Home Semiosis, art, and literature
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Semiosis, art, and literature

  • Barend van Heusden

    His research interests include the semiotics of culture and cognition and the semiotics of art. His recent publications include ‘Cassirers Ariadnefaden — Anthropologie und Semiotik’ (2003); ‘A bandwidth model of semiotic evolution’ (2004); ‘Torn between two (autonomous) lovers: Mimesis and beauty in modern art’; and ‘Künstlerische Prägnanz’ (in press).

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 31, 2007
Semiotica
From the journal Volume 2007 Issue 165

Abstract

The ‘state of literature’ in a visual culture is analyzed against the background of a theoretical semiotic framework based upon the distinction between three types of signs: one-place images, two-place symbols, and three-place structures. It is argued that literature is linguistic mimetic meta-representation. The semiotic perspective allows us to deal, in a productive way, with a number of key issues in literary theory (such as ‘literariness,’ literature versus entertainment, and literary diachrony). Moreover, a methodology for the study of literature and the arts in culture is proposed, consisting of three complementary approaches or ‘strategies’: the phenomenological, the hermeneutical, and the empirical.

About the author

Barend van Heusden

His research interests include the semiotics of culture and cognition and the semiotics of art. His recent publications include ‘Cassirers Ariadnefaden — Anthropologie und Semiotik’ (2003); ‘A bandwidth model of semiotic evolution’ (2004); ‘Torn between two (autonomous) lovers: Mimesis and beauty in modern art’; and ‘Künstlerische Prägnanz’ (in press).

Published Online: 2007-07-31
Published in Print: 2007-06-19

© Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/SEM.2007.036/html
Scroll to top button