Home Convex solutions of Monge-Ampère equations and systems: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior
Article Open Access

Convex solutions of Monge-Ampère equations and systems: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior

  • Meiqiang Feng EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 25, 2020

Abstract

In this paper, the equations and systems of Monge-Ampère with parameters are considered. We first show the uniqueness of of nontrivial radial convex solution of Monge-Ampère equations by using sharp estimates. Then we analyze the existence and nonexistence of nontrivial radial convex solutions to Monge-Ampère systems, which includes some new ingredients in the arguments. Furthermore, the asymptotic behavior of nontrivial radial convex solutions for Monge-Ampère systems is also considered. Finally, as an application, we obtain sufficient conditions for the existence of nontrivial radial convex solutions of the power-type system of Monge-Ampère equations.

1 Introduction

The Monge-Ampère equations come from geometric problems, fluid mechanics and other applied subjects. For example, in [51], Trudinger and Wang pointed out that Monge-Ampère equation can describe reflector shape design, or Weingarten curvature. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the study of the Monge-Ampère equations by different methods (see [3, 4, 7, 11, 13, 22, 23, 25, 34, 37, 38, 42, 45, 47, 52, 56, 57, 60]). In particular in [62], Zhang and Wang studied the following Monge-Ampère equation

detD2u=euinΩ,u=0onΩ, (1.1)

where Ω is a bounded convex domain in ℝN (N ≥ 1) with smooth boundary, and D2 u denotes the Hessian of u, det D2 u is Monge-Ampère operator. Applying the argument of moving plane, the authors firstly verified that any solution on a ball is radially symmetric. Then the authors showed there exists a critical radius such that when the radius of a ball is smaller than this critical value there exists a solution, and the converse is also true.

Recently, using standard approximation arguments, Philippis and Figalli [44] showed that convex Alexandrov solutions of

detD2u=f(u)inΩ,u=0onΩ, (1.2)

with 0 < λfΛ, are Wloc2,1 .

In [59], Zhang and Du proved sharp conditions of K(x) and f(u) on the existence of strictly convex solutions to the Monge-Ampère problem

M[u](x)=K(x)f(u) for xΩ,u(x)+ as dist(x,Ω)0, (1.3)

where M[u] = det (uxixj) is the Monge-Ampère operator, and Ω is a smooth, bounded, strictly convex domain in ℝN (N ≥ 2). The approach is largely based on the construction of suitable sub- and super-solutions.

This result of problem (1.3) has also been improved in Zhang and Feng [58], where it is actually verified that problem (1.3) admits a strictly convex solution if and only if f satisfies Keller-Osserman type condition. The asymptotic behavior of strictly convex solutions to (1.3) is also considered under weaker conditions than previous references. However, the most significant one is that if f does not satisfy Keller-Osserman type condition, the authors obtained the existence results of strictly convex solutions under appropriate conditions on K(x). The proof combines the sub-supersolution method with non-standard arguments and Karamata regular variation theory.

At the same time, we notice that many authors have paid more attention to various of system problems, for example, see [2, 10, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 29, 30, 32, 35, 40, 46, 49, 50]. Specially, Lair and Wood [36] analyzed the existence of entire positive solutions of system

Δu=p(|x|)vα,Δv=q(|x|)uβ,

where p and q are nonnegative, continuous, c-positive, and satisfy the decay conditions 0 tp(t)dt < ∞ and 0 tq(t)dt < ∞ for α and β greater than unity, and 0 tp(t)dt = ∞ and 0 tq(t)dt = ∞ if neither α nor β is greater than one. In [11], Cîrstea and Rădulescu generalized the results of Lair and Wood [36] to the following system

Δu=p(x)f(v),Δv=q(x)f(u), (1.4)

for p, q Cloc0,α (Rn) under the condition

limtf(cg(t))t=0

for all c > 0.

Recently, by utilizing the same method as papers [11], Ghergu and Rădulescu [8] improved the results of problem (1.4). Very recently, Mavinga and Pardo [41] provided a-priori L bounds for classical positive solutions of semilinear elliptic systems

Δu=vp[ln(e+v)]αinΩ,Δv=uq[ln(e+u)]βinΩ,u=0,v=0onΩ, (1.5)

where 1 < p, q < ∞ and α, β > 0. Applying moving planes method, Rellich-Pohozaev type identities for systems, and local and global bifurcation techniques, they proved the existence of positive solutions for system (1.5).

On Monge-Ampère system problems, only a few results can be found, for example see Wang, An [53] and Wang [54, 55]. Specially, Zhang and Qi [61] considered the following elliptic system coupled by Monge-Ampère equations

detD2u1=(u2)αinΩ,detD2u2=(u1)βinΩ,u1<0,u2<0inΩ,u1=u2=0onΩ,

where Ω is a smooth, bounded and strictly convex domain in RN, N ≥ 2, α > 0, β > 0. When Ω is the unit ball in RN, applying the index theory of fixed points for completely continuous operators, the authors obtained the existence, uniqueness results and nonexistence of radial convex solutions under some corresponding assumptions on α, β. When α > 0, β > 0 and αβ = N2 they also considered a corresponding eigenvalue problem in more general domains.

Moreover, we notice that many authors have paid more attention to existence and uniqueness problems, for example, see [1, 5, 6, 9, 17, 18, 19, 27, 28, 31, 39, 48]. Specially, we would like to mention some results of Hai and Shivaji [33] and Mohammed, Rădulescu and Vitolo [43]. In [33], Hai and Shivaji considered the following p-Laplacian equation

Δpz=λg(z)inΩ,z=0onΩ, (1.6)

where Δp u = div(|∇ u|p−2u), p > 1, λ is a positive parameter, Ω is the open unit ball in RN. By the sub-supersolution method together with sharp estimates near the boundary, the authors proved the existence and uniqueness of positive radial solutions to problem (1.6).

In [43], Mohammed, Rădulescu and Vitolo considered the infinite boundary value problem

H[u]=f(u)+h(x)inΩ,u=onΩ, (1.7)

where ΩRN is a bounded open set with C2 boundary ∂ Ω, H[u] := H(x, u, Du, D2u) is a fully nonlinear uniformly elliptic operator. The authors obtained existence and uniqueness results of solution to problem (1.7) by using the maximum principle. They also studied the asymptotic boundary estimates of solutions to problem (1.7).

Inspired by the above works, we are interested in the existence and uniqueness of nontrivial radial convex solutions to the following Monge-Ampère equation

detD2u=λf(u)inΩ,u=0onΩ. (Pλ)

Here λ > 0 is a parameter, D2 u denotes the Hessian of u, det(D2 u) is Monge-Ampère operator, Ω = {x ∈ RN : |x| < 1}.

We also give new existence results for system

detD2u1=λ1f1(u2)inΩ,detD2u2=λ2f2(u3)inΩ,detD2un=λnfn(u1)inΩ,u1=u2==un=0onΩ, (Sλ1,⋯,n)

λi (i = 1, 2, …, n) are positive parameters. Our main tool is the eigenvalue theory in cones. However, based on the idea of decoupling method we will investigate composite operators. Besides, the exactly determined intervals of positive parameter λ1 × λ2 × ⋯ × λn are established. Here we extend the study in Zhang and Qi [61] from a power-type coupled system to a more general system with n parameters, and also generalize that in Hai and Shivaji [33] from a quasilinear problem to a fully nonlinear system problem. Meanwhile, we obtain some new existence results by defining composite operators and using the eigenvalue theory in cones. Moreover, we also analyze the asymptotic behavior of nontrivial radial convex solutions to system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

The rest of the present article is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some preliminary and known results to be used for the proof of our main results, which mainly includes the eigenvalue theory. Section 3 is devoted to establish the uniqueness result of nontrivial radial convex solution to problem (Pλ). In Section 4, we analyze the exactly determined intervals of positive parameter λi (i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}) in which we get the existence and nonexistence results of nontrivial radial convex solutions for system (Sλ1,⋯,n). In Section 5, as an application, some new sufficient conditions for the existence of nontrivial radial convex solutions of the power-type system of Monge-Ampère equations are given. Finally in Section 6, we will discuss the asymptotic behavior of nontrivial radial convex solutions to system (Sλ1,⋯,n) on the parameters λ1, λ2, ⋯, λn.

