Home Umbilical artery Doppler and umbilical cord pH at birth in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: valid estimate of their relationship
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Umbilical artery Doppler and umbilical cord pH at birth in small-for-gestational-age fetuses: valid estimate of their relationship

  • Francesc Figueras , Elisenda Eixarch , Eva Meler , Montse Palacio , Bienvenido Puerto , Oriol Coll , Josep Figueras , Vicenç Cararach and Antonio J. Vanrell
Published/Copyright: July 5, 2005
Journal of Perinatal Medicine
From the journal Volume 33 Issue 3

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between umbilical artery pulsatility index and the umbilical cord pH in small-for-gestational-age fetuses.

Methods: Data were collected from all pregnancies seen in our Fetal Surveillance Unit that underwent antenatal monitoring for being small-for-gestational-age beyond 24 weeks of pregnancy. A linear regression was used to analyse the effect of the umbilical artery pulsatility index (UAPI) and umbilical artery pH at birth, assessing interaction and controlling for clinically meaningful antenatal, Doppler, biophysical and perinatal variables.

Results: A total of 117 pregnancies were included. According to the estimated model (which included all clinically significant confounders and statistically significant interactions), in cases with reactive cardiotography (CTG) a 1-unit increase in the UAPI resulted in a mean decrease of 0.021 (95% 0.05 to −0.005) units of umbilical artery pH at delivery. In the non-reactive CTG group a 1-unit increase in the UAPI resulted in a mean decrease of 0.02 (95% CI 0.059 to −0.019) units of umbilical artery pH at delivery. Finally, in fetuses with a pathological CTG a 1-unit increase in the UAPI resulted in a mean decrease of 0.149 (95% CI 0.107 to 0.19) units of umbilical artery pH at delivery.

Conclusions: The crude effect between umbilical artery velocimetry on umbilical artery pH at birth has to be interpreted with caution, since an important part of this effect is related to other factors that confound and modify the relationship. After controlling for confounders, it was only in fetuses with pathological CTG that the effect remained statistically significant.

:

Corresponding author: Francesc Figueras, MD, Hospital Clinic, Department of Obstetrics, Sabino de Arana 1, 08034 Barcelona /Spain. Tel.: +34 93 227 56 00; Fax: +34 93 227 56 00; E-mail:

References

1 Akalin-Sel T, KH Nicolaides, J Peacock: Doppler dynamics and their complex interrelation with fetal oxygen pressure, carbon dioxide and pH in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol84 (1994) 439Search in Google Scholar

2 Arduini D, G Rizzo, A Capponi, D Rinaldo, C Romanini: Fetal pH value determined by cordocentesis: an independent predictor of the development of antepartum fetal heart rate decelerations in growth retarded fetuses with absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery. J Perinat Med24 (1996) 601Search in Google Scholar

3 Baschat AA, U Gembruch: The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio revisited. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol21 (2003) 124Search in Google Scholar

4 Baschat AA: Doppler application in the delivery timing of preterm growth-restricted fetus: another step in the right direction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol23 (2004) 11110.1002/uog.989Search in Google Scholar

5 Bilardo CM, KH Nicolaides, S Campbell: Doppler measurements of foetal and uteroplacental circulations: relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol162 (1990) 115Search in Google Scholar

6 Bishop YMM, SE Fienberg, PW Holland: Discrete Multivatiate Analysis: Theory and Practice. 1975 MIT Press, Cambridge, MASearch in Google Scholar

7 Bonnin P, BB Guyot, BC Bernard, PH Blot, JP Martineaud: Relationship between fetal biophysical profile and fetal cerebral blood flow velocity waveforms and umbilical venous blood gases. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol2 (1992) 18Search in Google Scholar

8 Chauhan SP, EF Magann, JR Scott, JA Scardo, NW Hendrix, JN Martin Jr: Cesarean delivery for foetal distress: rate and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol Surv58 (2003) 337Search in Google Scholar

9 Ferrazzi E, G Pardi, M Bauscaglia: The correlation of biochemical monitoring versus umbilical velocity measurements of the huma fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol159 (1988) 1081Search in Google Scholar

10 Figueiras A, JM Domenech, C Cadarso: Regression models: calculating the confidence interval of effects in the presence of interactions. Statist Med17 (1998) 2099Search in Google Scholar

11 Figueras F, M Torrents, A Muñoz, C Comas, E Antolin, J Mallafre, JM Carrera: Biometrías fetales: curvas de normalidad. Prog Obstet Ginecol12 (2000) 50Search in Google Scholar

12 Gembruch U, L Gortner: Perinatal aspects of pretem intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol11 (1998) 233Search in Google Scholar

13 Gudmundsson S, A Lindblad, K Marsal: Cord blood gases and absence of end-diastolic blood velocities in the umbilical artery. Early Hum Dev24 (1990) 231Search in Google Scholar

14 Harrington K, RG Carpenter, M Nguyen, S Campbell: Changes observed in Doppler studies of the fetal circulation in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia or the delivery of a small-for-gestational-age baby. I. Cross-sectional analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Jul; 6(1) (1995) 19Search in Google Scholar

