Home Three-dimensional ultrasound power Doppler assessment of the cervix: comparison between nulliparas and multiparas
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Three-dimensional ultrasound power Doppler assessment of the cervix: comparison between nulliparas and multiparas

  • Alin Basgul , Zehra Nese Kavak , Nadi Bakırcı and Husnu Gokaslan
Published/Copyright: February 21, 2007
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
From the journal Volume 35 Issue 1

Abstract

Aim: To assess the sonographic cervical characteristics between nulliparous and multiparous women.

Subject and methods: Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler using the virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL) program were performed on 71 nulliparas and 59 multiparas at a mean gestational age of 25.3±7.9 weeks. We compared the cervical volume and power Doppler vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization-flow index (VFI) between nulliparas and multiparas.

Results: The mean cervical volume and mean VI, VFI, FI measurements were not significantly different between multiparas and nulliparas.

Conclusion: Our observations suggest that the morphological changes in the cervix of parous women are merely configurational without a change in cervical mass and vascularization. These configurational changes might result from the inevitable cervical streching during labor and represent a healing process that does not involve a subsequent change in mass or vascularity.

:

Corresponding author: Alin Basgul Cons. MD, Lecturer Marmara University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Abide-i Hurriyet Caddesi, No: 144, Ruyam Palas Apartmanı Kat: 3, D: 10, Sisli 34381 Istanbul, Turkey ;

References

[1] Brieger GM, XH Ning, RR Dawkins, KQ Ying, C Weng, AM Chang, et al.: Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical dynamics during the third trimester of normal pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand76 (1997) 118Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bergelin I, L Valentin: Normal cervical changes in parous women during the second half of pregnancy – a prospective, longitudinal ultrasound study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand81 (2002) 31Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cook CM, DA Ellwood: A longitudinal study of the cervix in pregnancy using transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Obstet Gynaecol103 (1996) 16Search in Google Scholar

[4] Iams JD, RL Goldenberg, PJ Meis, BM Mercer, A Moawad, A Das, et al.: The length of the cervix and the risk of spontaneous premature delivery. N Engl J Med334 (1996) 567Search in Google Scholar

[5] Liabsuetrakul T, T Suntharasaj, C Suwanrath, R Leetanaporn, R Rattanaprueksachart, P Tuntiseranee: Serial translabial sonographic measurement of cervical dimensions between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation in pregnant Thai women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol20 (2002) 168Search in Google Scholar

[6] Rovas L, P Sladkevicius, E Strobel, L Valentin: Reference data representative of normal findings at three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound examination of the cervix from 17 to 41 gestational weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol28 (2006) 761Search in Google Scholar

[7] Sonek J, C Shellhaas: Cervical sonography: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol11 (1998) 71Search in Google Scholar

[8] Strauss A, I Heer, S Fuchshuber, U Janssen, P Hillemanns, H Hepp: Sonographic cervical volumetry in higher order multiple gestation. Fetal Diagn Ther16 (2001) 346Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zorzoli A, A Soliani, M Perra, E Caravelli, A Galimberti, U Nicolini: Cervical changes throughout pregnancy as assessed by transvaginal sonography. Obstet Gynecol84 (1994) 960Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2007-02-21
Published in Print: 2007-02-01

©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 18.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2007.007/html
Scroll to top button