2 Preliminaries

Let us search radial convex solutions of (Pλ) and (Sλ1,⋯,n). It is similar to that of Appendix A.2 of [24], one can convert (Pλ) and (Sλ1,⋯,n) to the following equation

((u)N)=λNrN1f(u),0<r<1,u(0)=u(1)=0, (2.1)

and system

((u1)N)=λ1NrN1f1(u2),0<r<1,((u2)N)=λ2NrN1f2(u3),0<r<1,((un)N)=λnNrN1fn(u1),0<r<1,ui(0)=ui(1)=0,i=1,2,,n. (2.2)

Solutions of (2.1) and (2.2) equal to fixed points of certain operators, and we can handle more general equations and systems. Equivalently, we can search positive concave solutions for convenience by letting v = − u and vi = − ui(i = 1, 2, …, n), and then we can transform (2.1) and (2.2) to

((v)N)=λNtN1f(v),0<t<1,v(0)=v(1)=0, (Pλ)

and

((v1)N)=λ1NtN1f1(v2),0<t<1,((v2)N)=λ2NtN1f2(v3),0<t<1,((vn)N)=λnNtN1fn(v1),0<t<1,vi(0)=vi(1)=0,i=1,2,,n. (Sλ1,⋯,n)

For i = 1, 2, …, n, we assume that fi satisfies

  1. fiC(R+, R+), R+ = [0, +∞);

    and f satisfies

  2. fC(R+, R+) is strictly increasing and C1 on (0, ∞);

  3. limx+f(x)xN=0,limx0+f(x)xN>0;
  4. limx+xf(x)f(x)<N,limx0+xf(x)<.

Let E = C[0, 1]. Then E is a real Banach space with the norm ∥ ⋅ ∥ defined by

x=maxtJ|x(t)|.

Let PE be

P:={vE:v(t)0,tJ,v(t)θv,tJθ}, (2.3)

where

θ(0,12),Jθ=[θ,1θ]. (2.4)

It is easy to see that P is a normal cone of E.

For vP, define Ti : PE (i = 1, 2, …, n) to be

(T1v)(t)=t1(0τNsN1f1(v(s))ds)1Ndτ,
(T2v)(t)=λ21Nt1(0τNsN1f2(v(s))ds)1Ndτ,(Tnv)(t)=λn1Nt1(0τNsN1fn(v(s))ds)1Ndτ.

It follows from Lemma 2.2 in [44] that Ti (i = 1, 2, …, n) maps P into itself. Moreover, for i = 1, 2, …, n, Ti are completely continuous by standard arguments.

Define a composite operator T1~ = T1T2Tn, which is also completely continuous from P to itself. For the case λ1 = λ2 = … = λn = 1, similar to what Zhang and Qi [61] pointed out that

(v1,v2,,vn)C1[0,1]×C1[0,1]××C1[0,1]n

solves system (Sλ1,⋯,n) if and only if (v1, v2, …, vn) belongs to

P{0}×P{0}××P{0}n

satisfying

v1=T1v2,v2=T2v3,,vn=Tnv1.

This shows that if v1P ∖ {0} is a fixed point of T1~ , define v2 = T2 v3, …, vn = Tn v1, then v1P ∖ {0} such that

(v1,v2,,vn)C1[0,1]×C1[0,1]××C1[0,1]n

solves system (Sλ1,⋯,n); on the contrary, if

(v1,v2,,vn)C1[0,1]×C1[0,1]××C1[0,1]n

solves system (Sλ1,⋯,n), then v1 is certainly a nonzero fixed point of T1~ in P. Therefore the task of this paper is to search nonzero fixed points of operator T1~ .

We can also define other composite operators

T2~=T2T3TnT1,T3~=T3T4TnT1T2,Tn~=TnT1Tn2Tn1,

which have the same meaning as T1~ .

Next, we consider the existence results of system (Sλ1,⋯,n) by using a completely different method from that of [2, 8, 10, 11, 14, 15, 16, 20, 21, 29, 30, 32, 35, 36, 40, 41, 46, 49, 50, 53, 54, 55, 61], namely the eigenvalue theory:

Theorem 2.1

(See [26]) Suppose D is an open subset of an infinite-dimensional real Banach space E, θD, and P is a cone of E. If the operator Γ: PDP is completely continuous with Γθ = θ and satisfies

infxPDΓx>0,

then Γ has a proper element on P∂ D associated with a positive eigenvalue. That is, there exist x0P∂ D and μ0 > 0 such that Γ x0 = μ0 x0.

3 Uniqueness of positive concave solution for (Pλ)

In this section, we apply sharp estimates near the boundary to establish the uniqueness results of positive concave solution to system (Pλ).

Lemma 3.1

Suppose that (C1)-(C3) hold and let θ0 be a number in (0, 1). Then there exists positive constants ε and l such that for xl

  1. θNf(x)f(θx) θε if θ ≥ 1;

  2. θNf(x)f(θx) θε if θ0θ ≤ 1;

  3. For each L > 0,

    LxNf(x)(L1x)Nf(L1x),

    where L1 = max{1, L1ε }.

Proof

Letting H(θ, x) = θNf(x)f(θx) , then

ddθH(θ,x)=θN1f(x)f(θx)(Nθxf(θx)f(θx)).

Because θθ0, there is l > 0 such that

θxf(θx)f(θx)l<N

for xl. This shows that

ddθH(θ,x)εθH(θ,x),xl,

where ε = Nl* > 0. We hence get

ddθ(H(θ,x)θε)0,xl.

Therefore, we get H(θ,x)θε H(1, x) = 1 for θ ≥ 1, and H(θ,x)θε ≤ 1 for θ0θ ≤ 1. This gives the proof of (i) and (ii).

Obviously, (iii) holds when L ≤ 1. For L > 1, using (i) with θ = L1ε shows

LxNf(x)LNεf(x)f(L1εx)xNf(x)=LNεxNf(L1εx).

This finishes the proof of Lemma 3.1. □

The next result provides sharp upper and lower estimates for positive concave solutions of (Pλ).

Lemma 3.2

Suppose that (C1)-(C3) hold. Then for large λ > 0 there exists Aλ with limλ+Aλ=+ so that any positive concave solution v of (Pλ) satisfies

M1(λf(Aλ)))1N(1t)v(t)M2(λf(Aλ)))1N(1t),0<t<1,

where M1 and M2 are positive constants independent of λ.

Proof

Letting v be a positive concave solution of (Pλ), then v is decreasing, and a calculation proves that

v(t)=(0tλNSN1f(v)(s)ds)1N. (3.1)

So for t 12 we get

v(t)(012λNSN1f(v(s))ds)1N>(λCf(v(12)))1N, (3.2)

where C = 12N+1 .

Then we have by integrating on ( 12 , 1)

v(12)>12(λCf(v(12)))1N,

or

vN(12)f(v(12))>λC2N. (3.3)

Let Aλ > 0 be such that

sup0<zAλvN(z)f(z)=λC2N. (3.4)

It follows from (C2) that the function H(x)=sup0<zxzNf(z) satisfies limx0+H(x)<andlimxH(x)=. This shows that Aλ exists for λ large. Obviously,

limλAλ=.

We hence get from (3.2)-(3.3) that

v(12)>Aλ. (3.5)

By (3.2) and (3.5), we obtain

v(t)(λCf(Aλ))1N,t>12. (3.6)

From (3.6), we get by integration that

v(t)(λCf(Aλ))1N(1t),t>12.

For t 12 , we get

v(t)v(12)12(λCf(Aλ))1N(1t).

This proves the left-hand inequality in Lemma 3.2.

Next we verify the right-hand inequality in Lemma 3.2. Since

v(t)=λ1Nt1(0τNsN1f(v(s))ds)1Ndτ,

we get

vλ1N(f(v))1N.

This, together with (3.3) and Lemma 3.1 (iii), shows that

vNf(v)λ=2NCBλNf(Bλ)(C2Bλ)Nf(C2Bλ),

where Bλ ∈ (0, Aλ] is such that BλNf(Bλ)=Cλ2N, and C2 > 1 is independent of v and λ. Thus we get

vC2BλC2Aλ (3.7)

for large λ. It follows from (C3) that f(x)xN is decreasing for large x, so we obtain by (3.7) and (3.1)

v(t)(λNf(C2Aλ))1N(λNC2Nf(Aλ))1N. (3.8)

Therefore we get the right-hand inequality by integrating (3.8) on (r, 1). This gives the proof of Lemma 3.2. □

Theorem 3.1

Suppose that (C1)-(C3) hold. Then system (Pλ) admits at most one positive concave solution for large λ.

Proof

Let u and v be two positive concave solutions of system (Pλ). It follows from Lemma 3.2 that

M1M2vuM2M1v.

Letting θ=inf{u(x)v(x),x[0,1]}, then uθ v, and θ M1M2 θ0. We assert that θ ≥ 1. In fact, we can assume by contradiction that θ < 1.

It follows from the equations for u and v that

((u)N(θv)N)=λNtN1(f(u)θNf(v)).

By integrating, we get

(u(t))N(θv(N))N=λ0tNsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))ds.

