The Use of Metadiscourse Markers in the Spoken Discourse of Different EMI Disciplines

References

Ädel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Benjamins.10.1075/scl.24Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2010). Just to give you kind of a map of where we are going: A taxonomy of metadiscourse in spoken and written academic English, Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 69-97.10.35360/njes.218Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A. (2018). Variation in metadiscursive “you” across genres: From research articles to teacher feedback. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18, 777-796.Search in Google Scholar

Ädel, A., & Mauranen, A. (2010). Metadiscourse: Diverse and divided perspectives. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 1-11.10.35360/njes.215Search in Google Scholar

Aguilera, M. (2008). Metadiscourse in academic speech: A relevance-theoretic approach. Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Akbas, E. (2014). Are they discussing in the same way? Interactional metadiscourse in Turkish writers’ text. In A. Łyda & K. Warchał (Eds.), Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research, second language learning and teaching, (pp. 119-133), International Publishing Switzerland.10.1007/978-3-319-02526-1_8Search in Google Scholar

Akbas, E., & Hardman, J. (2017). An exploratory study on authorial (in)visibility across postgraduate academic writing: Dilemma of developing a personal and/or impersonal authorial self. In C. Hatipoglu, E. Akbas, & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of text (pp.139-175). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Bayyurt, Y. (2010). Author positioning in academic writing. Avaliaçoes e perspectivas: Mapeando os estudos empiricos na area de Humanas [Appraisals and perspectives: Mapping empirical studies in the humanities] (pp. 163-184). The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.Search in Google Scholar

Biber, D., Connor, U., & Upton, T. A. (2007). Discourse on the move: Studies in corpus linguistics 28. John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.28Search in Google Scholar

Broggini, S., & Murphy, A. C. (2017). Metadiscourse in EMI lectures: Reflections on a small corpus of spoken academic discourse. L’Analisi Linguistica E Letteraria, 25(S2).Search in Google Scholar

Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 41-56.10.1016/S0889-4906(98)00022-2Search in Google Scholar

Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2016). A contrastive study of interactive metadiscourse in academic papers written in English and in Spanish. In F. A. Almeida, L. C. Garcia, & V. G. Ruiz (Eds.), Corpus-based studies on language varieties. (pp. 89-114). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2020). English as a medium of instruction: What about pragmatic competence? In L. M. Carrió-Pastor (Ed.), Internationalising learning in higher education (pp. 137-153). Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-21587-3_7Search in Google Scholar

Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2021). The assessment of metadiscourse devices in English as a foreign language. Assessing Writing, 50, 100560.10.1016/j.asw.2021.100560Search in Google Scholar

Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315-1346.10.1080/09500690600621100Search in Google Scholar

Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers. Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Crismore, A., & Farnsworth, R. (1990). Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse. (pp. 118-136). Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10, 39-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/074108839301000100210.1177/0741088393010001002Search in Google Scholar

Crosthwaite, P., & Jiang, K. (2017). Does EAP affect written L2 academic stance? A longitudinal learner corpus study. System, 69, 92-107.10.1016/j.system.2017.06.010Search in Google Scholar

Dobbs, C. L. (2014). Signaling organization and stance: Academic language use in middle grade persuasive writing. Reading and Writing. 27, 1327-1352.10.1007/s11145-013-9489-5Search in Google Scholar

Doiz, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2022). Looking into English-medium instruction teachers’ metadiscourse: An ELF perspective. System, 105(2), 102730.10.1016/j.system.2022.102730Search in Google Scholar

Doyuran, Z. (2009). Conciliation of knowledge through hedging in Turkish scientific articles. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1).Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analyzing learner language. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Friedman, D. A. (2012). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 180-200). Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444347340.ch10Search in Google Scholar

Gezegin, B. B., & Guler, H. I. (2017). Appraisal resources in book reviews. In C. Hatipoglu, E. Akbas, & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of text (pp. 175-200). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Gholami, J., Nejad, S. R., & Pour, J. L. (2014). Metadiscourse markers misuses: A study of EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 580-589.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.454Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Hasselgren, A. (1994). Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 237-258.10.1111/j.1473-4192.1994.tb00065.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hatipoglu, C., & Algi, S. (2017). Contextual and pragmatic functions of modal epistemic hedges in argumentative paragraphs in Turkish. In C. Hatipoglu, E. Akbas, & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of text (pp. 85-108). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Ho, V., & Li, C. (2018). The use of metadiscourse and persuasion: An analysis of first year university students’ timed argumentative essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 33, 53-68.10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Hong, H., & Cao, F. (2014). Interactional metadiscourse in young EFL learner writing: A corpus-based study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 19(2), 201-224.10.1075/ijcl.19.2.03honSearch in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.54Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(2), 133-151.10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics. 113, 16-29.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156Search in Google Scholar

Hyland, K., Wang, W., & Jiang, K. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 262, 103105.10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1998). On language: Roman Jakobson. In L. R. Waugh & M. Monville-Burston, (Eds.), On Language. Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kashina, H. (2022). Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience. Journal of Pragmatics, 190, 60-72.10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.003Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., & Casal, J. E. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 46, 39-54.10.1016/j.system.2014.07.009Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., & Deakin, L. (2016). Interaction in L1 and L2 undergraduate student writing: Interactional metadiscourse in successful and less-successful argumentative essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 33, 21-34.10.1016/j.jslw.2016.06.004Search in Google Scholar

