Home Medicine Molecular diagnostics for pharmacogenomic testing of fluoropyrimidine based-therapy: costs, methods and applications
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Molecular diagnostics for pharmacogenomic testing of fluoropyrimidine based-therapy: costs, methods and applications

  • Raffaele Di Francia EMAIL logo , Massimiliano Berretta , Oriana Catapano , Lorella M.T. Canzoniero and Luigi Formisano
Published/Copyright: April 20, 2011

Abstract

Genetic testing of drug response represents an important goal for targeted therapy. In particular, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the backbone of several chemotherapic protocols for treatment of solid tumors. Unfortunately, in some patients, 5-FU is toxic and causes gastrointestinal and hematologic lesions leading to the suspension of therapy. Some adverse drug responses can be predicted by pharmacogenomics. Recently, several polymorphic traits of different genes involved with 5-FU biotransformation have been reported. Many methods have been used for qualitative and quantitative assessment of the mutational status of these genes, without a precise cost-effectiveness analysis. This article reviews recent findings on the seven germline polymorphic traits of four genes involved in the biotransformation of the 5-FU. In particular, we analyze the most common platforms used to identify the specific genetic alterations and their relative costs. Genotyping can be performed either by custom service laboratories or academic reference laboratories by using either the commercial kits (when available) or “in house” tests. By random selection of 20 certified laboratories out of a total of 71, we estimate that the cost of the analysis/single trait is on average €120.00 as custom genotyping service. “In house” validated tests by PCR-based platforms cost approximately €20.00 per single polimorphism. On the basis of this information, the lab manager can evaluate the advantage and limitations, in terms of costs and applicability, of the most appropriate methods for diagnostics of 5-FU pharmacogenomics tests.


Corresponding author: R. Di Francia, Laboratory of Molecular Hematology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione “G. Pascale”, IRCCS, via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy Phone: +39 81 5903635, Fax: +39 81 5903 833

Received: 2010-9-17
Accepted: 2011-2-10
Published Online: 2011-04-20
Published in Print: 2011-07-01

©2011 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Method comparison: where do we draw the line?
  3. Review
  4. Current role of liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry in clinical toxicology screening methods
  5. Minireview
  6. Molecular diagnostics for pharmacogenomic testing of fluoropyrimidine based-therapy: costs, methods and applications
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. Preanalytical quality improvement: from dream to reality
  9. Point
  10. Towards more complete specifications for acceptable analytical performance – a plea for error grid analysis
  11. Counterpoint
  12. Closing the brain-to-brain loop in laboratory testing
  13. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  14. Harmonization of growth hormone measurements with different immunoassays by data adjustment
  15. Comparison of the results from two different External Quality Assessment Schemes supports the utility of robust quality specifications
  16. High-throughput LC-MS/MS method for monitoring sirolimus and everolimus in the routine clinical laboratory
  17. Performance of the Roche Total Mycophenolic Acid® assay on the Cobas Integra 400®, Cobas 6000® and comparison to LC-MS/MS in liver transplant patients
  18. Diagnostic efficiency of truncated area under the curve from 0 to 2 h (AUC0–2) of mycophenolic acid in kidney transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and concomitant tacrolimus
  19. Good performance of an immunoassay based method for nevirapine measurements in human breast milk
  20. Measurement of plasma amino acids by Ultraperformance® Liquid Chromatography
  21. Interchangeability of blood gas, electrolyte and metabolite results measured with point-of-care, blood gas and core laboratory analyzers
  22. Granularity Index of the SYSMEX XE-5000 hematology analyzer as a replacement for manual microscopy of toxic granulation neutrophils in patients with inflammatory diseases
  23. Direct chromogenic substrate immuno-capture activity assay for testing of factor VII-activating protease
  24. The antinuclear antibody assay: developing criteria for reflexive anti-dsDNA antibody testing in a laboratory setting
  25. A simple liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for measuring metanephrine and normetanephrine in urine
  26. Monoclonal gammopathy missed by capillary zone electrophoresis
  27. Adaptation of the Diazyme Direct Enzymatic HbA1c Assay for a microplate reader at room temperature
  28. Validation and Outcome Studies
  29. Laboratory assessment of iron status in pregnancy
  30. Cardiovascular Diseases
  31. Blood cells characteristics as determinants of acute myocardial infarction
  32. No evidence for an association between the rs2824292 variant at chromosome 21q21 and ventricular fibrillation during acute myocardial infarction in a German population
  33. Letters to the Editor
  34. Letter to the Editor Reply: Statistical methods for assessment of added usefulness of new biomarkers
  35. Reply to Vavrova et al. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;49:89–92
Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2011.181/html
Scroll to top button