Metadiscourse in MOOC Video Lectures: Comparison with University Lectures and Disciplinary Variation

References

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.2410.1075/scl.24Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97. http://doi.org/10.35360/njes.21810.35360/njes.218Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.21510.35360/njes.215Search in Google Scholar

Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc (Version 3.5.8). Waseda University. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/softwareSearch in Google Scholar

Atapattu, T., & Falkner, K. (2017). Discourse analysis to improve the effective engagement of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference (pp. 580-581). https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.302947010.1145/3027385.3029470Search in Google Scholar

Bernad-Mechó, E., & Fortanet-Gómez, I. (2019). Organizational metadiscourse across lecturing styles: Engagement beyond language. In C. Sancho-Guinda (Ed.), Engagement in professional genres: Deference and disclosure (pp. 321-340). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.301.17ber10.1075/pbns.301.17berSearch in Google Scholar

Bouziri, B. (2020). A corpus-assisted genre analysis of the Tunisian lecture corpus: An exploratory study. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 103-132. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.08.02.0610.32714/ricl.08.02.06Search in Google Scholar

Bu, J. (2014). Towards a pragmatic analysis of metadiscourse in academic lectures: From relevance to adaptation. Discourse Studies, 16(4), 449-472. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F146144561351901910.1177/1461445613519019Search in Google Scholar

Crawford-Camiciottoli, B. (2015). Elaborating Explanations During OpenCourseWare Humanities Lectures: The Interplay of Verbal and Nonverbal Strategies. In B. Crawford-Camiciottoli & I. Fortanet-Gómez (Eds.), Multimodal Analysis in Academic Settings: From Research to Teaching (pp. 144-170). Routledge.10.4324/9781315738758Search in Google Scholar

Denver, L., Mees, I. M., Jensen, C., & Werther, C. (2017). Good enough to teach? A study of EMI lecturers’ language skills and metadiscourse. Moderna Språk, 110(2), 46-72.10.58221/mosp.v110i2.7864Search in Google Scholar

Flowerdew, J. (1992). Definitions in science lectures. Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 202-221. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/13.2.20210.1093/applin/13.2.202Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.00110.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.00710.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Bloomsbury Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 18-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.00110.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., & Subtirelu, N. C. (2015). Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.00510.1016/j.esp.2014.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Marsden, E., Mackey, A., & Plonsky, L. (2016). The IRIS Repository: Advancing research practice and methodology. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Advancing methodology and practice: The IRIS repository of instruments for research into second languages (pp. 1-21). Routledge.10.4324/9780203489666Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-ISearch in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (2010). Discourse reflexivity—A discourse universal? The case of ELF. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.35360/njes.21610.35360/njes.216Search in Google Scholar

Molino, A. (2018). “What I’m speaking is almost English …”: A corpus-based study of metadiscourse in English-medium lectures at an Italian university. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 935-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.4.033010.12738/estp.2018.4.0330Search in Google Scholar

Shah, D. (2021). A decade of MOOCs: A review of MOOC stats and trends in 2021. The report by class central. https://www.classcentral.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2021/Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. (2001). Metatalk in American academic talk: The cases of point and thing. Journal of English Linguistics, 29(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0075424012200518910.1177/00754240122005189Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.5810.1093/applin/22.1.58Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, S. E. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organisation in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 5-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-X10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-XSearch in Google Scholar

Tse, P., & Hyland, K. (2006). Gender and discipline: Exploring metadiscourse variation in academic book reviews. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 177-202). Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-0351-0446-2Search in Google Scholar

Yoon, H. J., & Römer, U. (2020). Quantifying disciplinary voices: An automated approach to interactional metadiscourse in successful student writing. Written Communication, 37(2), 208-244. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F074108831989867210.1177/0741088319898672Search in Google Scholar

Zare, J., & Tavakoli, M. (2017). The use of personal metadiscourse over monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Discourse Processes, 54(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2015.111634210.1080/0163853X.2015.1116342Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, D., & Sheng, D. (2021). EFL lecturers’ metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs across course types. Corpus Pragmatics, 5(2), 243-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00098-010.1007/s41701-021-00098-0Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, M. (2016). A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across written registers. Discourse Studies, 18(2), 204-222. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F146144561562390710.1177/1461445615623907Search in Google Scholar