Lee, J. J., & Subtirelu, N. (2015). Metadiscourse in the classroom: A comparative analysis of EAP lessons and university lectures. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 52-62.10.1016/j.esp.2014.06.005Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Z., & Xu, J. (2020). Reflexive metadiscourse in Chinese and English sociology research article introductions and discussions. Journal of Pragmatics, 159, 47-59.10.1016/j.pragma.2020.02.003Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2012). Instructed second language acquisition. In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (pp. 53-73). Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444347340.ch4Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, R. (2017). Should I boost or should I hedge: The use of hedges and boosters in the writing of argumentative essays by Japanese university students. In C. Hatipoglu, E. Akbas, & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of text (pp. 57-84). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2012). Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide. Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444347340Search in Google Scholar

Mauranen, A. (2010). Discourse reflexivity—A discourse universal? The case of ELF. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 9(2), 13-40.10.35360/njes.216Search in Google Scholar

McKeown, J., & Ladegaard, H. J. (2020). Exploring dominance-linked reflexive metadiscourse in moderated group discussions. Journal of Pragmatics, 166, 15-27.10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Molino, A. (2018). “What I’m speaking is almost English …”: A corpus-based study of metadiscourse in English-medium lectures at an Italian university. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 935-956.Search in Google Scholar

Nesi, H. (2021). Sources for courses: Metadiscourse and the role of citation in student writing. Lingua, 253, 1-17.10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103040Search in Google Scholar

Pérez, M. A., & Macià, E. A. (2002). Metadiscourse in lecture comprehension: Does it really help foreign language learners? Atlantis, 24(2), 3-21.Search in Google Scholar

Qin, W., & Uccelli, P. (2019). Metadiscourse: Variation across communicative contexts. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 22-39.10.1016/j.pragma.2018.10.004Search in Google Scholar

Şahin-Kızıl, A. (2017, January). The use of metadiscourse in spoken interlanguage of EFL learners: A contrastive analysis. [Paper presentation]. 4th Teaching & Education Conference, Venice, Italy.10.20472/TEC.2017.004.010Search in Google Scholar

Salas, M. D. (2015). Reflexive metadiscourse in research articles in Spanish: Variation across three disciplines (Linguistics, Economics and Medicine). Journal of Pragmatics, 77, 20-40.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Soysal, Y. (2020). Exploring elementary and middle school science teachers’ metadiscourse moves: A Vygotskian analysis and interpretation, Learning: Research and Practice, 6(2), 1-34.10.1080/23735082.2020.1761432Search in Google Scholar

Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, K. S. (2017). Analyzing teachers’ use of Metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education, 101(4), 548-583.10.1002/sce.21275Search in Google Scholar

Thompson, S. E. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation and the signalling of organisation in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 5-20.10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00036-XSearch in Google Scholar

Uccelli, P., Dobbs, C. L., & Scott, J. (2013). Mastering academic language: Organization and stance in the persuasive writing of high school students. Written Communication. 30, 36-62.10.1177/0741088312469013Search in Google Scholar

Ulucay, C., & Hatipoglu, C. (2017). Causal markers in Turkish cause paragraphs. Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of text (pp. 223-250). Peter Lang.10.3726/b11093Search in Google Scholar

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College composition and communication, 36, 82-93.10.58680/ccc198511781Search in Google Scholar

Williams, J. M. (1985). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. Scott Foresman.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, S. M. (2006). Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance: Investigating the strategy of problematization in students’ argumentation. RELC, 37, 329-353.10.1177/0033688206071316Search in Google Scholar

Wu, S. M. (2007). The use of engagement resources in high- and low-rated undergraduate geography essays. English for Academic Purposes, 6, 254-271.10.1016/j.jeap.2007.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Yantandu-Uba, S., & Baynham, M. (2017). Constraints on authorial stance in accounting PhD theses in a Nigerian University. In C. Hatipoglu, E. Akbas, & Y. Bayyurt (Eds.), Metadiscourse in written genres: Uncovering textual and interactional aspects of text (pp. 109-138). Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Yarar, E. (2001). Akademik Söylemde Belirteçlerin Olasılık ve Belirsizlik İşlevleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 128-138.Search in Google Scholar

Zare, J., & Tavakoli, T. (2017). The use of personal metadiscourse over monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech, Discourse Processes, 54(2), 163-175.10.1080/0163853X.2015.1116342Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, D., & Sheng, D. (2021). EFL lecturers’ metadiscourse in Chinese university MOOCs across course types. Corpus Pragmatics, 5(2), 243-270.10.1007/s41701-021-00098-0Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, M. (2018). Exploring personal metadiscourse markers across speech and writing using cluster analysis, Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 26(4), 1-20.10.1080/09296174.2018.1480856Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, M., Sun, W., Peng, H., Gan, Q., & Yu, B. (2017). A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across spoken registers. Journal of Pragmatics, 117, 106-118.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.06.004Search in Google Scholar