Fix t0 ∈ (0, 1). By Lemma 3.2, we get that for tt0

v(t)M1(λf(Aλ)))1N(1t0),

and so by Lemma 3.1 (ii)

0tNsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))ds0tNsN1(f(θv(s))θNf(v(s)))ds=0tNsN1f(θv(s))(1θNf(v(s))f(θv(s)))ds0tNsN1f(θv(s))ds(1θε)tNf(θ0v(t0))m1ε(1θ) (3.9)

for large λ, where m1ε = min{1, ε}. Here we use the inequality

1θεmin{1,ε}(1θ)for0<θ<1.

For t > t0, we have

0tNsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))ds=0t0NsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))ds+t0tNsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))dst0Nf(θ0v(t0))m1ε(1θ)T|NsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))|ds, (3.10)

where T = {t ∈ (t0, 1) : f(u(s))-θNf(v(s)) < 0}. For tT, we get

|NsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))||NsN1(f(θv(s))θNf(v(s)))|,

and also v(t) ≤ d, where d > 0 is so that f(θ x)-θNf(x) > 0 for x > d.

Fix x ∈ (0, d) and let h(θ) = f(θ x)-θNf(x). Then by the mean value theorem we know that there are ξ ∈ (θ, 1) and M4 > 0 so that

|h(θ)|=|h(θ)h(1)|=(1θ)|h(ξ)|=(1θ)|xf(θx)NθN1f(x)|M4(1θ), (3.11)

where Mi4 is independent of x ∈ (0, ξ). Here we use (C3) and the fact that θθ0.

When t0 is sufficiently close to 1, we hence from (3.9), (3.9) and (3.11) obtain that

0tNsN1(f(u(s))θNf(v(s)))ds[t0Nf(θ0v(t0))m1εM4(1t0)](1θ)>0.

This shows that u′-θ v′ < 0 on (0, 1], and hence there is a constant θ1 > θ such that uθ1 v on (0, 1], which is a contradiction. This finishes the proof of Theorem 3.1. □

4 New existence and nonexistence results

In this section, we apply Theorems 2.1 to establish the existence and nonexistence of positive radial concave solutions for system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let

fi:=limvfi(v)vN,fi0:=limv0fi(v)vN.

Theorem 4.1

Suppose that (C0) holds. If 0 < fi < +∞(i = 1, 2, …, n), then there exists β0 > 0 such that, for every R > β0, system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive radial concave solution vR = (v1R, v2R, …, vnR) satisfying ∥viR∥ = R for any

λiR[λR,λ¯R] (4.1)

under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji, where λR and λ̄R are positive finite numbers.

Proof

It follows from 0 < fi < +∞ that there exist 0 < l1 < l2, μ > 0 such that

l1v2N<f1(v2)<l2v2N,v2μ,l1v3N<f2(v3)<l2v3N,v3μ,l1vnN<fn1(vn)<l2vnN,vnμ,l1v1N<fn(v1)<l2v1N,v1μ.

Now, we prove that β0 = μθ is required. Let

ΩR={xE:x<R}.

Then ΩR is a bounded open subset of Banach space E and 0 ∈ ΩR.

Noticing R > β0, for any viP∂ ΩR, we have

vi(t)θvi=θR,tJθ,

and then

vi(t)θvi>θβ0=μ,tJθ.

Therefore, for any v2P∂ ΩR, we get

(T1v2)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1v2N(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1θNv2Nds)1Ndτθ2v2l11N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2v2(l1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

Similarly, for viP∂ ΩR, i = 1, 3, 4, …, n, we get

(T2v3)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1v3N(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1θNv3Nds)1Ndτθ2v3l11N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2v3(l1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,
(Tn1vn)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1fn1(vn(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1fn1(vn(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1vnN(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1θNvnNds)1Ndτθ2vnl11N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2vn(l1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,
(Tnv1)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1v1N(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1θNv1Nds)1Ndτθ2v1l11N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2v1(l1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

Therefore,

(T1~v1)(t)=(T1T2Tnv1)(t)θ2T2T3Tnv1(l1((1θ)NθN))1Nθ4T3T4Tnv1(l1((1θ)NθN))2Nθ2(n1)Tnv1(l1((1θ)NθN))(n1)Nθ2nv1(l1((1θ)NθN))nN.

Similarly, we get

(T2~v2)(t)=(T2T3TnT1v2)(t)θ2nv2(l1((1θ)NθN))nN,(Tn~vn)(t)=(TnT1Tn2Tn1vn)(t)θ2nvn(l1((1θ)NθN))nN.

This shows that

infv1PΩRT1~v1θ2n(l1((1θ)NθN))nNR>0,infv2PΩRT2~v2θ2n(l1((1θ)NθN))nNR>0,infvnPΩRTn~vnθ2n(l1((1θ)NθN))nNR>0.

For any R > β0, Theorem 2.1 yields that operator T1~ has a proper element v1RP associated with the eigenvalue μ1R > 0, further v1R satisfies ∥v1R∥ = R. For any R > β0, Theorem 2.1 also yields that operator T2~,,Tn~ have proper elements v2RP, …, vnRP associated with the eigenvalue μ2R > 0, …, μnR > 0, further viR satisfies ∥viR∥ = R, i = 2, 3, …, n.

For operator T1~ , one can denote

vnR=Tnv1R,v(n1)R=Tn1vnR,,v2R=T2v3R;

for operator T2~ , one can denote

v1R=T1v2R,vnR=Tnv1R,v(n1)R=Tn1vnR,,v3R=T3v4R;

for operator Tn~ , one can denote

v(n1)R=Tn1vnR,v(n2)R=Tn2v(n1)R,,v2R=T2v3R,v1R=T1v2R,

then (v1R, v2R, …, vnR) is the solution of system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let λiR=1μiRN. Then we have

T1~v1R=μ1Rv1R=λ1R1Nv1R, (4.2)
T2~v2R=μ2Rv2R=λ2R1Nv2R, (4.3)
Tn~vnR=μnRv2R=λnR1Nv2R. (4.4)

From the proof above, for any R > β0 and i = 1, 2, …, n, system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive solution v = (v1R, v2R, …, vnR) with viRP∂ ΩR associated with λi = λiR > 0. Thus, it respectively follows from (4.2), (4.3) and (4.4) that

v1R(t)=λ1R1NT1~v1R,v2R(t)=λ2R1NT2~v2R,vnR(t)=λnR1NTn~vnR,

and hence

v1R(t)=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1((T2T3Tn)v1R(s))ds)1Ndτ=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1((T2T3Tn1)vnR(s))ds)1Ndτ=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1((T2T3)v4R(s))ds)1Ndτ=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1((T2)v3R(s))ds)1Ndτ=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1(v2R(s))ds)1Ndτ.

Similarly, we have

v2R(t)=λ2R1Nt1(0τNsN1f2(v3R(s)))1Ndτ,vnR(t)=λnR1Nt1(0τNsN1fn(v1R(s))ds)1Ndτ,

with ∥viR∥ = R, i = 1, 2, …, n.

On the one hand,

v1R(t)=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ1R1N01(01NsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ1R1N01(01NsN1l2v2Nds)1Ndτ(λ1Rl2)1Nv2R,tJ.

Next, by v2 = T2 v3, …, vn = Tn v1, we similarly get

v2R(t)l21Nv3R,tJ,vnR(t)l21Nv1R,tJ.

This shows that

v1R=R(λ1Rl2n)1Nv1R,

and hence,

λ1Rl2n=λR.

On the other hand,

(v1R)(t)=λ1R1Nt1(0τNsN1f1(v2R(s))ds)1Ndτλ1R1N1θ1(01θNsN1f1(v2R(s))ds)1Ndτλ1R1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1f1(v2R(s))ds)1Ndτλ1R1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1v2RN(s))ds)1Ndτλ1R1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1l1θNv2RNds)1Ndτθ2v2R(λ1Rl1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

Similarly, by v2 = T2 v3, …, vn = Tn v1, one can prove that

(v2R)(t)θ2v3R(l1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,(vnR)(t)θ2v1R(l1((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

This yields that

v1Rθ2nv1R(λ1R)1N(l1((1θ)NθN))nN,

and hence,

λ1Rθ2nN(l1((1θ)NθN))n=λ¯R. (4.5)

In conclusion, λ1R ∈ [λR, λ̄R].

Similarly, we can prove λiR ∈ [λR, λ̄R] for i ∈ {2, 3, …, n}. This gives the proof of Theorem 4.1. □

Theorem 4.2

Suppose that (C0) holds. If 0 < fi0 < +∞(i = 1, 2, …, n), then there exists β0 > 0 such that, for every 0 < r < β0 , system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive radial concave solution vr = (v1r, v2r, …, vnr) satisfying ∥vir∥ = r for any

λir[λr,λ¯r]

under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji, where λr and λ̄r are positive finite numbers.

