Perceiving Ideas

AT Adam, C./Tannery, P. (eds.) 1996. Oeuvres de Descartes, 12 vols. Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

CSM Cottingham, J./Stoothoff, R./Murdoch, D. (eds.) 1990. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, vol. 1. 3 vols. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1999. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 2. 3 vols. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

CSMK Cottingham, J./Stoothoff, R./Murdoch, D./Kenny, A. (eds.) 1997. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes,Vol. 3. 3 vols. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

Alanen, L. 2001. “Sensory Ideas, Objective Reality, and Material Falsity”. In Reason, Will and Sensation: Studies in Descartes’ Metaphysics. Ed. J. Cottingham. Oxford, 229–250.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2003. Descartes’s Concept of Mind. Cambridge, MA.10.4159/9780674020108Suche in Google Scholar

Aquinas, T. 1981. Summa Theologica, Vol. I. 5 vols. Trans. Fathers of the English Dominican Province. Notre Dame, IN.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1994. Commentaries on Aristotle’s De Anima. Eds. S. Humphries/K. Foster. Notre Dame, IN.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariew, R./Cottingham, J./Sorell, T. 1998. Descartes’ Meditations: Background Source Materials. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9781139172844Suche in Google Scholar

Bolton, M. 1986. “Confused and Obscure Ideas of Sense”. In Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Ed. A. O. Rorty. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA, 389–403.10.1525/9780520907836-019Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, D. J. 2008. “Descartes on True and False Ideas”. In A Companion to Descartes. Eds. J. Broughton/J. Carriero. Chichester, 196–215.10.1002/9780470696439.ch12Suche in Google Scholar

Carriero, J. 2009. Between Two Worlds: A Reading of Descartes’s Meditations. Princeton/Oxford.10.1515/9781400833191Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, V. 1986. “The Theory of Ideas”. In Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Ed. by A. O. Rorty. Berkeley/Los Angeles, 177–198.10.1525/9780520907836-011Suche in Google Scholar

Clemenson, D. 2007. Descartes’ Theory of Ideas. London.Suche in Google Scholar

Cook, M. 1987. “Descartes’ Alleged Representationalism”. History of Philosophy Quarterly 4, 179–195.Suche in Google Scholar

Cronin, T. J. 1966. Objective Being in Descartes and in Suárez. Rome.Suche in Google Scholar

Eustace of St. Paul. 1609. Summa Philosophiae Quadripartita de rebus dialecticis, moralibus et metaphysicis. Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Gorham, G. 2002. “Descartes on the Innateness of All Ideas”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 32, 355–388.10.1080/00455091.2002.10716523Suche in Google Scholar

Grene, M. 1983. Descartes: Philosophers in Context. Minneapolis.Suche in Google Scholar

Hoffman, P. 1990. “Cartesian Passions and Cartesian Dualism”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 71, 310–333.10.1111/j.1468-0114.1990.tb00406.xSuche in Google Scholar

–. 1996. “Descartes on Misrepresentation”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 34, 357–381.10.1353/hph.1996.0068Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2002. “Direct Realism, Intentionality, and the Objective Being of Ideas”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83, 163–179.10.1111/1468-0114.00141Suche in Google Scholar

Hwang, J. W. 2011. “Descartes and the Aristotelian Framework of Sensory Perception”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35, 111–148.10.1111/j.1475-4975.2011.00226.xSuche in Google Scholar

Jolley, N. 1990. The Light of the Soul: Theories of Ideas in Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. Oxford.10.1093/0198238193.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Kaufman, D. 2000. “Descartes on the Objective Reality of Materially False Ideas”. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81, 385–408.10.1111/1468-0114.00111Suche in Google Scholar

Kenny, A. 1968. Descartes: A Study of His Philosophy. New York City.Suche in Google Scholar

Lennon, T. M. 1974. “The Inherence Pattern and Descartes’ Ideas”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12, 43–52.10.1353/hph.2008.0146Suche in Google Scholar

McRae, R. 1965. “‘Idea’ as a Philosophical Term in the Seventeenth Century”. Journal of the History of Ideas 26, 175–190.10.2307/2708226Suche in Google Scholar

Nadler, S. M. 1989. Arnauld and the Cartesian Philosophy of Ideas. Princeton, NJ.Suche in Google Scholar

Newman, L. 2009. “Ideas, Pictures, and the Directness of Perception in Descartes and Locke”. Philosophy Compass 4, 134–154.10.1111/j.1747-9991.2008.00187.xSuche in Google Scholar

–. 2011. “Sensory Doubts and the Directness of Perception in the Meditations”. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 35, 205–222.10.1111/j.1475-4975.2011.00227.xSuche in Google Scholar

Normore, C. 1986. “Meaning and Objective Being: Descartes and His Sources”. In Essays on Descartes’ Meditations. Ed. A. O. Rorty. Berkeley/Los Angeles, CA, 223–241.10.1525/9780520907836-013Suche in Google Scholar

Pasnau, R. 1997. Theories of Cognition in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 2008. “Id Quo Cognoscimus”. In Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. Eds. S. Knuuttila/P. Kärkkäinen. Springer, 131–149.10.1007/978-1-4020-6125-7_9Suche in Google Scholar

Rozemond, M. 1999. “Descartes on Mind-Body Interaction: What’s the Problem?”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 37, 435–467.10.1353/hph.2008.0799Suche in Google Scholar

Shapiro, L. 2012. “Objective Being and ‘Ofness’ in Descartes”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84, 378–418.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00475.xSuche in Google Scholar

Smith, K. 2005. “Rationalism and Representation”. In A Companion to Rationalism. Ed. A. Nelson. Chichester, 206–223.10.1002/9780470996904.ch11Suche in Google Scholar

Suárez, F. 1856–1878. Opera Omnia. Paris.Suche in Google Scholar

Wee, C. 2006. Material Falsity and Error in Descartes’ Meditations. New York City.10.4324/9780203648445Suche in Google Scholar

Wells, N. J. 1967. “Objective Being: Descartes and his Sources”. The Modern Schoolmen 45, 49–61.10.5840/schoolman19674513Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1984. “Material Falsity in Descartes, Arnauld, and Suárez”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 22, 25–50.10.1353/hph.1984.0010Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1990. “Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus, and Suárez”. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28, 33–61.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1993. “Descartes’ Idea and Its Sources”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 67, 513–535.10.5840/acpq19936741Suche in Google Scholar

Wilson, M. D. 1996. Descartes. London.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1999a. “Descartes on Sense and ‘Resemblance’”. In Ideas and Mechanism. Princeton, NJ, 10–15.Suche in Google Scholar

–. 1999b. “Descartes on the Representationality of Sensation”. In Ideas and Mechanism. Princeton, NJ, 68–83.Suche in Google Scholar