15 Hecher K, S Campbell, R Snijders, K Nicolaides: Reference ranges for fetal venous and atrioventricular blood flow parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol4 (1994) 381Search in Google Scholar

16 Hecher K, R Snijders, S Campbell, K Nicolaides: Fetal venous, intracardiac, and arterial blood flow measurements in intrauterine growth retardation: Relationship with fetal blood gases. Am J Obstet Gynecol173 (1995) 10Search in Google Scholar

17 Kleinbaum DG, LL Kupper, H Morgenstern: Epidemiologic research. Principles and Quantitative Methods. 1982 Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, New YorkSearch in Google Scholar

18 Low JA, C Panagiotopoulos, EJ Derrick: Newborn complications after intrapartum asphyxia with metabolic acidosis in the term fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol170 (1994) 1081Search in Google Scholar

19 Madazli C, S Sen, V Uludag, R Ocak: Doppler dynamics: their clinical significance and relationship with fetal blood gases and pH measurements. J Obstet Gynaecol21 (2001) 448Search in Google Scholar

20 Manning FA: Fetal biophysical profile. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am26 (1999) 55710.1016/S0889-8545(05)70099-1Search in Google Scholar

21 Nicolaides KH, CM Bilardo, PW Soothill, S Campbell: Absence of end diastolic frequencies in umbilical artery: a sign of fetal hypoxia and acidosis. BMJ297 (1988) 1026Search in Google Scholar

22 Nicolini U, KH Nicolaides, NM Fisk, JI Vaughan, L Fusi, R Gleeson, CH Rodeck: Limited role of fetal blood sampling in prediction of outcome in intrauterine growth retardation. Lancet336 (1990) 768Search in Google Scholar

23 Ribbert LS, RJ Snijders, KH Nicolaides, GH Visser: Relation of foetal blood gases and data from computer-assisted analysis of foetal heart rate patterns in small for gestation foetuses. Br J Obstet Gynaecol98 (1991) 820Search in Google Scholar

24 Rizzo G, A Capponi, D Arduini, C Romanini: The value of fetal arterial, cardiac and venous flows in predicting pH and blood gases measured in umbilical blood at cordocentesis in growth retarded fetuses. Br J Obstet Gyneacol102 (1995) 963Search in Google Scholar

25 Santamaría R, J Verdú, C Martín, G García: Tablas españolas de pesos neonatales según edad gestacional. Ed: Menarini 1998Search in Google Scholar

26 Sebire NJ, M Jolly, J Harris, KH Nicolaides, L Regan: Risks of obstetric complications in multiple pregnancies: an analysis of more than 400 000 pregnancies in the UK. Prenat Neonat Med6 (2001) 11Search in Google Scholar

27 Shalev E, Y Zalel, E Weiner: A comparison of the nonstress test, oxytocin challenge test, Doppler velocimetry and biophysical profile in predicting umbilical vein pH in growth retarded fetuses. Int J Gynaecol Obstet43(1) (1993) 15Search in Google Scholar

28 Shifrin BS, D Clement: Routine antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring. In Spencer J.A.D. (ed.) Fetal monitoring: Physiology and Techniques of Antenatal and Intrapartum Assessment. 1991 Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 98Search in Google Scholar

29 Soothill PW, CS Bobrow, R Holmes: Small for gestational age is not a diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol13 (1999) 225Search in Google Scholar

30 Spinillo A, C Bergante, B Gardella, R Mainini, L Montanari: Interaction between risk factors for fetal growth retardation associated with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand83 (2004) 431Search in Google Scholar

31 Tyrrell S, AH Obaid, RJ Lilford: Umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry as a predictor of fetal hypoxia and acidosis at bith. Obstetrics Gynecol74 (1989) 332Search in Google Scholar

32 Victory R, D Penava, O Da Silva, R Natale, B Richardson: Umbilical cord pH and base excess values in relation to neonatal morbidity for infants delivered preterm. Am J Obstet Gynecol189 (2003) 803Search in Google Scholar

33 Vintzileos AM, SE Gaffney, LM Salinger, WA Campbell, DJ Nochimson: The relationship between fetal biophysical profile assessment, umbilical artery velocimetry, and fetal acidosis. Obstet Gynecol77 (1991) 622Search in Google Scholar

34 Weiner CP: The relationship between the umbilical artery systolic/diastolic ratio and umbilical blood gas measurements in speciments obtained by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol162 (1990) 119810.1016/0002-9378(90)90016-ZSearch in Google Scholar

35 Yoon BH, HC Syn, SW Kim: The efficacy of Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in identifying fetal acidosis: a comparison with fetal biophysical profile. J Ultrasound Med11 (1992) 1Search in Google Scholar

36 Yoon BH, R Romero, CR Roh, SH Kim, JW Ager, HC Syn, D Cotton, SW Kim: Relationship between the fetal profile score biophysical, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol169 (1993) 1586Search in Google Scholar

37 Zelop CM, DK Richardson, LJ Heffner: Outcomes of severely abnormal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in structurally normal singleton fetuses. Obstet Gynecol87 (1996) 434Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2005-07-05
Published in Print: 2005-05-01

© by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/JPM.2005.040/html
Scroll to top button