Home Literary Studies Serial Singularity: Reading for the Project Form in the Business Romance
Chapter
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Serial Singularity: Reading for the Project Form in the Business Romance

  • James Dorson

    James Dorson is Assistant Professor of Literature at the John F. Kennedy Institute for North American Studies, Freie Universität Berlin. He has been a visiting professor at Brown University and the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich. His research interests include the politics of form, economic literary criticism, narrative theory, the history of science, and the Environmental Humanities. Among his publications are Counternarrative Possibilities: Virgin Land, Homeland, and Cormac McCarthy’s Westerns (Campus 2016), the coedited volumes Fictions of Management: Efficiency and Control in American Literature and Culture (Winter 2019) and Anecdotal Modernity: Making and Unmaking History (De Gruyter 2020), and the special issues Data Fiction: Naturalism, Narratives, and Numbers (Studies in American Naturalism 2017) and Cormac McCarthy Between Worlds (European Journal of American Studies 2017). He is currently writing a book about competing visions of organization in American literary naturalism.

Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Taking my departure in Chicago writers Samuel Merwin and Henry Kitchell Webster’s business romances around the turn of the twentieth century, this essay examines how their novels comprise an overlooked archive of reflexive project thinking that sheds light on the cultural appeal of the project form, which over the last four decades has become a predominant way of organizing life and work in deindustrializing societies. Tracing the literary origins of the project form back to Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, I show how the project form seeks to reconcile the two aesthetic and historical registers of capitalism – the romantic excitement of the capitalist adventurer and the bourgeois rationality of the work ethic – that Franco Moretti deems to be irreconcilable. While projects are by definition singular, they are also serial, as one project leads to the next. By examining the cultural logic of projects in Merwin and Webster’s novels, I show how the appeal of projects is closely tied to the narrativization of time, on the one hand, and the emplotment of projects through the adventure genre, on the other. But while the cultural function of projects underwrites their cultural authority and expansion across different domains of activity, the very seriality of the project form attenuates its cultural appeal by routinizing it. I argue that the business romance embodies this tension between singularity and seriality avant la lettrethrough its formulaic nature and the standardized singularity of its heroes designed for mass market consumption. As such, the essay charts a convergence of literary and organizational history that illuminates the cultural appeal of projects and the tension between singularity and seriality integral to the form.

Abstract

Taking my departure in Chicago writers Samuel Merwin and Henry Kitchell Webster’s business romances around the turn of the twentieth century, this essay examines how their novels comprise an overlooked archive of reflexive project thinking that sheds light on the cultural appeal of the project form, which over the last four decades has become a predominant way of organizing life and work in deindustrializing societies. Tracing the literary origins of the project form back to Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe, I show how the project form seeks to reconcile the two aesthetic and historical registers of capitalism – the romantic excitement of the capitalist adventurer and the bourgeois rationality of the work ethic – that Franco Moretti deems to be irreconcilable. While projects are by definition singular, they are also serial, as one project leads to the next. By examining the cultural logic of projects in Merwin and Webster’s novels, I show how the appeal of projects is closely tied to the narrativization of time, on the one hand, and the emplotment of projects through the adventure genre, on the other. But while the cultural function of projects underwrites their cultural authority and expansion across different domains of activity, the very seriality of the project form attenuates its cultural appeal by routinizing it. I argue that the business romance embodies this tension between singularity and seriality avant la lettrethrough its formulaic nature and the standardized singularity of its heroes designed for mass market consumption. As such, the essay charts a convergence of literary and organizational history that illuminates the cultural appeal of projects and the tension between singularity and seriality integral to the form.

Downloaded on 11.1.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783111705651-006/html
Scroll to top button