Home Steps towards a miniaturized, robust and autonomous measurement device for the long-term monitoring of patient activity: ActiBelt
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Steps towards a miniaturized, robust and autonomous measurement device for the long-term monitoring of patient activity: ActiBelt

  • Martin Daumer , Kathrin Thaler , Esther Kruis , Wolfgang Feneberg , Gerhard Staude and Michael Scholz
Published/Copyright: February 22, 2007
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
Biomedical Engineering / Biomedizinische Technik
From the journal Volume 52 Issue 1

Abstract

We describe the first steps in the development of a wearable measurement device for measuring a subject's three-dimensional acceleration. The ultimate aim is a standard measurement instrument integrated in a belt buckle that allows objective evaluation of treatment and rehabilitation measures in patients, in particular for disabling chronic diseases such as multiple sclerosis. In a first step we combined standard hardware elements to record test data from healthy volunteers. We then developed algorithms to automatically distinguish between different stages of activity, such as jogging, walking, lying, standing and sitting, and to detect and count steps. Distinction between standing and sitting is the most difficult to accomplish. As a first validation, we calculated the distance traveled from data of 17 experiments and a total of 4.5 h, for which one proband was walking and running for a known distance, and compared the results with two commercially available pedometers. We could show that the relative error for the ActiBelt is only half of that for the two pedometers. Apart from developing much smaller, robust and integrated hardware, we describe ideas on how to develop algorithms that allow extraction of a “baseline step pattern” in analogy to baseline ECG to define and detect clinically relevant deviations.


Corresponding author: M. Daumer, Sylvia Lawry Center for Multiple Sclerosis Research, Hohenlindener Str. 1, 81677 Munich, Germany Phone: +49-89-206026920

References

[1] Albrecht H, Wötzel C, Erasmus LP, Kleinpeter M, König N, Pöllmann W. Day-to-day variability of maximum walking distance in MS patients can mislead to relevant changes in the expanded disability status scale (EDSS): average walking speed is a more constant parameter. Mult Scler2001; 7: 105–109.10.1177/135245850100700206Search in Google Scholar

[2] Böckenhoff A, Knapp G, Löllgen H. Meta-Analyse von Studien zur Primärprävention der Gesamtmortalität durch Physische Aktivität: Ergebnisse. In: Abstracts Evaluation, Bochum 2006: Abstract 93.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Buss ME, Pearson OR, Van Deursen R, Wiles CM. Quantified measurement of activity provides insight into motor function and recovery in neurological disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2004; 75: 884–888.10.1136/jnnp.2003.020180Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bussmann JBJ, Veltink PH, Koelma F, Van Lummel RC, Stam HJ. Ambulatory monitoring of mobility-related activities: the initial phase of the development of an activity monitor. Eur J Phys Med Rehabil1995; 5: 2–7.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Daumer M, Neiß A. A new adaptive algorithm to detect shifts, drifts and outliers in biomedical time series. In: Kunert J, Trenkler G, editors. Mathematical statistics with applications in biometry. Köln: Josef Eul Verlag 2001: 265–275.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Goodkin DE. EDSS reliability. Neurology1991; 41: 332.10.1212/WNL.41.2_Part_1.332Search in Google Scholar

[7] Grillner S. Neural networks for vertebrate locomotion. Sci Am1996; 274: 64–69.10.1038/scientificamerican0196-64Search in Google Scholar

[8] Hegewald G. Ganganalytische Bestimmung und Bewertung der Druckverteilung unterm Fuß und von Gelenkwinkelverläufen – eine Methode für Diagnose und Therapie im medizinischen Alltag und für die Qualitätssicherung in der rehabilitationstechnischen Versorgung. Dissertation. Humboldt University Berlin 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Ioannidis JPA. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med2005; 2: e124.10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jovanov E, Milenkovic A, Otto C, de Groen P. A wireless body area network of intelligent motion sensors for computer assisted physical rehabilitation. J NeuroEng Rehab2005; 2: 6.10.1186/1743-0003-2-6Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kesselring J, Beer S. Symptomatic therapy and neurorehabilitation in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol2005; 4: 643–652.10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70193-9Search in Google Scholar