Proof

The proof is similar to that of Theorem 4.1, so we omit it here. □

Theorem 4.3

Suppose that (C0) holds. If fi = +∞(i = 1, 2, …, n), then there exists β̄0 > 0 such that, for every R* > β̄0, system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a nontrivial radial solution vR* = (v1R*, v2R*, ⋯, vnR*) satisfying ∥viR*∥ = R* for any

λiR(0,λR] (4.6)

under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji, where λR* is a positive finite number.

Proof

It follows from fi = +∞ that there exist l* > 0, μ* > 0 such that

f1(v2)>lv2N,v2μ,f2(v3)>lv3N,v3μ,fn(v1)>lv1N,v1μ.

Now, we prove that β̄0 = μθ is required. Let

ΩR={xE:x<R}.

Noticing R* > β̄0, for any viP∂ ΩR*, we have

vi(t)θvi=θR,tJθ,

and then

vi(t)θvi>θβ¯0=μ,tJθ.

Therefore, for any v2P∂ ΩR*, we get

(T1v2)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lv2N(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lθNv2Nds)1Ndτθ2v2l1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2v2(l((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

Similarly, for viP∂ ΩR*, i = 1, 3, 4, …, n, we get

(T2v3)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lv3N(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lθNv3Nds)1Ndτθ2v3l1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2v3(l((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,(Tn1vn)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1fn1(vn(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1fn1(vn(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lvnN(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lθNvnNds)1Ndτθ2vnl1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2vn(l((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,
(Tnv1)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lv1N(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1lθNv1Nds)1Ndτθ2v1l1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ2v1(l((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

Therefore,

(T1~v1)(t)=(T1T2Tnv1)(t)θ2T2T3Tnv1(l((1θ)NθN))1Nθ4T3T4Tnv1(l((1θ)NθN))2Nθ2(n1)Tnv1(l((1θ)NθN))(n1)Nθ2nv1(l((1θ)NθN))nN.

Similarly, we have

(T2~v2)(t)=(T2T3TnT1v2)(t)θ2nv2(l((1θ)NθN))nN,(Tn~vn)(t)=(TnT1Tn2Tn1vn)(t)θ2nvn(l((1θ)NθN))nN.

This shows that

infv1PΩRT1~v1θ2n(l((1θ)NθN))nNR>0,infv2PΩRT2~v2θ2n(l((1θ)NθN))nNR>0,infvnPΩRTn~vnθ2n(l((1θ)NθN))nNR>0.

For any R* > β0, Theorem 2.1 yields that operator T1~ has a proper element v1R*P associated with the eigenvalue μ1R* > 0, further v1R* satisfies ∥v1R*∥ = R*. For any R* > β0, Theorem 2.1 also yields that operator T2~,,Tn~ have proper elements v2R*P, …, vnR*P associated with the eigenvalue μ2R* > 0, …, μnR* > 0, further viR* satisfies ∥viR*∥ = R*, i = 2, 3, …, n.

For operator T1~ , one can denote

vnR=Tnv1R,v(n1)R=Tn1vnR,,v2R=T2v3R;

for operator T2~ , one can denote

v1R=T1v2R,vnR=Tnv1R,v(n1)R=Tn1vnR,,v3R=T3v4R;

for operator Tn~ , one can denote

v(n1)R=Tn1vnR,v(n2)R=Tn2v(n1)R,,v2R=T2v3R,v1R=T1v2R.

then (v1R*, v2R*, …, vnR*) is the solution of system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let λiR=1μiRN. Next, similar to the proof of (4.5), one can prove that (4.6) holds. This finishes the proof of Theorem 4.3. □

Theorem 4.4

Suppose that (C0) holds. If fi0 = +∞(i = 1, 2, …, n), then there exists β1 > 0 such that, for every 0 < r* < β1, system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive radial concave solution vr* = (v1r*, v2r*, …, vnr*) satisfying ∥vir*∥ = r* for any

λir(0,λ]

under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji, where λ** is a positive finite number.

Proof

The proof is similar to that of Theorem 4.3, we omit it here. □

For ease of exposition, we set

mfi(r)=min{f1(v)rN:v2[θr,r]},i=1,2,,n,

where θ is defined in (2.3).

Theorem 4.5

Suppose that (C0) holds. If there exist r** > 0 and βr** > 0 such that mfi(r**) ≥ βr** (i = 1, 2, …, n), then system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive radial concave solution vr** = (v1r**, v2r**, …, vnr**) satisfying ∥vir**∥ = r** for any

λir(0,λ¯]

under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji, where λ̄** is a positive finite number.

Proof

In fact, for any viP∂Ωr**, we get θ r**vi(t) ≤ r**, tJθ.

Noticing that mfi(r**) ≥ βr** > 0 (i = 1, 2), we get

f1(v2(t))mf1(r)rNrNβrβrv1N(t),tJθ,v2[θr,r],f2(v3(t))mf2(r)rNrNβrβrv2N(t),tJθ,v3[θr,r],fn(v1(t))mfn(r)rNrNβrβrv1N(t),tJθ,v1[θr,r].

The following proof is similar to that of Theorem 4.3. This finishes the proof of Theorem 4.5. □

Next, consider the nonexistence of positive radial concave solution of system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

Theorem 4.6

Assume that (C0) holds. If fi0 = fi = 0, i = 1, 2, …, n, then there exists λ > 0 such that system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits no positive radial concave solution for

λiR(0,λ_)

under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji.

Proof

It follows from fi0 = fi = 0 (i = 1, 2, …, n) that there exists 0 > 0 such that

fi(v¯0)v¯0N=maxv>0fi(v)vN,i=1,2,,n.

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let

M=max{fi(v¯0)v¯0N}+1.

Then M > 0 and

fi(v)MvN,i=1,2,,n,v>0. (4.7)

Assume that (v1, v2, …, vn) is a radial concave solution of system (Sλ1,⋯,n). We will show that this leads to a contradiction for λ1R < λ, where λ = Mn.

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let λi=1μiN. Then we have

T1~v1=μ1v1=λ11Nv1,T2~v2=μ2v2=λ21Nv2,
Tn~vn=μ2v2=λn1Nv2,

and then

v1(t)=λ11Nt1(0τNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ11N01(01NsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ11N01(01NsN1Mv2Nds)1Ndτ(λ1M)1Nv2,tJ.

Next, by v2 = T2 v3, …, vn = Tn v1, we similarly get

v2(t)M1Nv3,tJ,vn(t)M1Nv1,tJ.

This shows that

v1(λ1Mn)1Nv1<(λ_Mn)1Nv1=v1,

which is a contradiction. This completes the proof. □

5 On a power-type system of Monge-Ampère equations

In this section, as an application, we consider the power-type system of Monge-Ampère equations

detD2u1=λ1(u2)α2inΩ,detD2u2=λ2(u3)α3inΩ,detD2un1=λn1(u1)αninΩ,detD2un=λn(u1)α1inΩ,u1<0,u2<0,,un<0inΩ,u1=u2==un=0onΩ, (5.1)

where Ω is the unit ball in ℝN, N ≥ 2, αi > 0, i = 1, 2, …, n.

Similar to (Sλ1,⋯,n), we have

((u1)N)=λ1NrN1(u2)α2,0<r<1,((u2)N)=λ2NrN1(u3)α3,0<r<1,((un)N)=λnNrN1(u1)α1,0<r<1,ui(0)=ui(1)=0,i=1,2,,n. (5.2)

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let vi = −ui. Then it follows from (Sλ1,⋯,n) that

((v1)N)=λ1NtN1v2α2,0<t<1,((v2)N)=λ2NtN1v3α2,0<t<1,((vn)N)=λnNtN1v1α2,0<t<1,vi(0)=vi(1)=0,i=1,2,,n. (5.3)

Theorem 5.1

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let αi > 0. Then

  1. if α1α2αn > Nn, then for every r ∈ (0, 1), system (5.3) admits a positive radial concave solution vr = (v1r, v2r, …, vnr) satisfying ∥uir∥ = r for any

    λir1N[1,+)

    under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji;

  2. if α1α2αn < Nn, then for every r ∈ (1, +∞), system (5.3) admits a positive radial concave solution vr = (v1r, v2r, …, vnr) satisfying ∥vir∥ = r for any

    λir1N(0,λNα]

    under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji, where λ is a positive finite number;

  3. if α1α2αn = Nn, then for every r > 0, system (5.3) admits a positive radial concave solution vr = (v1r, v2r, …, vnr) satisfying ∥vir∥ = r for any

    λir1N[1,λNα]

    under the case λj = 1, j, i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, ji.

Proof

For r > 0, let

Ωr={xE:x<r}.

