One Journal, Different Practices: A Corpus-Based Study of Interactive Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics

References

Abdi, R., & Ahmadi, P. (2015). Signposting propositions: A study of interactive metadiscourse marking in the composition of research articles across sciences. Research in Applied Linguistics, 5, 5-17.Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.24Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11.10.35360/njes.215Search in Google Scholar

Anthony, L. (2019). AntConc 3.5.9. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Bal Gezegin, B., & Baş, M. (2020). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A comparison of research articles and book reviews. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45-62.10.32601/ejal.710204Search in Google Scholar

Barton, E. (2003). Linguistic discourse analysis: How the language in texts works. In C. Bazerman & P. A. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it. Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D. (2006). Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 97-116.10.1016/j.jeap.2006.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Birdsong, D. (2004). Second language acquisition and ultimate attainment. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 82-105). Blackwell.10.1002/9780470757000.ch3Search in Google Scholar

Cao, F., & Hu, G. (2014). Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, 66(2), 15-31.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007Search in Google Scholar

Cook, G. (2003). Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825.10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Englander, K. (2014). Writing and publishing science research papers in English: A global perspective. Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-7714-9Search in Google Scholar

Erickson, F. (1981). Some approaches to inquiry in school-community ethnography. In H. T. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au (Eds.), Culture and the bilingual classroom; Studies in classroom ethnography (pp. 17-35). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical research of language. Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Ghahremani Mina, K., & Biria, R. (2017). Exploring interactive and interactional metadiscourse markers in discussion sections of social and medical science articles. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(4), 11-29.10.29252/ijree.2.4.11Search in Google Scholar

Guba, E. G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E. G. Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog (pp. 17-27). Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, K. (1988). Rhetoric and epistemology in the social sciences: A contrast of two representative texts. Writing in academic disciplines: Advances in writing research. Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, T. (2002). Linguistics in applied linguistics: A historical overview. Journal of English Studies. Advance online publication.10.18172/jes.72Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 266-285.10.1093/applin/amm011Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83-101.10.1017/S0261444806003399Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2018). “In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. English for Specific Purposes, 51(1), 18-30.10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2019). Points of reference: Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 64-85.10.1093/applin/amx012Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2020). Text-organizing metadiscourse. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 21(1), 137-164.10.1075/jhp.00039.hylSearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2016). Nouns and academic interactions: A neglected feature of metadiscourse. Applied Linguistics, 9, 1-25.10.1093/applin/amw023Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46(2), 1-14.10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, F., & Hyland, K. (2021). “The goal of this analysis …”: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing. Lingua, 252(3), 103017.10.1016/j.lingua.2020.103017Search in Google Scholar

Jiang, F., & Ma, X. (2018). “As we can see”: Reader engagement in PhD candidature confirmation reports. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 35(1), 1-15.10.1016/j.jeap.2018.05.003Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, J. E., Berry, K. J., & Mielke, P. W. (2006). Measures of effect size for chi-squared and likelihood-ratio goodness-of-fit tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103(2), 412-414.10.2466/pms.103.2.412-414Search in Google Scholar

Johnstone, B. (2008). Discourse analysis. Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Khedri, M., Heng, C. S., & Ebrahimi, S. F. (2013). An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, 15(3), 319-331.10.1177/1461445613480588Search in Google Scholar

Kuhi, D., & Behnam, B. (2011). Generic variations and metadiscourse use in the writing of applied linguists: A comparative study and preliminary framework. Written Communication, 28(1), 97-141.10.1177/0741088310387259Search in Google Scholar

Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (2013). Laboratory life. Princeton University Press.10.2307/j.ctt32bbxcSearch in Google Scholar

Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540-561.10.1093/applin/amy003Search in Google Scholar

Lim, J. M.-H. (2011). “Paving the way for research findings”: Writers’ rhetorical choices in education and applied linguistics. Discourse Studies, 13(6), 725-749.10.1177/1461445611421364Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (1993). Cultural differences in academic rhetoric: A textlinguistic study. Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2003). Defining and measuring SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition. Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch21Search in Google Scholar

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction. Bloomsbury.10.5040/9781350934290Search in Google Scholar

Qian, T., & Jaeger, T. F. (2011). Topic shift in efficient discourse production. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (Vol. 33, No. 33).Search in Google Scholar

Rayson, P. (2016). Log-likelihood and effect size calculator [Computer Software].Search in Google Scholar

Salas, M. D. (2015). Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish: Variation across three disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics, 77(1), 20-40.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M., & Barto, K. (2017). Introducing second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316569832Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, S. G., & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis. Routledge.10.4324/9780203121559Search in Google Scholar

Su, H., Zhang, Y., & Lu, X. (2021). Applying local grammars to the diachronic investigation of discourse acts in academic writing: The case of exemplification in Linguistics research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 120-133.10.1016/j.esp.2021.05.002Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. M. (2014). Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers. Written Communication, 31(1), 118-141.10.1177/0741088313515166Search in Google Scholar

Wang, J., & Jiang, F. K. (2018). Chapter 9. Epistemic stance and authorial presence in scientific research writing: Hedges, boosters and self-mentions across disciplines and writer groups. Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing, 195-216. https://doi.org/10.1075/aals.18.09wan10.1075/aals.18.09wanSearch in Google Scholar

Widdowson, H. G. (2007). Discourse analysis. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woodrow, L. (2014). Writing about quantitative research in applied linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230369955Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, X. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of second language acquisition between 1997 and 2018. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(1), 199-222.10.1017/S0272263119000573Search in Google Scholar