Home The making of the literary symbol: Taking note of Langer
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The making of the literary symbol: Taking note of Langer

  • Robert E Innis

    His research interests include aesthetics, semiotics and language theory, American philosophy, and philosophy of religion. His publications include Karl Bühler: Semiotic Foundations of Language Theory (1982); Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology (1985); Consciousness and the Play of Signs (1994); and Pragmatism and the Forms of Sense: Language, Perception, Technics (2002).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2007
Semiotica
From the journal Volume 2007 Issue 165

Abstract

Why, in light of the multiple approaches to literature that mark the various semiotic traditions and their complex intertwinings, would one turn to Susanne Langer's seemingly ‘marginal’ or idiosyncratic semiotic theory of art for conceptual resources? I argue that the conceptual core of the answer is found in Langer's notion of a ‘symbol of feeling,’ which is connected with her notion of ‘semblance,’ the imaginal power of art symbols to construct and present their own ‘primary illusions.’ Works of literature — of the poetic art — do not follow a discursive, but rather a presentational logic, giving us access to ‘virtual experience.’

About the author

Robert E Innis

His research interests include aesthetics, semiotics and language theory, American philosophy, and philosophy of religion. His publications include Karl Bühler: Semiotic Foundations of Language Theory (1982); Semiotics: An Introductory Anthology (1985); Consciousness and the Play of Signs (1994); and Pragmatism and the Forms of Sense: Language, Perception, Technics (2002).

Published Online: 2007-07-31
Published in Print: 2007-06-19

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 12.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/SEM.2007.034/html
Scroll to top button