Home Medicine Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Visual analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings: inter- and intra-observer agreement and impact of knowledge of neonatal outcome

  • Francesc Figueras , Sonia Albela , Silvana Bonino , Montse Palacio , Enrique Barrau , Sandra Hernandez , Carme Casellas , Oriol Coll and Vicenç Cararach
Published/Copyright: July 5, 2005
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
From the journal Volume 33 Issue 3

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement of visual analysis of fetal heart rate tracing and to evaluate the bias introduced by knowledge of perinatal outcome in this interpretation.

Methods: One hundred tracings were independently analyzed by four observers. In a second study period, two observers re-analysed the 100 tracings in order to evaluate intra-observer agreement. The other two observers re-analyzed the tracings, which were labelled with fictitious perinatal outcome to evaluate the impact of this information on reliability. Agreement was analyzed by means of the proportion of agreement for qualitative parameters and the inter- and intra-class correlation coefficient for quantitative data.

Results: Poor agreement was found for quantitative variability, low variability category and number of decelerations. Moderate agreement was observed for baseline, normal variability category and number of accelerations. Fetal heart rate variability and number of accelerations and decelerations were found to be significantly influenced by clinical information of perinatal outcome. Biased observers showed lower reliability than unbiased ones.

Conclusion: Visual assessment of fetal heart rate tracings is unreliable due to low rates of agreement between and within observers. Only qualitative classification such as normal baseline and normal variability showed good agreement. Knowledge of clinical information introduces subjectivity to the visual analysis, leading to a negative impact on reliability.

:

Corresponding author: Francesc Figueras, MD, Hospital Clinic, Department of Obstetrics, Sabino de Arana 1, 08034 Barcelona/Spain. Tel.: +34 93 227 56 00 Fax: +34 93 227 56 00 E-mail:

References

1 Bernardes J, et al.: Evaluation of interobserver agreement of cardiotocograms. Int J Gynaecol Obstet57(1) (1997) 3310.1016/S0020-7292(97)02846-4Search in Google Scholar

2 Bracero LA, S Morgan, DW Byrne: Comparison of visual and computerized interpretation of nonstress test results in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol181 (5 Pt 1) (1999) 125410.1016/S0002-9378(99)70118-3Search in Google Scholar

3 Di Lieto A, et al.: Conventional and computerized antepartum telecardiotocography. Experienced and inexperienced observers versus computerized analysis. Gynecol Obstet Invest55(1) (2003) 37Search in Google Scholar

4 Donker DK, HP van Geijn, A Hasman: Interobserver variation in the assessment of fetal heart rate recordings. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol52(1) (1993) 21Search in Google Scholar

5 Feinstein AR, DV Cicchetti: High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol43(6) (1990) 543Search in Google Scholar

6 Fleiss J: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. 1981 Wiley, New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

7 Fleiss J: The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. 1986 Wiley, New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

8 Gagnon R, MK Campbell, C Hunse: A comparison between visual and computer analysis of antepartum fetal heart rate tracings. Am J Obstet Gynecol168(3 Pt 1) (1993) 84210.1016/S0002-9378(12)90831-5Search in Google Scholar

9 Grant JM: The fetal heart rate trace is normal, isn't it? Observer agreement of categorical assessments. Lancet337(8735) (1991) 215Search in Google Scholar

10 Guzman ER, et al.: The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol87(6) (1996) 969Search in Google Scholar

11 Lotgering FK, HC Wallenburg, HJ Schouten: Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of antepartum cardiotocograms. Am J Obstet Gynecol144(6) (1982) 701Search in Google Scholar

12 Pattison N, L McCowan: Cardiotocography for antepartum fetal assessment. The Cochrane Library (1) (2004)Search in Google Scholar

13 Roemer VM: Quantitative CTG appraisal sub partu with a new CTG score: diagnostic significance of the parameters of the acid-base balance in umbilical blood?Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol207 (4) (2003) 121Search in Google Scholar

14 Shifrin B, D Clement: Role of Antepartum Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring. 1991 Oxford University Press, OxfordSearch in Google Scholar

15 Taylor GM, et al.: The development and validation of an algorithm for real-time computerised fetal heart rate monitoring in labour. Bjog107(9) (2000) 1130Search in Google Scholar

16 Todros T, et al.: Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol68(1–2) (1996) 8310.1016/0301-2115(96)02487-6Search in Google Scholar

17 Visser GH, G Sadovsky, KH Nicolaides: Antepartum heart rate patterns in small-for-gestational-age third-trimester fetuses: correlations with blood gas values obtained at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol162(3) (1990) 698Search in Google Scholar

18 Walter SD, M Eliasziw, A Donner: Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Stat Med17(1) (1998) 101Search in Google Scholar

19 Zain HA, et al.: Interpreting the fetal heart rate tracing. Effect of knowledge of neonatal outcome. J Reprod Med43(4) (1998) 367Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2005-07-05
Published in Print: 2005-05-01

© by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 15.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2005.044/html
Scroll to top button