Home The role of Vorstellung in literary semantics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The role of Vorstellung in literary semantics

  • Horst Ruthrof

    His research interests include philosophy of language, phenomenology, semiotics, narrative, Kant, and poststructuralism. His recent publications include Pandora and Occam: On the Limits of Language and Literature (1992); Semantics and the Body: Meaning from Frege to the Postmodern (1997); The Body in Language (2000); ‘The fourth critique’ (2004); and ‘Modernity: Vernunftspaltung’.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2007
Semiotica
From the journal Volume 2007 Issue 165

Abstract

In spite of the current panoply of approaches to literary semantics, this paper argues that the discipline suffers from one scandalous absence: the theorization of Vorstellung, or ‘perceptual modification.’ The paper traces the trajectory of the elimination of Vorstellung in language semantics from Frege to Saussure and to the demise of the signified in the post-Saussurean tradition. Alternative perspectives are introduced that promise the rehabilitation of the perceptual ingredients of language, such as cognitive linguistics (Lakoff) and corporeal pragmatics (Ruthrof), approaches that could be used to revive literary semantics by granting Vorstellung its proper role in the theorization of literary meaning.

About the author

Horst Ruthrof

His research interests include philosophy of language, phenomenology, semiotics, narrative, Kant, and poststructuralism. His recent publications include Pandora and Occam: On the Limits of Language and Literature (1992); Semantics and the Body: Meaning from Frege to the Postmodern (1997); The Body in Language (2000); ‘The fourth critique’ (2004); and ‘Modernity: Vernunftspaltung’.

Published Online: 2007-07-31
Published in Print: 2007-06-19

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/SEM.2007.044/html
Scroll to top button