Home Fetal and neonatal outcome in patients with anterior abdominal wall defects (gastroschisis and omphalocele)
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fetal and neonatal outcome in patients with anterior abdominal wall defects (gastroschisis and omphalocele)

  • Ingolf Juhasz-Böss EMAIL logo , Rangmar Goelz , Erich-Franz Solomayer , Jörg Fuchs and Gabriele Meyberg-Solomayer
Published/Copyright: November 16, 2011

Abstract

Fetuses with gastroschisis and omphalocele frequently show intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). The aim of our study was to evaluate the intrauterine course of IUGR and the neonatal outcome in a large patient collective. We retrospectively included all euploid fetuses with gastroschisis and omphalocele between 2001 and 2009 in a single tertiary center. Patients’ characteristics, serial ultrasound examinations and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. From 39 fetuses (28 gastroschisis, 11 omphalocele) 61.5% had IUGR <5th percentile and 15.4% had IUGR<10th percentile. The rate of IUGR did not differ significantly between the two groups during pregnancy. Newborns with gastroschisis showed an average weight of 2386 g, and those with omphalocele showed an average weight of 3148 g (P<0.001). Nevertheless, newborns with omphalocele were more frequently eutrophic than those with gastroschisis (88.8% vs. 52.2%, P=0.079). On average, only one surgical intervention was necessary for the definitive repair of the defect (65.5% of the newborns). Children with gastroschisis remained hospitalized nearly twice as long as children with an omphalocele (38 vs. 20 days). IUGR rates during pregnancy did not differ significantly between fetuses with gastroschisis and omphalocele although patients with defects of omphalocele were more frequently eutrophic at birth. Most newborns needed only one operation for definitive surgical treatment. The mean hospitalization time after this intervention was 4 weeks.


Corresponding author: Ingolf Juhasz-Böss, MD Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Saarland Kirrbergerstr. 1 66421 Homburg Germany Tel.: +49 6841 16 28000

Received: 2011-1-31
Revised: 2011-7-5
Accepted: 2011-8-11
Published Online: 2011-11-16
Published in Print: 2012-01-01

©2012 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Review article
  2. WAPM Working Group on Nutrition: Potential chronobiotic role of human milk in sleep regulation
  3. Opinion Paper
  4. “Every case of asphyxia can be used as a learning example”. Conclusions from an analysis of substandard obstetrical care
  5. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  6. Hematologic profile of the fetus with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
  7. Optimized amniotic fluid analysis in patients suspected of intrauterine infection/inflammation
  8. Risk factors for preterm delivery with placenta previa
  9. Recombinant human factor VIIa prevents hysterectomy in severe postpartum hemorrhage: single center study
  10. Combination antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors in HIV-infected pregnancy
  11. Vitamin D status during normal pregnancy and postpartum. A longitudinal study in 141 Danish women
  12. The impact of the time interval between two successive deliveries in an obstetric unit in terms of the mode of each delivery and the rate of perinatal mortality
  13. Original Articles – Fetus
  14. Terbutaline: effects on the fetal heart at term
  15. Parallel maternal and fetal immune activation by bacterial toxins in vitro
  16. Original Articles – Newborn
  17. Prepregnancy body mass index, socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity and breastfeeding practices
  18. Fetal and neonatal outcome in patients with anterior abdominal wall defects (gastroschisis and omphalocele)
  19. Total serum bilirubin level in umbilical cord blood and respiratory distress syndrome in very low birth weight infants
  20. Short Communication
  21. Improved overall delivery documentation following implementation of a standardized shoulder dystocia delivery form
  22. Letters to the Editor
  23. Prevention of prematurity – a complex undertaking
  24. Prevention of prematurity – a complex undertaking reply
  25. Congress calendar
  26. 10.1515/JPM-2011-1000
Downloaded on 11.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2011.107/html
Scroll to top button