Then, for any viP∂ Ωr, we have

vi(t)θvi=θr,tJθ,

and then, for any v2P∂ Ωr, we get

(T1v2)(t)1θ1(01θNsN1v2α2(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1v2α2(s)ds)1Ndτ1θ1(θ1θNsN1θα2v2α2ds)1Ndτθ(θv2)α2N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nθ(θv2)α2N((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ.

Similarly, for viP∂ Ωr, i = 1, 3, 4, …, n, we get

(T2v3)(t)θ(θv3)α3N((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ,(Tn1vn)(t)θ(θvn)αnN((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ,(Tnv1)(t)θ(θv1)α1N((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ.

Therefore,

(T1~v1)(t)=(T1T2Tnv1)(t)θ(θT2T3Tnv1)α2N((1θ)NθN)1Nθ(θθN+α3NT3T4Tnv1α3N((1θ)NθN)1N)α2N((1θ)NθN)1Nh(θ;n,N,α1,α2,,αn)v1α1α2α3αnNn,

where h is a power function of θ, and the power exponent is a function of n, N, αi, i = 1, 2, …, n. Since 0 < θ < 12 , αi > 0, h(θ; n, N, α1, α2, …, αn) > 0.

(T2~v2)(t)=(T2T3TnT1v2)(t)h(θ;n,N,α1,α2,,αn)v2α1α2α3αnNn,(Tn~vn)(t)=(TnT1Tn2Tn1vn)(t)h(θ;n,N,α1,α2,,αn)vnα1α2α3αnNn.

This shows that

infv1PΩrT1~v1h(θ;n,N,α1,α2,,αn)rα1α2α3αnNn>0,infv2PΩrT2~v2h(θ;n,N,α1,α2,,αn)rα1α2α3αnNn>0,infvnPΩrTn~vnh(θ;n,N,α1,α2,,αn)rα1α2α3αnNn>0.

For any r > 0, Theorem 2.1 yields that operator T1~ has a proper element v1rP associated with the eigenvalue μ1r > 0, further v1r satisfies ∥v1r∥ = r. For any r > β0, Theorem 2.1 also yields that operator T2~,,Tn~ have proper elements v2rP, …, vnrP associated with the eigenvalue μ2r > 0, …, μnr > 0, further vir satisfies ∥vir∥ = r, i = 2, 3, …, n.

For operator T1~ , one can denote

vnr=Tnv1r,v(n1)r=Tn1vnr,,v2r=T2v3r;

for operator T2~ , one can denote

v1r=T1v2r,vnr=Tnv1r,v(n1)r=Tn1vnr,,v3r=T3v4r;

for operator Tn~ , one can denote

v(n1)r=Tn1vnr,v(n2)r=Tn2v(n1)r,,v2r=T2v3r,v1R=T1v2r.

then (v1r, v2r, …, vnr) is the solution of system (5.3).

For i = 1, 2, …, n, let λiR=1μiRN. Then we have

T1~v1r=μ1rv1r=λ1r1Nv1r, (5.4)
T2~v2r=μ2rv2r=λ2r1Nv2r, (5.5)
Tn~vnr=μ2rv2r=λnr1Nv2r. (5.6)

From the proof above, for any r > 0 and i = 1, 2, …, n, system (5.3) admits a positive solution v = (v1r, v2r, …, vnr) with virP∂ Ωr associated with λi = λir > 0. Thus, it respectively follows from (5.4), (5.5) and (5.6) that

v1r(t)=λ1r1NT1~v1r,v2r(t)=λ2r1NT2~v2r,,vnr(t)=λnr1NT1~vnr

and hence, we get

v1r(t)=λ1r1Nt1(0τNsN1v2rα2(s)ds)1Ndτ,
v2r(t)=λ2r1Nt1(0τNsN1v3rα3(s)ds)1Ndτ,vnr(t)=λnr1Nt1(0τNsN1v1rα1(s)ds)1Ndτ

with ∥vir∥ = r, i = 1, 2, …, n.

On the one hand,

v1r(t)=λ1r1Nt1(0τNsN1v2rα2(s)ds)1Ndτλ1r1N01(01NsN1v2rα2ds)1Ndτλ1r1Nv2rα2N,tJ.

Similarly, by v2 = T2 v3, …, vn = Tn v1, we get

v2r(t)v3rα3N,tJ,vnr(t)v1rα1N,tJ.

This shows that

v1r=rλ1r1Nv1rα1α2αnNn. (5.7)

On the other hand,

(v1r)(t)λ1r1N1θ1(01θNsN1v2rα2(s)ds)1Ndτλ1r1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1v2rα2(s)ds)1Ndτλ1r1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1(θv2r)α2ds)1Ndτλ1r1N(θv2r)α2N1θ1(θ1θNsN1ds)1Ndτλ1r1Nθα2+NNv2rα2N((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ.

Similarly, by v2 = T2 v3, …, vn = Tn v1, one can prove that

(v2r)(t)θα3+NNv3rα3N((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ,(vnr)(t)θα1+NNv1rα1N((1θ)NθN)1N,tJ.

This yields that

v1rλ1r1Nθα2+NNv2rα2N((1θ)NθN)1Nλ1r1Nθα2+NNθα2(α3+N)N2v3rα2α3N2((1θ)NθN)1N((1θ)NθN)α2N2λ1r1Nθα2+NNθα2(α3+N)N2θα2α3(α4+N)N3v3rα2α3N2((1θ)NθN)1N((1θ)NθN)α2N2((1θ)NθN)α2α3N3λ1r1Nθα2+NNθα2(α3+N)N2θα2α3(α4+N)N3θα2α3αn1(αn+N)Nnvnrα1α2α3αnNn((1θ)NθN)1N((1θ)NθN)α2N2((1θ)NθN)α2α3N3((1θ)NθN)α2α3αnNn. (5.8)

  1. For 0 < r < 1, if α1α2α3αn > Nn, then (5.7) yields that

    v1r=rλ1r1Nv1rα1α2αnNnλ1r1Nr,

    which shows that

    λ1r1N1. (5.9)
  2. For r > 1, if α1α2α3αn < Nn, then (5.8) yields that

    v1r=rλ1r1Nθα2+NNθα2(α3+N)N2θα2α3(α4+N)N3θα2α3αn1(αn+N)Nnvnrα1α2α3αnNn((1θ)NθN)1N((1θ)NθN)α2N2((1θ)NθN)α2α3N3((1θ)NθN)α2α3αnNnλ1r1Nθα2+NNθα2(α3+N)N2θα2α3(α4+N)N3θα2α3αn1(αn+N)Nnr((1θ)NθN)1N((1θ)NθN)α2N2((1θ)NθN)α2α3N3((1θ)NθN)α2α3αnNn,

    and hence,

    λ1r1N{θα2+NNθα2(α3+N)N2θα2α3(α4+N)N3θα2α3αn1(αn+N)Nn((1θ)NθN)1N((1θ)NθN)α2N2((1θ)NθN)α2α3N3((1θ)NθN)α2α3αnNn}1=λNα. (5.10)
  3. For r > 0, if α1α2α3αn = Nn, then (5.7) and (5.8) respectively yield that (5.9) and (5.10) hold.

The proof of Theorem 4.1 is complete. □

6 Asymptotic behavior of positive radial concave solutions

In this section, we consider the dependence of positive concave solutions on parameters λi (i = 1, 2, …, n) for system (Sλ1,⋯,n) by making use of the following fixed point theorem of cone expansion and compression of norm type.

Lemma 6.1

(Theorem 2.3.4 of [26])(Fixed point theorem of cone expansion and compression of norm type) Let Ω1 and Ω2 be two bounded open sets in a real Banach space E such that 0 ∈ Ω1 and Ω̄1Ω2. Let operator T : P ∩ (Ω̄2Ω1) → P be completely continuous, where P is a cone in E. Suppose that one of the two conditions

  1. Tx∥ ≤ ∥x∥, ∀ xP∂ Ω1 and ∥Tx∥ ≥ ∥x∥, ∀ xP∂ Ω2,

    and

  2. Tx∥ ≥ ∥x∥, ∀ xP∂ Ω1, and ∥Tx∥ ≤ ∥x∥, ∀ xP∂ Ω2

    is satisfied. Then T has at least one fixed point in P ∩ (Ω̄2Ω1).

Letting P be defined as (2.3), then for vP, define Ti*: PE (i = 1, 2, …, n) to be

(T1v)(t)=λ11Nt1(0τNsN1f1(v(s))ds)1Ndτ,(T2v)(t)=λ21Nt1(0τNsN1f2(v(s))ds)1Ndτ,(Tnv)(t)=λn1Nt1(0τNsN1fn(v(s))ds)1Ndτ.

It follows from Lemma 2.2 in [54] that Ti (i = 1, 2, …, n) maps P into itself. Moreover, for i = 1, 2, …, n, Ti are completely continuous by standard arguments.

