Startseite Literaturwissenschaften Constructing the Poet’s ‘Now’: “Deor’s” Modernist Temporalities
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Constructing the Poet’s ‘Now’: “Deor’s” Modernist Temporalities

  • Andrew James Johnston EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. März 2022
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Anglia
Aus der Zeitschrift Anglia Band 140 Heft 1

Abstract

In comparison with other Old English poems, “Deor” is unusual both for its stanzaic structure and its refrain. Furthermore, close to the end of the poem, the narrative voice shifts from one that appears to be comfortably heterodiegetic to a homodiegetic voice giving expression to a deep sense of loss. It is through that sense of loss, the article claims, that we witness the construction of an anguished sense of the ‘Now’. This article investigates the poem’s remarkable narrative, aesthetic and temporal features through the prism of a ‘global modernisms/global modernities’-approach as has been developed in the context of the world literature debate. The central argument unfolding here is that by opening itself up to the notion of an unknown future, “Deor” stages a complex, ‘modern’ entanglement of different temporalities. “Deor’s” specific modernism consists in the way in which it performs aesthetically, through an act of poetry, the mutually constitutive relationality of a past and a radical present.1

Works Cited

Akbari, Suzanne Conklin. 2017. “Modeling Medieval World Literature”. Middle Eastern Literatures 20.1: 2–17.10.1080/1475262X.2017.1303985Suche in Google Scholar

Altschul, Nadia R. 2020. Politics of Temporalization: Medievalism and Orientalism in Nineteenth-Century South America. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.10.9783/9780812297201Suche in Google Scholar

Bammesberger, Alfred. 2015. “The Old English Poem Deor: Its Structural Units and the Grammatical Analysis of Its Refrain”. Anglia 133.2: 320–329.10.1515/ang-2015-0025Suche in Google Scholar

Bannerjee, Jacqueline. 1984. “Deor: The Refrain”. The Explicator 42.4: 4–7.10.1080/00144940.1984.11483782Suche in Google Scholar

Beechy, Tiffany. 2010. The Poetics of Old English. Farnham: Ashgate.Suche in Google Scholar

Biggs, Frederick M. 1997. “Deor’s Threatened ‘Blame Poem’”. Studies in Philology 94.3: 297–320.Suche in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Morton, W. 1964. “The Form of Deor”. PMLA 79.5: 534–541.10.2307/461138Suche in Google Scholar

Bloomfield, Morton W. 1986. “Deor Revisited”. In: Phyllis Rigg Brown, Georgia Ronan Crampton and Fred. C. Robinson (eds.). Modes of Interpretation in Old English Literature – Essays in Honour of Stanley B. Greenfield. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 273–282.Suche in Google Scholar

Brljak, Vladimir. 2011. “Unediting ‘Deor’”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 112.3: 297–321.Suche in Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2008. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400828654Suche in Google Scholar

Cheah, Pheng. 2016. What is a World? On Postcolonial Literature as World Literature. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822374534Suche in Google Scholar

Condren, Edward I. 1981. “Deor’s Artistic Triumph”. Studies in Philology 78.5: 62–76.Suche in Google Scholar

D’haen, Theo. 2012. The Routledge Concise History of World Literature. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203803752Suche in Google Scholar

Damrosch, David. 2016. “Antiquity”. In: Eric Hayot and Rebecca L. Walkowitz (eds.). A New Vocabulary for Global Modernism. New York: Columbia University Press. 43–58.Suche in Google Scholar

Davis, Kathleen. 2013. “Old English Lyrics: A Poetics of Experience”. In: Clare Lees (ed.). The Cambridge History of Early English Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 332–356. 10.1017/CHO9781139035637.016Suche in Google Scholar

Dinshaw, Carolyn. 2012. How Soon Is Now? Medieval Texts, Amateur Readers and the Queerness of Time. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822395911Suche in Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. 2002. “Multiple Modernities”. In: Eisenstadt (ed.). Multiple Modernities. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers. 1–29.10.4324/9781315124872-1Suche in Google Scholar

Fabian, Johannes. 2002. Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Frank, Roberta. 2013. “Germanic Legend in Old English Literature”. In: Malcolm Godden and Michael Lapidge (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to Old English Literature. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 82–100.10.1017/CCO9781139042987.011Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, Susan Stanford. 2015. Planetary Modernisms: Provocations on Modernity Across Time. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/columbia/9780231170901.003.0003Suche in Google Scholar

Friedman, Susan Stanford. 2019. “Introduction: The Past in the Present: Temporalities of the Contemporary”. In: Friedman (ed.). Contemporary Revolutions: Turning Back to the Future in 21st-Century Literature and Art. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 3–20. Suche in Google Scholar

Garceau, Ben. 2017. “Passing Over, Passing On: Survivance in the Translations of Deor by Seamus Heaney and Jorge Luis Borges”. PMLA 132.2: 298–313.10.1632/pmla.2017.132.2.298Suche in Google Scholar

Goody, Jack. 2010. Renaissances: The One or the Many? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Harris, Joseph. 1987. “‘Deor’ and its Refrain: Preliminaries to an Interpretation”. Traditio 43: 23–53.10.1017/S0362152900012472Suche in Google Scholar

Hartmann, Jan-Peer. 2016. “The Structure of the Exeter Book: A Reading Based on Medieval Topics”. Leeds Studies in English, New Series 47: 29–61.Suche in Google Scholar

Heng, Geraldine. 2014. “Early Globalities, and Its Questions, Objectives, and Methods: An Inquiry into the State of Theory and Critique”. Exemplaria 26.2–3: 234–253.10.1179/1041257314Z.00000000052Suche in Google Scholar

Heng, Geraldine. 2021. The Global Middle Ages: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781009161176Suche in Google Scholar

Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. “Introduction: Inventing Traditions”. In: Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger (eds.). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1–14.10.1017/CBO9781107295636.001Suche in Google Scholar

Hurley, Mary Kate. 2019. “Weathering Time in the Wanderer”. In: Irina Dumitrescu and Eric Weiskott (eds.). The Shapes of Early English Poetry: Style, Form, History. Kalamazoo, MI: Medieval Institute Publications. 15–36.10.1515/9781580443609-004Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobs, Nicolas. 1981. “The Old English Heroic Tradition in the Light of Welsh Evidence”. Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies 2: 9–20.Suche in Google Scholar

Johnston, Andrew James. 2006. “The Riddle of Deor and the Performance of Fiction”. In: Johnston, Ferdinand von Mengden and Stefan Thim (eds.). Language and Text: Current Perspectives on English and Germanic Historical Linguistics and Philology. Heidelberg: Winter. 133–150.Suche in Google Scholar

Kim, Hyeree. 1995. “On the Genitive of Anglo-Saxon Poem Deor”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 96.4: 351–359.Suche in Google Scholar

Klinck, Anne L. 1992. The Old English Elegies: A Critical Edition and Genre Study. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.10.1515/9780773562905Suche in Google Scholar

Langeslag, Paul S. 2008. “Boethian Similitude in Deor and The Wanderer”. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 109.2: 205–222.Suche in Google Scholar

Neumann, Birgit and Gabriele Rippl. 2017. “Anglophone World Literatures: Introduction”. Anglophone World Literatures. Ed. Neumann and Rippl. Spec. issue of Anglia 135.1: 1–20.10.1515/ang-2017-0001Suche in Google Scholar

Niles, John D. 2003. “The Myth of the Anglo-Saxon Oral Poet”. Western Folklore 62.1–2: 7–61.Suche in Google Scholar

North, Richard. 1994. “King Æthelwulf and the Goths in ‘Deor’”. Amsterdamer Beiträge zur Älteren Germanistik 40.1: 9–20.10.1163/18756719-040-01-90000003Suche in Google Scholar

Pope, John C. (ed.). 2001. Eight Old English Poems. 3rd ed., revised by R. D. Fulk. New York: Norton.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosa, Hartmut. 2013. Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. New York: Columbia University Press.10.7312/rosa14834Suche in Google Scholar

Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. 2003. Death of a Discipline. Trans. Jonathan Trejo-Mathys. New York: Columbia University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Thornbury, Emily. 2014. Becoming a Poet in Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107280304Suche in Google Scholar

Trilling, Renée R. 2009. The Aesthetics of Nostalgia: Historical Representation in Old English Verse. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Waugh, Robin. 1997. “The Characteristic Moment as a Motif in The Finnsburg Fragment and Deor”. English Studies in Canada 23.3: 249–261.10.1353/esc.1997.0021Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-03-17
Published in Print: 2022-03-15

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Frontmatter
  3. Preliminary Note
  4. Constructing the Poet’s ‘Now’: “Deor’s” Modernist Temporalities
  5. Beaumont and Fletcher Rewrite Cervantes: Love’s Pilgrimage, a Farcical Representation of Spain and a Subversion of Jacobean Patriarchy
  6. The Textual Apparatus of Empire in Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness
  7. Narrative Conflict and Implied Value Conflict: An Analysis of Aspects of the Implied Worldview of Richard Morgan’s Altered Carbon (2002) and Hanif Kureishi’s The Body (2002)
  8. Huizinga’s Homo Ludens and the Element of Playfulness in Emily Dickinson
  9. Climate Change and the Ironies of Omniscience in Rumaan Alam’s Leave the World Behind
  10. Reviews
  11. John Gallagher. 2019. Learning Languages in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 286 pp., 19 illustr., £ 63.00.
  12. Review
  13. Michael D. J. Bintley. 2020. Settlements and Strongholds in Early Medieval England: Texts, Landscapes, and Material Culture. Studies in the Early Middle Ages 45. Turnhout: Brepols, 231 pp., 13 illustr., € 75.00.
  14. Anthony Bale and Sebastian Sobecki (eds.). 2019. Medieval English Travel: A Critical Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xviii + 498 pp., 4 figures, 3 maps, £ 95.00 (hb)/£ 20.00 (pb).
  15. A. W. Strouse. 2021. Form and Foreskin: Medieval Narratives of Circumcision. New York: Fordham University Press, 165 pp., $ 90.00 (hc)/$ 25.00 (pb).
  16. Torsten Meireis and Gabriele Rippl (eds.). 2019. Cultural Sustainability: Perspectives from the Humanities and Social Sciences. Routledge Environmental Humanities. Abingdon: Routledge, xiv + 268 pp., 19 figures, 3 tables, £ 120.00.
  17. Ina Habermann (ed.). 2020. The Road to Brexit: A Cultural Perspective on British Attitudes to Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press, xvi + 256 pp., 7 figures, 1 table, £ 80.00.
  18. Corinna Lenhardt. 2020. Savage Horrors: The Intrinsic Raciality of the American Gothic. American Culture Studies 29. Bielefeld: transcript, 288 pp., 1 figure, € 45.00.
  19. Timo Müller. 2018. The African American Sonnet: A Literary History. Margaret Walker Alexander Series in African American Studies. Jackson, MS: University of Mississippi Press, x + 172 pp., $ 99.00
  20. Verena Laschinger and Sirpa Salenius (eds.). 2019. Neglected American Women Writers of the Long Nineteenth Century. Routledge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature. New York/Abingdon: Routledge, xiii + 209 pp., £ 120.00.
Heruntergeladen am 3.2.2026 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ang-2022-0002/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen