Home Mathematics Sobolev embeddings and distance functions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Sobolev embeddings and distance functions

  • EMAIL logo , and
Published/Copyright: November 28, 2023

Abstract

On a general open set of the euclidean space, we study the relation between the embedding of the homogeneous Sobolev space D 0 1 , p into L q and the summability properties of the distance function. We prove that, in the superconformal case (i.e. when š‘ is larger than the dimension), these two facts are equivalent, while in the subconformal and conformal cases (i.e. when š‘ is less than or equal to the dimension), we construct counterexamples to this equivalence. In turn, our analysis permits to study the asymptotic behavior of the positive solution of the Lane–Emden equation for the š‘-Laplacian with sub-homogeneous right-hand side, as the exponent š‘ diverges to āˆž. The case of first eigenfunctions of the š‘-Laplacian is included, as well. As particular cases of our analysis, we retrieve some well-known convergence results, under optimal assumptions on the open sets. We also give some new geometric estimates for generalized principal frequencies.

MSC 2010: 46E35; 35J92; 35P30

A An infinite strip with slowly shrinking ends

In the next example, we consider a quasibounded open set for which d Ī© γ āˆ‰ L 1 ⁢ ( R N ) for any 0 < γ < āˆž . Sets of this type have been considered, for example, in [5] and [18, Section 7].

Example A.1

For every α > 0 and x 1 ∈ R , we set

f 1 ⁢ ( x 1 ) = 1 log ⁔ ( 2 + x 1 2 ) and f α ⁢ ( x 1 ) = f 1 ⁢ ( x 1 α ) = 1 log ⁔ ( 2 + ( x 1 α ) 2 ) .

Then we consider the quasibounded open set

Ω α = { x = ( x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ R 2 : x 1 ∈ R , | x 2 | < f α ⁢ ( x 1 ) } .

Observe that, for this set, we have d Ī© α γ āˆ‰ L 1 ⁢ ( Ī© α ) for any 0 < γ < āˆž . Thus, by Theorem 5.1, part (i), we have

D 0 1 , 2 ⁢ ( Ī© α ) ↪̸ L q ⁢ ( Ī© α ) for every ⁢ 1 ≤ q < 2 .

On the other hand, since Ω α is bounded in the x 2 direction, we easily get that λ 2 ⁢ ( Ω α ) > 0 , that is

D 0 1 , 2 ⁢ ( Ī© α ) ↪ L 2 ⁢ ( Ī© α ) .

As for the compactness of this embedding, we observe that this cannot be directly inferred from Theorem 5.4 since we are in the critical situation p = 2 = N . Nevertheless, we are going to show that actually such an embedding is compact if š›¼ is large enough, thanks to the peculiar geometry of the set Ī© α . In particular, the Dirichlet-Laplacian on Ī© α has a discrete spectrum.

We define

Ī© α , R := Ī© α ∩ ( ( āˆ’ R , R ) Ɨ ( āˆ’ R , R ) ) for ⁢ R ≄ R 0 = 1 log ⁔ 2 .

We denote by w Ω α the torsion function of Ω α , defined as

w Ī© α := lim R → āˆž w Ī© α , R ,

where w Ω α , R ∈ W 0 1 , 2 ⁢ ( Ω α , R ) is the torsion function of the bounded set Ω α , R , i.e. it solves

āˆ’ Ī” ⁢ u = 1 in ⁢ Ī© α , R

(see [12, Definition 2.2]). We observe that w Ī© α is a bounded function, by [12, Theorem 1.3]. In order to prove the compactness of the embedding of D 0 1 , 2 ⁢ ( Ī© α ) ↪ L 2 ⁢ ( Ī© α ) , it is sufficient to prove that

(A.1) lim R → āˆž ∄ w Ī© α ∄ L āˆž ⁢ ( Ī© α āˆ– B R ) = 0 ,

thanks to [12, Theorem 1.3]. We will achieve (A.1) by exploiting the geometry of Ω α in order to construct a suitable upper barrier. For every α > 0 and x 1 ∈ R , we set

F 1 ⁢ ( x 1 ) = ( f 1 ⁢ ( x 1 ) ) 2 and F α ⁢ ( x 1 ) := F 1 ⁢ ( x 1 α ) = ( f α ⁢ ( x 1 ) ) 2 .

Observe that F 1 has a bounded second order derivative, i.e. there exists L > 0 such that

| F 1 ′′ ⁢ ( t ) | ≤ L for every ⁢ t ∈ R .