Define a composite operator T1~ = T1*T2*Tn*, which is also completely continuous from P to itself. So the operator T1~ also maps P into P. For the case λ1 = λ2 = … = λn = 1, Zhang and Qi [61] pointed out that

(v1,v2,,vn)C1[0,1]×C1[0,1]××C1[0,1]n

solves system (Sλ1,⋯,n) if and only if (v1, v2, …, vn) belongs to

P{0}×P{0}××P{0}n

satisfying

v1=T1v2,v2=T2v3,,vn=Tnv1.

This shows that if v1P ∖ {0} is a fixed point of T1~ , define v2 = T2* v3, …, vn = Tn* v1, then v1 ∈ ∖ {0} such that

(v1,v2,,vn)C1[0,1]×C1[0,1]××C1[0,1]n

solves system (Sλ1,⋯,n); on the contrary, if

(v1,v2,,vn)C1[0,1]×C1[0,1]××C1[0,1]n

solves system (Sλ1,⋯,n), then v1 is certainly a nonzero fixed point of T1~ in P. Therefore the task of this paper is to search nonzero fixed points of operator T1~ .

We also define another composite operator

T2~=T2T3TnT1,T3~=T3T4TnT1T2,
Tn~=TnT1T(n2)T(n1),

which have the same meaning as T1~ .

Theorem 6.1

Suppose that (C0) holds. For i ∈ {1, 2, ⋯, n}, then we have the following two conclusions.

(C4) If fi0 = 0 and fi = ∞, then for every λi > 0 system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive radial concave solution v = (vλ1, vλ2, …, vλn) with vλi(t) satisfying limλi0+ vλi∥ = ∞;

(C5) If fi0 = ∞ and fi = 0, then for every λi > 0 system (Sλ1,⋯,n) admits a positive radial concave solution v = (vλ1, vλ2, …, vλn) with vλi(t) satisfying limλi0+ vλi∥ = 0.

Proof

Here we only prove this theorem under condition (C4) since the proof is similar when (C5) holds. For i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}, let λi > 0. Considering fi0 = 0, there exists r > 0 such that

f1(v2)1λ1v2N,0v2r,f2(v3)1λ2v3N,0v3r,fn(v1)1λnv1N,0v1r.

Thus, for i = {1, 2, …, n} and viP∂ Ωr, we have

(T1v2)(t)=λ11Nt1(0τNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ11N01(01NsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτv2,tJ,(T2v3)(t)=λ21Nt1(0τNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτλ21N01(01NsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτv3,tJ.
(Tnv1)(t)=λn1Nt1(0τNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτλn1N01(01NsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτv1,tJ.

Therefore,

T1~v1=T1T2Tnv1T2T3Tnv1T3T4Tnv1Tnv1v1. (6.1)

Next, turning to fi = ∞, there exists satisfying 0 < r < such that

f1(v2)εv2N,v2R^,
f2(v3)εv3N,v3R^,fn(v1)εv1N,v1R^,

where ε > 0 satisfies

(λ1λ2λn)1Nθ2n(ε((1θ)NθN))nN1.

Let R > max{, R^θ }. Then, for viP∂ ΩR, we have

vi(t)θviR^,tJθ,

and then

(T1v2)(t)λ11N1θ1(01θNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ11N1θ1(θ1θNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτλ11N1θ1(θ1θNsN1εv2N(s)ds)1Ndτλ11N1θ1(θ1θNsN1εθNv2Nds)1Ndτλ11Nθ2v2ε1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nλ11Nθ2v2(ε((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,
(T2v3)(t)λ21N1θ1(01θNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτλ21N1θ1(θ1θNsN1f2(v3(s))ds)1Ndτλ21N1θ1(θ1θNsN1εv3N(s)ds)1Ndτλ21N1θ1(θ1θNsN1εθNv3Nds)1Ndτλ21Nθ2v3ε1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nλ21Nθ2v3(ε((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ,
(Tnv1)(t)λn1N1θ1(01θNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτλn1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτλn1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1εv1N(s)ds)1Ndτλn1N1θ1(θ1θNsN1εθNv1Nds)1Ndτλn1Nθ2v1ε1N(θ1θNsN1ds)1Nλn1Nθ2v1(ε((1θ)NθN))1N,tJ.

Therefore,

(T1~v1)(t)=(T1T2Tnv1)(t)λ11Nθ2T2T3Tnv1(ε((1θ)NθN))1N(λ1λ2)1Nθ4T3T4Tnv1(ε((1θ)NθN))2N(λ1λ2λn1)1Nθ2(n1)Tnv1(ε((1θ)NθN))(n1)N(λ1λ2λn)1Nθ2nv1(ε((1θ)NθN))nNv1. (6.2)

Applying (i) of Lemma 6.1 to (6.1) and (6.2) yields that operator T1~ admits a fixed point v1P ∩ (Ω̄RΩr). Denote v2 = T2* v3, …, vn = Tn* v1, then (v1, v2, …, vn) is the desired solution of system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

Similarly, (i) of Lemma 6.1 also yields that T1~ admits a fixed point v2P ∩ (Ω̄RΩr), …, and Tn~ admits a fixed point vnP ∩ (Ω̄RΩr).

Next, for i ∈ {1, 2, …, m}, we prove that ∥vλi∥ = +∞ as λi → +∞. In fact, if not, there exist a number ςi > 0 and a sequence λim → +∞ such that

vλimςi(m=1,2,3,).

Furthermore, the sequence {∥vλim∥} contains a subsequence that converges to a number ηi(0 ≤ ηiςi). For simplicity, suppose that {∥vλim∥} itself converges to ηi.

If ηi > 0, then ∥vim∥ > ηi2 for sufficiently large m (m > N), and therefore

1λ1m1N=t1(0τNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτv1λ1m01(01NsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτv1λ1mM1v1λ1m<2M1η1(m>N),1λnm1N=t1(0τNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτvnλnm01(01NsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1NdτvnλnmMnvnλnm<2Mnηn(m>N),

where,

M1=max{f1(v2),r2v2R2},Mn=max{fn(v1),rmv1R2}.

This contradicts λim → 0+ for i ∈ {1, 2, …, n}.

If ηi = 0, then ∥vim∥ → 0 for sufficiently large m (m > N), and therefore it follows from (C4) that for any ε > 0 there exists r* > 0 such that

f1(v2λ2n)εv2λ2nN,0v2λ2nr,f2(v3λ3n)εv3λ3nN,0v3λ3nr,fn(v1λ1n)εv1λ1nN,0v1λ1nr.

Then, for vimP∂ Ωr* and ∥vim∥ = r*, we get

1λ1m1N=t1(0τNsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτv1λ1m01(01NsN1f1(v2(s))ds)1Ndτv1λ1mεv2v1λ1m,1λnm1N=t1(0τNsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτvnλnm01(01NsN1fn(v1(s))ds)1Ndτvnλnmεv1vmλnm,

Since ε is arbitrary, we have λim → +∞ (m → +∞) in contradiction with λim → 0+. Therefore, ∥vi∥ → +∞ as λi → 0+. Since (v1, v2, …, vn) is the desired solution of system (Sλ1,⋯,n), the proof of Theorem 6.1 is complete. □

Remark 6.2

Theorems 4.1-4.6 and Theorem 6.1 are also held for problem (Pλ), but the approach to prove Theorem 3.1 can not be applied to system (Sλ1,⋯,n).

Remark 6.1

If

f1(u2)=f1(u1,u2,,un),f2(u3)=f2(u1,u2,,un),,fn(u1)=fn(u1,u2,,un),

we conjecture that Theorem 3.1, Theorems 4.1-4.6 and Theorem 6.1 also hold, but we can not give a proof right now.

Acknowledgements

This work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11301178) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation of China (1163007). The author is grateful to anonymous referees for their constructive comments and suggestions, which has greatly improved this paper.

