Cervical surgery and preterm birth

References

[1] Acharya G, I Kjeldberg, SM Hansen, N Sorheim, BK Jacobsen, JM Maltau: Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure for the management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Gynecol Obstet272 (2005) 109Search in Google Scholar

[2] Andersen ES, B Pedersen, J Boris: Pregnancy outcome after combination laser conization: A case-control study. J Gynecol Surg15 (1999) 7Search in Google Scholar

[3] Anderson MC, DH Horwell, Z Broby: Outcome of pregnancy after laser vaporization conization. Colp Gynecol Laser Surg1 (1984) 35Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bekassy Z, CS Iosif: Laser ‘miniconisation’ and the outcome of subsequent pregnancy. Acta Gynecol Obstet258 (1996) 75Search in Google Scholar

[5] Blomfield PI, JD Buxton, DM Luesley: Pregnancy outcome after large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Am J Obstet Gynecol169 (1993) 620Search in Google Scholar

[6] Braet PG, JM Peel, DW Fenton: A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following loop diathermy excision of the transformation zone. J Obstet Gynaecol14 (1994) 79Search in Google Scholar

[7] Buller RE, HW Jones: Pregnancy following cervical conization. Am J Obstet Gynecol142 (1982) 506Search in Google Scholar

[8] Coppell K, C Paul, B Cox: An evaluation of the National Cervical Screening Programme Otago site. NZ Med J113 (2000) 48Search in Google Scholar

[9] Crane JMG: Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol102 (2003) 105810.1016/S0029-7844(03)00741-5Search in Google Scholar

[10] Cruikshank ME, G Flannelly, DM Campbell, HC Kitchener: Fertility and pregnancy outcome following large loop excision of the cervical transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol102 (1995) 467Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gunasekera PC, BV Lewis, JH Phipps: Obstetric outcome after cervical surgery for intra-epithelial dysplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol12 (1992) 291Search in Google Scholar

[12] Haffenden DK, A Bigrigg, BW Codling, MD Read: Pregnancy following large loop excision of the transformation zone. Br J Obstet Gynaecol100 (1993) 1059Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hagen B, FE Skjeldestad: The outcome of pregnancy after CO₂ laser conisation of the cervix. Br J Obstet Gynaecol100 (1993) 717Search in Google Scholar

[14] Jones JM, P Sweetnam, BM Hibbard: The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: A case-control study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol86 (1979) 913Search in Google Scholar

[15] Kyrgiou M, G Koliopoulos, P Martin-Hirsch, M Arbyn, W Prendiville, E Paraskevaidis: Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet367 (2006) 489Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kuoppala T, S Saarikoski: Pregnancy and delivery after cone biopsy of the cervix. Arch Gynecol237 (1986) 149Search in Google Scholar

[17] Larsson G, H Grundsell, B Gullberg, S Svennerud: Outcome of pregnancy after conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand61 (1982) 461Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ludviksson K, B Sandstrom: Outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy-a case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol14 (1982) 135Search in Google Scholar

[19] Moinian M, B Andersch: Does cervix conization increase the risk of complications in subsequent pregnancies? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol14 (1982) 135Search in Google Scholar

[20] Moscicki AB, S Shiboski, NK Hills, KJ Powell, N Jay, EN Hanson, S Miller, LK Canjura-Clayton, S Farhat, JM Broering, TM Darragh: Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women. Lancet354 (2004) 1678Search in Google Scholar

[21] Paraskevaidis E, G Koliopoulos, E Lolis, E Papanikou, V Malamou-Mitsi, N Agnantis: Delivery outcomes following loop electrosurgical excision procedure for microinvasive (FIGO stage IAI) cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol86 (2002) 10Search in Google Scholar

[22] Raoi L, F Ghezzi, E Di Naro, R Gomez, KP Luscher: Duration of pregnancy after carbon dioxide laser conization of the cervix: Influence of cone height. Obstet Gynecol90 (1997) 978Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sadler L, A Saftlas, W Wang, M Exeter, J Whittaker, L McCowan: Treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of preterm delivery. J Am Med Assoc29 (2004) 2100Search in Google Scholar

[24] Sagot P, Y Caroit, N Winer, P Lopes, G Boog: Obstetrical prognosis for carbon dioxide laser conisation of the uterine cervix. Eur J Obstet Gynecol58 (1995) 53Search in Google Scholar

[25] Samson SA, JR Bentley, TJ Fahey, DJ McKay, GH Gill: The effect of loop electrosurgical excision procedure on future pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol105 (2005) 325Search in Google Scholar

[26] Saunders N, DW Fenton, WP Soutter, VA Brown, F Sharp, F Abernethy: A case controlled study of the outcome of pregnancy following laser vapourisation cone of the cervix. Reproductive and Perinatal Medicine: Gynaecol Laser Surg6 (1986) 121Search in Google Scholar

[27] Schlecht NF, RW Platt, E Duarte-Franco, MC Costa, JP Sobrinho, JCM Prado, A Ferenczy, TE Rohan, LL Villa, EL Franco: Human papillomavirus infection and time to progression and regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst95 (2003) 1336Search in Google Scholar

[28] Spitzer M, J Herman, B Krumholz, M Lesser: The fertility of women after cervical laser surgery. Obstet Gynecol86 (1995) 504Search in Google Scholar

[29] Svare JA, LF Andersen, J Langhoff-Roos, ET Jensen, B Bruun, I Lind, H Madsen: The relationship between prior cervical conisation, cervical microbial colonization and preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol47 (1992) 41Search in Google Scholar

[30] Tan L, E Pepra, RK Haloob: The outcome of pregnancy after large loop excision of the transformation zone of the cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol24 (2004) 25Search in Google Scholar

[31] Van Rooijen M, E Persson: Pregnancy outcome after laser vaporization of the cervix. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand78 (1999) 346Search in Google Scholar