Home Literary Studies Eclogue: The End of History in Verse (Continued)
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Eclogue: The End of History in Verse (Continued)

  • Andrew Gross

    Andrew S. Gross is Professor of American Literature at the University of Göttingen and editor-in-chief of the New American Studies Journal.  He is the author of The Pound Reaction: Liberalism and Lyricism in Midcentury American Literature, co-author of Comedy, Avant-Garde, Scandal: Remembering the Holocaust after the End of History, and editor of two special issues of The Wallace Stevens Journal.

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This essay explores how the poet Jorie Graham taps into a pastoral tradition to challenge the “end of history” thesis, and the concept of narrative it depends on, as articulated by Fukuyama after the fall of the Soviet Union. The occasion is provided by the The Best American Poetryof 1990. The anthology was edited then – and now – by David Lehman, who works with a different guest editor each year. In 1990Graham did the honors, pursuing a principle of selection – and composition – that rejected the celebration of liberal triumph evident in Lehman’s Fukuyama-inspired introduction. Lehman and Fukuyama thought, at the end of the Cold War, that history had ended in freedom. Graham, on the contrary, argued that freedom involved resisting endings, both formally and as postulated endpoints of historical narratives. The conflict between those who embrace endings and those reject them turns out to be a long one, reaching back into the earliest eclogues, which can be understood as collections of songs, much like anthologies, collected in the shadow of epoch-making events such as the end of the Roman Empire. The poems in the 1990 anthology reflect this tradition of rejecting endings and – as a principle of composition, anthologizing, and politics – carrying on. Graham’s “Manifest Destiny,” written at this moment, also carries on by pushing pastoral conventions in new directions.

Abstract

This essay explores how the poet Jorie Graham taps into a pastoral tradition to challenge the “end of history” thesis, and the concept of narrative it depends on, as articulated by Fukuyama after the fall of the Soviet Union. The occasion is provided by the The Best American Poetryof 1990. The anthology was edited then – and now – by David Lehman, who works with a different guest editor each year. In 1990Graham did the honors, pursuing a principle of selection – and composition – that rejected the celebration of liberal triumph evident in Lehman’s Fukuyama-inspired introduction. Lehman and Fukuyama thought, at the end of the Cold War, that history had ended in freedom. Graham, on the contrary, argued that freedom involved resisting endings, both formally and as postulated endpoints of historical narratives. The conflict between those who embrace endings and those reject them turns out to be a long one, reaching back into the earliest eclogues, which can be understood as collections of songs, much like anthologies, collected in the shadow of epoch-making events such as the end of the Roman Empire. The poems in the 1990 anthology reflect this tradition of rejecting endings and – as a principle of composition, anthologizing, and politics – carrying on. Graham’s “Manifest Destiny,” written at this moment, also carries on by pushing pastoral conventions in new directions.

Downloaded on 11.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111705651-012/html
Scroll to top button