References

[1] S.B. Angenent, Uniqueness of the solution of a semilinear boundary value problem, Math. Ann. 272 (1985), 129-138.10.1007/BF01455933Search in Google Scholar

[2] D. Bonheure, E.M. dos Santos and H. Tavares, Hamiltonian elliptic systems: a guide to variational frameworks, Port. Math. 71 (2014), 301-395.10.4171/PM/1954Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Caffarelli, J.J. Kohn, L. Nirenberg and J. Spruck, The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second-order elliptic equations II. Complex Monge-Ampère equations, and uniformly elliptic equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 38 (1985), 209-252.10.1002/cpa.3160380206Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Caffarelli, L. Nirenberg and J. Spruck, The Dirichlet problem for nonlinear second-order elliptic equations I. Monge-Ampère equations, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 37 (1984), 369-402.10.1002/cpa.3160400508Search in Google Scholar

[5] A. Castro, M. Hassanpour, and R. Shivaji, Uniqueness of nonnegative solutions for a semipositone problem with concave nonlinearity, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 20 (1995), 1927-1936.10.1080/03605309508821157Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. Castro, L. Sankar, and R. Shivaji, Uniqueness of non-negative solutions for semipositone problems on exterior domains, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 394 (2012), 432-437.10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.005Search in Google Scholar

[7] S.Y. Cheng and S.T. Yau, On the regularity of the Monge-Ampère equation det((2u/∂ xi∂xj)) = F(x, u). Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 30 (1977), 41-68.10.1002/cpa.3160300104Search in Google Scholar

[8] M. Ghergu and V. Rădulescu, Explosive solutions of semilinear elliptic systems with gradient term, Rev. R. Acad. Cienc. Ser. A Mat. 97 (2003), 437-445.Search in Google Scholar

[9] K.D. Chu, D.D. Hai. and R. Shivaji, Uniqueness of positive radial solutions for infinite semipositone p-Laplacian problems in exterior domains, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 472 (2019), 510-525.10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.11.037Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ph. Clément, D.G. de Figueiredo and E. Mitidieri, Positive solutions of semilinear elliptic systems, Comm. Partial Differential Equations 17 (1992), 923-940.10.1080/03605309208820869Search in Google Scholar

[11] F. -C. Cîrstea and C. Trombetti, On the Monge-Ampère equation with boundary blow-up: existence, uniqueness and asymptotics, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 31 (2008), 167-186.10.1007/s00526-007-0108-7Search in Google Scholar

[12] F. -C. Cîrstea and V. Rădulescu, Entire solutions blowing up at infinity for semilinear elliptic systems, J. Math. Pures Appl. 81 (2002), 827-846.10.1016/S0021-7824(02)01265-5Search in Google Scholar

[13] G. Dai. Two Whyburn type topological theorems and its applications to Monge-Ampère equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 55 (2016), 1-28.10.1007/s00526-016-1029-0Search in Google Scholar

[14] R. Dalmasso, Existence and uniqueness of positive solutions of semilinear elliptic systems, Nonlinear Anal. 39 (2000), 559-568.10.1016/S0362-546X(98)00221-1Search in Google Scholar

[15] L. D’Ambrosio and E. Mitidieri, Entire solutions of quasilinear elliptic systems on Carnot groups, Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 283 (2013), 3-19.10.1134/S0081543813080026Search in Google Scholar

[16] L. D’Ambrosio and E. Mitidieri, Quasilinear elliptic systems in divergence form associated to general nonlinearities, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 7 (2018), 425-44710.1515/anona-2018-0171Search in Google Scholar

[17] E.N. Dancer, On the number of positive solutions of weakly nonlinear elliptic equations when a parameter is large, Proc. London Math. Soc. 53 (1986), 429-452.10.1112/plms/s3-53.3.429Search in Google Scholar

[18] L. Erbe and M. Tang, Structure of positive radial solutions of semilinear elliptic equations, J. Differential Equations 133 (1997), 179-202.10.1006/jdeq.1996.3194Search in Google Scholar

[19] L. Erbe and M. Tang, Uniqueness theorems for positive radial solutions of quasilinear elliptic equations in a ball, J. Differential Equations 138 (1997), 351-379.10.1006/jdeq.1997.3279Search in Google Scholar

[20] M. Feng, New results of coupled system of k-Hessian equations, Appl. Math. Lett. 94 (2019), 196-203.10.1016/j.aml.2019.03.008Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. Feng and X. Zhang, A coupled system of k-Hessian equations, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci. 2019: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.6053.10.1002/mma.6053Search in Google Scholar

[22] A. Figalli and G. Loeper, C1 regularity of solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation for optimal transport in dimension two, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 35 (2009), 537-550.10.1007/s00526-009-0222-9Search in Google Scholar

[23] D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001.10.1007/978-3-642-61798-0Search in Google Scholar

[24] J.V.A. Goncalves and C.A.P. Santos, Classical solutions of singular Monge-Ampère equation in a ball, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 305 (2005), 240-252.10.1016/j.jmaa.2004.11.019Search in Google Scholar

[25] B. Guan and H. Jian, The Monge-Ampère equation with infinite boundary value, Pacific J. Math. 216 (2004), 77-94.10.2140/pjm.2004.216.77Search in Google Scholar

[26] D. Guo and V. Lakshmikantham, Nonlinear Problems in Abstract Cones, Academic Press, New York, 1988.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Z.M. Guo, Existence and uniqueness of positive radial solutions for a class of quasilinear elliptic equations, Appl. Anal. 47 (1992), 173-190.10.1080/00036819208840139Search in Google Scholar

[28] Z.M. Guo and J.R.L. Webb, Uniqueness of positive solutions for quasilinear elliptic equations when a parameter is large, Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 124 (1994), 189-198.10.1017/S0308210500029280Search in Google Scholar

[29] Y. Guo and J. Liu, Bifurcation for strongly indefinite functional and applications to Hamiltonian system and noncooperative elliptic system, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 359 (2009), 28-38.10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.05.003Search in Google Scholar

[30] D.D. Hai, On a class of semilinear systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 285 (2003), 477-486.10.1016/S0022-247X(03)00413-XSearch in Google Scholar

[31] D.D. Hai, Uniqueness of positive solutions for a class of semilinear elliptic systems, Nonlinear Anal. 52 (2003), 595-603.10.1016/S0362-546X(02)00125-6Search in Google Scholar

[32] D.D. Hai and R. Shivaji, Existence and multiplicity of positive radial solutions for singular superlinear elliptic systems in the exterior of a ball, J. Differential Equations 266 (2019), 2232-2243.10.1016/j.jde.2018.08.027Search in Google Scholar

[33] D.D. Hai and R. Shivaji, Existence and uniqueness for a class of quasilinear elliptic boundary value problems, J. Differential Equations 193 (2003), 500-510.10.1016/S0022-0396(03)00028-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] H. Jian, X. Wang and Y. Zhao, Global smoothness for a singular Monge-Ampère equation, J. Differential Equations 263 (2017), 7250-7262.10.1016/j.jde.2017.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[35] X. Ke and C. Tang, Existence and multiplicity of solutions for asymptotically linear noncooperative elliptic systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 375 (2011), 631-647.10.1016/j.jmaa.2010.09.041Search in Google Scholar

[36] A.V. Lair and A.W. Wood, Existence of entire large positive solutions of semilinear elliptic systems, J. Differential Equations 164 (2000), 380-394.10.1006/jdeq.2000.3768Search in Google Scholar

[37] A.C. Lazer and P.J. McKenna, On singular boundary value problems for the Monge-Ampère operator, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 197 (1996), 341-362.10.1006/jmaa.1996.0024Search in Google Scholar

[38] Y. Li and S. Lu, Existence and nonexistence to exterior Dirichlet problem for Monge-Ampère equation, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations (2018) 57: 161.10.1007/s00526-018-1428-5Search in Google Scholar

[39] S.S. Lin, On the number of positive solutions for nonlinear elliptic equations when a parameter is large, Nonlinear Anal. 16 (1991), 283-297.10.1016/0362-546X(91)90229-TSearch in Google Scholar

[40] Z. Lou, T. Weth, and Z. Zhang, Symmetry breaking via Morse index for equations and systems of Hénon-Schrödinger type, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. (2019) 70: 35.10.1007/s00033-019-1080-8Search in Google Scholar

[41] N. Mavinga and R. Pardo, A priori bounds and existence of positive solutions for semilinear elliptic systems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 449 (2017), 1172-1188.10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.12.058Search in Google Scholar

[42] A. Mohammed, On the existence of solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation with infinite boundary values, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 135 (2007), 141-149.10.1090/S0002-9939-06-08623-0Search in Google Scholar

[43] A. Mohammed, V. Rădulescu, A. Vitolo, Blow-up solutions for fully nonlinear equations: existence, asymptotic estimates and uniqueness, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 9 (2020), 39-64.10.1515/anona-2018-0134Search in Google Scholar

[44] G. De Philippis and A. Figalli, W2,1 regularity for solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation, Invent. math. 192 (2013), 55-69.10.1007/s00222-012-0405-4Search in Google Scholar

[45] S. Pliś, On boundary blow-up problems for the complex Monge-Ampère equation, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 136 (2008), 4355-4364.10.1090/S0002-9939-08-09513-0Search in Google Scholar

[46] P. Quittner and P.H. Souplet, A priori estimates and existence for elliptic systems via bootstrap in weighted Lebesgue spaces, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 174 (2004), 49-81.10.1007/s00205-004-0323-8Search in Google Scholar

[47] O. Savin, Pointwise C2,α estimates at the boundary for the Monge-Ampère equation, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (2013), 63-99.10.1090/S0894-0347-2012-00747-4Search in Google Scholar

