeneous Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type equations involving the fractional p-Laplacian in RN, Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 54 (2015), 2785–2806.10.1007/s00526-015-0883-5Search in Google Scholar

[37] P. Pucci, M. Xiang, and B. Zhang, Existence and multiplicity of entire solutions for fractional p-Kirchhoff equations, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 5 (2016), 27–55. 10.1515/anona-2015-0102Search in Google Scholar

[38] P. Pucci and L. Temperini, Concentration-compactness results for systems in the Heisenberg group, Opuscula Math. 40 (2020), 151–162. 10.7494/OpMath.2020.40.1.151Search in Google Scholar

[39] P. Pucci and L. Temperini, Existence for (p,q) critical systems in the Heisenberg group, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 9 (2020), 895–922. 10.1515/anona-2020-0032Search in Google Scholar

[40] P. Pucci, Existence and multiplicity results for quasilinear elliptic equations in the Heisenberg group, Opuscula Math. 39 (2019), 247–257. 10.7494/OpMath.2019.39.2.247Search in Google Scholar

[41] P. Pucci, Critical Schrödinger-Hardy systems in the Heisenberg group, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S 12 (2019), 375–400. 10.3934/dcdss.2019025Search in Google Scholar

[42] P. Pucci, L. Temperini, (p,Q) systems with critical singular exponential nonlinearities in the Heisenberg group, Open Math. 18 (2020), 1423–1439. 10.1515/math-2020-0108Search in Google Scholar

[43] P. Pucci and L. Temperini, Existence for singular critical exponential (p,Q) equations in the Heisenberg group, Adv. Calc. Var. 15 (2022), no. 3, 601–617, https://doi.org/10.1515/acv-2020-0028. Search in Google Scholar

[44] P. H. Rabinowitz, Minimax methods in critical point theory with applications to differential equations, in: CBME Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, vol. 65, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1986. 10.1090/cbms/065Search in Google Scholar

[45] Y. Song and S. Shi, On a degenerate p-fractional Kirchhoff equations involving critical Sobolev-Hardy nonlinearities, Mediterr. J. Math. 15 (2018), 17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-017-1062-z. Search in Google Scholar

[46] F. E. Schunck and E. W. Mielke, General relativistic boson stars, Class. Quantum Grav. 20 (2003)301–356. 10.1088/0264-9381/20/20/201Search in Google Scholar

[47] L. Wang, K. Xie, and B. Zhang, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for critical Kirchhoff-type p-Laplacian problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 458 (2018), 361–378. 10.1016/j.jmaa.2017.09.008Search in Google Scholar

[48] Z. Wei and X. Wu, A multiplicity result for quasilinear elliptic equations involving critical sobolev exponents, Nonlinear Anal. 18 (1992), 559–567. 10.1016/0362-546X(92)90210-6Search in Google Scholar

[49] M. Xiang, B. Zhang, and V. D. Rădulescu, Superlinear Schrödinger-Kirchhoff type problems involving the fractional p-Laplacian and critical exponent, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 9 (2020), 690–709. 10.1515/anona-2020-0021Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-04-13
Revised: 2022-07-07
Accepted: 2022-07-14
Published Online: 2022-09-02

