Home Indifferenz oder: Prothesen des Gefühls. Bemerkungen zur Variation einer männlichen Emotion
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Indifferenz oder: Prothesen des Gefühls. Bemerkungen zur Variation einer männlichen Emotion

  • Dorothee Kimmich
Published/Copyright: August 14, 2009
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill
arcadia
From the journal Volume 44 Issue 1

Historically, indifference and disinterest belong to a variable semantic field of anti-feeling. This anti-feeling is predominantly gendered as male, and linked to a “self-fashioning of coolness”. Philosophical traditions of indifference go back to Hellenistic sources and range from Nietzsche's cynicism, over Plessner's cool persona, to Sloterdijk's “Kynismus”. They concern themselves with technologies of the self and stress disinterest as a strategy of survival. In the 1920s in Germany, Helmuth Plessner, Georg Simmel and Ernst Jünger argued that modern life in urban and capitalist environments generate emotional coolness; they foreground things and surfaces, yielding a poetics of “Sachlichkeit”. According to Jünger, war and the military form an attractive background for the concept of indifference. Joseph Roth and Erich Kästner play in their novels with the aesthetic possibilities of nearness and distance. Unable to live truly, their protagonists are forced to observe life from a distance. Albert Camus and Michel Houellebecq adopt this tradition of indifference, linking their disinterested heroes with moral monstrosities and perversions.

Online erschienen: 2009-08-14
Erschienen im Druck: 2009-August

© Copyright 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin

Downloaded on 16.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ARCA.2009.012/html
Scroll to top button