[12] Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology1983; 33: 1444–1452.10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Mayagoitia RE, Lötters JC, Veltink PH. Standing stability evaluation using a triaxial accelerometer. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vol. 2. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press 1996: 573–574.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Motl RW, McAuley E, Snook EM, Scott JA. Accuracy of two electronic pedometers for measuring steps taken under controlled conditions among ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler2005; 11: 343–345.10.1191/1352458505ms1161oaSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Perry J. Gait analysis – normal and pathological function. Thorofare, NJ: Slack Inc. 1992: Ch. 1 and 2.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Randell C, Muller H. The well mannered wearable computer. Pers Ubiq Comput2002; 6: 31–36.10.1007/s007790200003Search in Google Scholar

[17] Slycke PJ. Applications of inertial sensors in sports: the Runners Watch. In: PATO Course on Biomedical Measurement and Control Techniques. Utrecht: 2000.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Srinivasan M, Ruina A. Computer optimization of a minimal biped model discovers walking and running. Nature2006; 439: 72–75.10.1038/nature04113Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Published Online: 2007-02-22
Published in Print: 2007-02-01

©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Ralph Mueller and Herbert Witte join the Associate Editor team of Biomedizinische Technik/Biomedical Engineering
  2. Technological innovations in information engineering demand sustained updating and upgrading in biosignal processing applications: a continual renaissance
  3. Predicting initiation and termination of atrial fibrillation from the ECG
  4. Predicting the QRS complex and detecting small changes using principal component analysis
  5. The role of independent component analysis in the signal processing of ECG recordings
  6. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator algorithms: status review in terms of computational cost
  7. Assessment of dynamic changes in cerebral autoregulation
  8. Corrected body surface potential mapping
  9. Autonomic cardiac control in animal models of cardiovascular diseases. I. Methods of variability analysis
  10. Autonomic cardiac control in animal models of cardiovascular diseases II. Variability analysis in transgenic rats with α-tropomyosin mutations Asp175Asn and Glu180Gly
  11. Fetal ECG extraction during labor using an adaptive maternal beat subtraction technique
  12. Heart rate variability in the fetus: a comparison of measures
  13. Estimation of spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity using transfer function analysis: effects of positive pressure ventilation
  14. Mobile nocturnal long-term monitoring of wheezing and cough
  15. Vigilance monitoring – review and practical aspects
  16. Coupled oscillators for modeling and analysis of EEG/MEG oscillations
  17. Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of depth of anaesthesia: different configurations of artefact detection algorithms
  18. NeuMonD: a tool for the development of new indicators of anaesthetic effect
  19. Recording of focal direct current (DC) changes in the human cerebral cortex using refined non-invasive DC-EEG methodology
  20. Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100
  21. Wavelet-based analysis of MMN responses in children
  22. Branched EMG electrodes for stable and selective recording of single motor unit potentials in humans
  23. EMG analysis of the thenar muscles as a model for EMG-triggered larynx stimulation
  24. Physiological MR signal variations within the brain at 3 T
  25. Application of decorrelation-independent component analysis to biomagnetic multi-channel measurements
  26. A method for locating gradual changes in time series
  27. The use of digital signal processors (DSPs) in real-time processing of multi-parametric bioelectronic signals
  28. Steps towards a miniaturized, robust and autonomous measurement device for the long-term monitoring of patient activity: ActiBelt
  29. Motor timing and more – additional options using advanced registration and evaluation of tapping data
  30. Cellular signaling: aspects for tumor diagnosis and therapy
  31. List of reviewers engaged in the Special Issues on Biosignal Processing
  32. Stellungnahme zu „In vitro Langzeitkultur von humanem Knochen unter physiologischen Lastbedingungen“; Biomed Tech 2004; 49: 364–367
Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/BMT.2007.028/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button