Thus, if we take α > 0 such that α 2 > L , we obtain

(A.2) | F α ′′ ⁢ ( x 1 ) | = 1 α 2 ⁢ | F 1 ′′ ⁢ ( x 1 α ) | ≤ 2 ⁢ ( 1 āˆ’ C α ) for every ⁢ x 1 ∈ R ,

where

C α := 1 āˆ’ L 2 ⁢ α 2 , thus 0 < C α < 1 .

With such a choice of š›¼, we consider the function

U α ⁢ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = F α ⁢ ( x 1 ) āˆ’ x 2 2 2 ⁢ C α for every ⁢ ( x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ Ī© α .

We claim that this is the desired upper barrier. Indeed, by construction we have U α ≄ 0 and, thanks to (A.2), it holds

āˆ’ Ī” ⁢ U α ⁢ ( x 1 , x 2 ) = 1 C α āˆ’ F α ′′ ⁢ ( x 1 ) 2 ⁢ C α ≄ 1 for every ⁢ ( x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ Ī© α .

By applying the comparison principle in every Ω α , R , we get that

w Ī© α , R ⁢ ( x ) ≤ U α ⁢ ( x ) ≤ F α ⁢ ( x 1 ) 2 ⁢ C α for every ⁢ x = ( x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ Ī© α , R ,

and such an estimate does not depend on š‘…. Hence, by sending š‘… to āˆž, we have that

w Ī© α ⁢ ( x ) ≤ F α ⁢ ( x 1 ) 2 ⁢ C α for every ⁢ x = ( x 1 , x 2 ) ∈ Ī© α .

By using the properties of F α = ( f α ) 2 and the previous estimate, we eventually get (A.1).

Acknowledgements

We thank Ryan Hynd and Erik Lindgren for some discussions on Hardy’s inequality and the constant Ī» p , āˆž . This paper has been finalized during the meeting ā€œPDEs in Cogne: a friendly meeting in the snowā€, held in Cogne in January 2023. We wish to thank the organizers for the kind invitation and the nice working atmosphere provided during the staying. F. Prinari and A. C. Zagati are members of the Gruppo Nazionale per l’Analisi Matematica, la ProbabilitĆ  e le loro Applicazioni (GNAMPA) of the Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica (INdAM). F. Prinari is grateful to the Department of Mathematics and Computer Science at University of Ferrara for its hospitality.

  1. Communicated by: Juan Manfredi

References

[1] R. A. Adams, Compact Sobolev imbeddings for unbounded domains with discrete boundaries, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 24 (1968), 326–333. 10.1016/0022-247X(68)90034-6Search in Google Scholar

[2] R. A. Adams and J. J. F. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, 2nd ed., Pure Appl. Math. (Amsterdam) 140, Elsevier/Academic, Amsterdam, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[3] W. Allegretto and Y. X. Huang, A Picone’s identity for the š‘-Laplacian and applications, Nonlinear Anal. 32 (1998), no. 7, 819–830. 10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00530-0Search in Google Scholar

[4] F. G. Avkhadiev, Hardy type inequalities in higher dimensions with explicit estimate of constants, Lobachevskii J. Math. 21 (2006), 3–31. Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. BaƱuelos and B. Davis, Sharp estimates for Dirichlet eigenfunctions in horn-shaped regions, Comm. Math. Phys. 150 (1992), no. 1, 209–215. 10.1007/BF02096574Search in Google Scholar

[6] M. Belloni and B. Kawohl, A direct uniqueness proof for equations involving the š‘-Laplace operator, Manuscripta Math. 109 (2002), no. 2, 229–231. 10.1007/s00229-002-0305-9Search in Google Scholar

[7] M. van den Berg, Estimates for the torsion function and Sobolev constants, Potential Anal. 36 (2012), no. 4, 607–616. 10.1007/s11118-011-9246-9Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Bhattacharya, E. DiBenedetto and J. Manfredi, Limits as p → āˆž of Ī” p ⁢ u p = f and related extremal problems, Rend. Semin. Mat. Univ. Politec. Torino 1989 (1989), 15–68. Search in Google Scholar

[9] L. Brasco, On principal frequencies and isoperimetric ratios in convex sets, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 29 (2020), no. 4, 977–1005. 10.5802/afst.1653Search in Google Scholar

[10] L. Brasco, G. Franzina and B. Ruffini, Schrƶdinger operators with negative potentials and Lane–Emden densities, J. Funct. Anal. 274 (2018), no. 6, 1825–1863. 10.1016/j.jfa.2017.10.005Search in Google Scholar

[11] L. Brasco, F. Prinari and A. C. Zagati, A comparison principle for the Lane–Emden equation and applications to geometric estimates, Nonlinear Anal. 220 (2022), Paper No. 112847. 10.1016/j.na.2022.112847Search in Google Scholar

[12] L. Brasco and B. Ruffini, Compact Sobolev embeddings and torsion functions, Ann. Inst. H. PoincarĆ© C Anal. Non LinĆ©aire 34 (2017), no. 4, 817–843. 10.1016/j.anihpc.2016.05.005Search in Google Scholar

[13] H. BrĆ©zis and E. Lieb, A relation between pointwise convergence of functions and convergence of functionals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 88 (1983), no. 3, 486–490. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1983-0699419-3Search in Google Scholar

[14] L. Briani, G. Buttazzo and F. Prinari, Some inequalities involving perimeter and torsional rigidity, Appl. Math. Optim. 84 (2021), no. 3, 2727–2741. 10.1007/s00245-020-09727-7Search in Google Scholar

[15] D. Bucur and G. Buttazzo, On the characterization of the compact embedding of Sobolev spaces, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 44 (2012), no. 3–4, 455–475. 10.1007/s00526-011-0441-8Search in Google Scholar

[16] T. Champion, L. De Pascale and C. Jimenez, The āˆž-eigenvalue problem and a problem of optimal transportation, Commun. Appl. Anal. 13 (2009), no. 4, 547–565. Search in Google Scholar

[17] C. Clark, An embedding theorem for function spaces, Pacific J. Math. 19 (1966), 243–251. 10.2140/pjm.1966.19.243Search in Google Scholar

[18] E. B. Davies and B. Simon, Ultracontractivity and the heat kernel for Schrƶdinger operators and Dirichlet Laplacians, J. Funct. Anal. 59 (1984), no. 2, 335–395. 10.1016/0022-1236(84)90076-4Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Ercole and G. A. Pereira, Asymptotics for the best Sobolev constants and their extremal functions, Math. Nachr. 289 (2016), no. 11–12, 1433–1449. 10.1002/mana.201500263Search in Google Scholar

[20] N. Fukagai, M. Ito and K. Narukawa, Limit as p → āˆž of š‘-Laplace eigenvalue problems and L āˆž -inequality of the PoincarĆ© type, Differential Integral Equations 12 (1999), no. 2, 183–206. 10.57262/die/1367265629Search in Google Scholar

[21] D. Goel, Y. Pinchover and G. Psaradakis, On the weighted L p -Hardy inequality on domains in R n , Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. 7 (2022), no. 3, 1025–1033. Search in Google Scholar

[22] P. Hajłasz, Pointwise Hardy inequalities, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 127 (1999), no. 2, 417–423. 10.1090/S0002-9939-99-04495-0Search in Google Scholar

[23] J. Hersch, Sur la frĆ©quence fondamentale d’une membrane vibrante: Ɖvaluations par dĆ©faut et principe de maximum, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 11 (1960), 387–413. 10.1007/BF01604498Search in Google Scholar

[24] E. Hewitt and K. Stromberg, Real and Abstract Analysis. A Modern Treatment of the Theory of Functions of a Real Variable, Springer, New York, 1965. 10.1007/978-3-642-88047-6Search in Google Scholar

[25] R. Hynd and E. Lindgren, Extremal functions for Morrey’s inequality in convex domains, Math. Ann. 375 (2019), no. 3–4, 1721–1743. 10.1007/s00208-018-1775-8Search in Google Scholar

[26] R. Hynd and F. Seuffert, Asymptotic flatness of Morrey extremals, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 5, Paper No. 159. 10.1007/s00526-020-01827-0Search in Google Scholar

[27] R. Hynd and F. Seuffert, On the symmetry and monotonicity of Morrey extremals, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 19 (2020), no. 11, 5285–5303. 10.3934/cpaa.2020238Search in Google Scholar

[28] R. Hynd and F. Seuffert, Extremal functions for Morrey’s inequality, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 241 (2021), no. 2, 903–945. 10.1007/s00205-021-01668-xSearch in Google Scholar