© 2023 Xueqi Sun et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Regular Articles
  2. On sufficient “local” conditions for existence results to generalized p(.)-Laplace equations involving critical growth
  3. On the critical Choquard-Kirchhoff problem on the Heisenberg group
  4. On the local behavior of local weak solutions to some singular anisotropic elliptic equations
  5. Viscosity method for random homogenization of fully nonlinear elliptic equations with highly oscillating obstacles
  6. Double-phase parabolic equations with variable growth and nonlinear sources
  7. Logistic damping effect in chemotaxis models with density-suppressed motility
  8. Bifurcation diagrams of one-dimensional Kirchhoff-type equations
  9. Standing wave solution for the generalized Jackiw-Pi model
  10. Weak-strong uniqueness and energy-variational solutions for a class of viscoelastoplastic fluid models
  11. Eigenvalue inequalities for the buckling problem of the drifting Laplacian of arbitrary order
  12. Homoclinic solutions for a differential inclusion system involving the p(t)-Laplacian
  13. Equivalence between a time-fractional and an integer-order gradient flow: The memory effect reflected in the energy
  14. Bautin bifurcation with additive noise
  15. Small solitons and multisolitons in the generalized Davey-Stewartson system
  16. Nonstationary Poiseuille flow of a non-Newtonian fluid with the shear rate-dependent viscosity
  17. A global compactness result with applications to a Hardy-Sobolev critical elliptic system involving coupled perturbation terms
  18. On a strongly damped semilinear wave equation with time-varying source and singular dissipation
  19. Singularity for a nonlinear degenerate hyperbolic-parabolic coupled system arising from nematic liquid crystals
  20. Stability of stationary solutions to the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations with surface tension
  21. Uniform decay estimates for the semi-linear wave equation with locally distributed mixed-type damping via arbitrary local viscoelastic versus frictional dissipative effects
  22. Symmetry and nonsymmetry of minimal action sign-changing solutions for the Choquard system
  23. Periodic and quasi-periodic solutions of a four-dimensional singular differential system describing the motion of vortices
  24. Multiple nontrivial solutions of superlinear fractional Laplace equations without (AR) condition
  25. Existence and blow-up of solutions in Hénon-type heat equation with exponential nonlinearity
  26. Existence and concentration behavior of positive solutions to Schrödinger-Poisson-Slater equations
  27. On the fractional Korn inequality in bounded domains: Counterexamples to the case ps < 1
  28. Gradient estimates for nonlinear elliptic equations involving the Witten Laplacian on smooth metric measure spaces and implications
  29. Dynamical analysis of a reaction–diffusion mosquito-borne model in a spatially heterogeneous environment
  30. Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a quasilinear system with locally superlinear condition
  31. Nontrivial solution for Klein-Gordon equation coupled with Born-Infeld theory with critical growth
  32. Modeling Wolbachia infection frequency in mosquito populations via a continuous periodic switching model
  33. Infinitely many localized semiclassical states for nonlinear Kirchhoff-type equation
  34. Fujita-type theorems for a quasilinear parabolic differential inequality with weighted nonlocal source term
  35. Approximations of center manifolds for delay stochastic differential equations with additive noise
  36. Periodic solutions to a class of distributed delay differential equations via variational methods
  37. Groundstate for the Schrödinger-Poisson-Slater equation involving the Coulomb-Sobolev critical exponent
  38. Existence of nontrivial solutions for the Klein-Gordon-Maxwell system with Berestycki-Lions conditions
  39. Global Sobolev regular solution for Boussinesq system
  40. Normalized solutions for the p-Laplacian equation with a trapping potential
  41. Nonlinear elliptic–parabolic problem involving p-Dirichlet-to-Neumann operator with critical exponent
  42. Blow-up for compressible Euler system with space-dependent damping in 1-D
  43. High energy solutions of general Kirchhoff type equations without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz type condition
  44. On the dynamics of grounded shallow ice sheets: Modeling and analysis
  45. A survey on some vanishing viscosity limit results
  46. Blow-up for logarithmic viscoelastic equations with delay and acoustic boundary conditions
  47. Generalized Liouville theorem for viscosity solutions to a singular Monge-Ampère equation
  48. Front propagation in a double degenerate equation with delay
  49. Positive solutions for a class of singular (pq)-equations
  50. Higher integrability for anisotropic parabolic systems of p-Laplace type
  51. The Poincaré map of degenerate monodromic singularities with Puiseux inverse integrating factor
  52. On a system of multi-component Ginzburg-Landau vortices
  53. Existence and concentration of solutions to Kirchhoff-type equations in ℝ2 with steep potential well vanishing at infinity and exponential critical nonlinearities
  54. Multiplicity results for fractional Schrödinger-Kirchhoff systems involving critical nonlinearities
  55. On double phase Kirchhoff problems with singular nonlinearity
  56. Estimates for eigenvalues of the Neumann and Steklov problems
  57. Nodal solutions with a prescribed number of nodes for the Kirchhoff-type problem with an asymptotically cubic term
  58. Dirichlet problems involving the Hardy-Leray operators with multiple polars
  59. Incompressible limit for compressible viscoelastic flows with large velocity
  60. Characterizations for the genuine Calderón-Zygmund operators and commutators on generalized Orlicz-Morrey spaces
  61. Non-local gradients in bounded domains motivated by continuum mechanics: Fundamental theorem of calculus and embeddings
  62. Noncoercive parabolic obstacle problems
  63. Touchdown solutions in general MEMS models
  64. Existence and nonexistence of nontrivial solutions for the Schrödinger-Poisson system with zero mass potential
  65. Short-time existence of a quasi-stationary fluid–structure interaction problem for plaque growth
  66. Fine bounds for best constants of fractional subcritical Sobolev embeddings and applications to nonlocal PDEs
  67. Symmetries of Ricci flows
  68. Asymptotic behavior of solutions of a second-order nonlinear discrete equation of Emden-Fowler type
  69. On the topological gradient method for an inverse problem resolution
  70. Supersolutions to nonautonomous Choquard equations in general domains
  71. Uniform complex time heat Kernel estimates without Gaussian bounds
  72. Global existence for time-dependent damped wave equations with nonlinear memory
  73. Normalized solutions for a critical fractional Choquard equation with a nonlocal perturbation
  74. Reversed Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev inequalities with weights on the Heisenberg group
  75. Lamé system with weak damping and nonlinear time-varying delay
  76. Global well posedness for the semilinear edge-degenerate parabolic equations on singular manifolds
  77. Blowup in L1(Ω)-norm and global existence for time-fractional diffusion equations with polynomial semilinear terms
  78. Boundary regularity results for minimisers of convex functionals with (p, q)-growth
  79. Parametric singular double phase Dirichlet problems
  80. Special Issue on Nonlinear analysis: Perspectives and synergies
  81. Editorial to Special issue “Nonlinear analysis: Perspectives and synergies”
  82. Identification of discontinuous parameters in double phase obstacle problems
  83. Global boundedness to a 3D chemotaxis-Stokes system with porous medium cell diffusion and general sensitivity
  84. On regular solutions to compressible radiation hydrodynamic equations with far field vacuum
  85. On Cauchy problem for fractional parabolic-elliptic Keller-Segel model
  86. The evolution of immersed locally convex plane curves driven by anisotropic curvature flow
  87. Stability of combination of rarefaction waves with viscous contact wave for compressible Navier-Stokes equations with temperature-dependent transport coefficients and large data
  88. On concave perturbations of a periodic elliptic problem in R2 involving critical exponential growth
  89. Existence of solutions for a double-phase variable exponent equation without the Ambrosetti-Rabinowitz condition
Downloaded on 5.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2022-0270/html
Scroll to top button