Home Medicine Gender- and parity-specific reference charts for fetal size in low risk singleton pregnancies at the onset of the third trimester
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Gender- and parity-specific reference charts for fetal size in low risk singleton pregnancies at the onset of the third trimester

  • Paul De Reu , Luc J. Smits , Herman P. Oosterbaan , Rosalinde J. Snijders , Marga J. De Reu-Cuppens and Jan G. Nijhuis
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2007
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
From the journal Volume 35 Issue 1

Abstract

Objectives: To determine fetal growth in low risk pregnancies at the beginning of the third trimester and to assess the relative importance of fetal gender and maternal parity.

Setting: Dutch primary care midwifery practice.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study on 3641 singleton pregnancies seen at a primary care midwifery center in the Netherlands. Parameters used for analysis were fetal abdominal circumference (AC), fetal head circumference (HC), gestational age, fetal gender and maternal parity. Regression analysis was applied to describe variation in AC and HC with gestational age. Means and standard deviations in the present population were compared with commonly used reference charts. Multiple regression analysis was applied to examine whether gender and parity should be taken into account.

Results: The fetal AC and HC increased significantly between the 27th and the 33rd week of pregnancy (AC r2=0.3652, P<0.0001; HC r2=0.3301, P<0.0001). Compared to some curves, our means and standard deviations were significantly smaller (at 30+0 weeks AC mean=258±13 mm; HC mean=281±14 mm), but corresponded well with other curves. Fetal gender was a significant determinant for both AC (P<0.0001) and HC (P<0.0001). Parity contributed significantly to AC only but the difference was small (β=0.00464).

Conclusion: At the begining of the third trimester, fetal size is associated with fetal gender and, to a lesser extent, with parity. Some fetal growth charts (e.g., Chitty et al.) are more suitable for the low-risk population in the Netherlands than others.

:

Corresponding author: Paul De Reu Verloskundig Centrum Midden Brabant Boxtel Noord Brabant Pelgrimspad 3 5281 AA Boxtel/Netherlands

References

1 Alderliesten ME: Quality of perinatal care in a multi-ethnic population PhD thesis. University of Amsterdam-2006. ISBN-10: 90-9020461-XSearch in Google Scholar

2 Bais JMJ, M Eskes, M Pel, GJ Bonsel, OP Bleker: Effectiveness of detection of intrauterine retardation by abdominal palpation as screening test in a low-risk population: an observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol116 (2004) 164Search in Google Scholar

3 Bricker L, JP Neison: Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks gestation) (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update software; 200110.1002/14651858.CD001451Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4 Chitty LS, DG Altman, A Henderson, S Campbell: Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements. Br J Obstet Gynecol101 (1994) 35Search in Google Scholar

5 Chitty LS, DG Altman, A Henderson, S Campbell. Charts of fetal size: 3. Abdominal measurements. Br J Obstet Gynecol101 (1994) 125Search in Google Scholar

6 Das UG, GD Sysyn: Abnormal fetal growth: intrauterine growth retardation, small for gestation age, large for gestation age. Pediatr Clin N Am51 (2004) 539Search in Google Scholar

7 De Reu PAOM, JG Nijhuis, HP Oosterbaan, TKAB Eskes: Perinatal audit on avoidable mortality in a Dutch rural region: a retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol88 (2000) 65Search in Google Scholar

8 “De thuisbevalling in Nederland 1995-2002” Report published by SPRN/TNO-June 2005. Website SPRN: www.perinatreg.nlSearch in Google Scholar

9 Devlieger H, G Martens, A Bekaert, R Eeckels, R Vlietinck: SPE-Standaarden geboortegewicht voor zwangerschapsduur in Vlaanderen. Annex by “Perinatal activities in Flanders” 1996 – p. 94–116 (Annual report)Search in Google Scholar

10 Dutch Perinatal care list (=Verloskundige Indicatie Lijst) in the “Verloskundig Vademecum”. This is the manual of obstetric and neonatal most occurring risks and pathology – indicating the appropriate level of care. English abridged version http://www.cvz.nl Publicaties – overige publicitiesSearch in Google Scholar

11 Kloosterman GJ: On intra-uterine growth. Int J Gynecol Obstet8 (1970) 89510.1002/j.1879-3479.1970.tb00313.xSearch in Google Scholar

12 Moore WMO, BS Ward, VP Jones, FM Bamford: Sex difference in fetal head growth. Br J Obstet Gynecol95 (1988) 238Search in Google Scholar

13 Parker AJ, P Davies, AM Mayho, JR Newton: The ultrasound estimation of sex-related variations of intrauterine growth. Am J Obstet Gynecol149 (1984) 665Search in Google Scholar

14 Robinson HP, JEE Fleming: A critical evaluation of sonar “crown-rump length” measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol82 (1975) 702Search in Google Scholar

15 Royston P, EM Wright: How to construct ‘normal ranges'for fetal variables. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol11 (1998) 30Search in Google Scholar

16 Snijders RJM, KH Nicolaides: Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol4 (1994) 34Search in Google Scholar

17 Schwärtzler P, JM Bland, D Holden, S Campbell, Y Ville: Sex-specific antenatal reference growth charts for uncomplicated singleton pregnancies at 15–40 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol23 (2004) 23Search in Google Scholar

18 Sylvan K, EL Ryding, H Rydhstroem: Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand84 (2005) 1154Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2007-02-21
Published in Print: 2007-02-01

©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2007.008/pdf
Scroll to top button