[29] P. Juutinen, P. Lindqvist and J. J. Manfredi, The āˆž-eigenvalue problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 148 (1999), no. 2, 89–105. 10.1007/s002050050157Search in Google Scholar

[30] R. Kajikiya, A priori estimate for the first eigenvalue of the š‘-Laplacian, Differential Integral Equations 28 (2015), no. 9–10, 1011–1028. 10.57262/die/1435064548Search in Google Scholar

[31] B. Kawohl, On a family of torsional creep problems, J. Reine Angew. Math. 410 (1990), 1–22. 10.1515/crll.1990.410.1Search in Google Scholar

[32] B. Kawohl, M. Lucia and S. Prashanth, Simplicity of the principal eigenvalue for indefinite quasilinear problems, Adv. Differential Equations 12 (2007), no. 4, 407–434. 10.57262/ade/1355867457Search in Google Scholar

[33] J. L. Lewis, Uniformly fat sets, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 308 (1988), no. 1, 177–196. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1988-0946438-4Search in Google Scholar

[34] P. Lindqvist, On the equation div ⁔ ( | āˆ‡ u | p āˆ’ 2 ⁢ āˆ‡ u ) + Ī» ⁢ | u | p āˆ’ 2 ⁢ u = 0 , Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 109 (1990), no. 1, 157–164. Search in Google Scholar

[35] V. Maz’ya, Sobolev Spaces with Applications to Elliptic Partial Differential Equations, Grundlehren Math. Wiss. 342, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. 10.1007/978-3-642-15564-2Search in Google Scholar

[36] G. Poliquin, Principal frequency of the š‘-Laplacian and the inradius of Euclidean domains, J. Topol. Anal. 7 (2015), no. 3, 505–511. 10.1142/S1793525315500211Search in Google Scholar

[37] M. H. Protter, A lower bound for the fundamental frequency of a convex region, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 81 (1981), no. 1, 65–70. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1981-0589137-2Search in Google Scholar

[38] G. Talenti, Inequalities in rearrangement invariant function spaces, Nonlinear Analysis, Function Spaces and Applications. Vol. 5, Prometheus, Prague (1994), 177–230. Search in Google Scholar

[39] L. Tartar, An Introduction to Sobolev Spaces and Interpolation Spaces, Lect. Notes Unione Mat. Ital. 3, Springer, Berlin, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[40] N. N. Trong, B. L. T. Thanh and T. D. Do, Hardy–Lane–Emden inequalities for š‘-Laplacian on arbitrary domains, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl. 29 (2022), no. 5, Paper No. 59. 10.1007/s00030-022-00790-3Search in Google Scholar

[41] A. Wannebo, Hardy inequalities, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 109 (1990), no. 1, 85–95. 10.1090/S0002-9939-1990-1010807-1Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2023-02-03
Accepted: 2023-08-23
Published Online: 2023-11-28
Published in Print: 2024-10-01

Ā© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Another proof of the existence of homothetic solitons of the inverse mean curvature flow
  3. A Weierstrass extremal field theory for the fractional Laplacian
  4. Minimizing movements for anisotropic and inhomogeneous mean curvature flows
  5. A singular Yamabe problem on manifolds with solid cones
  6. Uniqueness for volume-constraint local energy-minimizing sets in a half-space or a ball
  7. Limit of solutions for semilinear Hamilton–Jacobi equations with degenerate viscosity
  8. Monotonicity of entire solutions to reaction-diffusion equations involving fractional p-Laplacian
  9. Hierarchy structures in finite index CMC surfaces
  10. No breathers theorem for noncompact harmonic Ricci flows with asymptotically nonnegative Ricci curvature
  11. Wolff potentials and local behavior of solutions to elliptic problems with Orlicz growth and measure data
  12. Asymptotic analysis of single-slip crystal plasticity in the limit of vanishing thickness and rigid elasticity
  13. On the regularity of optimal potentials in control problems governed by elliptic equations
  14. Sobolev embeddings and distance functions
  15. Effective quasistatic evolution models for perfectly plastic plates with periodic microstructure: The limiting regimes
  16. On the area-preserving Willmore flow of small bubbles sliding on a domain’s boundary
  17. Sobolev contractivity of gradient flow maximal functions
  18. Discrete approximation of nonlocal-gradient energies
  19. Symmetry and monotonicity of singular solutions to p-Laplacian systems involving a first order term
  20. Flat flow solution to the mean curvature flow with volume constraint
Downloaded on 23.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/acv-2023-0011/html
Scroll to top button