[48] R. Shivaji, I. Sim, and B. Son, A uniqueness result for a semipositone p-Laplacian problem on the exterior of a ball, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 445 (2017), 459-475.10.1016/j.jmaa.2016.07.029Search in Google Scholar

[49] B. Son and P. Wang, Analysis of positive radial solutions for singular superlinear p-Laplacian systems on the exterior of a ball, Nonlinear Anal. 192 (2020), 111657.10.1016/j.na.2019.111657Search in Google Scholar

[50] C. Tang, Solvability for two-point boundary value problems, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 216 (1997), 368-374.10.1006/jmaa.1997.5664Search in Google Scholar

[51] N. Trudinger and X.-J. Wang, The Monge-Ampère equation and its geometric applications, Handbook of geometric analysis, 1 (2008), 467-524.Search in Google Scholar

[52] N.S. Trudinger and X.-J. Wang, Boundary regularity for the Monge-Ampère and affine maximal surface equations. Ann. Math. 167 (2008) 993-1028.10.4007/annals.2008.167.993Search in Google Scholar

[53] F. Wang and Y. An, Triple nontrivial radial convex solutions of systems of Monge-Ampère equations, Appl. Math. Lett. 25 (2012), 88-92.10.1016/j.aml.2011.07.016Search in Google Scholar

[54] H. Wang, Convex solutions of systems arising from Monge-Ampère equations, Electron. J. Qual. Theory Differ. Equ. Special Edition I. 26 (2009), 1-8.10.14232/ejqtde.2009.4.26Search in Google Scholar

[55] H. Wang, Radial convex solutions of boundary value problems for systems of Monge-Ampère equations, arXiv:1008.4614v1.Search in Google Scholar

[56] X.-J. Wang, Existence of multiple solutions to the equations of Monge-Ampère type, J. Differential Equations 100 (1992), 95-118.10.1016/0022-0396(92)90127-9Search in Google Scholar

[57] H. Yang and Y. Chang, On the blow-up boundary solutions of the Monge-Ampère equation with singular weights, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 11 (2012), 697-708.10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.697Search in Google Scholar

[58] X. Zhang and M. Feng, Boundary blow-up solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation: Sharp conditions and asymptotic behavior, Adv. Nonlinear Anal. 9 (2020), 729-744.10.1515/anona-2020-0023Search in Google Scholar

[59] X. Zhang and Y. Du, Sharp conditions for the existence of boundary blow-up solutions to the Monge-Ampère equation, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations (2018) 57: 30.10.1007/s00526-018-1312-3Search in Google Scholar

[60] Z. Zhang, Boundary behavior of large solutions for semilinear elliptic equations with weights, Asymptot. Anal. 96 (2016), 309-329.10.3233/ASY-151345Search in Google Scholar

[61] Z. Zhang, Z. Qi, On a power-type coupled system of Monge-Ampère equations, Topol. Method. Nonl. An. 46 (2015), 717-729.Search in Google Scholar

[62] Z. Zhang and K. Wang, Existence and non-existence of solutions for a class of Monge-Ampère equations, J. Differential Equations 246 (2009), 2849-2875.10.1016/j.jde.2009.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-02-07
Accepted: 2020-06-12
Published Online: 2020-08-25

© 2021 M. Feng, published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Editorial to Volume 10 of ANA
  3. Regular Articles
  4. Convergence Results for Elliptic Variational-Hemivariational Inequalities
  5. Weak and stationary solutions to a Cahn–Hilliard–Brinkman model with singular potentials and source terms
  6. Single peaked traveling wave solutions to a generalized μ-Novikov Equation
  7. Constant sign and nodal solutions for superlinear (p, q)–equations with indefinite potential and a concave boundary term
  8. On isolated singularities of Kirchhoff equations
  9. On the existence of periodic oscillations for pendulum-type equations
  10. Multiplicity of concentrating solutions for a class of magnetic Schrödinger-Poisson type equation
  11. Nehari-type ground state solutions for a Choquard equation with doubly critical exponents
  12. Gradient estimate of a variable power for nonlinear elliptic equations with Orlicz growth
  13. The structure of 𝓐-free measures revisited
  14. Solvability of an infinite system of integral equations on the real half-axis
  15. Positive Solutions for Resonant (p, q)-equations with convection
  16. Concentration behavior of semiclassical solutions for Hamiltonian elliptic system
  17. Global existence and finite time blowup for a nonlocal semilinear pseudo-parabolic equation
  18. On variational nonlinear equations with monotone operators
  19. Existence results for nonlinear degenerate elliptic equations with lower order terms
  20. Blow-up criteria and instability of normalized standing waves for the fractional Schrödinger-Choquard equation
  21. Ground states and multiple solutions for Hamiltonian elliptic system with gradient term
  22. Positivity of solutions to the Cauchy problem for linear and semilinear biharmonic heat equations
  23. Convex solutions of Monge-Ampère equations and systems: Existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behavior
  24. Multiple solutions for critical Choquard-Kirchhoff type equations
  25. Regularity for sub-elliptic systems with VMO-coefficients in the Heisenberg group: the sub-quadratic structure case
  26. Inducing strong convergence of trajectories in dynamical systems associated to monotone inclusions with composite structure
  27. A posteriori analysis of the spectral element discretization of a non linear heat equation
  28. Liouville property of fractional Lane-Emden equation in general unbounded domain
  29. Large data existence theory for three-dimensional unsteady flows of rate-type viscoelastic fluids with stress diffusion
  30. On some classes of generalized Schrödinger equations
  31. Variational formulations of steady rotational equatorial waves
  32. On a class of critical elliptic systems in ℝ4
  33. Exponential stability of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with locally distributed damping on compact Riemannian manifold
  34. On a degenerate hyperbolic problem for the 3-D steady full Euler equations with axial-symmetry
  35. Existence, multiplicity and nonexistence results for Kirchhoff type equations
  36. Combined effects of Choquard and singular nonlinearities in fractional Kirchhoff problems
  37. Convergence analysis for double phase obstacle problems with multivalued convection term
  38. Multiple solutions for weighted Kirchhoff equations involving critical Hardy-Sobolev exponent
  39. Boundary value problems associated with singular strongly nonlinear equations with functional terms
  40. Global solvability in a three-dimensional Keller-Segel-Stokes system involving arbitrary superlinear logistic degradation
  41. Multiplicity and concentration behaviour of solutions for a fractional Choquard equation with critical growth
  42. Concentration results for a magnetic Schrödinger-Poisson system with critical growth
  43. Periodic solutions for a differential inclusion problem involving the p(t)-Laplacian
  44. The concentration-compactness principles for Ws,p(·,·)(ℝN) and application
  45. Regularity for commutators of the local multilinear fractional maximal operators
  46. An improvement to the John-Nirenberg inequality for functions in critical Sobolev spaces
  47. Local versus nonlocal elliptic equations: short-long range field interactions
  48. Analysis of a diffusive host-pathogen model with standard incidence and distinct dispersal rates
  49. Blowing-up solutions of the time-fractional dispersive equations
  50. Fixed point of some Markov operator of Frobenius-Perron type generated by a random family of point-transformations in ℝd
  51. Non-stationary Navier–Stokes equations in 2D power cusp domain
  52. Non-stationary Navier–Stokes equations in 2D power cusp domain
  53. Nontrivial solutions to the p-harmonic equation with nonlinearity asymptotic to |t|p–2t at infinity
  54. Iterative methods for monotone nonexpansive mappings in uniformly convex spaces
  55. Optimality of Serrin type extension criteria to the Navier-Stokes equations
  56. Fractional Hardy-Sobolev equations with nonhomogeneous terms
  57. New class of sixth-order nonhomogeneous p(x)-Kirchhoff problems with sign-changing weight functions
  58. On the set of positive solutions for resonant Robin (p, q)-equations
  59. Solving Composite Fixed Point Problems with Block Updates
  60. Lions-type theorem of the p-Laplacian and applications
  61. Half-space Gaussian symmetrization: applications to semilinear elliptic problems
  62. Positive radial symmetric solutions for a class of elliptic problems with critical exponent and -1 growth
  63. Global well-posedness of the full compressible Hall-MHD equations
  64. Σ-Shaped Bifurcation Curves
  65. On the critical behavior for inhomogeneous wave inequalities with Hardy potential in an exterior domain
  66. On singular quasilinear elliptic equations with data measures
  67. On the sub–diffusion fractional initial value problem with time variable order
  68. Partial regularity of stable solutions to the fractional Geľfand-Liouville equation
  69. Ground state solutions for a class of fractional Schrodinger-Poisson system with critical growth and vanishing potentials
  70. Initial boundary value problems for the three-dimensional compressible elastic Navier-Stokes-Poisson equations
Downloaded on 18.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/anona-2020-0139/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button