Home A simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring metanephrine and normetanephrine in urine
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring metanephrine and normetanephrine in urine

  • Jessica Gabler , Abby Miller and Sihe Wang EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 17, 2011

Abstract

Background: Measuring urinary fractionated metanephrines is one of the initial tests in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) represents the most specific and accurate technology for this purpose. The goal of this work was to develop a simple LC-MS/MS method for measuring metanephrines in urine.

Methods: Each urine sample was complexed with diphenylboronic acid, and purified on a Bond-Elute Plexa cartridge. The extract was concentrated and analyzed on a short Atlantis T3 column in 8.5 min. Metanephrines and their deuterated internal standards were monitored in positive electrospray ionization mode by multiple reaction monitoring.

Results: Ion suppression was observed, but was compensated for by the respective internal standard. The analytical measurement range was 0.2–27.4 μmol/L and 0.3–14.6 μmol/L for metanephrine and normetanephrine, respectively. The intra-assay and total coefficient of variation throughout the linear ranges was 2.03%–2.11% and 2.20%–3.80% for metanephrine, and 4.50%–8.09% and 9.00%–10.00% for normetanephrine, respectively. Comparison with a commercial HPLC method using patient samples (n=65) by Passing-Bablok regression showed a slope of 1.000 and 1.014, y-intercept of –0.080 and –0.067, a correlation coefficient of 0.8830 and 0.9022, and a mean difference of 14.0% and –0.43% for metanephrine and normetanephrine, respectively.

Conclusions: This simple method for urine metanephrines is suitable for clinical use.


Corresponding author: Department of Clinical Pathology, Mail Code L11, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA Phone: +1 216-445-2634, Fax: +1 216-444-4414

Received: 2010-11-13
Accepted: 2011-3-1
Published Online: 2011-05-17
Published in Print: 2011-07-01

©2011 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Method comparison: where do we draw the line?
  3. Review
  4. Current role of liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in clinical toxicology screening methods
  5. Minireview
  6. Molecular diagnostics for pharmacogenomic testing of fluoropyrimidine based-therapy: costs, methods and applications
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality
  9. Point
  10. Towards more complete specifications for acceptable analytical performance – a plea for error grid analysis
  11. Counterpoint
  12. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Harmonization of growth hormone measurements with different immunoassays by data adjustment
  15. Comparison of the results from two different External Quality Assessment Schemes supports the utility of robust quality specifications
  16. High-throughput LC-MS/MS method for monitoring sirolimus and everolimus in the routine clinical laboratory
  17. Performance of the Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay on the Cobas Integra 400®, Cobas 6000® and comparison to LC-MS/MS in liver transplant patients
  18. Diagnostic efficiency of truncated area under the curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC0–2) of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and concomitant tacrolimus
  19. Good performance of an immunoassay based method for nevirapine measurements in human breast milk
  20. Measurement of plasma amino acids by Ultraperformance® Liquid Chromatography
  21. Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers
  22. Granularity Index of the SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzer as a replacement for manual microscopy of toxic granulation neutrophils in patients with inflammatory diseases
  23. Direct chromogenic substrate immuno-capture activity assay for testing of factor VII-activating protease
  24. The antinuclear antibody assay: developing criteria for reflexive anti-dsDNA antibody testing in a laboratory setting
  25. A simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring metanephrine and normetanephrine in urine
  26. Monoclonal gammopathy missed by capillary zone electrophoresis
  27. Adaptation of the Diazyme Direct Enzymatic HbA1c Assay for a microplate reader at room temperature
  28. Validation and Outcome Studies
  29. Laboratory assessment of iron status in pregnancy
  30. Cardiovascular Diseases
  31. Blood cells characteristics as determinants of acute myocardial infarction
  32. No evidence for an association between the rs2824292 variant at chromosome 21q21 and ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction in a German population
  33. Letters to the Editor
  34. Letter to the Editor Reply: Statistical methods for assessment of added usefulness of new biomarkers
  35. Reply to Vavrova et al. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:89–92
Downloaded on 27.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2011.195/html
Scroll to top button